RESUMEN
Importance: Disability persists after hip fracture in older persons. Current rehabilitation may not be sufficient to restore ability to walk in the community. Objective: To compare a multicomponent home-based physical therapy intervention (training) with an active control on ability to walk in the community. Design, Setting, and Participants: Parallel, 2-group randomized clinical trial conducted at 3 US clinical centers (Arcadia University, University of Connecticut Health Center, and University of Maryland, Baltimore). Randomization began on September 16, 2013, and ended on June 20, 2017; follow-up ended on October 17, 2017. Patients aged 60 years and older were enrolled after nonpathologic, minimal trauma hip fracture, if they were living in the community and walking without human assistance before the fracture, were assessed within 26 weeks of hospitalization, and were not able to walk during daily activities at the time of enrollment. A total of 210 participants were randomized and reassessed 16 and 40 weeks later. Interventions: The training intervention (active treatment) (n = 105) included aerobic, strength, balance, and functional training. The active control group (n = 105) received transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and active range-of-motion exercises. Both groups received 2 to 3 home visits from a physical therapist weekly for 16 weeks; nutritional counseling; and daily vitamin D (2000 IU), calcium (600 mg), and multivitamins. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome (community ambulation) was defined as walking 300 m or more in 6 minutes at 16 weeks after randomization. The study was designed to test a 1-sided hypothesis of superiority of training compared with active control. Results: Among 210 randomized participants (mean age, 80.8 years; 161 women [76.7%]), 197 (93.8%) completed the trial (187 [89.0%] by completing the 6-minute walk test at 16 weeks and 10 [4.8%] by adjudication of the primary outcome). Among these, 22 of 96 training participants (22.9%) and 18 of 101 active control participants (17.8%) (difference, 5.1% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 16.3%]; 1-sided P = .19) became community ambulators. Seventeen training participants (16.2%) and 15 control participants (14.3%) had 1 or more reportable adverse events during the intervention period. The most common reportable adverse events reported were falls (training: 6 [5.7%], control: 4 [3.8%]), femur/hip fracture (2 in each group), pneumonia (training: 2, control: 0), urinary tract infection (training: 2, control: 0), dehydration (training: 0, control: 2), and dyspnea (training: 0, control: 2). Conclusions and Relevance: Among older adults with a hip fracture, a multicomponent home-based physical therapy intervention compared with an active control that included transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and active range-of-motion exercises did not result in a statistically significant improvement in the ability to walk 300 m or more in 6 minutes after 16 weeks. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01783704.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera/rehabilitación , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Femenino , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Humanos , Masculino , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio , Prueba de PasoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Following traumatic brain injury (TBI), older adults are at an increased risk of hemorrhagic and thromboembolic events, but it is unclear whether the increased risk continues after hospital discharge. We estimated incidence rates of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke following hospital discharge for TBI among adults 65 years or older and compared them with pre-TBI rates. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 16 936 Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with a diagnosis of TBI in any position on an inpatient claim between June 1, 2006, and December 31, 2009, who survived to hospital discharge. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a random 5% sample of Medicare claims data. MAIN MEASURES: Hemorrhagic stroke was defined as ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision) codes 430.xx-432.xx. Ischemic stroke was defined as ICD-9 codes 433.xx-435.xx, 437.0x, and 437.1x. RESULTS: There was a 6-fold increase in the rate of hemorrhagic stroke following TBI compared with the pre-TBI period (adjusted rate ratio, 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 5.3-7.8), controlling for age and sex. A smaller increase in the rate of ischemic stroke was observed (adjusted rate ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.4). CONCLUSION: Future studies should investigate causes of increased stroke risk post-TBI as well as effective treatment options to reduce stroke risk and improve outcomes post-TBI among older adults.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/complicaciones , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Hemorragias Intracraneales/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Frequent manual repositioning is an established part of pressure ulcer prevention, but there is little evidence for its effectiveness. This study examined the association between repositioning and pressure ulcer incidence among bed-bound elderly hip fracture patients, using data from a 2004-2007 cohort study in nine Maryland and Pennsylvania hospitals. Eligible patients (n=269) were age ≥ 65 years, underwent hip fracture surgery, and were bed-bound at index study visits (during the first 5 days of hospitalization). Information about repositioning on the days of index visits was collected from patient charts; study nurses assessed presence of stage 2+ pressure ulcers 2 days later. The association between frequent manual repositioning and pressure ulcer incidence was estimated, adjusting for pressure ulcer risk factors using generalized estimating equations and weighted estimating equations. Patients were frequently repositioned (at least every 2 hours) on only 53% (187/354) of index visit days. New pressure ulcers developed at 12% of visits following frequent repositioning vs. 10% following less frequent repositioning; the incidence rate of pressure ulcers per person-day did not differ between the two groups (incidence rate ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 0.5-2.4). No association was found between frequent repositioning of bed-bound patients and lower pressure ulcer incidence, calling into question the allocation of resources for repositioning.
