Variation in the Guidelines for the Acute Management of Anaphylaxis in Pediatric Patients: An International Narrative Review.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence-based guidelines have been created and disseminated by multiple organizations to standardize the care of pediatric patients with anaphylaxis. Differences across these guidelines can cause confusion and potentially errors in clinical practice leading to patient harm. The aim of this study was to describe and identify patterns of variation in the current guidelines. METHODS: A narrative review with 3 major components was designed. First, a narrative review of current, peer-reviewed, guidelines published by national and international allergy and immunology, pediatric, and emergency medicine organizations was performed. That was followed by a gray literature review of guidelines by resuscitation councils and national health organizations. The third component focused on the translation of these guidelines at local and institutional levels by reviewing clinical pathways published by academic institutions. RESULTS: With regard to the fixed epinephrine autoinjector dosing, 50% (6 of 12) of the reviewed guidelines offered weight-based and 41.7% (5 of 12) age-based dosing recommendations. Furthermore, different weight cutoffs for the 0.15- and 0.3-mg autoinjectors were identified among guidelines. Variation was identified in the description of intramuscular epinephrine concentration ("1:1000," "1 mg/mL," or both), the recommended concentration for intravenous administration ("1:10,000" or "1:1000"), or the rate of infusion or titration. Eight of the 12 guidelines (66.7%) recommend a dose in milligrams, and 33.3% (4 of 12) in micrograms. Five of 12 (41.7%) used both milliliters and milligrams or micrograms. CONCLUSIONS: Notable variation in the current guidelines for the acute management of anaphylaxis in the pediatric population was identified. Flagging this variability could help inform a consensus-based approach toward harmonization of guidelines, which in turn could streamline the management of anaphylaxis in pediatric patients across the United States, Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, and hopefully prevent errors and mitigate patient harm.

The Role of Advanced Practice Providers in Pediatric Emergency Care Across Nine Emergency Departments.

OBJECTIVES: Advance practice providers (APPs) have been increasingly incorporated into emergency department (ED) staffing. The objective of this study was to describe patient factors that predict when pediatric patient care is provided by APPs and/or physicians. We hypothesized that APPs care for a significant proportion of pediatric patients and are more likely to care for lower acuity patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of encounters in patients aged younger than 18 years across 9 EDs from January 2018 to December 2019. Data on age, acuity level, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code, procedures performed, disposition, provider type, and length of stay were extracted from the electronic health record. RESULTS: Of 159,035 patient encounters, 37% were cared for by an APP (30% APP independently, 7% physician + APP) and 63% by physicians independently. Advance practice providers were more likely to care for lower acuity patients (60.8% vs 4.4%, P < 0.05) and those in EDs with less pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) coverage (33.4% vs 6.8%, P < 0.05). In an adjusted multinomic regression model, APPs were less likely than physicians to care for high-acuity patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.09), admitted patients (OR, 0.31; CI, 0.28-0.35) and patients in EDs with more PEM coverage (OR, 0.09; CI, 0.09-0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Advance practice providers cared for more than one third of pediatric patients and tended to care for lower acuity patients and for patients in EDs with less PEM coverage. These data highlight the importance of integrating APPs into initiatives aiming to improve pediatric emergency care.

Dissemination, Utilization, and Satisfaction With Emergency Medicine Resident Simulation Curriculum for Pediatrics (EM ReSCu Peds) by North American Residency Programs.

OBJECTIVES: Our research team's primary objective was to investigate how a custom standard simulation curriculum for teaching emergency medicine residents about pediatrics was being used by programs across North America. We also wanted to know if program directors were satisfied with the curriculum and whether they had challenges with implementing it. Our long-term goal is to promote the Emergency Medicine Resident Simulation Curriculum for Pediatrics for use by all programs in the United States. METHODS: We distributed an electronic questionnaire to individuals who have downloaded the Emergency Medicine Resident Simulation Curriculum for Pediatrics in the form of an e-book from the Academic Life in Emergency Medicine Web site. The curriculum was marketed through national emergency medicine (EM) and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) groups, PEM listserv, and through the International Network for Simulation-Based Pediatric Innovation, Research, and Education. We asked survey recipients how they used the curriculum, plans for future maintenance, satisfaction with curriculum use, and whether they had any challenges with implementation. Finally, we asked demographic questions. RESULTS: Most survey respondents were EM or PEM health care physicians in the United States or Canada. Respondents' primary goal of using the curriculum was resident education. Through assessment with the Net Promoter Score, satisfaction with the curriculum was net positive with users largely scoring as curriculum promoters. We found COVID-19 and overall time limitations to be implementation barriers, whereas learner interest in topics was the largest cited facilitator. Most responders plan to continue to implement either selected cases or the entire curriculum in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Of those who responded, our target audience of EM physicians used our curriculum the most. Further investigation on implementation needs, specifically for lower resource emergency programs, is needed.

A Comparison of State-Specific Pediatric Emergency Medical Facility Recognition Programs, 2020.

OBJECTIVES: Prior research suggests that the presence of state-specific pediatric emergency medical facility recognition programs (PFRPs) is associated with high emergency department (ED) pediatric readiness. The PFRPs aim to improve the quality of pediatric emergency care, but individual state programs differ. We aimed to describe the variation in PFRP characteristics and verification requirements and to describe the availability of pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) in states with PFRPs. METHODS: In mid-2020, we collected information about each PFRP from 3 sources: the state Emergency Medical Services for Children (EMSC) website, the EMSC Innovation and Improvement Center website, or via communication with the state's EMSC program manager. For each state with a PFRP, we documented program characteristics, including program start date, number of tiers, whether participation was required/optional, and requirements for verification. RESULTS: Overall, we identified 17 states with active PFRPs. Five states had only 1 tier or level of recognition whereas the others had multiple. All programs did require presence of a PECC for verification. However, some PRFPs with multiple verification tiers did not require presence of a PECC to achieve each level of verification. In states with PFRPs, EDs with higher total visit volumes, a separate pediatric ED area, located in the Northeast, and earlier program start date were all more likely to have a PECC. CONCLUSIONS: There is variation in state PFRPs, although all prioritize the presence of a PECC. We encourage further research on the effect of different aspects of PFRPs on patient outcomes.

Emergency Department Pediatric Readiness Among US Trauma Centers: A Machine Learning Analysis of Components Associated With Survival.

OBJECTIVE: We used machine learning to identify the highest impact components of emergency department (ED) pediatric readiness for predicting in-hospital survival among children cared for in US trauma centers. BACKGROUND: ED pediatric readiness is associated with improved short-term and long-term survival among injured children and part of the national verification criteria for US trauma centers. However, the components of ED pediatric readiness most predictive of survival are unknown. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of injured children below 18 years treated in 458 trauma centers from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2017, matched to the 2013 National ED Pediatric Readiness Assessment and the American Hospital Association survey. We used machine learning to analyze 265 potential predictors of survival, including 152 ED readiness variables, 29 patient variables, and 84 ED-level and hospital-level variables. The primary outcome was in-hospital survival. RESULTS: There were 274,756 injured children, including 4585 (1.7%) who died. Nine ED pediatric readiness components were associated with the greatest increase in survival: policy for mental health care (+8.8% change in survival), policy for patient assessment (+7.5%), specific respiratory equipment (+7.2%), policy for reduced-dose radiation imaging (+7.0%), physician competency evaluations (+4.9%), recording weight in kilograms (+3.2%), life support courses for nursing (+1.0%-2.5%), and policy on pediatric triage (+2.5%). There was a 268% improvement in survival when the 5 highest impact components were present. CONCLUSIONS: ED pediatric readiness components related to specific policies, personnel, and equipment were the strongest predictors of pediatric survival and worked synergistically when combined.

The Management of Children and Youth With Pediatric Mental and Behavioral Health Emergencies.

Mental and behavioral health (MBH) emergencies in children and youth continue to increasingly affect not only the emergency department (ED), but the entire spectrum of emergency medical services for children, from prehospital services to the community. Inadequate community and institutional infrastructure to care for children and youth with MBH conditions makes the ED an essential part of the health care safety net for these patients. As a result, an increasing number of children and youth are referred to the ED for evaluation of a broad spectrum of MBH emergencies, from depression and suicidality to disruptive and aggressive behavior. However, challenges in providing optimal care to these patients include lack of personnel, capacity, and infrastructure, challenges with timely access to a mental health professional, the nature of a busy ED environment, and paucity of outpatient post-ED discharge resources. These factors contribute to prolonged ED stays and boarding, which negatively affects patient care and ED operations. Strategies to improve care for MBH emergencies, including systems level coordination of care, is therefore essential. The goal of this policy statement and its companion technical report is to highlight strategies, resources, and recommendations for improving emergency care delivery for pediatric MBH.

Frequency, Type, and Degree of Potential Harm of Adverse Safety Events among Pediatric Emergency Medical Services Encounters.

BACKGROUND: Only 5-10% of emergency medical services (EMS) patients are children, and most pediatric encounters are low-acuity. EMS chart review has been used to identify adverse safety events (ASEs) in high-acuity and high-risk pediatric encounters. The objective of this work was to evaluate the frequency, type, and potential harm of ASEs in varied acuity pediatric EMS encounters. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated pediatric (ages 0-18 years) prehospital records from 15 EMS agencies among three states (Colorado, Connecticut, and Rhode Island) between November 2019 and October 2021. Research associates used a previously validated tool to analyze electronic EMS and hospital records. Adverse safety events were recorded in six care categories, grouped into four levels for analysis: assessment/diagnosis/clinical decision-making, procedures, medication administration (including O2), and fluid administration, and defined across five types of ASEs: Unintended injuries or consequences, Near misses, Suboptimal actions, Errors, and Management complications (UNSEMs). Type and frequency of ASEs in each category were rated in three harm severities: Harm Unlikely, Mild/Temporary, or Permanent/Severe. Three physicians verified ASEs determined by research associates. Frequency of ASEs and harm likelihood are reported. RESULTS: Records for 508 EMS patients were reviewed, with 63 (12.4%) transported using lights and sirens. At least one clinical intervention beyond assessment/diagnosis/clinical decision-making was documented for 183 (36.1%, 95% CI: 31.8, 40.4) patients. A total of 162 ASEs were identified for 112 patients (22.1%, 95% CI: 18.5, 25.7). Suboptimal actions were the most frequent UNSEM (n = 66, 40.7%; 95% CI: 33.1, 48.3). For ASEs, (n = 162), the most frequent associations were with procedures 39.5% (95% CI: 32.0, 47.0) or assessment/diagnosis/clinical decision making, 32.1%, (95% CI: 24.9, 39.3). Among care categories, fluid administration was associated with significantly more UNSEMs (58.1%, 95% CI:53.8, 62.4). Most ASEs were determined to be 'Harm Unlikely' 62.4% (95% CI: 54.4, 70.4), with assessment/diagnosis/clinical decision making having significantly fewer ASEs with documented harm (22.4%, 95% CI: 10.7, 34.1) compared to other care categories. CONCLUSION: Over 20% of pediatric EMS encounters had an identified ASE, and most were unlikely to cause harm. Most frequent ASEs were likely to be associated with procedures and assessment/diagnosis/clinical decision-making.

Pediatric Emergency Care Coordination in EMS Agencies: Findings of a Multistate Learning Collaborative.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, the Health Resources and Services Administration's Maternal Child and Health Bureau's Emergency Medical Services for Children program implemented a performance measure for State Partnership grants to increase the percentage of EMS agencies within each state that have designated individuals who coordinate pediatric emergency care, also called a pediatric emergency care coordinator (PECC). The PECC Learning Collaborative (PECCLC) was established to identify best practices to achieve this goal. This study's objective is to report on the structure and outcomes of the PECCLC conducted among nine states. METHODS: This study used quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate outcomes from the PECCLC. Participating state representatives engaged in a 6-month collaborative that included monthly learning sessions with subject matter experts and support staff and concluded with a two-day in-person meeting. Outcomes included reporting the number of PECCs recruited, identifying barriers and enablers to PECC recruitment, characterizing best practices to support PECCs, and identifying barriers and enablers to enhance and sustain the PECC role. Outcomes were captured by self-report from participating state representatives and longitudinal qualitative interviews conducted with representative PECCs at 6 and 18 months after conclusion of the PECCLC. RESULTS: During the 6-month collaborative, states recruited 341 PECCs (92% of goal). Follow up at 5 months post-collaborative revealed an additional recruitment of 184 for a total of 525 PECCs (142% of the goal). Feedback from state representatives and PECCs revealed the following barriers: competition from other EMS responsibilities, budgetary constraints, lack of incentive for agencies to create the position, and lack of requirement for establishing the role. Enablers identified included having an EMS agency recognition program that includes the PECC role, train-the-trainer programs, and inclusion of the PECC role in agency licensure requirements. Longitudinal interviews with PECCs identified that the most common activity associated with their role was pediatric-specific education and the most important need for PECC success was agency-level support. CONCLUSION: Over the 6-month Learning Collaborative, nine states were successful in recruiting a substantial number of PECCs. Financial and time constraints were significant barriers to statewide PECC recruitment, yet these can be potentially addressed by EMS agency recognition programs.

Evaluation of Pediatric Readiness Using Simulation in General Emergency Departments in a Medically Underserved Region.

BACKGROUND: Regionalization of pediatric care in the United States was developed to improve care by directing patients to hospitals with optimal pediatric resources and experience, leading to less pediatric-trained providers in medically underserved areas. Children with emergencies, however, continue to present to local general emergency departments (GEDs), where pediatric emergencies are low-frequency, high-risk events. OBJECTIVE: The goals of this project were to: increase exposure of GEDs in the southeast United States to pediatric emergencies through simulation, assess pediatric emergency clinical care processes with simulation, describe factors associated with readiness including volume of pediatric patients and ED location (urban/rural), and compare these findings to the 2013 National Pediatric Readiness Project. METHODS: This prospective in situ simulation study evaluated GED readiness using the Emergency Medical Services for Children Pediatric Readiness Score (PRS) and team performance in caring for 4 simulated pediatric emergencies. Comparisons between GED and pediatric ED (PED) performance and PRS, GED performance, and PRS based on pediatric patient volume and hospital location were evaluated. A Composite Quality Score (CQS) was calculated for each ED. RESULTS: Seventy-five teams from 40 EDs participated (39 GED; 1 PED). The PED had a significantly higher volume of pediatric patients (73,000 vs 4492; P = 0.003). The PRS for GEDs was significantly lower (57% [SD, 17] vs 98%; P = 0.022). The CQSs for all GEDs were significantly lower than the PED (55% vs 87%; P < 0.004). Among GEDs, there was no statistically significant difference in PRS or CQS based on pediatric patient volume, but urban GEDs had significantly higher CQSs versus rural GEDs (59.8% vs 50.6%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a significant disparity in the performance and readiness of GEDs versus a PED in a medically underserved area. More education and better access to resources is needed in these areas to adequately care for critically ill pediatric patients.

Availability of Pediatric Emergency Care Coordinators in US Emergency Departments in 2018.

OBJECTIVES: In 2007, the US Institute of Medicine recommended that every emergency department (ED) appoint pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs). Despite this recommendation, our national surveys showed that few (17%) US EDs reported at least 1 PECC in 2015. This number increased slightly to 19% in 2016 and 20% in 2017. The current study objectives were to determine the following: percent of US EDs with at least 1 PECC in 2018, factors associated with availability of at least 1 PECC in 2018, and factors associated with addition of at least 1 PECC between 2015 and 2018. METHODS: In 2019, we conducted a survey of all US EDs to characterize emergency care in 2018. Using the National ED Inventory-USA database, we identified 5514 EDs open in 2018. This survey collected availability of at least 1 PECC in 2018. A similar survey was administered in 2016 and identified availability of at least 1 PECC in 2015. RESULTS: Overall, 4781 (87%) EDs responded to the 2018 survey. Among 4764 EDs with PECC data, 1037 (22%) reported having at least 1 PECC. Three states (Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island) had PECCs in 100% of EDs. The EDs in the Northeast and with higher visit volumes were more likely to have at least 1 PECC in 2018 (all P < 0.001). Similarly, EDs in the Northeast and with higher visit volumes were more likely to add a PECC between 2015 and 2018 (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The availability of PECCs in EDs remains low (22%), with a small increase in national prevalence between 2015 and 2018. Northeast states report a high PECC prevalence, but more work is needed to appoint PECCs in all other regions.

Improving the Quality of Clinical Care of Children with Diabetic Ketoacidosis in General Emergency Departments Following a Collaborative Improvement Program with an Academic Medical Center.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a collaborative initiative between a group of general emergency departments (EDs) and an academic medical center (AMC) on the process of care provided to patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) across these EDs. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study (January 2015 to December 2018) of all pediatric patients <18 years who presented with DKA to participating EDs and were subsequently admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit at the AMC. Our multifaceted intervention included simulation with postsimulation debriefing, targeted assessment reports, distribution of DKA best practices, pediatric DKA module, and scheduled check-in visits. The process of clinical care was measured by adherence to the pediatric DKA 9-item checklist. Adherence was scored based on the number of items performed correctly and calculated using equal weight for items and dividing by the total number of items. Patients' clinical outcomes also were collected. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients with DKA were included in the analysis; 38 patients were in the preintervention, and 47 were in the postintervention. There was a statistically significant improvement in adherence to the DKA checklist from 77.8% to 88.9%. Two of the 9 checklist items (hourly glucose check and appropriate fluid rate) showed statistically significant improvement. No significant change in patient clinical outcomes was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Our collaborative initiative resulted in significant improvements in adherence to pediatric DKA best practices across a group of general EDs. A collaborative approach between general EDs and AMCs is an effective improvement strategy for pediatric emergency care.

Improving Pediatric Readiness and Clinical Care in General Emergency Departments: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a collaborative initiative between general emergency departments (EDs) and the pediatric academic medical center on the process of clinical care in a group of general EDs. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study assessed the process of clinical care delivered to critically ill children presenting to 3 general EDs. Our previous multifaceted intervention included the following components: postsimulation debriefing, designation of a pediatric champion, customized performance reports, pediatric resources toolkit, and ongoing interactions. Five pediatric emergency care physicians conducted chart reviews and scored encounters using the Pediatric Emergency Care Research Network's Quality of Care Implicit Review Instrument, which assigns scores between 5 and 35 across 5 domains. In addition, safety metrics were collected for medication, imaging, and laboratory orders. RESULTS: A total of 179 ED encounters were reviewed, including 103 preintervention and 76 postintervention encounters, with an improvement in mean total quality score from 23.30 (SD 5.1) to 24.80 (4.0). In the domain of physician initial treatment plan and initial orders, scores increased from a mean of 4.18 (0.13) to 4.61 (0.15). In the category of safety, administration of wrong medications decreased from 28.2% to 11.8% after the intervention. CONCLUSION: A multifaceted collaborative initiative involving simulation and enhanced pediatric readiness was associated with improvement in the processes of care in general EDs. This work provides evidence that innovative collaborations between academic medical centers and general EDs may serve as an effective strategy to improve pediatric care.

Comparison of a dichotomous versus trichotomous checklist for neonatal intubation.

BACKGROUND: To compare validity evidence for dichotomous and trichotomous versions of a neonatal intubation (NI) procedural skills checklist. METHODS: NI skills checklists were developed utilizing an existing framework. Experts were trained on scoring using dichotomous and trichotomous checklists, and rated recordings of 23 providers performing simulated NI. Videolaryngoscope recordings of glottic exposure were evaluated using Cormack-Lehane (CL) and Percent of Glottic Opening scales. Internal consistency and reliability of both checklists were analyzed, and correlations between checklist scores, airway visualization, entrustable professional activities (EPA), and global skills assessment (GSA) were calculated. RESULTS: During rater training, raters gave significantly higher scores on better provider performance in standardized videos (both p < 0.001). When utilized to evaluate study participants' simulated NI attempts, both dichotomous and trichotomous checklist scores demonstrated very good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.868 and 0.840, respectively). Inter-rater reliability was higher for dichotomous than trichotomous checklists [Fleiss kappa of 0.642 and 0.576, respectively (p < 0.001)]. Sum checklist scores were significantly different among providers in different disciplines (p < 0.001, dichotomous and trichotomous). Sum dichotomous checklist scores correlated more strongly than trichotomous scores with GSA and CL grades. Sum dichotomous and trichotomous checklist scores correlated similarly well with EPA. CONCLUSIONS: Neither dichotomous or trichotomous checklist was superior in discriminating provider NI skill when compared to GSA, EPA, or airway visualization assessment. Sum scores from dichotomous checklists may provide sufficient information to assess procedural competence, but trichotomous checklists may permit more granular feedback to learners and educators. The checklist selected may vary with assessment needs.

Emergency Medical Services Provider Acceptance of and Attitudes About Pediatric SimBox Simulations.

OBJECTIVE: SimBox simulations allow for high-frequency open-access health care education, overcoming cost and resource barriers. Prehospital paramedics and emergency medical technician (EMT) care for children infrequently. In this study, prehospital providers evaluated pediatric SimBox simulations. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of EMS professionals participating in a series of simulations conducted in a larger project assessing improvement of the quality of pediatric care in the prehospital setting. Participants were teams of two, which comprised a paramedic/paramedic, paramedic/EMT, or 2 EMTs. The simulations used facilitator resources, debriefing prompts, video depictions of patients and vital signs, and a low-fidelity manikin. Pediatric emergency care coordinators, EMS training officers, and/or emergency physicians facilitated simulations of seizure, sepsis with respiratory failure, and child abuse, followed by debriefings. Participants completed an online survey after the simulation and rated it in 4 domains: prebriefing, scenario content, debriefing, and overall. Ratings were trifold: "strongly agree," "somewhat agree," or "do not agree." Data were analyzed by case type, participant type, location, participant reaction to simulation elements, and the debriefing. Net Promoter Scores were calculated to assess participant endorsement of SimBox. RESULTS: There were 121 participants: 103 (87%) were paramedics, and 18 (13%) were EMTs. Participant agreement of simulation benefit for clinical practice was high, for example, "I am more confident in my ability to prioritize care and interventions" (98.4% strongly or somewhat agree), and 99.2% of participants agreed the postsimulation debriefing with facilitators "provided opportunities to self-reflect on my performance during simulation." Overall, 97.5% strongly or somewhat agreed that the simulations "improved my comfort in pediatric acute care." Net Promoter Score showed 65.3% were promoters of and 24% were passive about SimBox. CONCLUSION: SimBox simulations are associated with improved self-efficacy of prehospital care providers for care of acutely ill or injured children. The majority promotes SimBox as a learning tool.

A Regional Intervention to Appoint Pediatric Emergency Care Coordinators in New England Emergency Departments.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe our expansion of a Massachusetts grassroots initiative-to increase the appointment of pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) in emergency departments (EDs)-to all 6 New England states. METHODS: We conducted annual surveys of all EDs in New England from 2015 to 2020 regarding 2014 to 2019, respectively. Data collection included ED characteristics. The intervention from 2018 to 2019 relied on principles of self-organization and collaboration with local stakeholders including state Emergency Medical Services for Children agencies, American College of Emergency Physician state chapters, and Emergency Nursing Association state chapters to help encourage appointment of at least 1 PECC to every ED. Most ED leadership were contacted in person at regional meetings, by e-mail and/or telephone. We reached out to each individual ED to both educate and encourage action. RESULTS: Survey response rates were greater than 85% in all years. From 2014 to 2016, less than 30% of New England EDs reported a PECC. In 2017, 51% of EDs in New England reported a PECC, whereas in 2019, 91% of New England EDs reported a PECC. All other ED characteristics remained relatively consistent from 2014 to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully expanded a Massachusetts grassroots initiative to appoint PECCs to all of New England. Through individual outreach, and using principles of self-organization and creating collaborations with local stakeholders, we were able to increase the prevalence of PECCs in New England EDs from less than 30% to greater than 90%. This framework also led to the creation of a New England-wide PECC network and has fostered ongoing collaboration and communication throughout the region.

