Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 37
Filtrar
Más filtros

Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 31(5): 385-403, 2021 Oct 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33653682

RESUMEN

The controlled drug provocation test (DPT) is currently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of drug allergy. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an increasingly common presenting complaint in both primary and specialized care. In Spain, ADRs are usually assessed via the allergology department, which rules out immunological mechanisms in up to 90% of cases. An adequate approach to ADRs clearly impacts the costs and efficacy of the treatments prescribed by other specialists. Consequently, if we did not use DPTs, patients would require more expensive, more toxic, and less effective treatments in many cases. In recent years, many new drugs have been developed. This document is intended to be a practical guideline for the management of DPTs according to the vision of the Spanish Allergology Society. The diagnostic work-up begins with a detailed clinical history. Skin tests are only useful for some medications, and in most cases the diagnosis can only be confirmed by DPT. Although cross-reactivity is common, DPTs can confirm the diagnosis and help to find an alternative drug. Programmed individualized patient management based on the type of drug to be studied and the patient´s comorbidities usually enables a solution to be found in most cases.


Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Pruebas Cutáneas , España
2.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 31(5): 364-384, 2021 Oct 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34045179

RESUMEN

Rapid drug desensitization has enabled first-line therapies in patients with drug hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs including monoclonal antibodies. Desensitization is a safe and highly effective procedure, not only for IgE-mediated reactions, but also for those mediated by non-IgE mechanisms. The likelihood of breakthrough reactions during desensitization is low, and most are mild; in fact, moderate-to-severe reactions are infrequent. In this document, 16 allergy departments belonging to the Spanish research network ARADyAL present a review of the available scientific evidence and provide general guidelines for the diagnosis and management of drug hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs and monoclonal antibodies. Emphasis is placed on the desensitization procedure.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Neoplasias , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/terapia , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 30(4): 229-253, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31932268

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a complex multisystemic severe drug hypersensitivity reaction whose diagnosis and management are troublesome. DRESS syndrome requires management by various specialists. The correct identification of the culprit drug is essential to ensure safe future therapeutic options for the patient. There are no previous Spanish guidelines or consensus statements on DRESS syndrome. Objective: To draft a review and guidelines on the clinical diagnosis, allergy work-up, management, treatment, and prevention of DRESS syndrome in light of currently available scientific evidence and the experience of experts from multiple disciplines. METHODS: These guidelines were drafted by a panel of allergy specialists from the Drug Allergy Committee of the Spanish Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC), together with other medical specialists involved in the management of DRESS syndrome and researchers from the PIELenRed consortium. A review was conducted of scientific papers on DRESS syndrome, and the expert panel evaluated the quality of the evidence of the literature and provided grades of recommendation. Whenever evidence was lacking, a consensus was reached among the experts. RESULTS: The first Spanish guidelines on DRESS syndrome are now being published. Important aspects have been addressed, including practical recommendations about clinical diagnosis, identification of the culprit drug through the Spanish pharmacovigilance system algorithm, and the allergy work-up. Recommendations are provided on management, treatment, and prevention. Algorithms for the management of DRESS in the acute and recovery phases have been drawn up. Expert consensus-based stepwise guidelines for the management and treatment of DRESS syndrome are provided.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Hígado/metabolismo , Piel/patología , Algoritmos , Alopurinol/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Comorbilidad , Consenso , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos/epidemiología , Eosinofilia , Testimonio de Experto , Humanos , Leucocitosis , Hígado/patología , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología
5.
Diabet Med ; 34(7): 966-972, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28326628

