What's New in Periprosthetic Femur Fractures?

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic femur fracture (PFF) is one of the most common indications for reoperation following total hip arthroplasty. METHODS/RESULTS: This article provides a review of a symposium on PFF that was presented at the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons 2023 annual meeting, including an overview of the Vancouver classification and its implications on treatment and subsequent complications, an updated approach to the management of intraoperative fractures, and finally, contemporary strategies for both osteosynthesis as well as revision arthroplasty for PFFs. CONCLUSION: As the incidence of PPF continues to increase, arthroplasty and trauma surgeons must be prepared to address this challenging complication with a contemporary understanding of the treatment options and their outcomes.

Obesity and Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Absolute versus Relative Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection at 15 Years.

BACKGROUND: To make an informed decision about total hip arthroplasty (THA), surgeons and patients need to understand the absolute and relative risks of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We sought to evaluate the long-term risk of PJI following primary THA stratified by body mass index (BMI) and PJI-related risk factors. METHODS: We identified 21,550 primary THAs performed from 2000 to 2021 at a single institution. Patients were stratified as having 0, 1, or ≥ 2 PJI risk factors (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, nonprimary osteoarthritis, immunosuppression, or active smoking) and into BMI categories. The 15-year cumulative risk of PJI was evaluated by BMI and PJI risk factors. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, the 15-year absolute risk of PJI was 2%. For patients who did not have PJI risk factors, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years was 1% in normal weight, 2% in class III obesity, and 4% in class IV obesity. Patients who had class III and IV obesity had a 3-times and 9-times higher relative risk of PJI, respectively (P = .03, P < .001). Among patients who had ≥ 2 PJI risk factors, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years was 2% in normal weight, 4% in class III obesity, and 18% in class IV obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy patients who had class III and IV obesity had a 3-times and 9-times increased risk of PJI at 15 years relative to normal weight patients. However, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years was 2 and 4%, respectively. Given emerging data questioning whether BMI modification decreases PJI risk, surgeons and patients must consider both a 3-times to 9-times increased relative risk of PJI and a 2 to 4% absolute risk of PJI at 15 years for healthy patients who had a BMI ≥ 40. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Obesity and Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Absolute versus Relative Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection at 15 Years.

INTRODUCTION: When indicating patients for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), surgeons and patients must understand the absolute and relative risks of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) to make an informed decision. We sought to evaluate the long-term risk of PJI following primary TKA stratified by body mass index (BMI) and PJI-related risk factors. METHODS: We identified 25,160 primary TKAs performed from 2000 to 2021 at a single institution. Patients were stratified as having 0, 1, or ≥ 2 PJI risk factors (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, non-primary osteoarthritis, immunosuppression, or active smoking) and into BMI categories. The 15-year cumulative risk of PJI was evaluated by BMI and PJI risk factors. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, the 15-year absolute risk of PJI was 3%. For patients who did not have PJI risk factors, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years was 3% in normal weight, 4% in class III obesity, and 4% in class IV obesity. Patients who had class III obesity had a 3-times higher relative risk of PJI when compared to normal-weight patients (P = 0.01). Among patients who had ≥ 2 PJI risk factors, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years was 5% in normal weight and 6% in patients who have class III obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy patients who had class III obesity had a 3-times increased risk of PJI relative to healthy, normal-weight patients; however, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years after primary TKA was 4% in this group. Surgeons and patients must consider both a 3-times increased relative risk of PJI and a 4% absolute risk of PJI at 15 years after primary TKA when considering surgery in otherwise healthy patients who have BMI ≥ 40.

New Ceramic Heads With Titanium Sleeves on Retained Femoral Components: Results of Over 500 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND: Ceramic heads are frequently combined with titanium sleeves in revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs), ostensibly to protect the ceramic head from existing damage to the retained trunnion. Although widely adopted, data on the performance and safety of this construct are minimal. The purpose of this study was to describe implant survivorships, radiographic results, and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent revision THA with a ceramic head and titanium sleeve on a retained femoral component. METHODS: We identified 516 revision THAs with femoral component retention (328 acetabular-only revisions and 188 bearing surface exchanges) treated with a new ceramic head and titanium sleeve between 2000 and 2020. Mean age at revision was 64 years, 56% were women, and mean body mass index was 30. The indications for revision THA were adverse local tissue reaction (25%), acetabular loosening (24%), dislocation (17%), infection (5%), and other (29%). Kaplan-Meier survivorships were analyzed, radiographs reviewed, and Harris Hip Scores evaluated. Mean follow-up was 4 years (range, 2 to 10). RESULTS: There were no reoperations or failures for ceramic head fracture, taper corrosion, or head/sleeve disengagement. The 10-year survivorship free of any re-revision was 85%. Indications for the 57 re-revisions included dislocation (33), infection (13), acetabular component loosening (7), periprosthetic fracture (2), psoas impingement (1), and sciatic nerve irritation (1). The 10-year survivorship free of any reoperation was 82%. There were an additional 14 reoperations. Radiographically, 1.9% had progressive femoral radiolucent lines, and 4.7% had progressive acetabular radiolucent lines. Mean Harris Hip Score was 81 at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: New ceramic heads with titanium sleeves in revision THAs with retained femoral components were durable and reliable with no cases of ceramic head fracture or taper complications at mean 4-year follow-up, including those revised for adverse local tissue reaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Association Between Tranexamic Acid and Decreased Periprosthetic Joint Infection Risk in Patients Undergoing Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Over 2 Million Patients.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between tranexamic acid (TXA) use during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and the risk of developing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after these procedures. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out from inception to October 17, 2022. There were 6 studies that were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The association between the development of PJI and TXA was analyzed using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and estimates of risk difference (RD). Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate only studies reporting out to 90 days of follow-up versus more than 90 days of follow-up. RESULTS: Among 2,098,469 arthroplasties, TXA utilization was associated with an overall lower risk of PJI (OR = 0.63 [95% CI 0.42 to 0.96], P < .001) and a 0.4% lower incidence of PJI (RD = -0.0038, 95% CI [-0.005 to -0.002], P < .001). When subgrouping the studies according to length of follow-up, TXA was associated with a lower risk of PJI (OR = 0.43 [95% CI 0.35 to 0.53], P < .001) and a 1% lower incidence of PJI (RD = -0.0095 [95% CI -0.013 to -0.005], P < .001) in patients followed for more than 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that TXA use is associated with a reduced risk of PJI, with our RD analysis identifying an approximately 0.4% reduction in PJI rates with TXA use. These findings provide even more data to support the routine use of TXA during primary THA and primary TKA.

Is the Rise of Medicare Advantage Impacting the Fidelity of Traditional Medicare Claims Data? Implications for Reporting of Long-Term Total Hip Arthroplasty Survivorship.

BACKGROUND: Arthroplasty registries often use traditional Medicare (TM) claims data to report long-term total hip arthroplasty (THA) survivorship. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the large number of patients leaving TM for Medicare Advantage (MA) has compromised the fidelity of TM data. METHODS: We identified 10,962 THAs in 9,333 Medicare-eligible patients who underwent primary THA from 2000 to 2020 at a single institution. Insurance type was analyzed, and 83% of patients had TM at the time of THA. Survivorship free from any revision or reoperation was calculated for patients who have TM. The same survivorship end points were recalculated with censoring performed when a patient transitioned to an MA plan after their primary THA to model the impact of losing patients from the TM dataset. Differences in survivorship were compared. The mean follow-up was 7 years. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2020, there was a decrease in TM insurance (93 to 73%) and a corresponding increase in MA insurance (0 to 19%) among THA patients. Following THA, 23% of TM patients switched to MA. For patients who had TM at the time of surgery, 15-year survivorship free from any reoperation or revision was 90% and 93%, respectively. When censoring patients upon transition from TM to MA, survivorship free from any reoperation became significantly higher (92 versus 90% at 15 years; hazard ratio = 1.16, P = .033), and there was a trend toward higher survivorship free from any revision (95 versus 93% at 15 years; hazard ratio = 1.16, P = .074). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 4 patients left TM for MA after primary THA, effectively making them lost to follow-up within TM datasets. The mass exodus of patients out of TM appears to have led to a slight overestimation of survivorship free from any reoperation and trended toward overestimating survivorship free from any revision. If MA continues to grow, efforts to obtain MA data will become even more important.

Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: Is an Ipsilateral Uninfected Total Joint Arthroplasty at Risk?

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) of total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may occur in the setting of an uninfected ipsilateral prosthetic joint. However, the risk to that uninfected ipsilateral joint is unknown. We analyzed the survivorship free from PJI in at risk THAs and TKAs following treatment of an ipsilateral knee or hip PJI, respectively. METHODS: Using our institutional total joint registry, we identified 205 patients who underwent treatment for PJI (123 THAs and 83 TKAs) with an at-risk ipsilateral in situ knee or hip, respectively, between 2000 and 2019. In total, 54% of index PJIs were chronic and 46% were acute. The mean age was 70 years, 47% were female, and the mean body mass index was 32. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were performed. Mean follow-up was 6 years. RESULTS: The 5-year survivorship free of PJI in an at-risk THA after an ipsilateral TKA was treated for PJI was 97%. The 5-year survivorship free of PJI in an at-risk TKA when the ipsilateral THA was treated for PJI was 99%. Three PJIs occurred (2 THAs and 1 TKA), all over 1 year from the index ipsilateral PJI treatment. One hip PJI was an acute hematogenous infection that resulted from pneumonia. The other 2 new PJIs were caused by the same organism as the index PJI and were due to a failure of source control at the index joint. CONCLUSIONS: When diagnosed with PJI in a single joint, the risk of developing PJI in an ipsilateral prosthetic joint within 5 years was low (1 to 3% risk). In the rare event of an ipsilateral infection, all occurred greater than one year from the index PJI and 2 of 3 were with the same organism when source infection control failed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III.

Medicare Advantage is Associated with Higher Mortality After Antibiotic Spacer Placement for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

INTRODUCTION: Privatized Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are an alternative to traditional Medicare (TM). We sought to identify differences in 90-day postoperative mortality and non-fatal adverse events between TM and MA patients undergoing stage one antibiotic spacer placement for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip or knee. METHODS: A nationally representative database was queried from 2015 to 2021 for adult patients undergoing stage one antibiotic spacer placement for PJI. Using the International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, as well as hospital charges for antibiotics, patients undergoing stage one exchange arthroplasty for PJI were identified. Patients were then grouped into TM and MA cohorts. The primary outcome was the odds of 90-day mortality. Multivariable logistic regressions were conducted to address possible confounding demographic, comorbidity, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 40,346 patients undergoing stage one spacer placement for PJI, 16,637 (41.2%) had TM coverage and 9,218 (22.8%) had MA coverage. Mortality within 90 days of surgery was higher in the MA cohort (1.4% versus 1.0%, P = 0.004). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated significantly higher adjusted odds of mortality (aOR [adjusted odds ratio] = 1.42, 95% CI [confidence interval] = 1.11 to 1.81, P = 0.005) in MA patients compared to TM. CONCLUSION: Even after accounting for available confounders with our multivariable analyses, patients enrolled in an MA plan were over 40% more likely to die within 90 days of surgery compared to patients who have TM coverage. Further study is necessary to better understand the underlying cause of this finding.

Highly Porous Acetabular Cup and Augment Constructs in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: What Predicts 10-Year Implant Survivorship?

BACKGROUND: Porous tantalum acetabular cup and augment constructs have demonstrated favorable outcomes up to 5 years postsurgery despite severe bone loss during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Prior literature lacks long-term studies with substantial case numbers. This study aims to assess long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes 10 years postsurgery in patients undergoing revision THA with porous tantalum acetabular cup-augment constructs and determine factors associated with long-term survivorship. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2012, 157 revision THAs were performed in cases with major acetabular defects (mainly Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB) utilizing porous tantalum cup-augment constructs. Pelvic discontinuity was noted intraoperatively in 17 hips (11%). Postoperative radiographs were evaluated at regular intervals for implant stability and radiolucent lines. There were 49 patients who had complete radiographic follow-up at 10 years or longer postsurgery. RESULTS: The 10-year survivorship free of revision of the cup-augment construct for aseptic loosening was 93%, free of any acetabular construct revision was 91%, free of any hip rerevision was 77%, and free of any reoperation was 75%. Pelvic discontinuity was associated with increased risk of reoperation (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.8), any hip rerevision (HR = 3.2), any cup-augment construct revision (HR = 11.8), and aseptic construct revision (HR = 10.0). Of unrevised cases with radiographs at 10 years, 4 hips showed radiographic loosening. Mean Harris hip scores improved from 47 preoperatively to 79 at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Porous tantalum acetabular cup-augment constructs used in revision THA with severe acetabular bone loss provide excellent implant survivorship at 10 years when the acetabulum is intact. Due to lower survivorship of cup-augment constructs in cases of pelvic discontinuity, additional construct fixation or stabilization methods are recommended, when a discontinuity is present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Femoral Head Length Impact on Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in 36 Millimeter Cobalt Chrome-on-Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Articulations.

BACKGROUND: Despite concerns for corrosion, dislocation, and periprosthetic femur fractures, minimal literature has investigated the effect of adjusting femoral head length on outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of femoral head length on the risk of any revision and reoperation following cobalt chromium (CoCr)-on-highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) THAs. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2018, we identified 1,187 primary THAs with CoCr-on-HXLPE articulations using our institutional total joint registry. The mean age at THA was 71 years (range, 19-97), 40% were women, and mean body mass index was 30 (range, 10-68). All THAs using 36 mm diameter femoral heads were included. Neutral (0 mm), positive, or negative femoral head lengths were used in 42, 31, and 27% of the THAs, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was assessed. The mean follow-up was 7 years (range, 2-16). RESULTS: The 10-year survivorships free of any revision or reoperation were 94 and 92%, respectively. A total of 47 revisions were performed, including periprosthetic femur fracture (17), periprosthetic joint infection (8), dislocation (7), aseptic loosening of either component (6), corrosion (4), and other (5). Nonrevision reoperations included wound revision (11), open reduction and internal fixation of periprosthetic femur fracture (4), and abductor repair (2). Multivariable analyses found no significant associations between femoral head length and revision or reoperation. CONCLUSION: Altering femoral head lengths in 36 mm CoCr-on-HXLPE THAs did not affect outcomes. Surgeons should select femoral head lengths that optimize hip stability and center of rotation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Defining Clinically Meaningful Subgroups for Risk Stratification in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Combined Unsupervised and Supervised Machine Learning Approach.

BACKGROUND: Studies developing predictive models from large datasets to risk-stratify patients under going revision total hip arthroplasties (rTHAs) are limited. We used machine learning (ML) to stratify patients undergoing rTHA into risk-based subgroups. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 7,425 patients who underwent rTHA from a national database. An unsupervised random forest algorithm was used to partition patients into high-risk and low-risk strata based on similarities in rates of mortality, reoperation, and 25 other postoperative complications. A risk calculator was produced using a supervised ML algorithm to identify high-risk patients based on preoperative parameters. RESULTS: There were 3,135 and 4,290 patients identified in the high-risk and low-risk subgroups, respectively. Each group significantly differed by rate of 30-day mortalities, unplanned reoperations/readmissions, routine discharges, and hospital lengths of stay (P < .05). An Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm identified preoperative platelets < 200, hematocrit > 35 or < 20, increasing age, albumin < 3, international normalized ratio > 2, body mass index > 35, American Society of Anesthesia class ≥ 3, blood urea nitrogen > 50 or < 30, creatinine > 1.5, diagnosis of hypertension or coagulopathy, and revision for periprosthetic fracture and infection as predictors of high risk. CONCLUSION: Clinically meaningful risk strata in patients undergoing rTHA were identified using an ML clustering approach. Preoperative labs, demographics, and surgical indications have the greatest impact on differentiating high versus low risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Can the American Joint Replacement Registry Utilize Administrative Claims Data to Accurately Classify Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Surgical Diagnoses?

BACKGROUND: The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) is a valuable tool for studying revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Currently, International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) codes are utilized by the AJRR for classifying surgical diagnoses. However, the validity of this methodology is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of these codes, as used by AJRR, in classifying rTHA diagnoses. METHODS: We identified 908 rTHAs performed at our institution from 2015 to 2021 using our total joint registry (TJR). Revision diagnoses were obtained from the TJR, which contains prospectively recorded surgical diagnoses collected by trained abstractors, independent from ICD-10 data. The ICD-10 diagnosis codes, as submitted to AJRR, were retrieved for the same procedures. The accuracy of ICD-10 codes for classifying rTHA diagnoses as septic versus aseptic, instability, aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic fracture was assessed using Cohen's Kappa statistic, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: Concordance between AJRR-submitted data and TJR for classifying rTHA as septic or aseptic was excellent (96.9%; k = 0.87). Agreement for aseptic diagnoses varied from very good for instability (k = 0.76) and loosening (k = 0.67) to moderate for periprosthetic fracture (k = 0.54). Specificity was high (>96%) for all 3 aseptic diagnoses, but sensitivity was lower at 74%, 68%, and 44% for instability, loosening, and periprosthetic fracture, respectively. CONCLUSION: The AJRR submitted ICD-10 data correctly classifies the infection status of rTHA procedures with outstanding accuracy, but the accuracy for more granular diagnoses was variable. These data demonstrate the potential for diagnosis specific limitations when utilizing ICD-10 administrative claims for registry reporting.

Is the American Joint Replacement Registry Able to Correctly Classify Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Procedural Diagnoses?

