Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 231(1): 109.e1-109.e9, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38365098

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids are the most common benign tumors that affect females. A laparoscopic myomectomy is the standard surgical treatment for most women who wish to retain their uterus. The most common complication of a myomectomy is excessive bleeding. However, risk factors for hemorrhage during a laparoscopic myomectomy are not well studied and no risk stratification tool specific for identifying the need for a blood transfusion during a laparoscopic myomectomy currently exists in the literature. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors for intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion during laparoscopic myomectomies and to develop a risk stratification tool to determine the risk for requiring a blood transfusion. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2020. Women who underwent a laparoscopic (conventional or robotic) myomectomy were included. Women who received 1 or more blood transfusions within 72 hours after the start time of a laparoscopic myomectomy were compared with those who did not require a blood transfusion. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify risk factors independently associated with the risk for transfusion. Two risk stratification tools to determine the need for a blood transfusion were developed based on the multivariable results, namely (1) based on preoperative factors and (2) based on preoperative and intraoperative factors. RESULTS: During the study period, 11,498 women underwent a laparoscopic myomectomy. Of these, 331(2.9%) required a transfusion. In a multivariable regression analysis of the preoperative factors, Black or African American and Asian races, Hispanic ethnicity, bleeding disorders, American Society of Anesthesiologists class III or IV classification, and a preoperative hematocrit value ≤35.0% were independently associated with the risk for transfusion. Identified intraoperative factors included specimen weight >250 g or ≥5 intramural myomas and an operation time of ≥197 minutes. A risk stratification tool was developed in which points are assigned based on the identified risk factors. The mean probability of transfusion can be calculated based on the sum of the points. CONCLUSION: We identified preoperative and intraoperative independent risk factors for a blood transfusion among women who underwent a laparoscopic myomectomy. A risk stratification tool to determine the risk for requiring a blood transfusion was developed based on the identified risk factors. Further studies are needed to validate this tool.


Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Transfusión Sanguínea , Laparoscopía , Leiomioma , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Miomectomía Uterina , Neoplasias Uterinas , Humanos , Femenino , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Leiomioma/cirugía , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Estados Unidos , Estudios de Cohortes
2.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 16, 2024 Jan 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38189849

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is unknown how patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with significant response to preoperative radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy fare relative to patients with true pathologic 0-1 disease undergoing upfront surgery. We aimed to determine whether survival is improved in locally advanced rectal cancer downstaged to pathologic stage 0-1 disease compared to true pathologic stage 0-1 tumors. METHODS: A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2016 was conducted. Three groups were identified: (1) clinical stage 2-3 disease downstaged to pathologic stage 0-1 disease after radiotherapy, (2) clinical stage 2-3 disease not downstaged after radiotherapy, and (3) true pathologic 0-1 tumors undergoing upfront surgery. The primary endpoint was overall survival and was compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 59,884 patients. Of the 40,130 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative radiation, 12,670 (31.5%) had significant downstaging (group 1), while 27,460 (68.4%) had no significant downstaging (group 2). A total of 19,754 had pathologic 0-1 disease treated with upfront resection (group 3). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, downstaged patients had significantly better overall survival compared to both non-downstaged and true pathologic stage 0-1 patients (median 156 vs. 99 and 136 months, respectively, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, downstaged patients had significantly better survival (HR 0.88, p < 0.001) compared to true pathologic 0-1 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Locally advanced rectal cancer downstaged after preoperative radiotherapy has significantly better survival compared to true pathologic stage 0-1 disease treated with upfront surgery. Response to chemoradiotherapy likely identifies a subset of patients with a particularly good prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Quimioradioterapia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia
3.
Colorectal Dis ; 26(6): 1223-1230, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702908

