Survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer according to lymph node disease: single pN1 vs multiple pN1 vs single unsuspected pN2.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to describe the characteristics and survival of NSCLC patients treated with surgery and single pN1 disease, multiple pN1, and single unsuspected pN2. METHODS: In 2005-2009, we treated 378 lung cancer patients with surgery with radical intent; 152 cases were pN1 or pN2. We excluded patients with neoadjuvant treatment, incomplete resection, incomplete lymph node dissection, metastasis, cN2 disease, multiple pN2, SCLC, and lack of PET-CT. All patients were staged with TNM 2010. We included 72 patients: 21 single pN1, 26 multiple pN1, and 25 single unsuspected pN2. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: The sample included 62 men (86 %) and 10 women (14 %), mean age 64 ± 9 years. The three subgroups did not show statistically significant differences in the main characteristics. Adjuvant treatment was performed in 56 patients (78 %). The 5 year overall survival (OS) for single pN1 was 73 %; for multiple pN1, 34 %; and for single unsuspected pN2, 25 % (P = 0.15). The mean OS for single pN1 was 63 ± 6 months; median OS for multiple pN1 was 45 (range, 42-48) months and for single pN2 was 54 (range, 32-77) months. Multivariate analysis found the following negative prognostic factors of OS: for single pN1, age, female sex, and microscopic intratumoral lymphatic and vascular invasion; for multiple pN1, ≤10 lymph nodes resected. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with single pN1 had better OS than patients with multiple pN1. Patients with single unsuspected pN2 had OS similar to that of multiple pN1.

A multicentre randomized trial of combined individual and telephone counselling for smoking cessation.

OBJECTIVE: The present study assessed the effectiveness of smoking cessation programs combining individual and telephone counselling, compared to individual or telephone counselling alone. METHOD: A randomized, multicentre, open-label trial was performed between January 2009 and July 2011 at six smoking cessation clinics in Spain. Of 772 smokers assessed for eligibility, 600 (77%) met inclusion criteria and were randomized. Smokers were randomized to receive individual counselling, combined telephone and individual counselling, or telephone counselling. The primary outcome was biochemically validated continuous abstinence at 52 weeks. RESULTS: The 52-week abstinence rate was significantly lower in the telephone group compared to the combined group (20.1% vs. 29.0%; OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7) and to the individual counselling group (20.1% vs. 27.9%; OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.0-2.8). The 52-week abstinence rates were not significantly higher in the combined group than the individual group (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.7-1.4). CONCLUSION: Individual counselling and combined individual and telephone counselling were associated with higher 52-week abstinence rates than telephone counselling alone. A combined approach may be highly useful in the clinical treatment of smokers, as it involves less clinic visits than individual counselling alone, thus reducing the program cost, and it increases patient compliance compared to telephone counselling alone.

Food groups and nutrient intake and risk of colorectal cancer: a hospital-based case-control study in Spain.

Although evidence supports that colorectal cancer (CRC) has an environmental etiology, the potential influence of diet appears to be one of the most important components. We studied the relation between food groups and nutrient intake and the risk of CRC. A hospital-based case-control study was conducted in Spain between 2007 and 2009. The authors matched 245 patients with incident histologically confirmed CRC by age, gender, and date of admission with 490 controls. Information about nutrient intake was gathered by using a semiquantitative frequency food questionnaire. Univariate analysis was done with individual food items. Odds ratios (ORs) for consecutive tertiles of nutrient intake were computed after allowance for sociodemographic variables and consumption of food groups. Vitamin B6 (OR: 0.26), vitamin D (OR: 0.45), vitamin E (OR: 0.42), polyunsaturated fatty acids (OR: 0.57), and fiber (OR: 0.40) were inversely associated with CRC, whereas carbohydrates (OR: 1.82) were significantly associated with CRC risk for the upper tertile. In multivariate analysis adjusting for major covariables (energy, age, and gender), vitamin D (OR:0.45), vitamin E (OR:0.36), and fiber (OR:0.46) remained associated with CRC. Data suggest that the etiology of colorectal cancer is not due to lifestyle and dietary patterns being important the effect of single nutrients.

Impact of comorbidity on survival by tumour location: Breast, colorectal and lung cancer (2000-2014).

BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of comorbidity, measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), on survival in breast, colorectal and lung cancer. METHODS: We identified 3455 breast cancer, 3336 colorectal cancer and 2654 lung cancer patients through the Hospital del Mar cancer registry. The prevalence of comorbidities according to the CCI was calculated. Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test were used to compare survival curves for each cancer location. Cox regression was used to calculate survival hazard ratios and 1-, 3- and 5-year mortality rate ratios adjusted by age, sex, CCI, place of first consultation, stage, treatment and period of diagnosis. RESULTS: The overall unadjusted 5-year follow-up survival proportion was 82.6% for breast cancer, 55.7% for colorectal cancer, and 16.3% for lung cancer. Overall survival was associated with CCI≥3 in breast cancer (HR: 2.33 95%CI: 1.76-3.08), colorectal cancer (HR: 1.39; 95%CI: 1.13-1.70) and lung cancer (HR: 1.22; 95%CI: 1.06-1.40). In breast cancer, the higher the CCI, the higher the adjusted mortality rate ratio and differences were greater in 5-year than in 1-year follow-up survival. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity is a significant predictor of overall survival in cancer patients; however, it has a stronger impact on survival in breast cancer than in colorectal and lung cancer.

[Epidemiology of the hospital adverse events in Catalonia, Spain: a first step for the patient safety improvement]. / Epidemiología de los eventos adversos hospitalarios en Catalunya: un primer paso para la mejora de la seguridad del paciente.

It has been published that hospital adverse events are an important source of morbidity and mortality in different countries and settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, magnitude, distribution and degree of preventability of adverse events in the Autonomous Community of Catalonia (Spain). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 4,790 hospital discharges that were selected by simple random sampling after stratified multistage sampling in 15 hospitals in Catalonia. 38.25% of patients had positive risk criteria (screening phase). We identified 356 cases of adverse events, which represent a 7.4% (95%CI: 6.7% to 8.1%). Of these, 43.5% (155 cases) were considered preventable. This study confirms that adverse events in hospitals in Catalonia are frequent, and generate a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. As in other studies, corroborated that a high proportion of these adverse events are considered preventable. It was possible to identify priority areas to focus improvement efforts.

Linking of primary care records to census data to study the association between socioeconomic status and cancer incidence in Southern Europe: a nation-wide ecological study.

BACKGROUND: Area-based measures of economic deprivation are seldom applied to large medical records databases to establish population-scale associations between deprivation and disease. OBJECTIVE: To study the association between deprivation and incidence of common cancer types in a Southern European region. METHODS: Retrospective ecological study using the SIDIAP (Information System for the Development of Research in Primary Care) database of longitudinal electronic medical records for a representative population of Catalonia (Spain) and the MEDEA index based on urban socioeconomic indicators in the Spanish census. Study outcomes were incident cervical, breast, colorectal, prostate, and lung cancer in 2009-2012. The completeness of SIDIAP cancer recording was evaluated through linkage of a geographic data subset to a hospital cancer registry. Associations between MEDEA quintiles and cancer incidence was evaluated using zero-inflated Poisson regression adjusted for sex, age, smoking, alcoholism, obesity, hypertension, and diabetes. RESULTS: SIDIAP sensitivity was 63% to 92% for the five cancers studied. There was direct association between deprivation and lung, colorectal, and cervical cancer: incidence rate ratios (IRR) 1.82 [1.64-2.01], IRR 1.60 [1.34-1.90], IRR 1.22 [1.07-1.38], respectively, comparing the most deprived to most affluent areas. In wealthy areas, prostate and breast cancers were more common: IRR 0.92 [0.80-1.00], IRR 0.91 [0.78-1.06]. Adjustment for confounders attenuated the association with lung cancer risk (fully adjusted IRR 1.16 [1.08-1.25]), reversed the direction of the association with colorectal cancer (IRR 0.90 [0.84-0.95]), and did not modify the associations with cervical (IRR 1.27 [1.11-1.45]), prostate (0.74 [0.69-0.80]), and breast (0.76 [0.71-0.81]) cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Deprivation is associated differently with the occurrence of various cancer types. These results provide evidence that MEDEA is a useful, area-based deprivation index for analyses of the SIDIAP database. This information will be useful to improve screening programs, cancer prevention and management strategies, to reach patients more effectively, particularly in deprived urban areas.

Epidemiología de los eventos adversos hospitalarios en Catalunya: un primer paso para la mejora de la seguridad del paciente / Epidemiology of the hospital adverse events in Catalonia, Spain: A first step for the patient safety improvement

Se ha documentado que los eventos adversos hospitalarios son una importante fuente de morbimortalidad en diferentes países y entornos. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la frecuencia, magnitud, distribución y grado de preventibilidad de los eventos adversos en la comunidad autónoma de Catalunya (España). Se realizó un estudio de cohortes retrospectivo de 4.790 altas hospitalarias que fueron elegidas por muestreo aleatorio simple tras un muestreo polietápico estratificado en 15 hospitales de Catalunya. Un 38,25% de los pacientes presentó criterios positivos de riesgo (fase de cribado). Se identificaron 356 casos de eventos adversos, lo que representa un 7,4% (intervalo de confianza del 95%, 6,7-8,1). De estos, el 43,5% (155 casos) se consideraron prevenibles. Este estudio confirma que los eventos adversos en hospitales de Catalunya son frecuentes y generan un impacto considerable en morbimortalidad. Al igual que en otros estudios, se ha podido corroborar que una alta proporción de estos eventos adversos son considerados prevenibles. Se han podido identificar áreas prioritarias donde centrar esfuerzos de mejora (AU)

It has been published that hospital adverse events are an important source of morbidity and mortality in different countries and settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency, magnitude, distribution and degree of preventability of adverse events in the Autonomous Community of Catalonia (Spain). We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 4,790 hospital discharges that were selected by simple random sampling after stratified multistage sampling in 15 hospitals in Catalonia. 38.25% of patients had positive risk criteria (screening phase). We identified 356 cases of adverse events, which represent a 7.4% (95%CI: 6.7% to 8.1%). Of these, 43.5% (155 cases) were considered preventable. This study confirms that adverse events in hospitals in Catalonia are frequent, and generate a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. As in other studies, corroborated that a high proportion of these adverse events are considered preventable. It was possible to identify priority areas to focus improvement efforts (AU)