Concomitant Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and is associated with increased risk of bleeding and stroke. While left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is approved as an alternative to anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with AF, placement of these devices in patients with severe aortic stenosis, or when performed at the same time as TAVR, has not been extensively studied. METHODS: WATCH-TAVR (WATCHMAN for Patients with AF Undergoing TAVR) was a multicenter, randomized trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of concomitant TAVR and LAAO with WATCHMAN in AF patients. Patients were randomized 1:1 to TAVR + LAAO or TAVR + medical therapy. WATCHMAN patients received anticoagulation for 45 days followed by dual antiplatelet therapy until 6 months. Anticoagulation was per treating physician preference for patients randomized to TAVR + medical therapy. The primary noninferiority end point was all-cause mortality, stroke, and major bleeding at 2 years between the 2 strategies. RESULTS: The study enrolled 349 patients (177 TAVR + LAAO and 172 TAVR + medical therapy) between December 2017 and November 2020 at 34 US centers. The mean age of patients was 81 years, and the mean scores for CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED (Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/alcohol concomitantly) were 4.9 and 3.0, respectively. At baseline, 85.4% of patients were taking anticoagulants and 71.3% patients were on antiplatelet therapy. The cohorts were well-balanced for baseline characteristics. The incremental LAAO procedure time was 38 minutes, and the median contrast volume used for combined procedures was 119 mL versus 70 mL with TAVR alone. At the 24-month follow-up, 82.5% compared with 50.8% of patients were on any antiplatelet therapy, and 13.9% compared with 66.7% of patients were on any anticoagulation therapy in TAVR + LAAO compared with TAVR + medical therapy group, respectively. For the composite primary end point, TAVR + LAAO was noninferior to TAVR + medical therapy (22.7 versus 27.3 events per 100 patient-years for TAVR + LAAO and TAVR + medical therapy, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.60-1.22]; Pnoninferiority<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant WATCHMAN LAAO and TAVR is noninferior to TAVR with medical therapy in severe aortic stenosis patients with AF. The increased complexity and risks of the combined procedure should be considered when concomitant LAAO is viewed as an alternative to medical therapy for patients with AF undergoing TAVR. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03173534.

Real-World Outcomes for the Fifth-Generation Balloon Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The fifth-generation SAPIEN 3 Ultra Resilia valve (S3UR) incorporates several design changes as compared with its predecessors, the SAPIEN 3 (S3) and SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U) valves, including bovine leaflets treated with a novel process intended to reduce structural valve deterioration via calcification, as well as a taller external skirt on the 29-mm valve size to reduce paravalvular leak (PVL). The clinical performance of S3UR compared with S3 and S3U in a large patient population has not been previously reported. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare S3UR to S3/S3U for procedural, in-hospital, and 30-day clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: Patients enrolled in the STS/ACC TVT (Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry between January 1, 2021, and June 30, 2023, who underwent TAVR with S3UR or S3U/S3 valve platforms were propensity-matched and evaluated for procedural, in-hospital, and 30-day clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. RESULTS: 10,314 S3UR patients were propensity matched with 10,314 patients among 150,539 S3U/S3 patients. At 30 days, there were no statistically significant differences in death, stroke, or bleeding, but a numerically higher hospital readmission rate in the S3UR cohort (8.5% vs 7.7%; P = 0.04). At discharge, S3UR patients exhibited significantly lower mean gradients (9.2 ± 4.6 mm Hg vs 12.0 ± 5.7 mm Hg; P < 0.0001) and larger aortic valve area (2.1 ± 0.7 cm2 vs 1.9 ± 0.6 cm2; P < 0.0001) than patients treated with S3/S3U. The 29-mm valve size exhibited significant reduction in mild PVL (5.3% vs 9.4%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: S3UR TAVR is associated with lower mean gradients and lower rates of PVL than earlier generations of balloon expandable transcatheter heart valve platforms.

Safety of Same-Day Hospital Discharge Post Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Findings from a Multicenter Study.

Transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is indicated for patients with cryptogenic stroke. Although procedural safety is well established, there are limited data on the safety of same-day (SD) discharge. We aimed to review the outcomes of PFO closure with SD. Patients who underwent transcatheter PFO closure between January 2011 and May 2022 at 4 large US hospitals were retrospectively analyzed, comparing outcomes of SD versus delayed discharge (DD). The primary end point was a composite of access-site complication, stroke, device embolization, atrial arrhythmia, and bleeding. Secondary analysis comparing imaging modality and outcomes was performed. 554 patients (49.2% female) were analyzed (382 discharged SD). Average age was 54.3 ± 15. Baseline characteristics in both groups were broadly similar. Previous stroke (78.0% SD vs 76.2% DD, p = 0.32) was the commonest indication for PFO closure. In the SD group, there was less general anesthesia use (5.5% vs 16.9%, p <0.001). Intraprocedural intracardiac echocardiography was used more frequently in SD cases (95.0% vs 81.4%, p <0.001). In the DD group, median stay was 1 night, and 34.9% stayed beyond 1 night. At 30 days, there was no difference in the primary composite end point (14.9% vs 11.6%, p = 0.15). There was no inter-group difference in individual adverse events (all p >0.05). When comparing imaging modality and outcomes, there was no difference in composite end points between transesophageal and intracardiac echocardiography (6.5% vs 14.7%, p = 0.063). In conclusion, SD discharge after transcatheter PFO closure appears safe. This efficient approach may be advantageous in optimizing workflow and minimizing hospital occupancy.

Trends in Clinical Presentation, Management, and Outcomes of STEMI in Patients With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported high in-hospital mortality for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with COVID-19 treated in the early phase of the pandemic. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe trends of COVID-19 patients with STEMI during the course of the pandemic. METHODS: The NACMI (North American COVID-19 STEMI) registry is a prospective, investigator-initiated, multicenter, observational registry of hospitalized STEMI patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection in North America. We compared trends in clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients treated in the first year of the pandemic (January 2020 to December 2020) vs those treated in the second year (January 2021 to December 2021). RESULTS: A total of 586 COVID-19-positive patients with STEMI were included in the present analysis; 227 treated in Y2020 and 359 treated in Y2021. Patients' characteristics changed over time. Relative to Y2020, the proportion of Caucasian patients was higher (58% vs 39%; P < 0.001), patients presented more frequently with typical ischemic symptoms (59% vs 51%; P = 0.04), and patients were less likely to have shock pre-PCI (13% vs 18%; P = 0.07) or pulmonary manifestations (33% vs. 47%; P = 0.001) in Y2021. In-hospital mortality decreased from 33% (Y2020) to 23% (Y2021) (P = 0.008). In Y2021, none of the 22 vaccinated patients expired in hospital, whereas in-hospital death was recorded in 37 (22%) unvaccinated patients (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Significant changes have occurred in the clinical characteristics and outcomes of STEMI patients with COVID-19 infection during the course of the pandemic.

Long-term outcomes of elective drug-eluting stenting of the unprotected left main coronary artery in patients with normal left ventricular function.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the early and long-term outcomes of patients with normal left ventricular function who undergo elective unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES). BACKGROUND: Although the standard of care for patients with ULMCA disease is coronary artery bypass surgery, the current guidelines recommend PCI in clinical conditions that predict an increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes. The long-term outcomes of patients with low risk of adverse surgical outcomes who undergo PCI are unknown. METHODS: Data from a multicenter international registry, which included 221 consecutive patients from four institutions with normal left ventricular function who underwent elective ULMCA PCI with DES from 2002 to 2009, were collected. RESULTS: There was no cardiac death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis, or stroke within the first 30 days. Seven (3%) patients had periprocedural myocardial infarction. Follow-up angiography was performed in 136 (62%) patients. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival curves at 1 year for cardiac death and TLR rates were 97.7% ± 1.0% and 92.9% ± 1.8%, respectively. At the mean follow-up of 44.8 ± 22.8 months, the event-free rates for cardiac death and TLR were 95.5% ± 1.5% and 88.9% ± 2.3%, respectively. Multivariate analyses identified the predictors of cardiac death: age ≥ 75 years (P = 0.015) and history of myocardial infarction (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Elective ULMCA PCI with DES in patients with normal left ventricular function is safe and effective with excellent short-term outcomes and favorable long-term outcomes and may be a viable option for low-risk patients with normal left ventricular function.

Standard- vs high-dose clopidogrel based on platelet function testing after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GRAVITAS randomized trial.

CONTEXT: High platelet reactivity while receiving clopidogrel has been linked to cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but a treatment strategy for this issue is not well defined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of high-dose compared with standard-dose clopidogrel in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity after PCI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized, double-blind, active-control trial (Gauging Responsiveness with A VerifyNow assay-Impact on Thrombosis And Safety [GRAVITAS]) of 2214 patients with high on-treatment reactivity 12 to 24 hours after PCI with drug-eluting stents at 83 centers in North America between July 2008 and April 2010. INTERVENTIONS: High-dose clopidogrel (600-mg initial dose, 150 mg daily thereafter) or standard-dose clopidogrel (no additional loading dose, 75 mg daily) for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the 6-month incidence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. The key safety end point was severe or moderate bleeding according to the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO) definition. A key pharmacodynamic end point was the rate of persistently high on-treatment reactivity at 30 days. RESULTS: At 6 months, the primary end point had occurred in 25 of 1109 patients (2.3%) receiving high-dose clopidogrel compared with 25 of 1105 patients (2.3%) receiving standard-dose clopidogrel (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.76; P = .97). Severe or moderate bleeding was not increased with the high-dose regimen (15 [1.4%] vs 25 [2.3%], HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.31-1.11; P = .10). Compared with standard-dose clopidogrel, high-dose clopidogrel provided a 22% (95% CI, 18%-26%) absolute reduction in the rate of high on-treatment reactivity at 30 days (62%; 95% CI, 59%-65% vs 40%; 95% CI, 37%-43%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with high on-treatment reactivity after PCI with drug-eluting stents, the use of high-dose clopidogrel compared with standard-dose clopidogrel did not reduce the incidence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00645918.

Impact of chronic renal insufficiency on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing saphenous vein graft intervention with drug-eluting stents: a multicenter Southern Californian Registry.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) who undergo saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention with drug-eluting stents (DES). BACKGROUND: Patients with CRI have higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after percutaneous revascularization. SVG intervention is associated with increased rates of MACE compared with percutaneous revascularization of native arteries. However, the impact of CRI on SVG intervention with DES has not been well delineated. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent SVG intervention with DES at five medical centers from April 2003 to December 2007 were included in this analysis. RESULTS: A total of 172 patients, 39 patients with CRI and a serum creatinine > or =1.5 mg dL(-1), and 133 patients without CRI, underwent SVG intervention with DES. Patients with CRI were more often older, diabetic, and had a longer mean total stent length. At 1 year, patients with CRI had a higher MACE rate (35.9% vs. 15.8%, hazard ratio [HR] 2.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-4.88, log rank P = 0.009), mainly driven by higher mortality (20.5% vs. 9.8%, HR 3.41, 95% CI 1.10-10.58, log rank P = 0.024). There was a trend toward higher rates of target vessel revascularization in the CRI group (21.8% vs. 10.3%, HR 2.42, 95% CI 0.94-6.24, log rank P = 0.059). Stent thrombosis rates were not different between patients with and without CRI (2.6% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.8). Multivariable analysis revealed that CRI was the only significant predictor of 1-year MACE (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.3; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CRI who underwent SVG intervention with DES had higher risks of MACE and death compared with patients with preserved renal function. Further treatment strategies are needed in this high-risk group who undergo SVG intervention with DES.

Noninvasive calibration of cardiac pressure transducers in patients with heart failure: an aid to implantable hemodynamic monitoring and therapeutic guidance.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardiac pressure monitors require assurance of calibration. This study evaluated if airway pressure responses during Valsalva maneuver (VM) can be used for calibrating intracardiac pressure transducers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-eight heart failure patients performed VMs while cardiac and airway pressures were recorded. Patients were designated as Lower (L) if baseline PCW was <20 mm Hg (n = 17); otherwise, they were categorized as Higher (H) (n = 21). VMs were repeated in 9 H patients after nitroglycerin. Procedural success was 92% and there were no complications. Differences between filling pressure and airway pressure (effective pressure) were eliminated during VM (RA(eff) = -0.9 +/- 1.3, RVED(eff) = 1.2 +/- 1.1, PCW(eff) = 2.1 +/- 2.8, and LVED(eff) = 0.9 +/- 1.6 mm Hg), and filling pressures were highly correlated with airway pressure r = 0.94. On average, group H had higher PCW(eff) and LVED(eff) than L patients by 1.8 and 2.5 mm Hg (P < or = .002), respectively, but after nitrates their responses were identical. CONCLUSION: The relationships between cardiac filling pressure and airway pressure during the Valsalva maneuver are sufficiently reliable to be considered as a new, noninvasive method for establishing the calibration of cardiac pressure sensors in patients with heart failure.

New heparin dosing regimen for diabetics undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

It has been previously demonstrated that diabetics are less sensitive to heparin compared to non-diabetics. We hypothesized that an initial heparin dose of 80 IU per kilogram administered to diabetics rather than 70 IU per kilogram might yield a more optimal initial ACT of 300 to 350 seconds when glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists are not used. We prospectively studied 130 elective PCI patients without diabetes treated with 70 IU per kilogram of unfractionated heparin and 81 elective PCI patients with diabetes treated with 80 IU per kilogram, and compared the initially achieved ACT. The mean heparin dose given per kg was greater (by intention) in diabetics versus non-diabetics. Despite that, there was no significant difference in the initially achieved ACT in diabetics and non-diabetics.

Comparison of frequency of left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in patients with a first acute myocardial infarction with versus without left ventricular hypertrophy.

One hundred fifty patients with their first acute myocardial infarctions (AMIs) were studied. AMIs were confirmed by troponin levels, ST-segment elevation, or angiographic coronary occlusion. In 36% of patients (16 of 45) with left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, the wall motion score index was normal, whereas in patients with no LV hypertrophy, only 18% (19 of 105) had no segmental wall motion abnormalities (p = 0.03). When adjusting for troponin level, the odds ratio for normal wall motion of patients with LV hypertrophy was 2.86 (95% confidence interval 1.26 to 6.50) compared with those with normal wall thickness. Consequently, normal LV wall motion by echocardiography in the setting of LV hypertrophy does not exclude AMI.

A rare noncardiac cause for acute myocardial infarction in a 13-year-old patient.

A case of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in an adolescent patient is presented. The patient presented with resting angina and echocardiographic evidence of wall motion abnormalities in the inferior and posterior segments. The patient was known to have metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumor was seen in the left inferior pulmonary vein and is proposed to be the source of embolism-causing myocardial infarction. Secondary to intracranial metastatic lesions, the patient was treated conservatively with opiates, nitrates, and beta-blockers. This case is an opportunity to review the causes and management of myocardial infraction in pediatric patients and represents a rare cause of embolic myocardial infraction.

Early safety and efficacy of percutaneous left atrial appendage suture ligation: results from the U.S. transcatheter LAA ligation consortium.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) ligation may represent an alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the early safety and efficacy of transcatheter ligation of the LAA for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter study of consecutive patients undergoing LAA ligation with the Lariat device at 8 U.S. sites. The primary endpoint was procedural success, defined as device success (suture deployment and <5 mm leak by post-procedure transesophageal echocardiography), and no major complication at discharge (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding type 3 or greater, or cardiac surgery). Post-discharge management was per operator discretion. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were enrolled. Median CHADS2 score (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism [doubled]) was 3 (interquartile range: 2 to 4). Device success was 94%, and procedural success was 86%. A major complication occurred in 15 patients (9.7%). There were 14 major bleeds (9.1%), driven by the need for transfusion (4.5%). Significant pericardial effusion occurred in 16 patients (10.4%). Follow-up was available in 134 patients at a median of 112 days (interquartile range: 50 to 270 days): Death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 4 patients (2.9%). Among 63 patients with acute closure and transesophageal echocardiography follow-up, there were 3 thrombi (4.8%) and 13 (20%) with residual leak. CONCLUSIONS: In this initial multicenter experience of LAA ligation with the Lariat device, the rate of acute closure was high, but procedural success was limited by bleeding. A prospective randomized trial is required to adequately define clinical efficacy, optimal post-procedure medical therapy, and the effect of operator experience on procedural safety.

Comparison of sirolimus-, paclitaxel-, and everolimus-eluting stent in unprotected left main coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study evaluated the outcomes of patients who underwent unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with different types of drug-eluting stents (DES). BACKGROUND: The standard of care for patients with ULMCA is coronary artery bypass surgery. However, current guidelines recommend PCI in clinical conditions where there is an increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes. Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing ULMCA PCI with different types of drug-eluting stents (DES) are unknown. METHODS: Data from a multicenter international registry, which included 239 consecutive patients from four institutions who ULMCA PCI with DES, were collected. RESULTS: There were 42 patients receiving paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), 158 patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), and 39 patients receiving everolimus-eluting stent (EES). There was no statistical difference in major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis among PES, SES, and EES at 30 days and 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences in clinical events among patients receiving PES, SES, and EES for ULMCA disease.

Multicenter international registry of unprotected left main coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting stents.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with everolimus-eluting stents (EES) for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease. BACKGROUND: The standard of care for the treatment of ULMCA disease is coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Data suggest that PCI with drug-eluting stents is a viable alternative to CABG for the treatment of ULMCA disease. Randomized trials demonstrated superior event-free survival with EES compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents in non-ULMCA lesions. However, data with ULMCA PCI with EES are limited. METHODS: This multicenter international registry included 178 patients from the United States, South Korea, and Italy who underwent ULMCA PCI with EES from 2008 to 2010. The primary endpoint was freedom from target lesion failure (TLF), defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year. RESULTS: At 30 days, 4 patients (2.2%) died from cardiac causes, and no patient experienced MI or TLR. One-year freedom from TLF was 94.4%. One-year freedom from cardiac death, MI, and ischemia-driven TLR was 96.6%, 98.9%, and 98.3%, respectively. Two patients (1.1%) had definite or probable stent thrombosis. CONCLUSION: PCI with EES is safe and effective and may be a viable option for the treatment of ULMCA disease.

Comparison of sirolimus-eluting stents with paclitaxel-eluting stents in saphenous vein graft intervention (from a multicenter Southern California Registry).

This study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) to paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) in percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions. SVGs develop atherosclerosis at high rates and often require repeat revascularization. Percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stents has become the preferred method of revascularization due to higher restenosis with bare metal stents and increased morbidity and mortality with repeat coronary artery bypass grafting. We sought to compare the rate of major adverse cardiac events and stent thrombosis between SESs and PESs in patients undergoing SVG intervention. A multicenter analysis of 172 patients with SVG lesions treated with SESs or PESs was performed. The 30-day and 1-year clinical outcomes of 102 patients receiving SESs were compared to those of 70 patients receiving PESs. There was no significant difference in baseline demographic, angiographic, and procedural characteristics between the SES and PES treatment groups. There was no statistical difference in major adverse cardiac events at 30 days and at 1 year (hazard ratio [HR] 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77 to 3.23, log-rank p = 0.21). There was also no difference in survival (HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.39 to 4.25, log-rank p = 0.69) or target vessel revascularization (HR 2.54, 95% CI 0.84 to 7.72, log-rank p = 0.09). In conclusion, this multicenter analysis of real-world patients demonstrated that SESs and PESs have similar clinical outcomes when used in SVG intervention.

Stent fracture associated with drug-eluting stents: clinical characteristics and implications.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and implications of stent fracture in drug-eluting stents. BACKGROUND: Approximately 2.5 million drug-eluting stents are implanted every year worldwide. In 10 randomized controlled trials involving 2,602 patients, no incidence of stent fracture was recognized or reported. METHODS: From April 2003 to December 2005, 2,728 patients underwent drug-eluting stenting. The angiograms of all 530 patients who underwent repeat angiography were analyzed to identify the presence of stent fracture. We then documented the incidence of adverse events associated with drug-eluting stent fracture and systematically analyzed the clinical, procedural, and structural factors, which might predispose to stent fracture. RESULTS: Stent fracture was identified in 10 patients. None of these fractures were detectable at the time of stent placement. The median time interval from stent implantation to detection of fracture at repeat angiography was 226 days (range, 7-620 days). Adverse clinical outcomes associated with stent fracture occurred in 7 patients (6 patients had binary restenosis and 1 patient had stent thrombosis), all necessitating repeat intervention. Analysis of potential predisposing clinical, procedural, and structural factors revealed that 4 patients had excessive tortuosity in the proximal segment, and overlapping stents were used in 5 cases. All fractures occurred in sirolimus-eluting stents. CONCLUSIONS: Stent fracture may represent a new potential mechanism of restenosis and stent thrombosis in drug-eluting stents. Predisposing clinical and procedural factors may be vessel tortuosity and use of overlapping stents. The most important predisposing factor, however, may be stent structure, since all fractures occurred in sirolimus-eluting stents.

Pimecrolimus and dual pimecrolimus-paclitaxel eluting stents decrease neointimal proliferation in a porcine model.

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness and vascular response of a pimecrolimus drug eluting stent and a combination (pimecrolimus + paclitaxel) stent as compared with bare metal controls in the porcine coronary model. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the first phase of the study, cobalt chromium stents were loaded with an erodible polymer and either a slow release or a fast release formulation of pimecrolimus. Thirty stents (metal, n = 10; pimecrolimus slow, n = 10; pimecrolimus fast, n = 10) were implanted in the coronary arteries of 10 pigs. At 30 days, neointimal proliferation and inflammation were both significantly less in the pimecrolimus fast release group as compared with the bare metal controls. Endothelialization was complete and equal in all three groups of stents. In the second phase of the study, stents were loaded with an erodible polymer with alternating reservoirs of paclitaxel and pimecrolimus. Twenty stents (8 control stents and 12 dual stents) were implanted in the coronary arteries of seven pigs. At 30 days, neointimal proliferation was significantly less in the dual drug group as compared with the bare metal controls. Endothelialization was complete in both groups of stents, suggesting complete healing of the arteries. CONCLUSIONS: In a 30-day porcine stent model, pimecrolimus inhibits neointimal proliferation as compared with bare metal stents. Also, the proof of concept of a dual drug eluting stent was established showing both safety and efficacy.

Coronary sinus is dilated and outwardly displaced in patients with mitral regurgitation: quantitative angiographic analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to define the anatomy of the coronary sinus (CS) by venography. These measurements are essential in the selection of physical characteristics of percutaneous annuloplasty devices for mitral regurgitation (MR). BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of percutaneous annuloplasty of the CS for MR are now underway. Although the CS is in close proximity to the mitral annulus, there is as yet no published quantitative data defining the magnitude of change in CS dimensions in MR, and how these changes might reflect the magnitude of MR. METHODS: We studied 57 patients (27 patients with MR and 30 patients with no MR) who were referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy and underwent CS venography. Echocardiography was used to assess the degree of MR, cardiac dimensions, and right heart filling pressures. The diameter of the ostial and proximal CS and perimeter of the CS-great cardiac vein (GCV) were assessed by quantitative coronary analysis. RESULTS: Patients with MR had a larger ostial CS diameter (19.4+/-3.9 mm vs. 16.9+/-4.6 mm, P=0.02) and proximal CS diameter (8.2+/-1.7 mm vs. 7.4+/-2.3 mm, P=0.05) and larger CS-GCV perimeter (104.4+/-15.6 mm vs. 86.5+/-15.3 mm, P=0.005) compared with patients with no MR. The CS-GCV perimeter is positively correlated to the severity of MR (P=0.02) and pulmonary artery pressure (r=0.32, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MR have a dilated and outward displacement of the CS. The CS-GCV perimeter is positively correlated with the degree of MR and pulmonary artery pressure.

Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery with percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of consecutive, selected patients treated with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease. BACKGROUND: Although recent data suggest that PCI with DES provides better clinical outcomes compared to bare-metal stenting for ULMCA disease, there is a paucity of data comparing PCI with DES to CABG. METHODS: Since April 2003, when DES first became available at our institution, 123 patients underwent CABG, and 50 patients underwent PCI with DES for ULMCA disease. RESULTS: High-risk patients (Parsonnet score >15) comprised 46% of the CABG group and 64% of the PCI group (p = 0.04). The 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rate for CABG and PCI was 17% and 2% (p < 0.01), respectively. The mean follow-up was 6.7 +/- 6.2 months in the CABG group and 5.6 +/- 3.9 months in the PCI group (p = 0.26). The estimated MACCE-free survival at six months and one year was 83% and 75% in the CABG group versus 89% and 83% in the PCI group (p = 0.20). By multivariable Cox regression, Parsonnet score, diabetes, and CABG were independent predictors of MACCE. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher percentage of high-risk patients, PCI with DES for ULMCA disease was not associated with an increase in immediate or medium-term complications compared with CABG. Our data suggest that a randomized comparison between the two revascularization strategies for ULMCA may be warranted.