Povidone-iodine intra-abdominal irrigation versus no irrigation in pediatric perforated appendicitis: A secondary economic analysis of a Bayesian randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in children (2-17 â€‹y) with perforated appendicitis demonstrated an 89% probability of reduced intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) rate with povidone-iodine (PVI) irrigation, compared with no irrigation (NI). We hypothesized that PVI also reduced 30-day hospital costs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective economic analysis of a pilot RCT. Hospital costs, inflated to 2019 U.S. dollars, were obtained for index admissions and 30-day emergency visits and readmissions. Cost differences between groups were assessed using frequentist and Bayesian generalized linear models. RESULTS: We observed a 95% Bayesian probability that PVI reduced 30-day mean total hospital costs ($16,555 [PVI] versus $18,509 [NI]; Bayesian cost ratio: 0.90, 95% CrI, 0.78-1.03). The mean absolute difference per patient was $1,954 less with PVI (95% CI, -$4,288 to $379). CONCLUSIONS: PVI likely reduced the IAA rate and 30-day hospital costs, suggesting the intervention is both clinically superior and cost saving.

Interhospital variability in localization techniques for small pulmonary nodules in children: A pediatric surgical oncology research collaborative study.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary nodules that are deep within lung parenchyma and/or small in size can be challenging to localize for biopsy. This study describes current trends in performance of image-guided localization techniques for pulmonary nodules in pediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients < 21 years of age undergoing localization of pulmonary nodules at 15 institutions. Localization and resection success, time in interventional radiology (IR), operating room (OR) and total anesthesia time, complications, and technical problems were compared between techniques. RESULTS: 225 patients were included with an average of 1.3 lesions (range 1-5). Median nodule size and depth were 4 mm (range 0-30) and 5.4 mm (0-61), respectively. The most common localization techniques were: wire + methylene blue dye (MBD) (28%), MBD only (25%), wire only (14%), technetium-99 only (11%), coil + MBD (7%) and coil only (5%). Localization technique was associated with institution (p < 0.01); technique and institution were significantly associated with mean IR, OR, and anesthesia time (all p < 0.05). Comparing techniques, there was no difference in successful IR localization (range 92-100%, p = 0.75), successful resection (94-100%, p = 0.98), IR technical problems (p = 0.22), or operative complications (p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Many IR localization techniques for small pulmonary nodules in children can be successful, but there is wide variability in application by institution and in procedure time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective review, Level 3.

Prophylactic intraabdominal drains do not confer benefit in pediatric perforated appendicitis: Results from a quality improvement initiative.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Prophylactic, intraabdominal drains have been used to prevent intraabdominal abscess (IAA) after perforated appendicitis. We hypothesized that routine drain placement would reduce the IAA rate in pediatric perforated appendicitis. METHODS: A 27-month quality improvement (QI) initiative was conducted: closed-suction, intraabdominal drains were placed intraoperatively in pediatric (age < 18) perforated appendicitis patients. QI patients were compared to controls admitted during the preceding 8 months and following 4 months. The primary outcome was 30-day IAA rate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy QI patients were compared to 109 controls. There was 100% compliance during 21 of 27 months of the QI initiative; only 7 QI patients did not receive drains. IAA occurred in 20.0% of QI patients and 22.9% of control (p = 0.52). After adjustment, the QI initiative was not associated with reduced odds of IAA (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.48-1.44). Median length of stay was longer in QI patients during the index admission (p = 0.03) and over 30 postoperative days (p = 0.03), but these relationships did not persist after adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: A QI initiative investigating prophylactic, intraabdominal drain placement in perforated appendicitis did not reduce the IAA rate. We recommend against routine drain placement in pediatric perforated appendicitis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Demographics in general surgery programs: Relationship between female faculty and proportion of female residents.

INTRODUCTION: We hypothesized that general surgery programs with more female faculty and leadership may be associated with more female residents. METHODS: The Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access system (FREIDA) was assessed for chair gender, program director gender, percentage of female faculty, and percentage of female residents at general surgery residency programs. Programs were stratified by type: university-based (UB), community-based/university-affiliated (UA) and community-based (CB). RESULTS: 304 general surgery programs reported a mean of 38.4% female residents which did not differ by program type. Chairs were more likely female in UB programs (12.8%) versus 5.5% in UA and CB programs (p = 0.05). There were more female faculty at UB programs (23.3%) versus UA (21.7%) and CB (17.4%) (p = 0.04). Chair (p = 0.21), program director (p = 0.98) and faculty gender proportion (p = 0.40) was not associated with female resident complement. CONCLUSIONS: In general surgery programs, faculty and leadership gender composition was not associated with proportion of female residents.