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of this work was to determine racial disparities in access to minimally invasive proctectomy using a national database. METHOD: A retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program evaluated for surgical approach (robotic, laparoscopic or open), demographics and comorbidity, and then compared by race. RESULTS: A total of 3511 patients (325 Asian, 2925 White, 261 African American/Black) with cancer who underwent a proctectomy between 2016 and 2020 were included. Both Asians and Whites had significantly higher rates of laparoscopic proctectomy relative to African Americans (38.5%, 33.8% and 28.7%, respectively; p = 0.0001). Asians had the highest rate of robotic proctectomy (38.2%, p = 0.0001). Conversely, Black patients had significantly higher rates of open proctectomy followed by Whites and then Asians (42.1%, 35.4% and 23.4%, respectively; p = 0.0001). In multivariable logistic regression with backward elimination, African Americans were 0.7 times as likely to undergo laparoscopic proctectomy and 1.4 times more likely to undergo open proctectomy than Whites (p = 0.043). Compared with Whites, Asians were 1.8, 1.7 and 1.9 times more likely to undergo minimally invasive, laparoscopic proctectomy and robotic proctectomy, respectively (p = 0.0001, p = 0.001, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Asians had the highest rate of laparoscopic and robotic proctectomy, while Blacks had the highest rate of open proctectomy. African Americans were least likely to undergo laparoscopic proctectomy compared with all races. Race is an independent risk factor for access to minimally invasive proctectomy.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Laparoscopía , Proctectomía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Neoplasias del Recto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Población Blanca , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/etnología , Proctectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Proctectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Asiático/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Bases de Datos Factuales
4.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 38(1): 199, 2023 Jul 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37470901

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Previous studies have suggested that coffee may shorten the postoperative ileus period. We sought to evaluate the impact of both coffee and caffeine on shortening the return of postoperative bowel function following minimally invasive colectomy. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in a tertiary hospital. Patients undergoing an elective robotic or laparoscopic small or large bowel operation were included in this study. Patients were randomized into one of three groups: warm water, decaffeinated coffee, and caffeinated coffee. Subjects were assigned to drink a 4-oz cup three times daily starting on postoperative day one. The primary endpoint was time to first bowel movement. Secondary endpoints included time to first flatus, length of hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were included in this study: 31 warm water, 31 decaffeinated coffee, and 37 caffeinated coffee. The groups were similar in age and sex (p = 0.51 and 0.91, respectively). Mean (SD) time to the first bowel movement in days was 2.94 (1.4), 2.58 (1.2), and 2.86 (1.3), respectively (p = 0.53). There were no significant differences observed in postoperative morbidity (p = 0.52) between groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis did not reveal a statistically significant association between any interventions and time to first bowel movement or length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Coffee (caffeinated or decaffeinated) does not expedite the return of bowel function following minimally invasive operation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT02639728 NCT02639728.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Ileus , Humanos , Café/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Cafeína/efectos adversos , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Ileus/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
5.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 38(1): 252, 2023 Oct 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37819537

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We sought to compare the effectiveness of a novel antibiotic irrigation device to the standard O-ring wound retractor in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) following colorectal resections. METHODS: This single-arm clinical trial included patients undergoing colorectal resections utilizing the novel device. A retrospective cohort of patients undergoing the same procedures with the O-ring retractor was selected as the control group. The primary outcome assessed was SSI. Secondary outcomes assessed were overall complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), and 30-day readmission. A univariable and multivariable logistic regression model was built to evaluate the association between SSI as the outcome variable and the use of the novel device as the main independent variable. The model was adjusted for any confounding variables. RESULTS: Eighty-six novel device cases and 170 O-ring retractor cases were enrolled. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographics and preoperative comorbidities. Cases with the novel device had fewer Pfannenstiel incisions (1.2% vs. 14.6%, p < 0.001). There were no other significant differences in intraoperative variables. SSI rates were significantly lower in the novel device group (1.2% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.014). There were no other significant differences in postoperative complications. Multivariable logistic regression with backward elimination showed that the use of the novel device was significantly more effective against SSI by 92.5% compared to the use of the O-ring retractor. CONCLUSION: The novel device may contribute to lower SSI rates compared to the O-ring retractor following colorectal resection.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Comorbilidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología
6.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 39(1): 1, 2023 Dec 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38055072