Asunto(s)
Reposo en Cama/efectos adversos , Fracturas de Cadera/terapia , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/complicaciones , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Defining long-term outcomes in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) has been complicated by varying definitions of treatment response and differing scales measuring impairment or disability. An expert panel was convened to devise a CIDP Disease Activity Status (CDAS) and to classify long-term outcome by applying it to 106 patients with a consensus diagnosis of CIDP. Sixty of these cases were graded blindly by three independent reviewers to assess inter-rater reliability. The mean duration of follow-up was 6.4 years (range, 3 months-23 years). Eleven percent of patients were classified as cured (stable examination and off treatment for ≥5 years), 20% were in remission (stable and off treatment for <5 years), 44% had stable active disease but required ongoing therapy for at least 1 year, 7% were improving after recent initiation of therapy, and 18% had unstable active disease (treatment naïve or treatment refractory). Excellent inter-rater reliability was observed (kappa scores: 0.93-0.97; p < 0.0001). The CDAS is considered a simple and reproducible tool to classify patients with CIDP according to disease activity and treatment status that can be applied easily in practice and potentially to select patients for clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/normas , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/clasificación , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/diagnóstico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polirradiculoneuropatía Crónica Inflamatoria Desmielinizante/terapia , Inducción de Remisión , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of digital photographs for the assessment of the presence of pressure ulcers stage 2 or higher. Participants were 48 patients (28 white and 20 black) with pressure ulcers identified in the course of a wound specialist's routine clinical practice at the University of Maryland Medical Center. One pressure ulcer and one unaffected skin area were photographed on each participating patient. The gold standard diagnosis (stage 2 pressure ulcer vs. stage 1 or no pressure ulcer) was recorded by the wound specialist based on bedside examination. The photographs were reviewed blindly by another wound expert. The sensitivity of the blinded assessment was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91-100%). The specificity was 97% (95% CI 92-100%). The sensitivity and specificity were both 100% in the white patients. In black patients, the sensitivity and specificity were 92% (95% CI 75-100%) and 93% (95% CI 82-100%), respectively. These results suggest that the use of photographic images to assess the presence or absence of a pressure ulcer stage 2 or higher has a high degree of validity. Since blinded outcome assessment is one of the cornerstones of good clinical trial design, photography offers the potential to strengthen future studies.
Asunto(s)
Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Fotograbar/métodos , Úlcera por Presión/diagnóstico , Negro o Afroamericano , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Intervalos de Confianza , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/normas , Maryland , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Fotograbar/instrumentación , Fotograbar/normas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Método Simple Ciego , Población BlancaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines for the prevention of pressure ulcers advise that pressure-reducing devices should be used for all patients at risk of or with pressure ulcers and that all pressure ulcers should be documented in the patient record. Adherence to these guidelines among elderly hospital patients early in the hospital stay has not been examined in prior studies. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine adherence to guidelines by determining the frequency and correlates of use of preventive devices early in the hospital stay of elderly patients and by determining the frequency and correlates of recording pressure ulcers in the patient record. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 792 patients aged 65 years or older admitted through the emergency department to the inpatient medical service at two teaching hospitals in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, between 1998 and 2001. Patients were examined by a research nurse on Hospital Day 3 (median of 48 hours after admission) to determine the use of preventive devices, presence of pressure ulcers, and risk of pressure ulcers (by Norton scale). Data on additional risk factors were obtained from the admission nursing assessment in the patient record. Data on documentation of pressure ulcers were obtained by chart abstraction. RESULTS: Only 15% of patients had any preventive devices in use at the time of the examination. Among patients considered at risk of pressure ulcers (Norton score < or =14), only 51% had a preventive device. In multivariable analyses, high risk of pressure ulcers was associated with use of preventive devices (odds ratio = 41.8, 95% confidence interval = 14.0-124.6), whereas the type and stage of pressure ulcer were not. Documentation of a pressure ulcer was present for only 68% of patients who had a pressure ulcer according to the research examination. DISCUSSION: Use of preventive devices and documentation of pressure ulcers are suboptimal even among patients at high risk.
