Direct, Indirect, and Combined Extracranial-to-Intracranial Bypass for Adult Moyamoya Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Moyamoya disease is a chronic, progressive cerebrovascular disease involving occlusion or stenosis of the terminal portion of the internal carotid artery. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate clinical and angiographic outcomes comparing direct, combined, and indirect bypass for the treatment of moyamoya disease in adults. METHODS: Two independent authors performed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guided literature searches in December 2021 to identify articles reporting clinical/angiographic outcomes in adult moyamoya disease patients undergoing bypass. Primary end points used were ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes, clinical outcomes, and angiographic revascularization. Study quality was evaluated with Newcastle-Ottawa and the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine scales. RESULTS: Four thousand four hundred fifty seven articles were identified in the initial search; 143 articles were analyzed. There were 3827 direct, 3826 indirect, and 3801 combined bypasses. Average length of follow-up was 3.59±2.93 years. Pooled analysis significantly favored direct (odds ratio [OR], 0.62 [0.48-0.79]; P<0.0001; OR, 0.44 [0.32-0.59]; P<0.0001; OR, 0.56 [0.42-0.74]; P<0.0001; OR, 3.1 [2.5-3.8]; P=0.0001) and combined (OR, 0.53 [0.41-0.69]; P<0.0001; OR, 0.28 [0.2-0.41]; P<0.0001; OR, 0.41 [0.3-0.56]; P<0.0001; OR, 3.1 [2.8-4.3]; P=0.0001) over indirect bypass for early stroke, late stroke, late intracerebral hemorrhage, and favorable outcomes, respectively. Indirect bypass was favored over combined (OR, 3.1 [1.7-5.6]; P<0.0001) and direct (OR, 4.12 [2.34-7.25]; P<0.0001) for early intracerebral hemorrhage. The meta-analysis significantly favored direct (OR, 0.37 [0.23-0.60]; P<0.001; OR, 0.49 [0.31-0.77]; P=0.002) and combined (OR, 0.23 [0.12-0.43]; P<0.00001; OR, 0.30 [0.18-0.49]; P<0.00001) bypass over indirect bypass for late stroke and late hemorrhage, respectively. Combined bypass was favored over indirect bypass for favorable outcomes (OR, 2.06 [1.18-3.58]; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Based on combined meta-analysis (43 articles) and pooled analysis (143 articles), the existing literature indicates that combined and direct bypasses have significant benefits for patients suffering from late stroke and hemorrhage versus indirect bypass. Combined bypass was favored over indirect bypass for favorable outcomes. This is a strong recommendation based on low-quality evidence when utilizing the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. These findings have important implications for bypass strategy selection.

A Scoping Review of Professionalism in Neurosurgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Milestones provides a foundation for professionalism in residency training. Specific professionalism concepts from neurosurgery could augment and expand milestones for the specialty. We reviewed the current literature and identified professionalism concepts within the context of neurosurgical practice and training. METHODS: We used a scoping review methodology to search PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus and identify English-language articles with the search terms "professionalism" and "neurosurgery." We excluded articles that were not in English, not relevant to professionalism within neurosurgery, or could not be accessed. Non-peer-reviewed and qualitative publications, such as commentaries, were included in the review. RESULTS: A total of 193 articles were included in the review. We identified 6 professionalism themes among these results: professional identity (n = 53), burnout and wellness (n = 51), professional development (n = 34), ethics and conflicts of interest (n = 27), diversity and gender (n = 19), and misconduct (n = 9). CONCLUSION: These 6 concepts illustrate concerns that neurosurgeons have concerning professionalism. Diversity and gender, professional identity, and misconduct are not specifically addressed in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Milestones. This review could be used to aid the development of organizational policy statements on professionalism.

Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) examined in the trauma population.

BACKGROUND: Previous data on the prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) vary widely, and studies based on these data are plagued with unintentional bias. Accurate prevalence data are paramount for any physician who counsels patients with intracranial aneurysms on rupture risk and treatment. We therefore sought to determine a more accurate number for the true prevalence of UIAs. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a level 1 trauma center and tertiary care hospital in an urban setting between 2019 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included patients admitted with blunt trauma. Exclusion criteria included not having a head and neck CTA performed and read by an attending radiologist. All head and neck CTA radiology reads were reviewed for incidentally discovered UIAs. Subgroup analysis was performed by age group, race, and gender. RESULTS: A total of 5978 out of 8999 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 54 patients with 58 total aneurysms were identified giving an overall prevalence of 0.9%. Subgroup analysis was performed for all age groups, genders, and racial groups. CONCLUSION: The overall aneurysm prevalence was found to be 0.9% in this sample. This rate is lower than rates previously cited in the literature and those quoted in local practice. This finding has significant implications when attempting to understand average rupture risk. Further studies are needed to power more subgroup analyses to use a more personalized approach to understanding an individual's risk of rupture.

Acute and Long-Term Management of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury at a Quaternary Referral Level 1 Trauma Center: The Memphis Experience and Comparison of a New Scoring System.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The management of blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs) remains an important topic within trauma and neurosurgery today. There remains a lack of consensus within the literature and significant variation across institutions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate management of BCVI at a large, tertiary referral trauma center. METHODS: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained to conduct a retrospective review of patients with BCVI at our Level 1 Trauma Center. Computed tomography angiography was used to identify BCVI for each patient. Patient information was collected, and statistical analysis was performed. With the included risk factors for ischemic complications, a novel scoring system based on ischemic risk, the "Memphis Score," was developed and evaluated to grade BCVI. RESULTS: Two hundred seventeen patients with BCVI from July 2020 to August 2022 were identified. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (141, 65.0%). Vertebral arteries were the most common vessel injured (136, 51.1%) with most injuries occurring at a high cervical location (101, 38.0%). Denver Grade 1 injuries (89, 33.5%) and a Memphis Score of 1 were most frequent (172, 64.6%), and initial anticoagulation with heparin drip was initiated 56.7% of the time (123). Endovascular treatment was required in 24 patients (11.1%) and was usually performed in the first 48 hours (15, 62.5%). While Denver Grade (P = .019) and Memphis Score (P < .00001) were significantly higher in those patients undergoing endovascular treatment, only the Memphis Score demonstrated a significant difference between those patients who had stroke or worsening on follow-up imaging and those who did not (P = .0009). CONCLUSION: Although BCVI management has improved since early investigative efforts, institutions must evaluate and share their data to help clarify outcomes. The novel "Memphis Score" presents a standardized framework to communicate ischemic risk and guide management of BCVI.

Extracranial-Intracranial Cerebral Revascularization for Atherosclerotic Vessel Occlusion: An Updated Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic steno-occlusive cerebrovascular disease includes extracranial carotid occlusive and intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Despite the negative findings in Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS), many large centers continue to report favorable results for revascularization surgery in select groups of patients. The aim of our study was to perform an updated systematic review to investigate the role of revascularization surgery for atherosclerotic steno-occlusive patients in the modern era. METHODS: Five independent reviewers performed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-guided literature searches in October 2022 to identify articles reporting clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing bypass for atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease. Primary endpoints used were perioperative and long-term ischemic strokes, intracerebral hemorrhage, bypass patency, and favorable clinical outcomes. Study quality was evaluated with Newcastle-Ottawa, JADAD, and the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine scales. RESULTS: A total of 6709 articles were identified in the initial search. Of these articles, 50 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. A notable increase in the proportion of articles published over the past 10 years was observed. There were 6046 total patients with 4447 bypasses performed over the period from 1978 to 2022. The average length of follow-up was 2.75 ± 2.71 years. The average Newcastle-Ottawa was 6.23 out of 9 stars. There was a significant difference in perioperative stroke (odds ratio [OR], 0.65 [0.48-0.87]; P = 0.004), long-term ischemia (OR, 0.32 [0.23-0.44]; P < 0.0001), overall ischemia (OR, 0.36 [0.28-0.44]; P < 0.0001), and favorable outcomes (OR, 3.63 [2.84-4.64]; P < 0.0001) when comparing pre-COSS to post-COSS time frames in favor of post-COSS. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a systematic review of 50 articles, the existing literature indicates that long-term stroke rates and favorable outcomes for surgical revascularization for steno-occlusive disease have improved over time and are lower than previously reported. Improved patient selection, perioperative care, and surgical techniques may contribute to improved outcomes.

Surgical techniques and indications for treatment of adult moyamoya disease.

Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a chronic, progressive cerebrovascular disease involving the occlusion or stenosis of the terminal portion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the proximal anterior and middle cerebral arteries. Adults with MMD have been shown to progressively accumulate neurological and cognitive deficits without treatment, with a mortality rate double that of pediatric patients with MMD. Surgical intervention is the mainstay of treatment to prevent disease progression and improve clinical outcomes. Several different types of bypasses can be utilized for revascularization in MMD, including indirect, direct, and combined forms of extracranial-to-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass. Overall, the choice of appropriate technique requires consideration of the age of the patient, preoperative hemodynamics, neurologic status, and territories most at risk and in need of revascularization. Here, we will review the indications and surgical techniques for the treatment of adult MMD. Step-by-step instructions for performing several bypass variants with technical pearls are discussed.

Double-Barrel (2-Donor-2-Recipient) Bypass as Rescue Treatment for Patient with Occluded Middle Cerebral Artery Intracranial Stent and Recurrent Ischemia.

Stent occlusion is a challenging complication following endovascular interventions that require intracranial stenting.1-4 Although there are small series describing revascularization for stenoocclusive disease failing best medical management,5-14 there are few reports in the literature regarding surgical bypass as a treatment for stent occlusion.5 We present the case of a 37-year-old man who presented with right-sided weakness, numbness, and difficulty with speech and ambulation. His history is notable for a left M1 (segment of middle cerebral artery) occlusion 6 months prior that was treated with mechanical thrombectomy requiring repeat thrombectomy and rescue acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) stent placement given vessel reocclusion. Diagnostic cerebral angiography demonstrated stent occlusion. Given his continued ischemic symptoms despite best medical management, the patient underwent a double-barrel superficial temporal artery-MCA direct bypass to revascularize the MCA territory. To our knowledge, there is no literature to date describing a 2-donor-2-recipient direct bypass for the rescue treatment of symptomatic intracranial stent occlusion with recurrent ischemia. We review the case presentation, angiographic findings, surgical nuances, and postoperative course with imaging. The patient provided informed consent for the procedure and verbal support for publishing his image and inclusion in this submission.

Neurosurgical Operative Videos: An Analysis of an Increasingly Popular Educational Resource.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical education has increasingly relied on electronic learning. In particular, online operative videos have become a core resource within neurosurgery. We analyze the forums for neurosurgical operative videos. METHODS: Operative videos from 5 sources were reviewed: 1) the NEUROSURGERY Journal YouTube channel; 2) the American Association of Neurological Surgeons Neurosurgery YouTube channel; 3) The Neurosurgical Atlas Operative Video Cases; 4) Operative Neurosurgery; and 5) Neurosurgical Focus: Video. Title, year of publication, senior author, institution, country, and subspecialty were documented for each video. RESULTS: A total of 1233 videos showing 1247 surgeries were identified. Ten videos included >1 surgery; of those, there was a median of 2 surgeries (interquartile range, 2.0-2.5) per video. The most frequently represented subspecialties included vascular (48.3%), tumor (35.2%), and skull base surgery (27.5%), with almost 40% of videos showing >1 category. Videos were submitted by investigators from 28 countries, but 82.1% of the videos originated in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgical operative videos have become increasingly common through a variety of online platforms. Future efforts may benefit from collecting videos from underrepresented regions and subspecialties, providing long-term follow-up data and showing techniques for managing complications.