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We aimed to describe the incidence and identify risk factors for the occurrence of short-term major posto-perative complications following colorectal resection for endometriosis. METHODS: A cohort study using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2012-2020. We included patients with a primary diagnosis of endometriosis who underwent colon or rectal resections for endometriosis. RESULTS: Of 755 women who underwent colorectal resection, 495 (65.6%) had laparoscopic surgery and 260 (34.4%) had open surgery. The major complication rate was 13.5% (n = 102). Women who underwent open surgery had a higher proportion of major complications (n = 53, 20.4% vs. n = 49, 9.9%, p < 0.001). In a multivariable regression analysis, Black race (aOR 95%CI 2.81 (1.60-4.92), p < 0.001), Hispanic ethnicity (aOR 95%CI 3.02 (1.42-6.43), p = 0.004), hypertension (aOR 95%CI 1.89 (1.08-3.30), p = 0.025), laparotomy (aOR 95%CI 1.64 (1.03-3.30), p = 0.025), concomitant enterotomy (aOR 95%CI 3.02 (1.26-7.21), p = 0.013), and hysterectomy (aOR 95%CI 2.59 (1.62-4.15), p < 0.001) were independently associated with major post-operative complications. In a subanalysis of laparoscopies only, Hispanic ethnicity, chronic hypertension, lysis of bowel adhesions, and hysterectomy were independently associated with major complications. In a subanalysis of laparotomies only, Black race and hysterectomy were independently positively associated with the occurrence of major complications. CONCLUSION: This study provides a current population-based estimate of short-term complications after surgery for colorectal endometriosis in the USA. The identified risk factors for complications can assist during preoperative shared decision-making and informed consent process.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Endometriosis , Hipertensión , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Endometriosis/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Riesgo
7.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 408(1): 432, 2023 Nov 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940770

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Studies evaluating the rate and histology of appendiceal neoplasms between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis include a small number of patients. Therefore, we sought a meta-analysis and systematic review comparing the rates and types of appendiceal neoplasm between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. METHODS: We included articles published from the time of inception of the datasets to September 30, 2022. The electronic databases included English publications in Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Scopus. RESULTS: A total of 4962 patients with appendicitis enrolled in 4 comparative studies were included. The mean age was 43.55 years (16- 94), and half were male (51%). Based on intra-operative findings, 1394 (38%) had complicated appendicitis, and 3558 (62%) had uncomplicated appendicitis. The overall incidence rate of neoplasm was 1.98%. No significant difference was found in the incidence rate of appendiceal neoplasm between complicated (3.29%) and uncomplicated (1.49%) appendicitis (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.16- 1.23; p < 0.087; I2 = 54.9%). The most common appendiceal neoplasms were Neuroendocrine Tumors (NET) (49.21%), Nonmucinous Adenocarcinoma (24.24%), Mixed Adeno-Neuroendocrine Tumor (MANEC) (11.40%), Mucinous Adenocarcinoma (4.44%). There was a significant difference between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in rates of adenocarcinoma (50% vs. 13%), NET (31% vs. 74%), MANEC (19% vs. 13%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: While there was no significant difference in the overall neoplasm rate between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis, the NET rate was significantly higher in uncomplicated appendicitis. In comparison, the Adenocarcinoma rate was considerably higher in Complicated appendicitis. These findings emphasize the importance of evaluating risk factors for neoplasm when considering appendectomy in patients with appendicitis.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias del Apéndice , Apendicitis , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Neoplasias del Apéndice/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Apéndice/patología , Neoplasias del Apéndice/cirugía , Apendicitis/epidemiología , Apendicitis/cirugía , Incidencia , Factores de Riesgo , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 30(10): 820-826, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37321298

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study the rate and risk factors for short-term postoperative complications of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for endometriosis in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2020. PATIENTS: Patients with endometriosis diagnosis. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We compared women with and without 30-day postoperative major complications, defined according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. A total of 28 697 women underwent MIS during the study period, of which 2.6% had major postoperative complications. Organ space surgical site infection and reoperation were the most common complications (47.0% and 39.8%, respectively). In multivariable regression analysis, African American race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61 [1.29-2.01], p <.001), hypertension (aOR 95% CI 1.23 [1.01-1.50], p = .036), bleeding disorders (aOR 95% CI 1.96 [1.03-3.74], p = .041), bowel procedures (aOR 95% CI 1.93 [1.37-2.72], p <.001) and hysterectomy (aOR 95% CI 2.09 [1.67-2.63], p <.001) were independently associated with increased risk of major complications. In multivariable regression analysis of laparoscopies without bowel procedures, African American race, bleeding disorders, and hysterectomy were independently associated with increased major complication risk. Among cases with bowel procedures, African American race and colectomy were independently associated with increased major complication risk. In multivariable regression analysis of women who underwent hysterectomy, African American race, bleeding disorders, and lysis of adhesions were independently associated with increased major complications risk. Among women who underwent uterine-sparing surgery, African American race, hypertension, preoperative blood transfusion, and bowel procedures were independently associated with increased major complications risk. CONCLUSION: Among women undergoing MIS for endometriosis, African American race, hypertension, bleeding disorders, and bowel surgery or hysterectomy are risk factors for major complications. African American race is a risk factor for major complications among women undergoing surgeries with and without bowel procedures or hysterectomy.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Femenino , Humanos , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Endometriosis/cirugía , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/cirugía , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Histerectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud
9.
Surg Endosc ; 36(8): 5669-5675, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35277768