A Workplace Procedure Training Cart to Augment Pediatric Resident Procedural Learning.

OBJECTIVE: Our primary aim was to describe pediatric residents' use of a workplace procedural training cart. An exploratory aim was to examine if the cart associated with increased resident procedural experiences with real patients. METHODS: Guided by the procedural training construct of "Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, Maintain," we created a novel workplace procedural training cart with videos (learn and see) and simulation equipment (practice and prove). An electronic logbook recorded resident use data, and a brief survey solicited residents' perceptions of the cart's educational impact. We queried our electronic medical record to compare the proportion of real procedures completed by residents before and after the intervention. RESULTS: From August 1 to December 31, 2019, 24 pediatric residents (10 interns and 14 seniors) rotated in the pediatric emergency department. Twenty-one cart encounters were logged, mostly by interns (67% [14/21]). The 21 cart encounters yielded 32 learning activities (8 videos watched and 24 procedures practiced), reflecting the residents' interest in laceration repair (50% [4/8], 54% [13/24]) and lumbar puncture (38% [3/8], 33% [8/24]). All users agreed (29% [6/21]) or strongly agreed (71% [15/21]) the cart encouraged practice and improved confidence in independently performing procedures. No changes were observed in the proportion of actual procedures completed by residents. CONCLUSIONS: A workplace procedural training cart was used mostly by pediatric interns. The cart cultivated residents' perceived confidence in real procedures but was not used by all residents or influenced residents' procedural behaviors in the pediatric emergency department.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum for Endotracheal Tube Confirmation for Pediatric Critical Care Transport Team Through Remote Learning and Teleguidance.

OBJECTIVE: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is used to manage patients in real time. This study aimed to teach pediatric critical care team members to use POCUS for endotracheal tube (ETT) placement confirmation. A secondary aim was to assess the feasibility of a remote curriculum for this purpose. METHODS: The Kern 6-step approach was used. The curriculum involved virtual didactics, asynchronous learning modules, and remote hands-on sessions using teleguidance with the Butterfly IQ+ probe, Butterfly Network, Inc, Guilford, CT. Participants learned direct and indirect methods of ETT placement confirmation and were directed to practice independently. Outcomes included attitudes and satisfaction, knowledge and skills acquisition and retention, and the use of POCUS on shift. RESULTS: Ten participants completed the curriculum. The average knobology and quiz scores improved by 29.3% and 20.8%, respectively. Improvement was sustained at re-evaluation. Seven of 10 participants performed independent scans. At the 3-month reassessment, most demonstrated mastery of thoracic scans. All required prompting for satisfactory tracheal scans. All felt positively toward POCUS and the remote curriculum. CONCLUSION: Pediatric critical care team members acquired and retained knowledge and skills for POCUS basics and ETT placement confirmation through a remote curriculum. Participants were satisfied with the course. Further studies are needed to reassess longer-term knowledge and skill retention and the effects on patient outcomes.

Availability of Pediatric Emergency Care Coordinators in United States Emergency Departments.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the availability of pediatric emergency care coordinators (PECCs) in US emergency departments (EDs) in 2015, and to determine the change in availability of PECCs in US EDs from 2015 to 2017. STUDY DESIGN: As part of the National Emergency Department Inventory-USA, we administered a survey to all 5326 US EDs open in 2015; all 5431 in 2016; and all 5489 in 2017. Through these surveys, we assessed the availability of PECCs. Descriptive statistics characterized EDs with and without PECCs; multivariable logistic regressions identified characteristics independently associated with PECC availability. RESULTS: Among the 4443 (83%) EDs with 2015 data, 763 (17.2%) reported the availability of at least 1 PECC. The states with the largest proportion of EDs with PECCs were Delaware (78%, 7/9 EDs) and Maryland (48%, 20/42 EDs), and no PECCs were reported in Mississippi, North Dakota, or Wyoming. Availability of a PECC was associated (P < .001) with larger annual total ED visit volume and a dedicated pediatric ED area. Compared with the 17.2% of EDs reporting a PECC in 2015, 833 (18.6%) reported 1 in 2016, and 917 (19.8%) reported 1 in 2017 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Availability of at least 1 PECC increased slightly (2.6%) between 2015 and 2017, but ∼80% of EDs continue without one.

Improving Pediatric Readiness in General Emergency Departments: A Prospective Interventional Study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of a national interventional collaborative on pediatric readiness within general emergency departments (EDs). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, multicenter, interventional study measured pediatric readiness in general EDs before and after participation in a pediatric readiness improvement intervention. Pediatric readiness was assessed using the weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS) on a 100-point scale. The study protocol extended over 6 months and involved 3 phases: (1) a baseline on-site assessment of pediatric readiness and simulated quality of care; (2) pediatric readiness interventions; and (3) a follow-up on-site assessment of WPRS. The intervention phase included a benchmarking performance report, resources toolkits, and ongoing interactions between general EDs and academic medical centers. RESULTS: Thirty-six general EDs were enrolled, and 34 (94%) completed the study. Four EDs (11%) were located in Canada, and the rest were in the US. The mean improvement in WPRS was 16.3 (P < .001) from a baseline of 62.4 (SEM = 2.2) to 78.7 (SEM = 2.1), with significant improvement in the domains of administration/coordination of care; policies, protocol, and procedures; and quality improvement. Six EDs (17%) were fully adherent to the protocol timeline. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a collaborative intervention model including simulation and quality improvement initiatives is associated with improvement in WPRS when disseminated to a diverse group of general EDs partnering with their regional pediatric academic medical centers. This work provides evidence that innovative collaboration facilitated by academic medical centers can serve as an effective strategy to improve pediatric readiness and processes of care.

ACEP SimBox: A Pediatric Simulation-Based Training Innovation.

Thirty million pediatric visits (<18 years old) occur across 5,000 US emergency departments (EDs) each year, with most of these cases presenting to community EDs. Simulation-based training is an effective method to improve and sustain EDs' readiness to triage and stabilize critically ill infants and children, but large simulation centers are mostly concentrated at academic hospitals. The use of pediatric simulation-based training has been limited in the community ED setting due to the high cost of equipment and limited access to content experts in pediatric critical care. We designed an innovative "off-the-shelf" simulation-based training resource, "American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) SimBox," that provides a free low-technology manikin along with teaching aids and train-the-trainer materials to community EDs to run a simulation drill in their own workspaces with local educators. The goal was to develop an "off-the-shelf," free, open-access, simulation-based resource to improve the readiness of community EDs to triage, resuscitate, and transfer critically ill infants as measured by presimulation and postsimulation surveys measuring opinions regarding the scenario, session experience, and most valuable aspect of the session. Between January 2018 and December 2019, 179 ACEP SimBoxes were shipped across the United States, reaching 36 of 50 states. Facilitators and participants who completed the postsimulation survey evaluated the session as a valuable use of their time. All facilitator respondents reported that the low-technology manikins, paired with their institution-specific equipment, were sufficient for learning, thus reducing costs. All participant respondents reported an increased commitment to pediatric readiness for their ED after completing the simulation session. This innovation resulted in the implementation of a unique simulation-based training intervention across many community EDs in the United States. The ACEP SimBox innovation demonstrates that an easy to use and unique simulation-based training tool can be developed, distributed, and implemented across many community EDs in the United States to help improve community ED pediatric readiness.