RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe whether body mass index (BMI) is a clinically meaningful predictor of patient reported outcomes following primary total hip replacement (THR) surgery. DESIGN: Combined data from prospective cohort studies. We obtained information from four cohorts of patients receiving primary THR for osteoarthritis: Exeter Primary Outcomes Study (EPOS) (n = 1431); EUROHIP (n = 1327); Elective Orthopaedic Centre (n = 2832); and St. Helier (n = 787). The exposure of interest was pre-operative BMI. Confounding variables included: age, sex, SF-36 mental health, comorbidities, fixed flexion, analgesic use, college education, OA in other joints, expectation of less pain, radiographic K&L grade, ASA grade, years of hip pain. The primary outcome was the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Regression models describe the association of BMI on outcome adjusting for all confounders. RESULTS: For a 5-unit increase in BMI, the attained 12-month OHS decreases by 0.78 points 95%CI (0.27-1.28), P-value 0.001. Compared to people of normal BMI (20-25), those in the obese class II (BMI 35-40) would have a 12-month OHS that is 2.34 points lower. Although statistically significant this effect is small and not clinically meaningful in contrast to the substantial change in OHS seen across all BMI groupings. In obese class II patients achieved a 22.2 point change in OHS following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Patients achieved substantial change in OHS after THR across all BMI categories, which greatly outweighs the small difference in attained post-operative score. The findings suggest BMI should not present a barrier to access THR in terms of PROMs.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Masa Corporal , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/rehabilitación , Satisfacción del Paciente , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Femoroacetabular Impingement (FAI) and Acetabular Dysplasia are common deformities, which have been implicated as a major cause of hip osteoarthritis (OA). We examined whether these subtle deformities of the hip are associated with the development of radiographic OA and total hip replacement (THR) in women. DESIGN: A population-based, longitudinal cohort of 1003 women underwent pelvis radiographs at years 2 and 20. Alpha Angle, Triangular Index Height, Lateral Centre Edge (LCE) angle and Extrusion Index were measured. An alpha angle of greater than 65° was defined as Cam-type FAI. Radiographic OA and the presence of a THR were then determined at 20 years. RESULTS: Cam-type FAI was significantly associated with the development of radiographic OA. Each degree increase in alpha angle above 65° was associated with an increase in risk of 5% (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.05 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.09]) for radiographic OA and 4% (OR 1.04 [95% CI 1.00-1.08]) for THR. For Acetabular Dysplasia, each degree reduction in LCE angle below 28° was associated with an increase in risk of 13.0% (OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.78-0.96]) for radiographic OA and 18% (OR 0.82 [95% CI 0.75-0.89]) for THR. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that Cam-type FAI and mild Acetabular Dysplasia are predictive of subsequent OA and THR in a large female population cohort. These are independent of age, BMI and joint space and significantly improve current predictive models of hip OA development.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Pinzamiento Femoroacetabular/epidemiología , Luxación de la Cadera/epidemiología , Articulación de la Cadera/anomalías , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Pinzamiento Femoroacetabular/diagnóstico por imagen , Luxación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) and questionnaire-based assessments have been used to demonstrate features of neuropathic pain in subjects with musculoskeletal pain. However, their direct relationship has not been investigated in the community. The purpose of this study was to conduct an observational study to describe the characteristics of joint pain and to examine the relationship between QST measures and the PainDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q). METHODS: Warm detection, heat pain, and mechanical pain thresholds as well as mechanical pain sensitivity over the sternum were determined and the PD-Q scores were calculated in a cross-sectional study of 462 participants in the Chingford Study. Comparisons were made between subjects with and those without joint pain. Logistic regression modeling was used to describe the association between neuropathic pain features, as determined by the PD-Q score, and each of the QST measures individually, adjusting for age, body mass index, and use of pain-modifying medications. RESULTS: A total of 66.2% of the subjects reported recent joint pain, with a median average pain severity of 5 of 10. There was increased sensitivity to painful stimuli in the group with pain as compared to the pain-free group, and this persisted after stratification by pain-modifying medication use. While only 6.7% of subjects had possible neuropathic pain features and 1.9% likely neuropathic pain features according to the standard PD-Q thresholds, features of neuropathic pain were common and were present in >50% of those reporting pain of at least moderate severity. Heat pain thresholds and mechanical pain sensitivity were significantly associated with features of neuropathic pain identified using the PD-Q, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.79-0.97; P = 0.011) and an OR of 1.24 (95% CI 1.04-1.48; P = 0.018), respectively. CONCLUSION: QST measures and the PD-Q identified features of neuropathic pain in subjects in this community-based study, with significant overlap between the findings of the two techniques.
Asunto(s)
Artralgia/complicaciones , Neuralgia/diagnóstico , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Neuralgia/complicaciones , Dimensión del Dolor , Umbral del Dolor , Umbral Sensorial , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Genetic factors and abnormalities of joint morphology are important in the aetiology of hip osteoarthritis (OA). The extent to which genetic influences are manifest through joint morphology has undergone limited investigation. Using a cohort with an hereditary predisposition to end-stage hip OA and a control group with no inherited risk, we aimed to identify associations with abnormal joint morphology and clinical features. DESIGN: One hundred and twenty-three individuals (mean age 52 years) with a family history of total hip arthroplasty (THA) (termed 'sibkids') were compared with 80 spouse controls. Morphology was assessed using standardised radiographs and cam, dysplasia, and pincer deformities defined. Regression modelling described the association of cohort with abnormal joint morphology, adjusting for confounders [age, gender, body mass index (BMI), OA, and osteophyte]. RESULTS: Sibkids had an odds ratio of 2.1 [95%confidence interval (CI) 1.3-3.5] for cam deformity. There were no differences in the prevalence of dysplasia or pincer deformities. In both groups, hips with cam deformities or dysplasia were more likely to have clinical features than normal hips [odds ratio (OR) 4.46 (1.8-11.3), and 4.40 (1.4-14.3) respectively]. Pincer deformity was associated with positive signs in the sibkids but not in the controls (OR 3.0; 1.1-8.2). DISCUSSION: After adjustment for confounders that cause secondary morphological change, individuals with an hereditary predisposition to end-stage hip OA had a higher prevalence of morphological abnormalities associated with hip OA. Sibkids were more likely to demonstrate clinical features in the presence of pincer deformity, suggesting that the genes are acting not only through abnormal morphology but also through other factors that influence the prevalence of pain.
Asunto(s)
Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Articulación de la Cadera/anomalías , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/epidemiología , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/genética , Acetábulo/anomalías , Acetábulo/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Fémur/anomalías , Fémur/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Prospectivos , RadiografíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Genetic factors are important in the aetiology of hip osteoarthritis (OA), but studies are limited by cross-sectional design and poor association with clinically important disease. Identifying cohorts with progressive OA will facilitate development of OA biomarkers. Using a middle-aged cohort with genetic predisposition to hip OA and a control group, we compared the prevalence of clinical and radiographic hip OA and incidence of progression over 5 years. DESIGN: 123 individuals (mean age 52 years) with a family history of total hip arthroplasty (THA) ('sibkids') were compared with 80 (mean age 54 years) controls. The prevalence of radiographic OA [scored according to Kellgren & Lawrence (K&L)], clinical features, and incidence of clinical progression over a 5-year period were compared. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Sibkids had odds ratios (ORs) of 2.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-6.3, P = 0.02] for hip OA (K&L grade ≥2), 3.4 (1.4-8.4, P = 0.008) for clinical signs, and 2.1 (0.8-5.8, P = 0.14) for signs and symptoms. Over 5 years, sibkids had ORs of 4.7 (1.7-13.2, P = 0.003) for the development of signs, and 3.2 (1.0-10.3, P = 0.047) for the development of signs and symptoms. DISCUSSION: Compared to a control group and after adjustment for confounders, individuals with genetic predisposition to end-stage hip OA have higher prevalence of OA, clinical features, and progression. In addition to structural degeneration, the inherited risk may include predisposition to pain. Genetically-loaded cohorts are useful to develop hip OA biomarkers, as they develop progressive disease at a young age.
Asunto(s)
Osteoartritis de la Cadera/genética , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteoartritis de la Cadera/cirugía , RadiografíaRESUMEN
To develop and validate a clinical prediction model of patient-reported pain and function after undergoing total knee replacement (TKR). We used data of 1,649 patients from the Knee Arthroplasty Trial who received primary TKR across 34 centres in the UK. The external validation included 595 patients from Southampton University Hospital, and Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (Oxford). The outcome was the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) 12-month after TKR. Pre-operative predictors including patient characteristics and clinical factors were considered. Bootstrap backward linear regression analysis was used. Low pre-operative OKS, living in poor areas, high body mass index, and patient-reported anxiety or depression were associated with worse outcome. The clinical factors associated with worse outcome were worse pre-operative physical status, presence of other conditions affecting mobility and previous knee arthroscopy. Presence of fixed flexion deformity and an absent or damaged pre-operative anterior cruciate ligament (compared with intact) were associated with better outcome. Discrimination and calibration statistics were satisfactory. External validation predicted 21.1% of the variance of outcome. This is the first clinical prediction model for predicting self-reported pain and function 12 months after TKR to be externally validated. It will help to inform to patients regarding expectations of the outcome after knee replacement surgery.