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous publications revealed more complications in afternoon versus morning surgeries. With much attention given to robotic surgery outcomes, we sought to evaluate whether morning versus afternoon start time matters. METHODS: In a retrospective review of a prospective database, 210 robotic colorectal surgeries were grouped into 97 morning versus 113 afternoon cases. Preoperative risk factors, intraoperative events, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared. An independent samples t-test, Fisher's exact test, and linear regression were used for categorical and continuous variables. RESULTS: Morning patients were significantly younger than afternoon patients (59.5 vs. 65.5, p = 0.004), but there were no significant differences in gender, mean BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, total operative time, console time, estimated blood loss, indications for surgery, and resection type. Morning patients had a significantly shorter mean length of stay (6.0 vs. 8.0 days, p = 0.021), but no significant differences in overall postoperative complications (0.30 vs. 0.30, p = 0.715), wound infection (5.2% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.564), anastomotic leak (0% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.251), ileus/small bowel obstruction (29.9% vs. 22.1%, p = 0.199), and 30-day readmission (8.2% vs. 7.1%, p = 1.000). When analyzing time of day as a continuous variable, we found no significant associations with intra- or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: We found no correlation between surgery start time and intra- or postoperative outcomes. This can be partly attributed to these cases being non-emergent and performed primarily by two experienced surgeons with highly trained operating room robotic staff in a large volume tertiary center. This, along with decreased fatigue attributed to superior ergonomics of robotic surgery, may have mitigated previously reported differences between morning and afternoon procedures.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Neoplasias Colorrectales/complicaciones , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Surg Endosc ; 35(10): 5643-5654, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33051762

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Various methods have been described to create a functional neovagina with feminizing (male-to-female) gender affirming surgery. Intestinal vaginoplasty using ileal or colon segments confers natural mucus production and greater canal depth with primary vaginoplasty. In this work we describe an alternative approach to primary and salvage vaginoplasty using right colon. We focus on relative advantages compared to use of other bowel segments, and we review patient outcomes. METHODS: Transgender women who had previously undergone primary vaginoplasty underwent laparoscopic right colon vaginoplasty at our center between 12/2017 and 7/2019. Demographic, medical, outcome, and satisfaction data was collected and retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-two consecutive transgender women patients underwent laparoscopic right colon vaginoplasty. Mean age was 39.3 years. There were two intraoperative complications:1 injury of the ileocolic pedicle, and 1 minor bladder injury. Four of 22 patients (18.2%) had short-term complications (< 30 days): 3 had postoperative ileus/small bowel obstruction and 1 had intra-abdominal hemorrhage. All were managed conservatively. Six of 22 patients (27.3%) experienced a total of 14 long-term complications (> 30 days): 1 developed Crohn's (not involving the neovagina); 1 developed late small bowel obstruction (SBO) (managed conservatively); 5 developed neovagina prolapse; 4 developed stenosis (2 at the vaginal introitus, and 2 had extrinsic obstruction at the recto-vaginal junction (all underwent successful laparoscopic surgical correction); and 3 were diagnosed with diversion neovaginitis (all treated conservatively). All complications were successfully treated with conservative and/or surgical intervention. All (100%) patients reported satisfaction with neovagina function and appearance. CONCLUSION: This is the only outcomes series of transgender women patients who have undergone right colon vaginoplasty, to date. Our study finding suggests that laparoscopic right colon for primary or salvage vaginoplasty has several important advantages over use of Sigmoid colon or Ileum, and is a reliable technique whose complications can be managed successfully, with favorable, satisfactory long-term outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo , Adulto , Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vagina/cirugía
12.
Surg Technol Int ; 34: 199-207, 2019 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31034575