Home Antibiotics at Discharge for Pediatric Complicated Appendicitis: Friend or Foe?

BACKGROUND: The role of home antibiotics (HA) at discharge in children after perforated appendicitis is unclear. This study evaluates the outcomes of complicated appendicitis in patients being discharged with or without HA after initial operation and inpatient treatment. STUDY DESIGN: The 2015 and 2016 NSQIP-Pediatric database was queried for patients younger than 18 years of age with complicated appendicitis. Home antibiotics were prescribed or not (no home antibiotics [NHA]). Patients were stratified based on presence or absence of predischarge surgical site infection (SSI) and postoperative day of discharge (≤5 days or >5 days). The primary end point was 30-day postdischarge composite morbidity, including emergency department visit, readmission, postdischarge reoperation, and SSI. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for baseline covariables. RESULTS: Of 6,412 patients with complicated appendicitis, the majority were discharged with HA (HA 56.4%; NHA 43.6%). Patients receiving HA had higher preoperative leukocytosis, longer procedures, higher incidence of sepsis, more predischarge SSIs, and longer length of stay than the NHA cohort (all p < 0.01), suggesting greater severity of illness. In adjusted multivariable models, HA patients without a predischarge SSI had higher postdischarge morbidity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.22; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.44), as did HA patients discharged ≤5 days post operation (aOR 1.28; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.57) compared with NHA patients. Composite morbidity was similar between NHA and HA patients with predischarge SSIs (aOR 1.06; 95% CI 0.56 to 2.00) or who were discharged >5 days post operation (aOR 1.14; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.46). CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of pediatric patients with complicated appendicitis are discharged with HA, NSQIP-Pediatric data suggest there is no evidence of a significant benefit. There might be a cohort of patients with more severe disease who require continued antibiotics.

Decreasing intraoperative delays with meaningful use of the surgical safety checklist.

BACKGROUND: Purposeful completion (fidelity) more than simple adherence to items in the surgical safety checklist may improve operating room efficiency and patient safety. The purpose of this study was to evaluate intraoperative delays and correlate them with adherence and fidelity to the preincision surgical safety checklist. METHODS: Trained observers evaluated surgical safety checklist compliance during 3 observation periods from 2014-2016. Degree of adherence, checkpoint verbalization, fidelity, and meaningful completion were assessed. Delays were categorized as missing or malfunctioning equipment, staff error, and medication issues. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, logistic regression, χ2 and Student t test were used to analyze results. RESULTS: Of the 591 cases observed, 19% (n = 110) had at least one documented, intraoperative delay. The majority of delays were related to missing (50%) or malfunctioning (30%) equipment. Compared with cases without delays, cases with delays did not have a different mean degree of adherence (96.3 ± 7.6% vs 95.6 ± 5.8%, P = .36). Degree of fidelity was different between cases with and without delays (mean fidelity 77.1 ± 14.9% vs 80.5 ± 7.14.2%, P = .03). CONCLUSION: The preincision SSC is a communication tool offering an opportunity to discuss potential concerns and anticipated intraoperative needs. Fidelity rather than adherence to the surgical safety checklist seems to diminish intraoperative delays.

Too much of a bad thing: Discharge opioid prescriptions in pediatric appendectomy patients.

BACKGROUND: Opioid misuse is a public health crisis in the United States. This study aimed to evaluate the discharge opioid prescription practices for pediatric simple appendectomy patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric appendectomy patients at a tertiary children's hospital was conducted from October 2016 to January 2018. Only patients with simple appendicitis were included. Written opioid prescriptions were found in the electronic medical record (EMR) or through a statewide prescription monitoring database. All dosing data were converted to oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). Analysis of variance and logistic regression were used. RESULTS: During the study, 590 patients underwent appendectomy, of which 371 (62.9%) were diagnosed as having simple acute appendicitis. The majority of patients were prescribed an opioid analgesic (62.5%). Demographics were similar between those who received opioids and those who did not. The OME prescribed per day (range 0.2 to 3.4 mg/kg/day) was highly variable as was duration of prescription (1 to 30 days). Odds of emergency department visit were 3.3 times higher (95% CI 1.3-8.2) in those who received opioids. CONCLUSION: Postdischarge prescription practices for pediatric appendectomy are highly variable. Two-thirds of patients who received narcotics had a higher rate of complications. Greater scrutiny is required to optimize opioid stewardship. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Approaching zero: Implications of a computed tomography reduction program for pediatric appendicitis evaluation.

PURPOSE: Because of awareness of iatrogenic radiation exposure, there is a national trend of diminishing computed tomography (CT) use for pediatric suspected appendicitis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a CT reduction program for evaluation of appendicitis. METHODS: A multidisciplinary group (emergency medicine, radiology, and surgery) at a children's hospital developed a reduction program which included: ultrasound (U/S) first (2012), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) second (2014), and standardized U/S reports (2016). Imaging modality, negative appendectomy rate, time from first image to incision, and imaging costs were evaluated over time. RESULTS: Of the 571 patients evaluated from 2012 to 2016, there was a significant decrease in CT use and increase U/S and MRI use over the study period (all p<0.01). CT use approached zero in 2016. Time from first image to incision (median 10.7h, IQR 5.6-15.5) and negative appendectomy rate (mean 3.7±0.2%) did not change. Median imaging costs ($88, IQR $52-$169) and radiology percent of total costs (range 0.8%-3.9%) increased over time (both p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Approaching zero CT use for evaluation of pediatric appendicitis is possible through a multidisciplinary protocol without impacting clinical outcomes. However, increased MRI use led to higher costs. Cost-effectiveness of replacing CT with MRI warrants further study. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Imaging gently? Higher rates of computed tomography imaging for pediatric appendicitis in non-children's hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Growing concerns regarding radiation exposure in children have led to recommendations to minimize computed tomography imaging for appendicitis. We hypothesized that within a metropolitan hospital system (1 children's hospital and 8 non-children's hospitals), use of preoperative computed tomography is much greater in non-children's hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients <18 years of age undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis from April 2012 to April 2015. Patient demographics, location, and imaging modality (computed tomography and ultrasonography) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1,448 pediatric patients were identified (children's hospital = 215, 15%; non-children's hospitals = 1,233, 85%). Children's hospital patients had fewer computed tomography scans (23% vs 70%, P < .01) and more ultrasonography (75% vs 20%, P < .01). On multivariate regression, increased preoperative computed tomography use was significantly associated with non-children's hospitals (odds ratio 7.6, 95% confidence interval 5.4-10.8). At non-children's hospitals, older age (age >10: odds ratio 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.8-3.1) and higher patient weight (>45 kg odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.4-2.8) predicted computed tomography use. Children presenting at a children's hospital were much more likely to undergo ultrasonography (odds ratio 11.7, 95% confidence interval 8.3-16.6). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in imaging modalities for pediatric appendicitis between a children's hospital and non-children's hospitals. Further investigation is needed to identify other factors contributing to imaging preference in the pediatric population in order to establish clinical practice guidelines to decrease or prevent unnecessary radiation exposure in children.

Don't forget the dose: Improving computed tomography dosing for pediatric appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: A pediatric computed tomography (CT) radiation dose reduction program was implemented throughout our children's associated hospital system in 2010. We hypothesized that the CT dose received for evaluation of appendicitis in children would be significantly higher among the 40 referral, nonmember hospitals (NMH) than the 9 member hospitals (MH). METHODS: Preoperative CTs of pediatric (<18years) appendectomy patients between April 2012 and April 2015 were reviewed. Size specific dose estimate (SSDE), an approximation of absorbed dose incorporating patient diameter, and Effective Dose (ED) were calculated for each scan. RESULTS: 1128 (65%) of 1736 appendectomy patients underwent preoperative CT. 936 patients seen at and 102 children evaluated at NMH had dosing and patient diameter data for analysis. SSDE and ED were significantly higher with greater variance at NMH across all ages (all p<0.05, Figure). NMH's SSDE and ED also exceeded reference levels. CONCLUSION: Radiation exposure in CT scans for evaluation of pediatric appendicitis is significantly higher and more variable in NMH. A proactive approach to reduce dose, in addition to frequency, of CT scans in pediatric patients is essential. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.