RESUMEN

AIMS: Hyperglycaemic crises (diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state) are medical emergencies in people with diabetes. We aimed to determine their incidence, recurrence and economic impact. METHODS: An observational study of hyperglycaemic crises cases using the database maintained by the out-of-hospital emergency service, the Healthcare Emergency Public Service (EPES) during 2012. The EPES provides emergency medical services to the total population of Andalusia, Spain (8.5 million inhabitants) and records data on the incidence, resource utilization and cost of out-of-hospital medical care. Direct costs were estimated using public prices for health services updated to 2012. RESULTS: Among 1 137 738 emergency calls requesting medical assistance, 3157 were diagnosed with hyperglycaemic crises by an emergency coordinator, representing 2.9 cases per 1000 persons with diabetes [95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.8 to 3.0]. The incidence of diabetic ketoacidosis was 2.5 cases per 1000 persons with diabetes (95% CI 2.4 to 2.6) and the incidence of hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state was 0.4 cases per 1000 persons with diabetes (95% CI 0.4 to 0.5). In total, 17.7% (n = 440) of people had one or more hyperglycaemic crisis. The estimated total direct cost was €4 662 151, with a mean direct cost per episode of €1476.8 ± 217.8. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperglycaemic crises require high resource utilization of emergency medical services and have a significant economic impact on the health system.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones de la Diabetes/terapia , Cetoacidosis Diabética/terapia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Hiperglucemia/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Niño , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/economía , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/epidemiología , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/fisiopatología , Cetoacidosis Diabética/economía , Cetoacidosis Diabética/epidemiología , Cetoacidosis Diabética/fisiopatología , Costos Directos de Servicios , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/economía , Hiperglucemia/epidemiología , Hiperglucemia/fisiopatología , Incidencia , Masculino , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , España/epidemiología
7.
Malays J Pathol ; 39(2): 181-187, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28866702

RESUMEN

The authors describe a fatal case of gastric perforation secondary to an ulcerated metastasis in a woman with undiagnosed breast cancer. The 48-year-old woman, with no significant medical history, presented with weight loss, persistent dyspepsia and pain in the epigastric and mesogastric region. She was treated by her primary care physician with proton-pump inhibitors and antispasmodics. The following day she was found dead at her home. External examination showed a tumefaction in the lateral region of her left breast, near the axilla. Autopsy revealed 1000 ml of turbid, light-brown peritoneal fluid in the abdominal cavity and a perforated gastric wall. Histological examination of the breast mass showed an infiltrating, poorly-differentiated breast carcinoma. Microscopical analysis of the stomach wall revealed a perforated metastatic gastric ulcer. Immunohistochemistry was required to confirm the neoplastic involvement of the stomach due to metastatic breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/secundario , Úlcera Gástrica/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Perforación Espontánea/etiología
10.
Diabet Med ; 32(11): 1520-6, 2015 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26118472

RESUMEN

AIMS: Hypoglycaemia is a serious medical emergency. The need for emergency medical service care and the costs of hypoglycaemic emergencies are not completely known. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study using Public Company for Health Emergencies (EPES) data for hypoglycaemia in 2012. The EPES provides emergency medical services to the entire population of Andalusia, Spain (8.5 million people). Data on event type, onsite treatments, emergency room visits or hospitalization were collected. Medical costs were estimated using the public rates for healthcare services. RESULTS: From a total of 1 137 738 emergency calls that requested medical assistance, 8683 had a primary diagnosis of hypoglycaemia (10.34 per 10 000 person-years). The incidence of severe hypoglycaemic episodes requiring emergency treatment in the estimated population with diabetes was 80 episodes per 10 000 person-years. A total of 7479 episodes (86%) required an emergency team to visit the patient's residence. The majority of cases (64%) were addressed in the residence, although 1784 (21%) cases were transferred to hospital. A total of 5564 events (65%) involved patients aged > 65 years. Overall mortality was 0.32% (28 cases). The total annual cost of attending a hypoglycaemic episode was €6 093 507, leading to an estimated mean direct cost per episode of €702 ± 565. Episodes that required hospital treatment accounted for 49% of the total costs. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoglycaemia is a common medical emergency that is associated with high emergency medical service utilization, resulting in a significant economic impact on the health system.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones de la Diabetes/terapia , Costos Directos de Servicios , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Hipoglucemia/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Niño , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/economía , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/epidemiología , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/fisiopatología , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/economía , Hipoglucemia/epidemiología , Hipoglucemia/fisiopatología , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España/epidemiología
11.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed) ; 86(1): 51-58, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32499179