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The educational environment is a crucial metric of medical education that affects the course participants' motivation, achievement, happiness and success. The aim of this study was to evaluate the educational environment of a cadaver course in robotic colorectal surgery by comparing the perceptions of the participating residents to those of the participating surgeons. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in 2017. Participants from the U.S. and Europe attended a course using eight fresh frozen cadaver torsos with no prior abdominal surgery. After course completion, participants anonymously completed 50-item Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) questionnaires to evaluate five components of the educational environment: perception of learning, perception of teachers, academic self-perception, perception of atmosphere, and social self-perception. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Mean scores were compared using an independent samples t-test. RESULTS: Twenty of 24 participants completed the DREEM questionnaire, consisting of 9 residents and 11 surgeons (12 from the U.S., 8 from Europe). The internal consistency of the questionnaire was excellent (alpha=0.97). The mean total score was excellent for both residents and surgeons, and the difference between the groups was not significant (154.1±25.8 vs. 168.1±18.9, p=0.197). Perception of learning was significantly better among surgeons ("teaching highly thought of") than among residents ("a more positive perception") (40.5±3.6 vs. 35.7±5.6, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the residents' perception of learning may have been negatively influenced by the participation of surgeons in the same cadaver station.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal/educación , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/educación , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Cadáver , Estudios Transversales , Evaluación Educacional , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Cirujanos/educación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
Fertil Steril ; 121(6): 1053-1062, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38342374

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study racial and ethnic disparities among women undergoing hysterectomy performed for adenomyosis across the United States. DESIGN: A cohort study. SETTING: Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) from 2012-2020. PATIENTS: Patients with an adenomyosis diagnosis. INTERVENTION: Hysterectomy for adenomyosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were identified using the International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th editions codes 617.0 and N80.0 (endometriosis of the uterus). Hysterectomies were classified on the basis of the Current Procedural Terminology codes. We compared baseline and surgical characteristics and 30-day postoperative complications across the different racial and ethnic groups. Postoperative complications were classified into minor and major complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. RESULTS: A total of 12,599 women underwent hysterectomy for adenomyosis during the study period: 8,822 (70.0%) non-Hispanic White, 1,597 (12.7%) Hispanic, 1,378 (10.9%) non-Hispanic Black or African American, 614 (4.9%) Asian, 97 (0.8%) Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and 91 (0.7%) American Indian or Alaska Native. Postoperative complications occurred in 8.8% of cases (n = 1,104), including major complications in 3.1% (n = 385). After adjusting for confounders, non-Hispanic Black race and ethnicity were independently associated with an increased risk of major complications (adjusted odds ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] {1.16-2.04}). Laparotomy was performed in 13.7% (n = 1,725) of cases. Compared with non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity, the adjusted odd ratios for undergoing laparoscopy were 0.58 (95% CI 0.50-0.67) for Hispanic, 0.56 (95% CI 0.48-0.65) for non-Hispanic Black or African American, 0.33 (95% CI 0.27-0.40) for Asian, and 0.26 (95% CI 0.17-0.41) for Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander race and ethnicity. CONCLUSION: Among women undergoing hysterectomy for postoperatively diagnosed adenomyosis, non-Hispanic Black or African American race and ethnicity were associated with an increased risk of major postoperative complications. Compared with non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity, Hispanic ethnicity, non-Hispanic Black or African American, Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander race and ethnicity were less likely to undergo minimally invasive surgery.


Asunto(s)
Adenomiosis , Etnicidad , Histerectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenomiosis/cirugía , Adenomiosis/etnología , Indio Americano o Nativo de Alaska , Asiático , Negro o Afroamericano , Estudios de Cohortes , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Nativos de Hawái y Otras Islas del Pacífico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etnología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Blanco
15.
Surg Endosc ; 27(5): 1730-6, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23242489

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis following resection of the right colon. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of selected patients who underwent laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis following resection of the right colon for tumors or Crohn's disease by a single surgeon from July 2002 through June 2012. Data were retrieved from an Institutional Review Board-approved database. Study end point was postoperative adverse events, including mortality, complications, reoperations, and readmissions at 30 days. Antiperistaltic side-to-side anastomoses were fashioned laparoscopically with a 60-mm-long stapler cartridge and enterocolotomy was hand-sewn intracorporeally in two layers. Values were expressed as medians (ranges) for continuous variables. RESULTS: There were 243 patients (143 females) aged 61 (range = 19-96) years, with body mass index of 29 (18-43) kg/m(2) and ASA 1:2:3:4 of 52:110:77:4; 30 % had previous abdominal surgery and 38 % had a preexisting comorbidity. There were 84 ileocolic resections with ileo ascending anastomosis and 159 right colectomies with ileotransverse anastomosis. Operating time was 135 (60-220) min. Estimated blood loss was 50 (10-600) ml. Specimen extraction site incision length was 4.1 (3-4.4) cm. Conversion rate was 3 % and there was no mortality at 30 days, 15 complications (6.2 %), and 8 reoperations (3.3 %). Readmission rate was 8.7 %. Length of stay was 4 (2-32) days. Pathology confirmed Crohn's disease in 84 patients, adenocarcinoma in 152, and other tumors in 7 patients. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis following resection of the right colon resulted in a favorable outcome in selected patients with Crohn's disease or tumors of the right colon.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Colectomía/instrumentación , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Íleon/cirugía , Fístula Intestinal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Técnicas de Sutura , Adulto Joven
16.
Am Surg ; 89(6): 2499-2504, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35580246

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Flap procedures following pilonidal excision have high recurrence and dehiscence rates. We present a cosmetic, outpatient technique to reconstruction via bilateral gluteal fasciocutaneous advancement flaps with and without tie-over sutures. METHODS: This is a prospective case series of 51 patients (40 males and 11 females). Following elliptical excision of pilonidal disease, gluteal fasciocutaneous advancement flaps were elevated circumferentially using blunt, discontinuous dissection, and a multilayered closure was performed. The resulting scar was midline. Thirty-five patients (68.6%) also had two full-thickness, compressing sutures tied over rolled up gauze. RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 28.2 and body mass index of 26.8. Eight (15.9%) were smokers and 11 (21.6%) were obese. At a mean follow-up of 38.7 months, there were no recurrences and 19 (37.3%) patients had wound dehiscence. There was no significant difference in dehiscence between patients with and without tie-over sutures (31.4% vs 50%, P = 0.20). There was no significant difference in dehiscence between smokers and non-smokers, (62.5% vs 41.9%, P = 0.47), or between obese and non-obese patients (36.4% vs 46.3%, P = 0.51). Obese patients with tie-over sutures had significantly less dehiscence compared to obese patients without tie-over sutures (14% vs 75%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Bilateral gluteal fasciocutaneous advancement flap with consideration of tie-over sutures is an outpatient treatment for chronic pilonidal disease with resultant midline scar and with no recurrence in our series.


Asunto(s)
Seno Pilonidal , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Cicatriz , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Enfermedad Crónica , Seno Pilonidal/cirugía , Suturas , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Am Surg ; 89(2): 224-229, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36321223

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hartmann's reversal (HR) is associated with significant technical complexity and morbidity. The decision to perform HR is difficult and up to 50% of patients with colostomies do not undergo a reversal. To better guide surgeons and patients with this decision, we sought to assess the surgical risks and outcomes of HR as compared to elective left colectomy (LC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective database at a tertiary medical center. Patients undergoing elective Hartmann's reversal and left colectomy between January 2014 and November 2021 were identified. We compared preoperative variables, intraoperative events, and short-term postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: 135 patients were identified: 30 HR and 105 LC. There were no significant differences in demographics or preoperative comorbidities between HR and LC. There were more open and fewer robotic cases in HR (23.3% vs 2.9%, P < .0001; 46.6% vs 76.0%, P < .01). Total operative time was significantly longer in HR than LC (261.8 vs 211.7 minutes, P = .02). There was a significantly higher percentage of intraoperative complications in HR (13.3% vs 1.9%, P < .01). There was a significantly higher rate of minor postoperative complications in HR than LC (46.7% vs 26.7%, P = .04), but not major (6.7% vs 5.8%, P = .85). Time to first flatus/bowel movement was significantly longer in HR than LC (3.6 vs 2.5 days, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Hartmann's reversal is a more technically challenging operation than elective left colectomy and is associated with significantly higher rates of intraoperative and minor postoperative complications. Future studies should focus on mitigating these risk factors to optimize patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Colostomía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colostomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
J Robot Surg ; 17(5): 1907-1915, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37310528

RESUMEN

Previous studies comparing right and left colectomies have shown variable short-term outcomes. Despite the rapid adoption of robotics in colorectal operations, few studies have addressed outcome differences between robotic right (RRC) and left (RLC) colectomies. Therefore, we sought to compare the short-term outcomes of RRC and RLC for neoplasia. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles published from the time of inception of the datasets to May 1, 2022. The electronic databases included English publications in Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Scopus. A total of 13,514 patients with colon neoplasia enrolled in 9 comparative studies were included. The overall mean age was 64.1 years (standard deviation [SD] ± 9.8), and there was a minor female predominance (52% female vs. 48% male). 8656 (64.0%) underwent RRC and 4858 (36.0%) underwent RLC. The ASA score 1 of - 2 in the LRC group was 37% vs. 21% in the R. Whereas the ASA score 3-4 was 62% in the LRC vs. 76% in RRC. Moreover, the mean of the Charlson Comorbidity Score in the LRC was 4.3 (SD 1.9) vs. 3.1 (SD 2.3) in the RRC. Meta-analysis revealed a significantly higher rate of ileus in RRC (10%) compared to RLC (7%) (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.27-1.67). Additionally, operative time was significantly shorter by 22.6 min in RRC versus LRC (95% CI - 37.4-7.8; p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between RRC and RLC in conversion to open operation, estimated blood loss, wound infection, anastomotic leak, reoperation, readmission, and hospital length of stay. In this only meta-analysis comparing RRC and LRC for colon neoplasia, we found that RRC was independently associated with a shorter operative time but increased risk of ileus.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Ileus , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Tempo Operativo , Ileus/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
19.
J Robot Surg ; 16(4): 875-881, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34581955

RESUMEN

Studies comparing right (RC) and left colectomies (LC) show higher rates of ileus in RC and higher wound infection and anastomotic leak rates in LC. However, prior studies did not include robotic procedures. We compared short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic RC and LC for cancer, with sub-analysis of robotic procedures. In a retrospective review of a prospective database, preoperative factors, intraoperative events, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared. Student's t tests and Chi-square tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A logistic binomial regression was performed to assess whether type of surgery was associated with postoperative complications. Between January 2014 and August 2020, 115 patients underwent minimally invasive RC or LC for cancer. Sixty-eight RC [30 (44.1%) laparoscopic, 38 (55.9%) robotic] and 47 LC [13 (27.6%) laparoscopic, 34 (72.4%) robotic] cases were included. On univariate analysis, RC patients had significantly higher overall postoperative complications but no differences in rates of ileus/small bowel obstruction, wound infection, time to first flatus/bowel movement, length of hospital stay, and 30-day readmissions. On multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in overall complications and laparoscopic surgery had a 2.5 times higher likelihood of complications than robotic surgery. In sub-analysis of robotic cases, there was no significant difference among all outcome variables. Previously reported outcome differences between laparoscopic RC and LC for cancer may be mitigated by robotic surgery.


Asunto(s)
Ileus , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Infección de Heridas , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/métodos , Humanos , Ileus/epidemiología , Ileus/etiología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos
20.
Am J Surg ; 224(6): 1351-1355, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36272826

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hartmann's reversal (HR) is associated with significant technical difficulty and morbidity. Using the ACS-NSQIP database, we assessed the outcomes of HR as compared to elective left colectomy (LC). METHODS: The 2016-2019 ACS-NSQIP datasets were queried to identify patients undergoing HR and elective LC. Patients' demographics, comorbidities, and short-term surgical outcomes were evaluated using both univariable and multivariable methods. RESULTS: The study included 7,632 HR cases and 29,162 LC cases. The HR group had more patients with ASA grade III (50% vs. 42.4%). HR had more open-operative cases (69.4 vs. 18.5%) and longer mean operative times (213 vs. 191 min) than LC. Postoperatively, the HR group had a longer mean hospital stay (5.5 vs. 4.1 days) and higher complication rate (18.3% vs. 10.3%). HR was associated with increased odds of having a concurrent ileostomy (OR 2.11), deep space/organ infection (OR 1.55), and at least one complication (OR 1.56). CONCLUSION: HR is a more challenging operation with patients who fared worse than their LC counterparts. Consideration should be given to alternatives of the index Hartmann's procedure.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Humanos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Reoperación/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Colectomía/métodos , Colostomía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA