Screening for Elder Abuse in the Veterans Health Administration: Varied Approaches Across a National Health System.

BACKGROUND: Elder abuse (EA) is common and has devastating health consequences yet is rarely detected by healthcare professionals. While EA screening tools exist, little is known about if and how these tools are implemented in real-world clinical settings. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has experience screening for, and resources to respond to, other forms of interpersonal violence and may provide valuable insights into approaches for EA screening. OBJECTIVE: Describe EA screening practices across a national integrated healthcare system serving a large population of older adults at risk for EA. DESIGN: Survey of all 139 VHA medical centers from January to August 2021. PARTICIPANTS: Surveys were completed by the Social Work Chief, or delegate, at each site. MAIN MEASURES: The survey assessed the presence and characteristics of EA-specific screening practices as well as general abuse/neglect screening conducted with patients of all ages, including older adults. Follow-up emails were sent to sites that reported screening requesting additional details not included in the initial survey. KEY RESULTS: Overall, 130 sites (94%) responded. Among respondents, 5 (4%) reported screening older adults for EA using a previously published tool, while 6 (5%) reported screening for EA with an unstudied or locally developed tool. Forty-eight percent reported screening patients of all ages for general abuse/neglect using unstudied questions/tools, and 44% reported no EA screening at their site. Characteristics of screening programs (e.g., frequency, clinical setting, provider type) varied widely between sites, as did respondents' understanding of the definition of screening. CONCLUSIONS: High variability in screening practices for abuse/neglect and lack of EA-specific screening in a system that has successfully deployed other standardized screening approaches present an important opportunity to standardize and improve EA detection practices. Lessons learned in VHA could help advance the evidence base for EA screening more broadly to increase overall detection rates for EA nationally.

Sleep and Alcohol Use Among Veterans Living With Long COVID.

OBJECTIVES: Study objectives were to: (1) better understand sleep experiences and unhealthy alcohol use among Veterans with long COVID and (2) explore providers' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to delivering evidence-based care for sleep problems and unhealthy alcohol use in patients with long COVID. METHODS: VA electronic health records were used to conduct chart reviews (n = 57) of patients evaluated in a VA COVID-19 Recovery Clinic during 1 calendar year; semi-structured interviews were completed with Veterans (n = 5) and clinicians (n = 7) recruited from the clinic. Veteran participants also completed quantitative, self-report measures assessing sleep- and alcohol-related experiences and behaviors. RESULTS: Data from chart reviews and interviews suggested that Veterans with long COVID often had pre-existing sleep problems that were exacerbated during long COVID. Patients and providers agreed that sleep interventions would be beneficial and acceptable in the COVID-19 Recovery clinic. Conversely, few Veterans with long COVID had a pre-existing alcohol use disorder (AUD) diagnosis; alcohol use occurred less frequently and was less often discussed between patients and providers. Providers had mixed viewpoints on delivering alcohol-related care in the clinic; some were highly amenable, others were unsure whether patients would be receptive. CONCLUSIONS: This study is among the first to take a mixed-method approach to understanding experiences of sleep-wake behaviors and unhealthy alcohol use in Veterans with long COVID. Characterizing sleep and alcohol-related experiences, examining associations with functioning, and exploring perspectives on treatment approaches is critical to support efforts to refine, personalize, and optimize evidence-based sleep and alcohol care for Veterans living with long COVID.

Quality of Life in Patients With Recurrent and Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: In the setting of similar outcomes, quality of life (QOL) measures can be utilized to compare treatment modalities in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We evaluate QOL and symptoms in patients treated for primary, second primary, and recurrent HNSCC. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Head and neck cancer survivorship clinic. METHODS: We identified patients seen between 2016 and 2019. QOL and symptoms were assessed with the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaire, 10-item Eating Assessment Tool, 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire, 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Neck Disability Index. Regression analysis was utilized to explore associations and compare QOL outcomes. RESULTS: Our cohort comprised 662 patients: 546 with primary HNSCC, 34 with second primary HNSCC, and 82 with recurrent HNSCC. Multimodality therapy was associated with lower UW-QOL Physical Subscale (UW-QOL-PS) vs single modality: chemoradiation therapy (-12.17 [95% CI, -16.57 to -7.78]) and surgery + postadjuvant treatment (-12.11 [-16.06 to -8.16]). Multimodality therapy was also associated with lower UW-QOL Social-Emotional Subscale (UW-QOL-SS): chemoradiation therapy (-6.70 [-11.41 to -1.99]) and surgery + postadjuvant treatment (-7.41 [-11.63 to -3.19]). Recurrence (-14.42 [-18.80 to -10.04]) and second primary (-11.15 [-17.71 to -4.59]) demonstrated lower UW-QOL-PS vs primary. Radiation for recurrence or second primary had worse UW-QOL-PS (-10.43 [-19.27 to -1.59]) and UW-QOL-SS (-10.58 [-18.76 to -1.54]) and higher Eating Assessment Tool (6.08 [1.39-10.77]) than surgery alone. Surgery + postadjuvant treatment showed worse UW-QOL-PS (-12.65 [-23.76 to -1.54]) and UW-QOL-SS (-12.20 [-22.38 to -2.03]). CONCLUSION: Multimodality therapy, particularly with recurrent and second primary HNSCC, is more likely to contribute to diminished QOL and symptoms. This important consideration should play a role in framing informed discussions with patients regarding treatment.

Health Literacy and Adherence to Clinical Recommendations in Head and Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND: After definitive cancer treatment, survivors of head and neck cancer (HNC) are commonly recommended to participate in therapies aimed at reducing the burden of treatment-related side effects. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluated whether adherence to referral to physical therapy (PT) and speech-language pathology therapy (SLPT) is related to patient health literacy (HL). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients attending a multidisciplinary HNC survivorship clinic between 2017 and 2019. HL was measured using the Brief Health Literacy Screen, with scores below 10 indicating inadequate HL. Chi-square and logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between HL and adherence to PT or SLPT referral. KEY RESULTS: From the overall cohort (N = 454), 80 patients (18%) had inadequate HL. Compared to those with adequate HL, patients with inadequate HL were significantly less likely to complete initial PT evaluation (74% vs. 58%, p = .034) but were not significantly less likely to complete initial SLPT evaluation (70% vs. 61%, p = .37). After adjusting for age, primary tumor site, and treatment stage, we found that patients with inadequate HL were half as likely to follow up for initial PT evaluation (odds ratio 0.45, p = .032). CONCLUSION: Overall, inadequate HL is associated with reduced adherence to PT but is not associated with adherence to SLPT among HNC survivors. These results highlight the clinical importance of HL and underscore the need for interventions to facilitate adherence to treatment for patients with inadequate HL. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2023;7(1):e52-e60.].

Association Between Patient-Reported Symptoms of Dysphagia and Psychological Distress in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of and the association between patient-reported dysphagia and psychological distress (anxiety and depression) in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors. SAMPLE & SETTING: 228 HNC survivors seen at an interprofessional survivorship clinic in Pittsburgh, PA, between October 2018 and January 2020. METHODS & VARIABLES: Dysphagia was evaluated using the Eating Assessment Tool. Anxiety and depression were measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-8, respectively. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression were performed. RESULTS: 70% (n = 159) of survivors reported problems with swallowing safely and efficiently. Twenty-seven survivors reported symptoms of major depression, 34 reported mild symptoms of anxiety, and 19 reported moderate to severe symptoms of anxiety and depression. After controlling for treatment modality, age, and stage, dysphagia was associated with increased symptoms of anxiety and depression. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses can inform their daily practice by implementing regular assessments for anxiety and depression in HNC survivors reporting symptoms of dysphagia.

Flourishing in head and neck cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: There is a growing cohort of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients affected by late- and long-term posttreatment side effects. Our study evaluates the relationship between the demographics, clinical characteristics, and posttreatment symptom burden with the subjective sense of flourishing among HNC survivors. METHODS: A cross-sectional, single-center study of adult survivors of squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx/hypopharynx who completed the Secure Flourishing Index (SFI) and patient-reported outcomes related to depression, anxiety, swallowing dysfunction, neck disability, and insomnia between November 2020 and April 2021. RESULTS: A total of 100, predominantly male (86%), survivors with an average age of 63.0 ± 9.6 were included in the study. Univariable analysis showed a significant association between higher flourishing scores and advanced age (95% CI: [0.011, 0.84], p = 0.0441), normal diet (95% CI: [5.79, 31.18], p = 0.0149), employment (95% CI: [1.24, 17.20], p = 0.0239), higher income (95% CI: [7.30, 27.72], p = 0.0248), and decreased reported difficulty paying for needs (95% CI: [-33.46, -18.88], p < 0.001). Flourishing was inversely associated with higher symptoms of depression (95% CI: [-2.23, -1.15], p < 0.001), anxiety (95% CI: [-1.92,-0.86], p < 0.001), swallowing dysfunction (95% CI: [-0.77, -0.26], p < 0.001), neck disability (95% CI: [-1.05, -0.35], p < 0.001), and insomnia (95% CI: [-1.12, -0.22], p = 0.004) in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Common late- and long-term side effects of HNC treatment and financial hardship are associated with lower levels of flourishing or a more negative perception of life after treatment. Results highlight the importance of symptom burden for survivors' overall evaluation of their quality of life.