Asunto(s)
Lechos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Aparatos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Documentación , Femenino , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Evaluación en Enfermería , Investigación en Evaluación de Enfermería , Registros de Enfermería , Philadelphia , Úlcera por Presión/diagnóstico , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the impact of extrinsic factors on pressure ulcer risk. The objective of this study was to determine whether risk of pressure ulcers early in the hospital stay is associated with extrinsic factors such as longer emergency department (ED) stays, night or weekend admission, potentially immobilizing procedures and medications, and admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A nested case-control study was performed in two teaching hospitals in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Participants were medical patients age > or =65 years admitted through the ED. Cases (n = 195) had > or =1 possibly or definitely hospital-acquired pressure ulcers. Three controls per case were sampled randomly from among noncases at the same hospital in the same month (n = 597). Pressure ulcer status was determined by a research nurse on the third day of hospitalization. Pressure ulcers were classified as preexisting, possibly hospital-acquired, or definitely hospital-acquired. Information on extrinsic factors was obtained by chart review. RESULTS: The odds of pressure ulcers were twice as high for those with an ICU stay as for those without (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-3.5). The aOR was 0.6 (95% CI, 0.3-0.9) for use of any potentially immobilizing medications during the early inpatient period. CONCLUSIONS: Many of the procedures experienced by patients in the ED and early in the inpatient stay do not confer excess pressure ulcer risk. Having an ICU stay is associated with a doubling of risk. This finding emphasizes the importance of developing and evaluating interventions to prevent pressure ulcers among patients in the ICU.
Asunto(s)
Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Inmovilización/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Atención al Paciente/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of pressure ulcers among newly hospitalized nursing home residents and among newly hospitalized patients from nonnursing home settings. Study participants were at least 65 years old and admitted through the emergency department to one of two study hospitals. Research nurses ascertained the presence of pressure ulcers (stage 1-4) by visual skin assessment on the third day following admission to the hospital unit. Other data were collected by clinical examination, interview, and medical record review. The prevalence of preexisting pressure ulcers at the time of admission was 26.2% among those admitted from a nursing home and 4.8% among those admitted from another living situation (odds ratio 5.5, 95% confidence interval 4.3-7.1). After adjustment for confounders, the association between admission from a nursing home and pressure ulcer prevalence on admission was reduced (odds ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.03-2.23). These results indicate that admission from a nursing home is a potent marker for pressure ulcer risk and that the excess risk is largely mediated by the higher prevalence of pressure ulcer risk factors among patients admitted from a nursing home. The results highlight the importance of continuity of care across transitions between care settings.
Asunto(s)
Evaluación Geriátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland , Oportunidad Relativa , Úlcera por Presión/clasificación , Prevalencia , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the dynamic causal effects of depressive symptoms on osteoarthritis (OA) knee pain. METHODS: Marginal structural models were used to examine dynamic associations between depressive symptoms and pain over 48 months among older adults (n = 2,287) with radiographic knee OA (Kellgren/Lawrence grade 2 or 3) in the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Depressive symptoms at each annual visit were assessed (threshold ≥16) using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. OA knee pain was measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale, rescaled to range from 0 to 100. RESULTS: Depressive symptoms at each visit were generally not associated with greater OA knee pain at subsequent time points. Causal mean differences in WOMAC pain score comparing depressed to nondepressed patients ranged from 1.78 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] -0.73, 4.30) to 2.58 (95% CI 0.23, 4.93) within the first and fourth years, and the depressive symptoms by time interaction were not statistically significant (P = 0.94). However, there was a statistically significant dose-response relationship between the persistence of depressive symptoms and OA knee pain severity (P = 0.002). Causal mean differences in WOMAC pain score comparing depressed to nondepressed patients were 0.89 (95% CI -0.17, 1.96) for 1 visit with depressive symptoms, 2.35 (95% CI 0.64, 4.06) for 2 visits with depressive symptoms, and 3.57 (95% CI 0.43, 6.71) for 3 visits with depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: The causal effect of depressive symptoms on OA knee pain does not change over time, but pain severity significantly increases with the persistence of depressed mood.
Asunto(s)
Afecto , Artralgia/fisiopatología , Artralgia/psicología , Depresión/fisiopatología , Depresión/psicología , Articulación de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/psicología , Anciano , Artralgia/diagnóstico por imagen , Depresión/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between age at antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation and immunologic response over time by stratum of baseline CD4 cell counts. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of data pooled from four President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief funded countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: General linear models were used to estimate the mean CD4 cell count by age group within groups defined by baseline CD4 cell count. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate time to achieving a CD4 cell count of at least 500 cells/µl by age group and stratified by baseline CD4 cell count. RESULTS: A total of 126â672 previously treatment-naive patients provided 466â482 repeated CD4 cell count measurements over 4 years of ART. The median baseline CD4 cell count for all age groups was less than 200 cells/µl. Patients aged 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60 and older at ART initiation had significantly lower mean CD4 cell counts in most strata and at most time points than those 20-29 years old. Compared with those 20-29, all older age groups had a significantly longer time to, and lower rate of, achieving a CD4 cell count of 500 cells. CONCLUSION: Age is associated with the magnitude of CD4 cell gain and the amount of time it takes to gain cells at different levels of baseline CD4 cell count. The delay in achieving a robust immune response could have significant implications for the risk of tuberculosis reactivation as well as comorbidities associated with age in the management of older HIV-infected patients.
Asunto(s)
Antirretrovirales/administración & dosificación , Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa/métodos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/patología , Adulto , África del Sur del Sahara , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Both underweight and obesity have been suggested as risk factors for pressure ulcers (PU) development, although data are limited. Our aim was to evaluate the odds of PU in underweight and obese, relative to optimal weight patients. METHODS: Secondary data analysis of a prospective cohort study of risk factors for PU on admission or by hospital day 3 in 3214 elderly patients admitted during 1998-2001 to two hospitals in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. RESULTS: Patients who were underweight had greater odds of developing PU (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.6). Patients who were obese had reduced odds (adjusted OR = 0.7, 95% CI, 0.4-1.0), and those with severe obesity had the lowest odds of PU (adjusted OR = 0.1, 95% CI, 0.01-0.6). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that extra body fat reduces the risk of PU in elderly hospitalized patients.
Asunto(s)
Obesidad/epidemiología , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine factors associated with increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease in a high-risk patient population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of a retrospective cohort study. METHODS: One-hundred patients at an inner city HIV clinic in 2008 were reviewed. The atherosclerotic vascular disease risk score was calculated using the Pooled Cohort Equation. Chi-square test was performed to identify associations of potential risk factors with elevated atherosclerotic vascular disease risk. RESULTS: Eighty-one participants were included in the final analysis. In total, 95.1% were African American, and 38.3% were women. The median atherosclerotic vascular disease risk score was 8.8% and 8.1% in 2008 and 2012, respectively. The medical co-morbidities associated with increased atherosclerotic vascular disease risk were hepatitis C infection (X2 = 3.93; p value = 0.048), elevated triglycerides levels (X2 = 4.0; p value = 0.046), and low albumin (X2 = 4.65; p value = 0.031). There were a higher number of women with known atherosclerotic vascular disease despite lower median atherosclerotic vascular disease risk score compared to men. CONCLUSION: An elevated risk of developing cardiovascular disease persists in high-risk demographic groups of the HIV epidemic even in the current HIV era. There is an unexplained gender disparity and some non-traditional risk factors not accounted for in the Pooled Cohort Equation may be contributing to the excess cardiovascular disease risk observed among HIV-infected patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers among elderly hospital patients diminish quality of life and increase the cost of hospital care. Evidence suggests that pressure ulcers can arise after only a few hours of immobility. The goals of this study were to estimate the incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in the first 2 days of the hospital stay and to identify patient characteristics associated with higher incidence. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed between 1998 and 2001. A total of 3233 patients 65 years old or older admitted through the Emergency Department to the inpatient Medical Service at two study hospitals were examined by a research nurse on the third day of hospitalization. Pressure ulcers were ascertained using standard criteria and were classified as either preexisting, possibly hospital-acquired, or definitely hospital-acquired. RESULTS: There were 201 patients with one or more possibly or definitely hospital-acquired pressure ulcers for a cumulative incidence of 6.2% (95% confidence interval, 5.4%-7.1%). Most of the pressure ulcers were stage 2, and the majority were in the sacral area or on the heels. In multivariable analysis, pressure ulcer incidence was significantly associated with increasing age, male gender, dry skin, urinary and fecal incontinence, difficulty turning in bed, nursing home residence prior to admission, recent hospitalization, and poor nutritional status. CONCLUSIONS: A small but significant proportion of elderly emergently admitted hospital patients acquire pressure ulcers soon after their admission. New models of care may be required to ensure that preventive interventions are provided very early in the elderly person's hospital stay.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Reposo en Cama , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between dementia and mortality, adverse health events, and discharge disposition of newly admitted nursing home residents. It was hypothesized that residents with dementia would die at a higher rate and develop more adverse health events (e.g., infections, fevers, pressure ulcers, falls) than residents without dementia because of communication and self-care difficulties. DESIGN: An expert clinician panel diagnosed an admission cohort from a stratified random sample of 59 Maryland nursing homes, between 1992 and 1995. The cohort was followed for up to 2 years or until discharge. SETTING: Fifty-nine Maryland nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand one hundred fifty-three newly admitted residents aged 65 and older not having resided in a nursing home for 8 or more days in the previous year. MEASUREMENTS: Mortality, infection, fever, pressure ulcers, fractures, and discharge home. RESULTS: Residents with dementia had significantly lower overall rates of infection (relative risk (RR)=0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.70-0.85) and mortality (RR=0.61, 95% CI=0.53-0.71) than those without dementia, whereas rates of fever, pressure ulcers, and fractures were similar for the two groups. These results persisted when rates were adjusted for demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and functional status. During the first 90 days of the nursing home stay, residents with dementia had significantly lower rates of mortality if not admitted for rehabilitative care under a Medicare qualifying stay (RR=0.25, 95% CI=0.14-0.45), were less often discharged home (RR=0.33, 95% CI=0.28-0.38), and tended to have lower fever rates (RR=0.78, 95% CI=0.63-0.96) than residents without dementia. CONCLUSION: Newly admitted nursing home residents with dementia have a profile of health events that is distinct from that of residents without dementia, indicating that the two groups have different long-term care needs. Results suggest that further investigation of whether residents with dementia can be well managed in alternative residential settings would be valuable.
Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas/mortalidad , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/mortalidad , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Fiebre/mortalidad , Fracturas Óseas/mortalidad , Hogares para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Úlcera por Presión/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Causas de Muerte , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Maryland , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Riesgo , Estadística como AsuntoRESUMEN
This study examined warfarin usage for elderly Medicare beneficiaries with atrial fibrillation (AF) who suffered traumatic brain injury (TBI), hip fracture, or torso injuries. Using the 5% Chronic Condition Data Warehouse administrative claims data, this study included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries who had a single injury hospitalization (TBI, hip fracture, or major torso injury) between 1/1/2007 and 12/31/2009, with complete Medicare Parts A, B (no Medicare Advantage), and D coverage 6 months before injury, and who were aged 66 years or older and diagnosed with AF at least 1 year before injury. About 45% of the AF patients were using warfarin before TBI or torso injury, and 35% before hip fracture. After injury, there was a dramatic and persistent decrease in warfarin use in TBI and torso injury groups (30% for TBI and 37% for torso injury at 12 months after injury). Warfarin usage in hip fracture patients also dropped after injury but returned to pre-injury level within 4 months. TBI and torso injury lead to significant decreases in warfarin usage in elderly AF patients. Further research is needed to understand reasons for the pattern and to develop evidence-based management strategies in the post-acute setting.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Lesiones Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas de Cadera/tratamiento farmacológico , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Torso/lesiones , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Quasi-experimental study designs, sometimes called nonrandomized, pre-post-intervention study designs, are ubiquitous in the infectious diseases literature, particularly in the area of interventions aimed at decreasing the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Little has been written about the benefits and limitations of the quasi-experimental approach. This article outlines a hierarchy of quasi-experimental study design that is applicable to infectious diseases studies and that, if applied, may lead to sounder research and more-convincing causal links between infectious diseases interventions and outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmisibles/patología , Enfermedades Transmisibles/transmisión , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/tendencias , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Little is known about risk factors that increase the risk of development of opioid side effects. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of the type of opioid, age, gender, and race on the incidence of side effects from short-term opioid use. METHODS: A secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study in 35 community-based and tertiary hospitals was done. There were 8855 black or white subjects aged 16 years and older. Patients received meperidine (INN, pethidine), morphine, or fentanyl as part of their treatment. Measurements were made to assess the presence of nausea and vomiting and respiratory depression. RESULTS: Of the patients, 26% had nausea and vomiting and 1.5% had respiratory depression after opioid administration. After adjustment for opioid dose, route of administration, age, gender, and race, meperidine produced less nausea and vomiting (odds ratio [OR] = 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-0.8) and less respiratory depression (OR = 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2-0.9) than morphine. The risk of respiratory depression increased with age. Compared with patients aged between 16 and 45 years, those aged between 61 and 70 years had 2.8 times the risk of development of respiratory depression (95% CI, 1.2-6.6); those aged between 71 and 80 years had 