A proprietary GMP human platelet lysate for the expansion of dermal fibroblasts for clinical applications.

Recent years have witnessed the introduction of ex vivo expanded dermal fibroblasts for several cell therapy and tissue-engineering applications, including the treatment of facial scars and burns, representing a promising cell type for regenerative medicine. We tested different in-house produced human platelet lysate (HPL) solutions against fetal bovine serum as supplements for in vitro fibroblast expansion by comparing cell yield, molecular marker expression, extracellular matrix (ECM) generation, genomic stability and global gene expression. Our in-house produced HPL supported fibroblast growth at levels similar to those for FBS and commercial HPL products and was superior to AB human serum. Cells grown in HPL maintained a fibroblast phenotype (VIM+, CD44+, CD13+, CD90+), ECM generation capacity (FN+, COL1+) and a normal karyotype, although gene expression profiling revealed changes related to cell metabolism, adhesion and cellular senescence. The HPL manufacturing process was validated within a GMP compliant system and the solution was stable at -80ºC and -20ºC for 2 years. Dermal fibroblasts expanded in vitro with HPL maintain a normal karyotype and expression of fibroblast markers, with only minor changes in their global gene expression profile. Our in-house produced GMP-HPL is an efficient, safe and economical cell culture supplement that can help increase the healthcare activity of blood transfusion centers through the re-use of transfusional plasma and platelets approaching their expiration date. Currently, our HPL solution is approved by the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices and is being used in the manufacture of cell therapy products.Abbreviations: AB plasma: plasma group AB; ABHS: AB Human Serum; ABHS+GF: AB Human Serum supplemented with growth factors; ANOVA: Analysis of variance; ATMPs: Advanced Therapies for Medicinal Products; CPE: cytopathic effect; DEGs: Differentially expressed genes; DMEM: Dulbecco's modified Eagle's Medium; ECM: Extracellular matrix; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FBS: Fetal bovine serum; FDR: False discovery rate; FGF: Fibroblast growth factor; GMP: Good manufacturing practice; HPL: Human platelet lysate; HPL-CM: commercial human platelet lysate; MSCs: mesenchymal stem cells; NEAA: non-essential amino acids; P/S: penicillin/streptomycin; PBS: phosphate buffered saline; PC: leukodepleted platelet concentrate; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; PDGF: Platelet-derived growth factor; PDGFRA: Platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha; qPCR: quantitative polymerase chain reaction; RNA: Ribonucleic acid; RT: Room temperature; TAC: Transcriptome analysis console; TGF-ß: Transforming growth factor beta.

Bioengineered tissue and cell therapy products are efficiently cryopreserved with pathogen-inactivated human platelet lysate-based solutions.

BACKGROUND: There remains much interest in improving cryopreservation techniques for advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs). Recently, human platelet lysate (hPL) has emerged as a promising candidate to replace fetal bovine serum (FBS) as a xeno-free culture supplement for the expansion of human cell therapy products. Whether hPL can also substitute for FBS in cryopreservation procedures remains poorly studied. Here, we evaluated several cryoprotective formulations based on a proprietary hPL for the cryopreservation of bioengineered tissues and cell therapy products. METHODS: We tested different xenogeneic-free, pathogen-inactivated hPL (ihPL)- and non-inactivated-based formulations for cryopreserving bioengineered tissue (cellularized nanostructured fibrin agarose hydrogels (NFAHs)) and common cell therapy products including bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (BM-MSCs), human dermal fibroblasts (FBs) and neural stem cells (NSCs). To assess the tissue and cellular properties post-thaw of NFAHs, we analyzed their cell viability, identity and structural and biomechanical properties. Also, we evaluated cell viability, recovery and identity post-thaw in cryopreserved cells. Further properties like immunomodulation, apoptosis and cell proliferation were assessed in certain cell types. Additionally, we examined the stability of the formulated solutions. The formulations are under a bidding process with MD Bioproducts (Zurich, Switzerland) and are proprietary. RESULTS: Amongst the tissue-specific solutions, Ti5 (low-DMSO and ihPL-based) preserved the viability and the phenotype of embedded cells in NFAHs and preserved the matrix integrity and biomechanical properties similar to those of the standard cryopreservation solution (70% DMEM + 20% FBS + 10% DMSO). All solutions were stable at - 20 °C for at least 3 months. Regarding cell-specific solutions, CeA maintained the viability of all cell types > 80%, preserved the immunomodulatory properties of BM-MSCs and promoted good recovery post-thaw. Besides, both tested solutions were stable at - 20 °C for 18 months. Finally, we established that there is a 3-h window in which thawed NFAHs and FBs maintain optimum viability immersed in the formulated solutions and at least 2 h for BM-MSCs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that pathogen-inactivated solutions Ti5 allocated for bioengineered tissues and CeA allocated for cells are efficient and safe candidates to cryopreserve ATMPs and offer a xenogeneic-free and low-DMSO alternative to commercially available cryoprotective solutions.

Human Neural Stem Cells for Cell-Based Medicinal Products.

Neural stem cells represent an attractive tool for the development of regenerative therapies and are being tested in clinical trials for several neurological disorders. Human neural stem cells can be isolated from the central nervous system or can be derived in vitro from pluripotent stem cells. Embryonic sources are ethically controversial and other sources are less well characterized and/or inefficient. Recently, isolation of NSC from the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with spina bifida and with intracerebroventricular hemorrhage has been reported. Direct reprogramming may become another alternative if genetic and phenotypic stability of the reprogrammed cells is ensured. Here, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of available sources of neural stem cells for the production of cell-based therapies for clinical applications. We review available safety and efficacy clinical data and discuss scalability and quality control considerations for manufacturing clinical grade cell products for successful clinical application.