Impact of Treating Depression on Associated Comorbidities: A Systematic Literature Review.

Objective: To identify and summarize data that describe the impact of effectively treating major depressive disorder (MDD) on the severity or risk of serious comorbidities.Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and several congresses were searched. Searches included terms related to MDD, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and physical comorbidities and were restricted to English-language publications. Searches were conducted in November 2019 for the previous 2 years for conference proceedings; no date restriction was applied to the database searches.Study Selection: Included studies were RCTs or meta-analyses that assessed depression therapies. Studies were required to report a statistically significant improvement in depression scores as well as the concurrent impact on comorbidities. A total of 1,997 articles were initially identified for screening.Data Extraction: Two investigators extracted data and assessed study quality.Results: A total of 30 studies, including 24 RCTs (N = 6,333) and 6 meta/pooled analyses of RCTs, were included. Findings in several comorbidity categories were mixed; for example, in half (4 of 8) of the identified studies in people with cardiovascular disease and depression, individuals who received treatment leading to reduced depressive symptoms compared with a control arm also had a significantly decreased incidence of cardiovascular events or significantly improved cardiac disease symptom/severity scores compared with controls. Significant improvements in comorbid disease severity observed alongside improvements in depressive symptoms were also noted in studies of comorbid Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic pain and fibromyalgia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Conclusions: Effective treatment of MDD may lead to a reduction in the severity of certain serious comorbidities. These results highlight the importance of appropriate and timely treatment of MDD.

Impact of Major Depressive Disorder on Comorbidities: A Systematic Literature Review.

Objective: To summarize the breadth of data exploring the relationship between major depressive disorder (MDD) and both the incidence and the disease course of a range of comorbidities.Data Sources: The authors searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and several prespecified congresses. Searches included terms related to MDD and several comorbidity categories, restricted to those published in the English language from 2005 onward.Study Selection: Eligibility criteria included observational studies within North America and Europe that examined the covariate-adjusted impact of MDD on the risk and/or severity of comorbidities. A total of 6,811 articles were initially identified for screening.Data Extraction: Two investigators extracted data and assessed study quality.Results: In total, 199 articles were included. Depression was significantly (P < .05) associated with an increased incidence of dementia and Alzheimer's disease as well as cognitive decline in individuals with existing disease; increased incidence and worsening of cardiovascular disease/events (although mixed results were found for stroke); worsening of metabolic syndrome; increased incidence of diabetes, particularly among men, and worsening of existing diabetes; increased incidence of obesity, particularly among women; increased incidence and worsening of certain autoimmune diseases; increased incidence and severity of HIV/AIDS; and increased incidence of drug abuse and severity of both alcohol and drug abuse.Conclusions: The presence of MDD was identified as a risk factor for both the development and the worsening of a range of comorbidities. These results highlight the importance of addressing depression early in its course and the need for integrating mental and general health care.

Impact of a multivariate serum-based proteomic test on physician treatment recommendations for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The VeriStrat 1 (VS) test is intended to help guide treatment decisions for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without an EGFR-sensitizing mutation, classifying patients into two categories. Patients classified as VSGood have a favorable prognosis and significant clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Patients classified as VSPoor have a less favorable prognosis and exhibit no significant response to EGFR-TKIs. The objective of this paper is to assess the real-world impact of VS test results on physicians' treatment recommendations including referrals for best supportive care (BSC). METHODS: Between 1 January 2012 and 1 November 2016, physician respondents were asked to complete standardized questionnaires before and after receiving VS results in patients meeting criteria for the intended use of the VS test. This study evaluated three endpoints: whether physicians followed VS test results in making treatment recommendations, the extent to which tests results changed these treatment recommendations, and the patterns of care subsequent to VS testing. RESULTS: Of the tests ordered by 989 physicians, 2494 VS tests had completed treatment recommendation questionnaires both prior to and after testing. Prior to VS testing, physicians were considering treatment with EGFR-TKIs for 2250 patients (90%). The VS test classified 1950 patients as VSGood and 544 patients as VSPoor. For patients classified as VSPoor, physicians recommended BSC for 25% of patients and standard systemic treatments such as chemotherapies for 65% of patients. Consistent with previous publications, physicians recommended EGFR-TKI therapy for only 10% of VSPoor patients but for 89% of VSGood patients. Overall, physician's treatment recommendations were consistent with test results in 98% of cases. Availability of test results decreased ineffective treatment recommendations by 89% for VSPoor patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among physicians ordering VS, the test significantly influenced treatment recommendations for patients with NSCLC, reducing ineffective and expensive treatment at the end of life.