5.4 times the risk (95% CI, 2.4-11.8); and those aged older than 80 years had 8.7 times the risk (95% CI, 3.8-20.0). Men had less nausea and vomiting than women (OR = 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.6). White subjects had more nausea and vomiting than black subjects (OR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7). CONCLUSIONS: Meperidine produced fewer side effects than morphine during short-term use. The risk of respiratory depression increases substantially after 60 years of age. Women have nausea and vomiting more often than men. The effect of race deserves further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento/fisiología , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fentanilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Ketorolaco Trometamina/efectos adversos , Masculino , Meperidina/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morfina/efectos adversos , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Náusea/epidemiología , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Grupos Raciales , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/inducido químicamente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Caracteres Sexuales , Vómitos/inducido químicamente , Vómitos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to estimate the period prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcer among those 65 years of age and older. METHODS: We used a patient-record database called the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Subjects were 65 years of age and older and cases were ascertained based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The accuracy of the ascertainment strategy was estimated using mailed physician-answered questionnaires. Annual period prevalence and age-specific incidence were estimated per 100 person-years with exact 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The accuracy of our ascertainment strategy was excellent, with a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI: 92%,100%) and negative predictive value of 95% (85%, 95%). Over 200,000 person-years of data were analyzed. The annual period prevalence of pressure ulcer among those 65 years of age and older varied from 0.31% to 0.70%. The incidence varied significantly with advancing patient age from 0.18 to 3.36 per 100-person years (p < 0.001) but was not associated with gender (p = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Pressure ulcers are seen in the general practice setting. They are most likely to occur in those over 85 years of age. Preventative strategies within the general practice setting should concentrate on the oldest of the elderly.
Asunto(s)
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Prevalencia , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare black and white nursing home residents with respect to the incidence of nursing home (NH)-acquired pressure ulcers (PUs) and to examine the role of resident characteristics and facility characteristics in explaining differences between the racial groups. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study conducted between 1992 and 1995. SETTING: Fifty-nine Maryland NHs. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,938 residents (301 black, 1,637 white) aged 65 and older newly admitted to participating NHs. MEASUREMENTS: The outcome variable was the first occurrence of a Stage 2, 3, or 4 PU as determined based on medical record review. The predictor variable was race (black, white). Eight resident characteristics (age, sex, number of activity of daily living dependencies, bedfast, PU on admission to facility, incontinence, dementia, and whether the resident was on Medicaid) and three facility characteristics (number of beds, for-profit ownership status, and urban/nonurban location) were considered as possible confounding variables. RESULTS: The incidence of PUs was 0.38 per person-year in the NH. The rate for blacks was significantly higher than for whites (0.56 vs 0.35 per person-year) (P<.001). In multivariate analysis, controlling for eight resident characteristics and three facility characteristics, race was significantly associated with PU incidence (hazard ratio comparing blacks with whites=1.31, 95% confidence interval=1.02-1.66). CONCLUSION: Blacks have a higher incidence of NH-acquired PUs than whites; resident characteristics appear to mediate the higher risk. Future research should aim to identify modifiable factors that explain differences between racial groups in PU risk and to develop solutions to prevent the suffering and cost associated with PUs.
Asunto(s)
Población Negra , Casas de Salud , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Población Blanca , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Maryland/epidemiología , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare rates of falling between nursing home residents with and without dementia and to examine dementia as an independent risk factor for falls and fall injuries. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with 2 years of follow-up. SETTING: Fifty-nine randomly selected nursing homes in Maryland, stratified by geographic region and facility size. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand fifteen newly admitted residents aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: During 2 years after nursing home admission, fall data were collected from nursing home charts and hospital discharge summaries. RESULTS: The unadjusted fall rate for residents in the nursing home with dementia was 4.05 per year, compared with 2.33 falls per year for residents without dementia (P<.0001). The effect of dementia on the rate of falling persisted when known risk factors were taken into account. Among fall events, those occurring to residents with dementia were no more likely to result in injury than falls of residents without dementia, but, given the markedly higher rates of falling by residents with dementia, their rate of injurious falls was higher than for residents without dementia. CONCLUSION: Dementia is an independent risk factor for falling. Although most falls do not result in injury, the fact that residents with dementia fall more often than their counterparts without dementia leaves them with a higher overall risk of sustaining injurious falls over time. Nursing home residents with dementia should be considered important candidates for fall-prevention and fall-injury-prevention strategies.