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Video capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted enteroscopy are complementary diagnostic methods in the study of small bowel bleeding, and different factors can affect their diagnostic yield. AIMS: To define the level of agreement between video capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy in small bowel bleeding, according to the type of lesion, in a cohort of patients at a tertiary care referral center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted that included 428 capsule endoscopies performed within the time frame of 2011 and 2019 at our healthcare institution. Seventy-four video capsule endoscopies, followed by enteroscopy, in 71 patients suspected of presenting with small bowel bleeding, were analyzed. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 63.9 ± 13.5 years and 42 patients were women. The two diagnostic procedures were performed. Overall diagnostic yield of positive findings between video capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy was 86.5% vs. 58.1%, respectively (p = 0.0527). Agreement between video capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy for positive pathologic findings was weak (Ik = 0.17, 95% CI: -0.0097-0.3543), but according to lesion type, it was good for inflammatory lesions (Ik = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.5182-0.9119) and moderate for angiectasias (Ik = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.2469-0.6538) and tumors (Ik = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.1217-0.6794). The results between the two methods differed in 38 patients (51.3%). There was complete intestinal capsule retention in one patient (1.4%) and active bleeding in 13 (17.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that the two techniques had a similar overall detection rate for small bowel lesions, but the type of lesion was the main factor that could modify diagnostic agreement.

12.
Seizure ; 89: 5-9, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33933947

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: New treatments for acute ischaemic stroke, such as mechanical thrombectomy, can achieve reperfusion of large ischaemic tissue. Some studies have suggested that reperfusion therapies can increase the risk of suffering acute symptomatic seizure (ASS) and poststroke epilepsy (PSE). The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of ASS and PSE in patients undergoing thrombectomy, and related factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre study including patients with ischaemic stroke and NIHSS> 8 treated with thrombectomy with a follow-up ≥5 years. We evaluated several epidemiological, radiological, clinical and electroencephalographic variables. RESULTS: Of the 344 included patients, 21 (6.1%) presented ASS, 53 (15.40%) died in the acute phase, and 13 (4.46%) died during the first year. The degree of reperfusion (p 0.029), advanced age (p 0.035), and haemorrhagic transformation (p 0.038) increased the risk of suffering ASS, with degree of reperfusion being an independent factor, OR 2.02 (1.21-4.64). The incidence of PSE was 4.12% in the first year, 3.72% in the second, and 1.61% in the fifth. The accumulated incidence at 5 years was 8.93%. Related risk factor for suffering PSE was ASS (p < 0.001), yielding an OR value of 2.00 (1.28-3.145). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombectomy doesn´t increase the risk of ASS. A higher percentage of reperfusion, advanced age, and haemorrhagic transformation are associated with an increased risk of ASS. ASS is a risk factor for suffering PSE. In terms of mortality, having suffered ASS and/or PSE does not increase acute or long-term mortality.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Epilepsia , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Epilepsia/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/epidemiología , Convulsiones/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Trombectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex ; 74(3): 212-7, 2009.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19858009

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for most of the primary and secondary liver tumors, unfortunately, many patients are not suitable for resection. Several ablative alternatives have been employed for treatment; the most commonly used has been radiofrequency ablation. OBJECTIVE: To establish the safety and results of treatment with radiofrequency ablation (RF) of malignant liver tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of clinical files of patients with malignant hepatic tumors treated with RF was performed. Epidemiological variables, selection criteria pre- treatment and morbidity and mortality related to the procedure were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: From September 2002 to August 2006, 30 patients were treated: eighteen females and 12 males with a median age of 62 years (range 41-83 years). Histologic type was as follows: 18 hepatocellular carcinomas; 10 metastatic tumors (four breast, four colorectal and two neuro- endocrine); one gallbladder carcinoma and one peripheral cholangiocarcinoma. Indications for ablative procedure were the presence of cirrhosis, poor functional reserve, bilobar disease, proximity to major vascular structures and patients with increased operative risk. The size of the lesion range from 2 to 20 cm (mean 5.6 cm) and the median time of ablation was 30.2 min (range 5-50 min). Two minor complications (6.6%) and no operative mortality were recorded. At 18 months of follow-up, 23 patients (76.6%) are still alive and seven patients have died for tumor progression. CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency ablation is a safe procedure that allows local control of the disease with satisfactory results, when the surgical resection is not feasible.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/etiología , Cirrosis Hepática/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17323868

RESUMEN

Patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) intolerance usually have cutanous-mucosal or/and respiratory symptoms. We report the case of a patient who developed several episodes of left-eye conjunctivitis, manifested as conjunctival chemosis, with no other symptoms, after taking metamizole and other unidentified NSAIDs. We performed both a single blind placebo-controlled oral challenge test and conjunctival challenge test with different NSAIDs. The single blind placebo-controlled oral challenge was positive to ketoprofen and diclofenac. The conjunctival challenge with diclofenac and flurbiprofen was negative. The patient tolerated celecoxib and nabumetone. We believe this to be an exceptional case of NSAID intolerance as conjunctival chemosis has not hitherto been included in any of the classic types of pseudoallergic reactions.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos , Enfermedades de la Conjuntiva/diagnóstico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de la Conjuntiva/inducido químicamente , Dipirona/efectos adversos , Edema/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
15.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 31(5): 364-384, 2021. ilus, tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-216381

RESUMEN

Rapid drug desensitization has enabled first-line therapies in patients with drug hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs including monoclonal antibodies. Desensitization is a safe and highly effective procedure, not only for IgE-mediated reactions, but also for those mediated by non-IgE mechanisms. The likelihood of breakthrough reactions during desensitization is low, and most are mild; in fact, moderate-to-severe reactions are infrequent. In this document, 16 allergy departments belonging to the Spanish research network ARADyAL present a review of the available scientific evidence and provide general guidelines for the diagnosis and management of drug hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs and monoclonal antibodies. Emphasis is placed on the desensitization procedure (AU)


La desensibilización a medicamentos ha permitido la administración de fármacos de primera línea en pacientes con reacciones dehipersensibilidad (RH) a quimioterápicos (QT), incluyendo los anticuerpos monoclonales (AcM). La desensibilización es un procedimientoseguro y altamente efectivo, no únicamente para las reacciones mediadas por IgE sino también para aquellas relacionadas con un mecanismoindependiente de IgE. El riesgo de reacciones durante la desensibilización es bajo y frecuentemente las reacciones observadas son leves,considerándose infrecuentes las reacciones moderadas o graves.En este documento, dieciséis Servicios de Alergia pertenecientes a la red española de investigación ARADyAL presentan una revisiónde la evidencia científica disponible y sugieren unas pautas de actuación generales para el diagnóstico y manejo de las RH a QT y AcM,centrándose en el proceso de desensibilización (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/terapia , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico
16.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 31(5): 385-403, 2021. tab, ilus
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-216382

RESUMEN

The controlled drug provocation test (DPT) is currently considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of drug allergy. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an increasingly common presenting complaint in both primary and specialized care. In Spain, ADRs are usually assessed via the allergology department, which rules out immunological mechanisms in up to 90% of cases. An adequate approach to ADRs clearly impacts the costs and efficacy of the treatments prescribed by other specialists. Consequently, if we did not use DPTs, patients would require more expensive, more toxic, and less effective treatments in many cases. In recent years, many new drugs have been developed. This document is intended to be a practical guideline for the management of DPTs according to the vision of the Spanish Allergology Society. The diagnostic work-up begins with a detailed clinical history. Skin tests are only useful for some medications, and in most cases the diagnosis can only be confirmed by DPT. Although cross-reactivity is common, DPTs can confirm the diagnosis and help to find an alternative drug. Programmed individualized patient management based on the type of drug to be studied and the patient's comorbidities usually enables a solution to be found in most cases (AU)


