Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 14: 307, 2014 Jun 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24902856

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Molecular typing is integral for identifying Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains that may be shared between patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). We conducted a side-by-side comparison of two P. aeruginosa genotyping methods utilising informative-single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) methods; one targeting 10 P. aeruginosa SNPs and using real-time polymerase chain reaction technology (HRM10SNP) and the other targeting 20 SNPs and based on the Sequenom MassARRAY platform (iPLEX20SNP). METHODS: An in-silico analysis of the 20 SNPs used for the iPLEX20SNP method was initially conducted using sequence type (ST) data on the P. aeruginosa PubMLST website. A total of 506 clinical isolates collected from patients attending 11 CF centres throughout Australia were then tested by both the HRM10SNP and iPLEX20SNP assays. Type-ability and discriminatory power of the methods, as well as their ability to identify commonly shared P. aeruginosa strains, were compared. RESULTS: The in-silico analyses showed that the 1401 STs available on the PubMLST website could be divided into 927 different 20-SNP profiles (D-value = 0.999), and that most STs of national or international importance in CF could be distinguished either individually or as belonging to closely related single- or double-locus variant groups. When applied to the 506 clinical isolates, the iPLEX20SNP provided better discrimination over the HRM10SNP method with 147 different 20-SNP and 92 different 10-SNP profiles observed, respectively. For detecting the three most commonly shared Australian P. aeruginosa strains AUST-01, AUST-02 and AUST-06, the two methods were in agreement for 80/81 (98.8%), 48/49 (97.8%) and 11/12 (91.7%) isolates, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The iPLEX20SNP is a superior new method for broader SNP-based MLST-style investigations of P. aeruginosa. However, because of convenience and availability, the HRM10SNP method remains better suited for clinical microbiology laboratories that only utilise real-time PCR technology and where the main interest is detection of the most highly-prevalent P. aeruginosa CF strains within Australian clinics.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Fibrosis Quística/complicaciones , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento/métodos , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus/métodos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/clasificación , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Australia , Fibrosis Quística/microbiología , ADN Bacteriano/análisis , Genotipo , Humanos , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/diagnóstico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación
2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 85(1): 98-101, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26971634

RESUMEN

Infection caused by Aeromonas spp. ranges from superficial wound infection to life-threatening septicemia. Carbapenem resistance due to metallo-beta-lactamase, CphA encoded by the cphA gene, is a significant problem. This study defines Aeromonas spp. causing clinical disease in Queensland, Australia. Phenotypic tests for carbapenemase detection were assessed. One hundred Aeromonas isolates from blood (22), wound (46), sterile sites (11), stool (18), eye (2), and sputum (1) were characterized by rpoB and gyrB sequencing. Meropenem susceptibility by VITEK2, disk diffusion, and E-test MIC were determined. Carbapenemase production was assessed by Carba NP test and cphA by PCR. Gene sequencing identified isolates as Aeromonas dhakensis (39), Aeromonas veronii (21), Aeromonas hydrophila (20), Aeromonas caviae (14), Aeromonas jandaei (4), Aeromonas bestiarum (1), and Aeromonas sanarellii (1). Disk diffusion and E-test failed to detect resistance in isolates with presence of cphA. Carba NP was performed with 97.4% sensitivity and 95.7% specificity. Carbapenem resistance gene cphA was detected in A. veronii (21; 100%), A. hydrophila (18; 90%), A. dhakensis (34; 87.2%), A. jandaei (3; 75%), and A. bestiarum (1; 100%) but not A. caviae. We found that A. dhakensis was the predominant species, a previously unrecognized pathogen in this region.


Asunto(s)
Aeromonas/efectos de los fármacos , Aeromonas/genética , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Genotipo , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Resistencia betalactámica , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Aeromonas/clasificación , Aeromonas/aislamiento & purificación , Australia , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
3.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 63(2): 127-31, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19026507

RESUMEN

Phenotypic identification of Gram-negative bacteria from respiratory specimens of patients with cystic fibrosis carries a high risk of misidentification. Molecular identification techniques that use single-gene targets are also susceptible to error, including cross-reaction issues with other Gram-negative organisms. In this study, we have designed a Pseudomonas aeruginosa duplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (PAduplex) assay targeting the ecfX and the gyrB genes. The PAduplex was evaluated against a panel of 91 clinical and environmental isolates that were presumptively identified as P. aeruginosa. The results were compared with those obtained using a commercial biochemical identification kit and several other P. aeruginosa PCR assays. The results showed that the PAduplex assay is highly suitable for routine identification of P. aeruginosa isolates from clinical or environmental samples. The 2-target format provides simultaneous confirmation of P. aeruginosa identity where both the ecfX and gyrB PCR reactions are positive and may also reduce the potential for false negatives caused by sequence variation in primer or probe targets.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Girasa de ADN/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Factor sigma/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana/métodos , Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/microbiología , Fibrosis Quística/complicaciones , Fibrosis Quística/microbiología , Cartilla de ADN/genética , ADN Bacteriano/genética , ADN Ribosómico/genética , Humanos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/complicaciones , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Esputo/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA