Adenylates regulate Arabidopsis plastidial thioredoxin activities through the binding of a CBS domain protein.

Cystathionine-ß-synthase (CBS) domains are found in proteins of all living organisms and have been proposed to play a role as energy sensors regulating protein activities through their adenosyl ligand binding capacity. In plants, members of the CBSX protein family carry a stand-alone pair of CBS domains. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), CBSX1 and CBSX2 are targeted to plastids where they have been proposed to regulate thioredoxins (TRXs). TRXs are ubiquitous cysteine thiol oxido-reductases involved in the redox-based regulation of numerous enzymatic activities as well as in the regeneration of thiol-dependent peroxidases. In Arabidopsis, 10 TRX isoforms have been identified in plastids and divided into five sub-types. Here, we show that CBSX2 specifically inhibits the activities of m-type TRXs toward two chloroplast TRX-related targets. By testing activation of NADP-malate dehydrogenase and reduction of 2-Cys peroxiredoxin, we found that TRXm1/2 inhibition by CBSX2 was alleviated in the presence of AMP or ATP. We also determined, by pull-down assays, a direct interaction of CBSX2 with reduced TRXm1 and m2 that was abolished in the presence of adenosyl ligands. In addition, we report that, compared with wild-type plants, the Arabidopsis T-DNA double mutant cbsx1 cbsx2 exhibits growth and chlorophyll accumulation defects in cold conditions, suggesting a function of plastidial CBSX proteins in plant stress adaptation. Together, our results show an energy-sensing regulation of plastid TRX m activities by CBSX, possibly allowing a feedback regulation of ATP homeostasis via activation of cyclic electron flow in the chloroplast, to maintain a high energy level for optimal growth.

Two interacting PPR proteins are major Arabidopsis editing factors in plastid and mitochondria.

RNA editing is converting hundreds of cytosines into uridines during organelle gene expression of land plants. The pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are at the core of this posttranscriptional RNA modification. Even if a PPR protein defines the editing site, a DYW domain of the same or another PPR protein is believed to catalyze the deamination. To give insight into the organelle RNA editosome, we performed tandem affinity purification of the plastidial CHLOROPLAST BIOGENESIS 19 (CLB19) PPR editing factor. Two PPR proteins, dually targeted to mitochondria and chloroplasts, were identified as potential partners of CLB19. These two proteins, a P-type PPR and a member of a small PPR-DYW subfamily, were shown to interact in yeast. Insertional mutations resulted in embryo lethality that could be rescued by embryo-specific complementation. A transcriptome analysis of these complemented plants showed major editing defects in both organelles with a very high PPR type specificity, indicating that the two proteins are core members of E+-type PPR editosomes.

Dissecting the molecular puzzle of the editosome core in Arabidopsis organelles.

Over the last decade, the composition of the C-to-U RNA editing complex in embryophyte organelles has turned out to be much more complex than first expected. While PPR proteins were initially thought to act alone, significant evidences have clearly depicted a sophisticated mechanism with numerous protein-protein interaction involving PPR and non-PPR proteins. Moreover, the identification of specific functional partnership between PPRs also suggests that, in addition to the highly specific PPRs directly involved in the RNA target recognition, non-RNA-specific ones are required. Although some of them, such as DYW1 and DYW2, were shown to be the catalytic domains of the editing complex, the molecular function of others, such as NUWA, remains elusive. It was suggested that they might stabilize the complex by acting as a scaffold. We here performed functional complementation of the crr28-2 mutant with truncated CRR28 proteins mimicking PPR without the catalytic domain and show that they exhibit a specific dependency to one of the catalytic proteins DYW1 or DYW2. Moreover, we also characterized the role of the PPR NUWA in the editing reaction and show that it likely acts as a scaffolding factor. NUWA is no longer required for efficient editing of the CLB19 editing sites once this RNA specific PPR is fused to the DYW catalytic domain of its partner DYW2. Altogether, our results strongly support a flexible, evolutive and resilient editing complex in which RNA binding activity, editing activity and stabilization/scaffolding function can be provided by one or more PPRs.

A Semi-throughput Procedure for Assaying Plant NADP-malate Dehydrogenase Activity Using a Plate Reader.

Chloroplast NADP-dependent malate dehydrogenase (NADP-MDH) is a redox regulated enzyme playing an important role in plant redox homeostasis. Leaf NADP-MDH activation level is considered a proxy for the chloroplast redox status. NADP-MDH enzyme activity is commonly assayed spectrophotometrically by following oxaloacetate-dependent NADPH oxidation at 340 nm. We have developed a plate-adapted protocol to monitor NADP-MDH activity allowing faster data production and lower reagent consumption compared to the classic cuvette format of a spectrophotometer. We provide a detailed procedure to assay NADP-MDH activity and measure the enzyme activation state in purified protein preparations or in leaf extracts. This protocol is provided together with a semi-automatized data analysis procedure using an R script.

Analysis of the Plant Mitochondrial Transcriptome.

Transcriptome analyses are widely performed, but the analysis of organelle genome expression is often overlooked. In this chapter, we describe three methods to analyse the accumulation, splicing, editing and processing of plant mitochondrial transcript expression: a classical RT-qPCR assay, an RNA-Seq approach with its bioinformatical and statistical analysis pipeline, as well as a useful complementary technique, the Northern-blot analysis, using short biotinylated oligonucleotides as probes.

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DicoExpress.

The proper use of statistical modeling in NGS data analysis requires an advanced level of expertise. There has recently been a growing consensus on using generalized linear models for differential analysis of RNA-Seq data and the advantage of mixture models to perform co-expression analysis. To offer a managed setting to use these modeling approaches, we developed DiCoExpress that provides a standardized R pipeline to perform an RNA-Seq analysis. Without any particular knowledge in statistics or R programming, beginners can perform a complete RNA-Seq analysis from quality controls to co-expression through differential analysis based on contrasts inside a generalized linear model. An enrichment analysis is proposed both on the lists of differentially expressed genes, and the co-expressed gene clusters. This video tutorial is conceived as a step-by-step protocol to help users take full advantage of DiCoExpress and its potential in empowering the biological interpretation of an RNA-Seq experiment.

The Analysis of the Editing Defects in the dyw2 Mutant Provides New Clues for the Prediction of RNA Targets of Arabidopsis E+-Class PPR Proteins.

C to U editing is one of the post-transcriptional steps which are required for the proper expression of chloroplast and mitochondrial genes in plants. It depends on several proteins acting together which include the PLS-class pentatricopeptide repeat proteins (PPR). DYW2 was recently shown to be required for the editing of many sites in both organelles. In particular almost all the sites associated with the E+ subfamily of PPR proteins are depending on DYW2, suggesting that DYW2 is required for the function of E+-type PPR proteins. Here we strengthened this link by identifying 16 major editing sites controlled by 3 PPR proteins: OTP90, a DYW-type PPR and PGN and MEF37, 2 E+-type PPR proteins. A re-analysis of the DYW2 editotype showed that the 49 sites known to be associated with the 18 characterized E+-type PPR proteins all depend on DYW2. Considering only the 288 DYW2-dependent editing sites as potential E+-type PPR sites, instead of the 795 known editing sites, improves the performances of binding predictions systems based on the PPR code for E+-type PPR proteins. However, it does not compensate for poor binding predictions.