La prueba de exposición controlada a fármacos (DPT) se considera actualmente el estándar de oro para el diagnóstico de alergia amedicamentos. Las reacciones adversas inducidas por medicamentos (RAM) son un motivo creciente de consulta tanto en atención primariacomo especializada. Las consultas de Alergología en España son las que habitualmente estudian estas RAM y descartan mecanismosinmunológicos implicados hasta en el 90% de los casos consultados. Un abordaje adecuado de estos casos repercute de una maneraevidente en los costes y la eficacia de los tratamientos requeridos por otros especialistas, de modo que, si no empleáramos los DPT, lospacientes requerirían tratamientos más costosos, más tóxicos y menos eficaces en la mayoría de los casos.En los últimos años se han desarrollado un gran número de nuevos fármacos y este documento pretende ser una guía práctica en lagestión de las DPT con la visión de la Sociedad Española de Alergología. El trabajo de diagnóstico comienza con un historial detalladodel paciente. Las pruebas cutáneas solo son útiles en algunos medicamentos y, en la mayoría de los casos, el diagnóstico solo puedeconfirmarse mediante el DPT. Aunque suele haber reactividad cruzada, las DPT pueden confirmar el diagnóstico y también contribuir aencontrar un fármaco alternativo tolerable. El manejo individual de los pacientes de forma programada, teniendo en cuenta tanto eltipo de fármaco a estudiar como las comorbilidades del paciente, suele permitir encontrar una solución para la mayoría de los pacientes (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Sociedades Médicas , Pruebas Cutáneas , España
19.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 30(4): 229-253, 2020. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-194932

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a complex multisystemic severe drug hypersensitivity reaction whose diagnosis and management are troublesome. DRESS syndrome requires management by various specialists. The correct identification of the culprit drug is essential to ensure safe future therapeutic options for the patient. There are no previous Spanish guidelines or consensus statements on DRESS syndrome. OBJECTIVE: To draft a review and guidelines on the clinical diagnosis, allergy work-up, management, treatment, and prevention of DRESS syndrome in light of currently available scientific evidence and the experience of experts from multiple disciplines. METHODS: These guidelines were drafted by a panel of allergy specialists from the Drug Allergy Committee of the Spanish Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC), together with other medical specialists involved in the management of DRESS syndrome and researchers from the PIELenRed consortium. A review was conducted of scientific papers on DRESS syndrome, and the expert panel evaluated the quality of the evidence of the literature and provided grades of recommendation. Whenever evidence was lacking, a consensus was reached among the experts. RESULTS: The first Spanish guidelines on DRESS syndrome are now being published. Important aspects have been addressed, including practical recommendations about clinical diagnosis, identification of the culprit drug through the Spanish pharmacovigilance system algorithm, and the allergy work-up. Recommendations are provided on management, treatment, and prevention. Algorithms for the management of DRESS in the acute and recovery phases have been drawn up. Expert consensus-based stepwise guidelines for the management and treatment of DRESS syndrome are provided


ANTECEDENTES: El síndrome DRESS (Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) es una reacción cutánea grave inducida por hipersensibilidad a fármacos, compleja y multisistémica. Su diagnóstico y manejo es difícil e implica a diferentes especialistas. Es muy importante una correcta identificación del fármaco responsable para que el paciente disponga de opciones terapéuticas seguras en el futuro. No hay guías ni documentos de consenso españoles previos sobre el síndrome DRESS. OBJETIVO: Realizar una revisión y guía sobre el diagnóstico clínico y alergológico, manejo, tratamiento y prevención del DRESS según la evidencia científica disponible y la experiencia de expertos de diferentes especialidades médicas. MÉTODOS: Esta guía ha sido elaborada por un grupo de alergólogos del Comité de Alergia a Fármacos de la SEAIC, junto a otros especialistas involucrados en el manejo del DRESS e investigadores del Consorcio PIELenRed. Se realizó una búsqueda de publicaciones científicas sobre DRESS y el grupo de expertos evaluó la evidencia científica de la literatura y aportaron grados de recomendación. Cuando no existía evidencia se alcanzó un consenso entre expertos. RESULTADOS: Se publica la guía española sobre DRESS. Incluye aspectos prácticos importantes sobre el diagnóstico clínico, la identificación de fármacos causales a través del algoritmo del Sistema Español de Farmacovigilancia y guía para el diagnóstico alergológico. Se realizan recomendaciones sobre el manejo, tratamiento y prevención del DRESS. Se aportan algoritmos sobre el manejo en la fase aguda y en la de recuperación. Se ha elaborado una guía terapéutica escalonada consensuada por expertos especialistas implicados en el tratamiento del DRESS


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos/prevención & control , Síndrome de Hipersensibilidad a Medicamentos/terapia , España
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA