RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Underweight among adolescents is an important clinical and public health issue. It is associated with adverse health outcomes throughout the life-span and may reflect food poverty, unhealthy eating habits, or some underlying health conditions. OBJECTIVE: To study prevalence and trends in underweight among adolescents 1998-2018, to examine social inequality in underweight, and whether social inequality changed over time. METHODS: Data were derived from 6 cross-sectional school surveys from The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children study in Denmark. The study included 11-, 13-, and 15-year-old schoolchildren in random samples of schools in 1998, 2002, 2006, 2010, 2014, and 2018 (n = 22,177). Underweight was determined by body mass index-for-age thinness grade 2-3 (the Cole and Lobstein method). Socioeconomic status was determined using occupational social class (the Danish OSC Measurement). RESULTS: The overall prevalence of underweight was 3.1% among boys and 5.3% among girls (P < 0.0001) and decreased by age (P < 0.0001) among both boys and girls. The prevalence of underweight was almost stable from 1998 to 2018. There was no observed absolute or relative social inequality in the prevalence of underweight among boys or girls. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of underweight in 11- to 15-year-olds was significantly higher among girls than boys. The prevalence remained stable from 1998 to 2018. There was no significant association between SES and prevalence of underweight. It is important to elucidate the underlying causes of underweight such as malnutrition, eating disorders, eating problems, loss of appetite, chronic diseases, insufficient knowledge of nutrients effects on bodily functions, and persistent pain.
Underweight among adolescents is an important clinical and public health issue as it may reflect food poverty, unhealthy eating habits, or some underlying health problem. The aim was to study prevalence and trends in underweight among adolescents 19982018 and to examine social inequality in underweight. We used data from 6 cross-sectional school surveys from Denmark. Across all surveys, the number of participants was 22,177 11-, 13-, and 15-year-old students. The prevalence of thinness grades 2 and 3 were taken as indicators of underweight and were 3.1% among boys and 5.3% among girls. This prevalence was almost stable from 1998 to 2018. Contrary to overweight, which is usually more prevalent in lower socioeconomic groups, underweight was not associated with socioeconomic status. There were 2 exceptions: the prevalence of underweight among girls was highest in those from high socioeconomic groups in1998, while the prevalence among boys was highest in those from low socioeconomic groups in 2018. Underweight conditions in adolescents need careful medical examinations to elucidate the underlying causes of underweight, for example, malnutrition, eating disorders, eating problems, loss of appetite, voluntary uptake of fad diets, chronic disease, insufficient knowledge of nutrients that impact their bodily functions, mental health problems, and persistent pain.
Asunto(s)
Clase Social , Delgadez , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Sobrepeso/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Delgadez/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: Existing quality of life questionnaires are either disease specific or generic in their assessment of themes which are perceived important to the quality of life in populations with disabilities. To be able to improve quality of life in a population with diverse disabilities there was a need for a cross-disability instrument. The Electronic Quality of Life (EQOL)-questionnaire was developed to meet this need. It is crucial that such an instrument is validated, easy to use, and interpret by, for example, clinicians and policy planners. This study aims to test the content validity of the EQOL questionnaire and to construct a user-friendly, cross-disability quality of life profile. METHODS: To further test the content validity of the EQOL-questionnaire, we conducted field test analyses on 318 individuals (aged 16-64) with self-reported disabilities. Comments on the questionnaire were scrutinised and sorted. A profile with six domains of quality of life was developed. Model fit was evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis and content validity was evaluated based on distributions. RESULTS: The EQOL-questionnaire was found to have an acceptable content validity and respondents from the field test found that it features important themes of quality of life. The confirmatory factor analysis estimated a satisfying model fit by the root-mean-squared error of approximation (0.06), whereas the comparative fit index and goodness of fit index indicated poorer model fit. Graphical charts, with colour categories for user-friendly interpretation, were constructed. CONCLUSION: By identifying themes reported as problematic, the EQOL-profile can be used to inform and target interventions aiming to improve quality of life in populations with diverse disabilities.
Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad , Calidad de Vida , Análisis Factorial , Humanos , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Aims: Socio-economic inequalities in health behaviour may be influenced by health interventions. We examined whether the X:IT II intervention, aiming at preventing smoking in adolescence, was equally effective among students from different occupational social classes (OSC). Methods: We used data from the multi-component school-based smoking preventive intervention X:IT II, targeting 13- to 15-year-olds in Denmark. The intervention was tested in 46 schools with 2307 eligible students at baseline (response rate=86.6%) and had three main intervention components: smoke-free school time, smoke-free curriculum and parental involvement. We used a difference-in-difference design and estimated the change in current smoking after the first year of implementation in high versus low OSC. Analyses were based on available cases (N=1190) and imputation of missing data at follow-up (N=1967). Results: We found that 1% of the students from high OSC and 4.9% from low OSC were smokers at baseline (imputed data), and 8.2% of the students from high OSC and 12.2% from low OSC were smokers at follow-up. Difference-in-difference estimates were close to zero, indicating no differential trajectory. Conclusions: As intended, the X:IT II intervention, designed to apply equally to students from all socio-economic groups, did not seem to create different trajectories in current smoking among adolescents in high and low socio-economic groups. To diminish social inequality in health, future studies should carefully consider the ability to affect all socio-economic groups equally, or even to appeal mainly to participants from lower socio-economic groups, as they are often the ones most in need of intervention.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones Académicas , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Adolescente , Humanos , Fumar/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , EstudiantesRESUMEN
AIMS: There are well-known gender differences in smoking, including the pattern of use and the effectiveness of smoking prevention programs. However, little is known about the differences between boys and girls in their attitudes towards smoking prevention interventions. This study explores gender differences in attitudes towards a school-based intervention to prevent smoking. METHODS: We used data from the X:IT II intervention study conducted in 46 Danish elementary schools. RESULTS: Compared to boys, girls were more positive towards smoke-free school time, both concerning rules for teachers smoking (odds ratio (OR) = 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.35-2.12) and for students smoking (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.13-1.76). No difference was observed in students signing the smoke-free agreement. However, a larger proportion of girls reported that the agreement was a good occasion to talk about smoking with their parents (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.13-1.76). Girls were also more positive towards the smoke-free curriculum (OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.19-1.94). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that girls were, overall, more positive towards the components of the smoking preventive intervention. Our findings highlight the importance of considering differences in intervention preferences for boys and girls in future health prevention initiatives.
Asunto(s)
Actitud , Servicios de Salud Escolar , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/organización & administración , Estudiantes/psicología , Adolescente , Dinamarca , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Instituciones Académicas , Factores Sexuales , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
School organizational readiness to implement interventions may play an important role for the actual obtained implementation level, and knowledge about organizational readiness prior to intervention start can help pinpoint how to optimize support to the schools. In this study, we applied a novel heuristic, R = MC2 to assess school organizational readiness prior to implementation of a multicomponent smoking prevention program. Furthermore, we examined the association to actual implementation after the first year of study. We used questionnaire data from school coordinators at 40 schools in Denmark who had accepted to implement the multi-component smoking prevention intervention-X:IT II-in the school year 2017-2018 including three main components: (1) Rules on smoke-free school time, (2) A smoke-free curriculum, and (3) Parental involvement. On behalf of the school, a school coordinator answered a baseline questionnaire about the organizational readiness and a follow-up questionnaire about implementation of the three components after first year of study. Readiness was measured by summing aspects of motivation (relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, and priority), general capacity (culture, climate, and staff capacity), and innovation-specific capacity (knowledge, skills, and abilities). Based on school coordinators' perceptions, almost all schools had good general capacity while the other two areas of readiness varied across schools; overall, 56.8% of schools (N = 25) had good motivation for implementing the X:IT II intervention and 61.3% (N = 27) had high innovation-specific capacity. Half of the schools had high overall readiness defined as high motivation and high innovation-specific capacity. Schools with high overall readiness implemented the rules on smoke-free school time, smoke-free curriculum, and parental involvement to a higher degree than schools with low overall readiness. All participating schools possessed sufficient levels of general capacity, e.g., a well-functioning organizational culture and sufficient staff capacity. High levels of motivation and innovation-specific capacity were positively associated with the schools' actual implementation of the main intervention components. This way of conceptualizing and measuring organizational readiness may be useful in future studies, i.e., in studies where enhancing readiness is a main objective.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Escolar , Instituciones Académicas , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Dinamarca , Humanos , Motivación , Grupos de PoblaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emerging adults with type 1 diabetes often have poor diabetes self-care and pose a considerable therapeutic challenge. They simultaneously handle a life phase characterized by instability, identity exploration, and transitions and manage a chronic illness that demands structure, self-discipline, and repeated health care contacts. Relation to parents is often ambivalent but typically remains the most stable social support, so parental support could potentially be helpful for diabetes self-care and wellbeing. METHOD: This scoping review aimed to identify, summarize and analyze empirical studies (for instance interview studies, questionnaire studies and intervention studies) exploring parental support for emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. Studies were identified in PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Data were extracted by one author and checked by another. Study results were synthesized by a convergent mixed methods approach and qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS: We included 26 studies (2829 participants), 16 interview studies, 10 questionnaire studies, and no intervention studies. Five overarching themes were identified: self-care and glycemic control, diabetes-related emotional wellbeing, support characteristics, ambivalence and harms, and core support providers. Parents tended to contribute positively to diabetes self-care, glycemic control, and psychological wellbeing. However, emerging adults did not want to be too dependent on their parents and family, and family could also act unsupportively; when absent, disinterested in diabetes or controlling. CONCLUSION: This review underlines that parental support still plays a role for diabetes self-care and wellbeing in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes. Age-appropriate parental support therefore seems a promising path to investigate further.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Padres , Apoyo Social , Adolescente , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/psicología , Humanos , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Autocuidado/psicología , Autoeficacia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Aim: To examine trends in socioeconomic differences in daily smoking among 15-year-old Danes between 1991-2014, using occupational social class as indicator of socioeconomic status. Methods: The study included 15-year-olds participating in seven Danish Health Behaviour in School-aged Children studies between 1991-2014, n = 8,641. The analyses focused on absolute socioeconomic differences (prevalence difference between low and high occupational social class) and relative socioeconomic differences communicated by odds ratio for daily smoking. Results: The prevalence of daily smoking declined from 18.6% in 1991 to 4.5% in 2014. Across all surveys, the prevalence was 8.9% in high, 12.8% in middle and 16.5% in low occupational social classes (p < 0.0001). The absolute socioeconomic differences increased from 1991 to 2006 and declined thereafter. Across all survey years, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for daily smoking was 1.40 (1.19-1.65) in middle and 1.90 (1.56-2.32) in low versus high occupational social classes. The statistical interaction between occupational social class and survey year was significant (p = 0.0404), suggesting increasing relative socioeconomic differences from 1991 to 2014. Conclusions: There was a substantial decline in daily smoking among 15-year-olds between 1991-2014 in all occupational social class groups. The prevalence of daily smoking was highest in the low occupational social class during the entire period. The absolute socioeconomic differences in daily smoking increased between 1991-2006 and declined thereafter. The relative socioeconomic differences increased over 1991-2014. Studies of change in socioeconomic differences over time should address both absolute and relative socioeconomic differences as they may result in different conclusions and because important improvement in prevalence patterns may be disguised by exclusive focus on changes in relative socioeconomic differences.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Fumar/epidemiología , Clase Social , Adolescente , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
Aims:Review studies on the long-term effects of school-based smoking interventions show mixed results. X:IT was a three-year cluster randomized controlled trial to prevent uptake of smoking among Danish students from age 13 years until age 15 years which previously proved effective in preventing smoking after the first year of intervention. The aim of this paper was to conduct the pre-planned analyses of the effects of the X:IT intervention on smoking after the second year. Methods: We used self-reported questionnaire data from students at baseline, first, second, and third follow-up (n at second follow-up=3269, response rate=79.4%). Data from third follow-up were not suitable for analysis. Outcome measure: 'current smoking', dichotomised into smoke daily, weekly, monthly or more seldom versus do not smoke. We performed multilevel, logistic regression analyses of available cases and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses, replacing missing outcome values by multiple imputation. Results: The prevalence of smoking increased from 5.8% at baseline to 17.0% at second follow-up among students at intervention schools, and from 7.6% to 18.7% among students at control schools. Analyses of available cases and ITT analyses did not support X:IT being effective in preventing smoking after the second year of intervention. Conclusions: Although X:IT was effective after the first year of intervention, we were not able to demonstrate any effects after the second year. Implementation of the intervention was lower in the second year compared to the first year which indicates that the missing effect of the intervention at second follow-up is due to lack of implementation.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Escolar , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Fumar/epidemiología , Estudiantes/psicología , Adolescente , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Instituciones Académicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The X:IT intervention, conducted in 2010 to 2013, showed overall smoking preventive effect. However, parts of the intervention appeared less appealing to children from families with lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Therefore, the intervention components were modified and an evaluation of the amended intervention X:IT II is needed to show the effect of this revised intervention and whether children from different social backgrounds benefits equally from the current intervention. METHODS: Main intervention components are smoke free schools, a curricular component, and parental involvement (smoke free agreements and talks about tobacco). Components have been revised from the first version; 1) previously, schools should be smoke free on the school ground and were encouraged to hide smoking so that it wasn't visible to pupils from the school ground. Now they are encouraged to tighten the rules so that no pupils or teachers smoke during the school day, no matter where they are; 2) the specifically developed educational material (Up in Smoke) has been revised so that all materials are online and all texts has a ARI; 3) the parental involvement is now targeted multiple groups of parents, e.g. parents that are smokers, and parents of children that smoke. Language used is simpler and the website for parents presents very specific examples. X:IT is implemented in 46 Danish public schools from fall 2017 until summer 2020. Data is collected through electronic questionnaires to students and coordinators four times (fall 2017, spring/summer 2018, 2019 and 2020). Further, qualitative interviews and observations are conducted. DISCUSSION: Prevalence of smoking among Danish adolescents is high compared to other Nordic countries and there is social inequality in smoking, leaving individuals from the lowest social backgrounds at higher risk. Although there has been an overall decline in smoking among Danish adolescents over the last decades, a recent levelling of this development indicates an urgent need for smoking prevention in Denmark. The X:IT intervention has the potential to prevent uptake of smoking among adolescents. However, there is a particular need for evaluating the effectiveness of the revised X:IT intervention, X:IT II, with focus on the effect across socioeconomic groups of adolescents. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN31292019 , date of registration 24/10/2017. Retrospectively registered.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar/organización & administración , Fumar/epidemiología , Adolescente , Dinamarca , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Proyectos de Investigación , Países Escandinavos y Nórdicos , Instituciones Académicas/organización & administración , Normas Sociales , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Measures to identify infancy mental health problems are essential to guide interventions and reduce the risk of developmental psychopathology in early years. We investigated a new service-setting-based measure the Copenhagen Infant Mental Health Screening (CIMHS) within the general child health surveillance by community health nurses (CHN). The study population of 2973 infants was assessed by CIMHS at age 9-10 months. A subsample of 416 children was examined at age 1½ years, using parent interviews including the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL 1½-5), Check List of Autism and Toddlers (CHAT), Infant-Toddler Symptom Checklist (ITSCL), and the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID) and observations of behavior, communication, and interaction. Child mental disorders were diagnosed according to ICD-10 and parent-child relationship disorders according to DC:0-3R. Statistical analyses included logistic regression analyses adjusted and weighted to adjust for sampling and bias. CIMHS problems of sleep, feeding and eating, emotions, attention, communication, and language were associated with an up to fivefold increased risk of child mental disorders across the diagnostic spectrum of ICD-10 diagnoses. Homo-type continuity was seen in problems of sleep and feeding and eating being associated with a threefold increased risk of disorders within the same area, OR 3.0 (95% CI 1.6-5.4) and OR 2.7 (95% CI 1.7-4.2), respectively. The sensitivity at high CIMHS problem scores was 32% and specificity 86%. In summary, CIMHS identify a broad range of infants' mental health problems that are amenable to guide intervention within the general child health surveillance.
Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Salud Mental , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Atención , Trastorno Autístico/diagnóstico , Lista de Verificación , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Masculino , Padres , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are a major public health challenges, and strategies of early prevention are needed. Effective prevention depends on feasible and validated measures of screening and intervention. Previous research has demonstrated potentials for infant mental health screening by community health nurses (CHN) in existing service settings in Denmark. This study was conducted to describe the development of a service setting based measure to screen for infant mental health problems, to investigate problems identified by the measure and assess the validity and feasibility in existing public health settings. METHODS: Experts within the field developed a short, feasible and comprehensive measure. A consecutive sample of 2973 infants from 11 municipalities around the city of Copenhagen was screened at 9-10 months. Face validity and feasibility were evaluated among CHNs. Data on child and family factors and the results of screening were included in descriptive analyses. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to assess content validity. RESULTS: The measure identified problems of communication and interaction in 20.7% of the children, problems of eating in 20.1%, attention problems in 15.9% and problems of emotional regulation in 14.3%. Significant gender differences were seen. EFA demonstrated that among 27 items 11 items were clustering into five areas: Problems of eating, emotions, attention, language and communication and attachment, respectively. High face validity and feasibility was demonstrated, and the participation was 91%. CONCLUSIONS: The new measure shows potentials for infant mental health screening. However, further exploration of construct validity and reliability is needed.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Niño , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Proyectos Piloto , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study reports secular trends in medicine use for headache among adolescents in 20 countries from 1986 to 2010. METHODS: The international Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey includes self-reported data about medicine use for headaches among nationally representative samples of 11-, 13- and 15-year-olds. We included 20 countries with data from at least three data collection waves, with a total of 380 129 participants. RESULTS: The prevalence of medicine use for headaches varied from 16.5% among Hungarian boys in 1994 to 62.9% among girls in Wales in 1998. The prevalence was higher among girls than boys in every country and data collection year. The prevalence of medicine use for headaches increased in 12 of 20 countries, most notably in the Czech Republic, Poland, Russia, Sweden and Wales. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of medicine use for headaches among adolescents is high and increasing in many countries. As some medicines are toxic this may constitute a public health problem.
Asunto(s)
Conducta del Adolescente , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Cefalea/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Niño , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , América del Norte , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ethnic differences in the use of anti-asthmatic medication have been reported, with ethnic minorities being at a higher risk of suboptimal asthma control. As contextual socioeconomic characteristics may play a role, we analysed whether ethnic differences in the use of anti-asthmatic medication among children residing in the Capital Region of Denmark varied by place of residence. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Danish Civil Registration System, the Central Taxpayers' Register and the Danish National Prescription Register and were linked at the individual level. Population used was the entire child population in the Capital Region from 0 to 17 years old in 2008 (n = 342,403). Use of anti-asthma medicine was defined as at least one prescription having been filled in 2008. The analyses included multiple multilevel logistic regression models. RESULTS: Children living in low-income places of residence had lower odds of being prescribed preventive anti-asthmatics compared with children living in higher-income places of residence [odds ratio (OR) = 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.91]. Immigrant children had the lowest OR of being prescribed anti-asthmatics medication, both relief (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.20-0.77) and preventive (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.24-0.82) compared with ethnic Danes. Similar associations were found among descendants of immigrant children (OR for preventive medication = 0.70, 95% CI 0.62-0.78). Place of residence contributed to but did not account for the ethnic differences in the use of anti-asthmatic medication. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic differences in the use of anti-asthmatic medication were documented, and they cannot be explained by socioeconomic characteristics of place of residence. The lower prevalence of anti-asthmatic medication among ethnic minority children suggests poor asthma management control.
Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Etnicidad/etnología , Características de la Residencia , Migrantes , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Dinamarca/etnología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adolescent smoking is still highly prevalent in Denmark. One in four 13-year olds indicates that they have tried to smoke, and one in four 15-year olds answer that they smoke regularly. Smoking is more prevalent in socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in Denmark as well as in most Western countries. Previous school-based programs to prevent smoking have shown contrasting results internationally. In Denmark, previous programs have shown limited or no effect. This indicates a need for developing a well-designed, comprehensive, and multi-component intervention aimed at Danish schools with careful implementation and thorough evaluation.This paper describes X:IT, a study including 1) the development of a 3-year school-based multi-component intervention and 2) the randomized trial investigating the effect of the intervention. The study aims at reducing the prevalence of smoking among 13 to 15-year olds by 25%. METHODS/DESIGN: The X:IT study is based on the Theory of Triadic Influences. The theory organizes factors influencing adolescent smoking into three streams: cultural environment, social situation, and personal factors. We added a fourth stream, the community aspects. The X:IT program comprises three main components: 1) smoke-free school premises, 2) parental involvement including smoke-free dialogues and smoke-free contracts between students and parents, and 3) a curricular component. The study encompasses process- and effect-evaluations as well as health economic analyses. Ninety-four schools in 17 municipalities were randomly allocated to the intervention (51 schools) or control (43 schools) group. At baseline in September 2010, 4,468 year 7 students were eligible of which 4,167 answered the baseline questionnaire (response rate = 93.3%). DISCUSSION: The X:IT study is a large, randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of an intervention, based on components proven to be efficient in other Nordic settings. The X:IT study directs students, their parents, and smoking prevention policies at the schools. These elements have proven to be effective tools in preventing smoking among adolescents. Program implementation is thoroughly evaluated to be able to add to the current knowledge of the importance of implementation. X:IT creates the basis for thorough effect and process evaluation, focusing on various social groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN77415416.
Asunto(s)
Conducta del Adolescente , Prevención del Hábito de Fumar , Adolescente , Servicios de Salud del Adolescente , Dinamarca , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Padres , Prevalencia , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Servicios de Salud Escolar , Instituciones Académicas , Estudiantes , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This article is based on a qualitative evaluation of a project offering intensive support to Danish adolescents with poorly regulated type I diabetes and their families. The article explores 1) how the project allowed for another approach to the families than what is possible in usual care at the hospital, and 2) how the nurse involved other professionals in caring for the adolescents. METHODS: The study involved interviews with four participating adolescents, four parents, a social worker, and the nurse running the project, along with a reading of the nurse's entries in the adolescents' electronic patient records. Data was analyzed within the framework of realistic evaluation. RESULTS: The findings showed that key mechanisms in the nurse's work was her open and flexible approach to the families, the way she anchored conversations about diabetes in here and now situations, and her efforts at engaging teachers, social and health care professionals in helping the adolescents. CONCLUSION: The strengths of the project were the nurse's special approach to the families and her ability to engage other professionals. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A care manager providing individualized and flexible help can have positive results on the treatment of adolescents with poorly regulated type 1 diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/psicología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Adolescente , Femenino , Masculino , Dinamarca , Entrevistas como Asunto , Padres/psicología , Apoyo Social , Familia/psicologíaRESUMEN
AIMS: To assess diabetes-related emotional distress (DD) in emerging adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and assess a group-based intervention's impact. METHODS: To investigate DD we used data from the Problem Areas in Diabetes Questionnaire comprising 20 items (PAID-20). Furthermore, changes in the WHO Well-Being Index comprising five items (WHO-5) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) were analysed. The intervention was evaluated using follow-up data from the emerging adults who participated. RESULTS: From 2021 to 2023, we screened 180 emerging adults using PAID-20. DD (PAID-20≥30) was prevalent in 25.0 % (95 % CI 18.9; 32.0 %), and associated with the female sex, higher HbA1c and WHO-5 < 50. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion at baseline was associated with PAID-20<30. 21 individuals attended a group-based intervention. At one-week follow up PAID-20 was reduced (29.1 ± 15.4 vs. 41.3 ± 12.1 at baseline, p = 0.003), and at nine-twelve months' follow-up HbA1c was reduced (59.3 ± 15.3 mmol/mol vs. 68.0 ± 17.4 mmol/mol at baseline, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated that 25 % of the investigated emerging adults with T1D experienced DD (PAID-20≥30) associated with four clinical factors. We found a reduction in HbA1c and a short-term reduction in PAID-20 following the group-based intervention.
RESUMEN
Although self-reported health outcomes are of importance, attempts to validate a clinical applicable instrument (e.g., nomogram) combining sociodemographic and self-reported information on periodontitis have yet to be performed to identify periodontitis cases. Clinical and self-reported periodontitis, along with sociodemographic data, were collected from 197 adults. Akaike information criterion models were developed to identify periodontitis, and nomograms developed based on its regression coefficients. The discriminatory capability was evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic curves. Decision curve analysis was performed. Smoking [OR 3.69 (95%CI 1.89, 7.21)], poor/fair self-rated oral health [OR 6.62 (95%CI 3.23, 13.56)], previous periodontal treatment [OR 9.47 (95%CI 4.02, 22.25)], and tooth loss [OR 4.96 (95%CI 2.47, 9.97)], determined higher probability of having "Moderate/Severe Periodontitis". Age [OR 1.08 (95%CI 1.05, 1.12)], low educational level [OR 1.65 (95%CI 1.34, 2.23)], poor/fair self-rated oral health [OR 3.57 (95%CI 1.82, 6.99)], and previous periodontal treatment [OR 6.66 (95%CI 2.83, 15.68)] determined higher probability for "Any Periodontitis". Both nomograms showed excellent discriminatory capability (AUC of 0.83 (95%CI 0.75, 0.91) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.74, 0.88), good calibration, and slight overestimation of high risk and underestimation of low risk. Hence, our nomograms could help identify periodontitis among adults in Denmark.
Asunto(s)
Nomogramas , Periodontitis , Humanos , Periodontitis/diagnóstico , Periodontitis/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Curva ROC , Autoinforme , Salud Bucal , Factores de Riesgo , AncianoRESUMEN
Diabetes care in institutional settings is a significant challenge that affects the whole family as well as care workers and teachers. The present study is the ideation part of a rigorous development process in the KIds with Diabetes in School (KIDS) project. We have previously conducted a thorough three-part needs assessment in which we explored the problem area from the viewpoints of (1) municipal administrative staff, (2) preschool and school staff and (3) families. Based on the identified needs and to a great extent on the contents and shortcomings of existing guidelines, the objective of the present study is to explore and develop possible solutions and recommendations for addressing the challenges and problems. To meet this objective, we held comprehensive multistakeholder participatory workshops in each of the five Danish regions. Five main themes with multiple subthemes were identified as areas to be addressed: (1) training and knowledge, (2) communication and collaboration, (3) the designated contact/support person, (4) national guidelines, and (5) the Diabetes Coordinator. Our findings demonstrate that communicative structures and dynamics are at the very heart of the identified problems and challenges and that the possible solutions should revolve around improving existing structures and highlighting the importance of constantly working on understanding and developing communication strategies. We propose a set of recommendations for practice based on these communicative needs.
RESUMEN
AIMS: To examine inequality in dentist, ophthalmologist, and podiatrist attendance among adults with type 2 diabetes in a country with varying degrees of co-payment. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study with a population of 41,181 people with type 2 diabetes resident in the Central Denmark Region in 2019, identified through Danish registers using a prespecified diabetes algorithm. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression were used to examine the attendance at dentist, ophthalmologist, and podiatrist, controlling for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Attendance at dentist, ophthalmologist, and podiatrist were examined separately. RESULTS: The majority (59.7 %) had attended the ophthalmologist at least once in the preceding year, whereas 46.5 % and 34.2 % had visited the dentist/dental hygienist and podiatrist, respectively. Disposable household income increased attendance significantly, with a clear gradient in the OR of attending the dentist (p < 0.001), whereas age significantly magnified the OR of podiatrist and ophthalmologist attendance (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides circumstantial evidence that co-payment can increase inequality in health care attendance, especially for dental attendance, and it further shows that there is significant sociodemographic inequality in healthcare utilisation among people with type 2 diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Humanos , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Modelos Logísticos , Análisis Multivariante , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
AIMS: This study aimed to examine the association between type 2 diabetes and poor self-rated oral health, and to investigate whether such association is modified by socioeconomic position. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study, including a population aged 18-75 years with self-reported type 2 diabetes (N = 41,884) and a sex-, age- and municipality-matched reference population from the Health in Central Denmark survey (2020). Multivariable logistic regression was used, and effect modification of indicators of socioeconomic position was examined. RESULTS: Oral health was rated as poor in 37.0% of the population with type 2 diabetes and in 23.8% of the reference population without diabetes. Individuals with diabetes had higher risk of poor oral health (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.46 (95% CI: 1.39; 1.53)) than references. Interaction was seen between type 2 diabetes and highest attained education (p < 0.001). Stratified analyses showed higher risk of poor oral health in people with type 2 diabetes across all educational levels. CONCLUSIONS: People with type 2 diabetes were more likely to rate their oral health as poor than the reference population. Low education strengthened the association between diabetes and poor oral health.