Left Upper Lobe Multi-Segmentectomy Versus Lobectomy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The left upper lobe (LUL) has unique hilar anatomy, and LUL multi-segmentectomy (apical trisegmentectomy and lingulectomy) may result in different outcomes than both single anatomical segmentectomy and left upper lobectomy in the management of early-stage primary lung cancer; however no meta-analyses have been performed. The aim of this meta-analysis is to determine if LUL multi-segmentectomy is non-inferior to left upper lobectomy for long-term survival outcomes, or superior for in-hospital outcomes. METHODS: Electronic databases searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies comparing outcomes in LUL multi-segmentectomy vs left upper lobectomy in early-stage lung cancer (clinical stage T2 N0 or less). Long-term postoperative overall and disease-free survival were assessed via reconstruction of Kaplan-Meier survival curves. In-hospital complications and length of stay, as well as long term recurrence were analysed via random effects models. RESULTS: Five relevant studies were identified, including 1,196 patients. Overall survival did not differ at 5 years (multi-segmentectomy 92.6% vs lobectomy 89.3%, P=0.188), but patients undergoing LUL multi-segmentectomy had better disease-free survival at 5 years (93.1% vs 88.4%, P=0.041). Patients undergoing LUL multi-segmentectomy had a shorter mean length of hospital stay (mean difference -0.26 days, 95% CI; -0.39 to 0.14, P<0.01, I2=0.00%). There was no difference in combined in-hospital complications (P=0.14), local recurrence (P=0.35), distant recurrence (P=0.23), or overall recurrence (P=0.39). CONCLUSION: LUL multi-segmentectomy is associated with reduced hospital length of stay, but no difference in long-term overall survival compared with left upper lobectomy in the management of early-stage primary lung cancer.

Conventional Glycaemic Control May Not Be Beneficial in Diabetic Patients Following Cardiac Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Stress hyperglycaemia is common following cardiac surgery. Its optimal management is uncertain and emerging literature suggests that flexible glycaemic control in diabetic patients may be preferable. This study aims to assess the relationship between maximal postoperative in-hospital blood glucose levels (BSL) and the morbidity and mortality outcomes of diabetic and non-diabetic cardiac surgery patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of all patients undergoing cardiac surgery at a tertiary single centre institution from 2015 to 2019 was undertaken. Early management and outcomes of hyperglycaemia following cardiac surgery were assessed via multivariable regression modelling. Follow-up was assessed to 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Consecutive non-diabetic patients (n=1,050) and diabetic patients (n=689) post cardiac surgery were included. Diabetics with peak BSL ≤13.9 mmol/L did not have an increased risk of morbidity or mortality compared to non-diabetics with peak BSL ≤10.0 mmol/L. In non-diabetics, stress hyperglycaemia with peak BSL >10.0 mmol/L was associated with overall wound complications (5.7% vs 8.8%, OR 1.64 [1.00-2.69], p=0.049) and postoperative pneumonia (2.7% vs 7.3%, OR 2.35 [1.26-4.38], p=0.007). Diabetic patients with postoperative peak BSL >13.9 mmol/L were at an increased risk of overall wound complication (7.4% vs 14.8%, OR 2.47 [1.46-4.16], p<0.001), graft harvest site infection (3.7% vs 11.8%, OR 3.75 [1.92-7.30], p<0.001), and wound-related readmission (3.1% vs 8.8%, OR 3.11 [1.49-6.47], p=0.002) when compared to diabetics with peak BSL ≤13.9 mmol/L. CONCLUSION: In non-diabetics, stress hyperglycaemia with peak BSL >10.0 mmol/L is associated with morbidity. In diabetic patients, hyperglycaemia with peak BSL ≤13.9 mmol/L was not associated with an increased risk of morbidity or mortality compared to non-diabetics with peak BSL ≤10.0 mmol/L. Further investigation of flexible glycaemic targets (target BSL ≤13.9 mmol/L) in diabetic patients is warranted.

Medical and conservative surgical management of bacterial sternoclavicular joint septic arthritis: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Sternoclavicular joint septic arthritis (SCJ SA) is a rare infectious disease process with reported life-threatening complications such as mediastinal abscess and mediastinitis. The available literature reports variable success of medical management and a predominance of surgical management, with a 58% rate of surgical washout/debridement and high rates (47%) of resection of the SCJ and medial third of the clavicle. METHODS: A retrospective case series of radiologically or microbiologically confirmed cases of bacterial SCJ SA at Fiona Stanley Hospital was analysed. Demographic data, investigations, management and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Eleven cases of bacterial SCJ SA were identified. Eight cases were of primary SCJ SA, whilst three cases were secondary to haematogenous seeding. Recognized risk factors such as intravenous drug use, diabetes mellitus, trauma, smoking and immunosuppression were present. The most common complication was clavicular osteomyelitis (64%). Life-threatening complications included mediastinal abscess and rapidly progressive necrotizing myositis. Nine patients (82%) were managed with primary medical therapy, with two patients failing antibiotic therapy and requiring joint washout. Two patients were taken for urgent washout on presentation. Four cases (36%) resulted in operative SCJ washout. There were no cases requiring resection of the SCJ or clavicle. CONCLUSION: This series suggests that SCJ SA can be primarily treated medically in the absence of life-threatening complications. In addition, medical management may be sufficient for cases complicated by clavicular osteomyelitis. Need for surgical resection of the SCJ and medial third of the clavicle may be less than previously reported.