BACKGROUND: The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) is a powerful tool for the study of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The AJRR uses International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10-CM) codes for recording surgical diagnoses. However, the validity of this methodology is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of ICD-10-CM codes, as used by AJRR, in classifying rTKA diagnoses. METHODS: There were 988 rTKAs performed from 2015 to 2021 identified in our institutional total joint registry (TJR). Revision diagnoses were obtained from TJR, in which trained abstractors prospectively record diagnoses independent of ICD-10-CM data. The ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes submitted to AJRR were retrieved for the same procedures. The accuracy of ICD-10-CM codes for classifying rTKA diagnoses as septic versus aseptic, aseptic loosening, instability, and periprosthetic fracture was assessed using Cohen's Kappa statistics, sensitivities, and specificities. RESULTS: Concordance between AJRR-submitted codes and TJR was excellent (97.3%, k = 0.9) for identifying septic versus aseptic revisions. Agreement for aseptic diagnoses varied from very good for loosening (k = 0.65) and instability (k = 0.64) to fair for periprosthetic fracture (k = 0.36). Specificity was high (> 94%) for all three diagnoses, but sensitivity was lower at 71%, 63%, and 28% for loosening, instability, and periprosthetic fracture, respectively. CONCLUSION: The AJRR submitted ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes correctly classified rTKA cases as septic or aseptic with remarkable accuracy, but accuracy for more granular diagnoses varied. These data demonstrate the potential for diagnosis-specific limitations when using administrative claims data for registry reporting and have important implications for researchers using ICD-10-CM data.

2023 American College of Rheumatology and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline for the Optimal Timing of Elective Hip or Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Symptomatic Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis or Advanced Symptomatic Osteonecrosis With Secondary Arthritis for Whom Nonoperative Therapy Is Ineffective.

OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for the optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty to improve patient-important outcomes including, but not limited to, pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year for patients with symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis of the hip or knee who have previously attempted nonoperative therapy, and for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective, and who have chosen to undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty (collectively referred to as TJA). METHODS: We developed 13 clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) questions. After a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low), and evidence tables were created. A Voting Panel, including 13 physicians and patients, discussed the PICO questions until consensus was achieved on the direction (for/against) and strength (strong/conditional) of the recommendations. RESULTS: The panel conditionally recommended against delaying TJA to pursue additional nonoperative treatment including physical therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, ambulatory aids, and intraarticular injections. It conditionally recommended delaying TJA for nicotine reduction or cessation. The panel conditionally recommended delay for better glycemic control for patients who have diabetes mellitus, although no specific measure or level was identified. There was consensus that obesity by itself was not a reason for delay, but that weight loss should be strongly encouraged, and the increase in operative risk should be discussed. The panel conditionally recommended against delay in patients who have severe deformity or bone loss, or in patients who have a neuropathic joint. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low quality. CONCLUSION: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal timing of TJA in patients who have symptomatic and radiographic moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective to improve patient-important outcomes, including pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year. We acknowledge that the evidence is of low quality primarily due to indirectness and hope future research will allow for further refinement of the recommendations.

Use of Cementless Metaphyseal Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Fixation options for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) have expanded and now include cementless metaphyseal fixation. The utilization rates of these implants in the United States are not well known. The purpose of this study was to analyze trends in cementless metaphyseal fixation for rTKA within the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR). METHODS: The AJRR was queried for the years 2015-2019 to identify all rTKA with implant data. Trends in the use of cementless sleeves, metaphyseal cones, and any cementless metaphyseal fixation (sleeves + cones) were examined over the study period using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Twenty thousand two hundred and eighty rTKA were analyzed. Cementless metaphyseal fixation was used in 16% of rTKA and significantly increased over the study period (14% to 19%, P < .0001). Cementless metaphyseal fixation was more frequently utilized during revision for aseptic loosening than other diagnoses (OR 1.014, 95% CI 1.001-1.027). Cementless sleeve utilization decreased over time (11% to 9%, P = .004), driven by decreased use on the femur (4% to 2%, P < .0001). The use of cones increased significantly over time (3% to 9%, P < .0001), driven by increased use on the tibia (2% to 9%, P < .0001). Cones were 22 times more likely to be utilized on the tibia relative to the femur (P < .0001) and were more likely to be used in revisions for infection (OR 1.103, 95% CI 1.089-1.117) and aseptic loosening (OR 1.764, 95% CI 1.728-1.800). CONCLUSION: Cementless metaphyseal fixation has grown in popularity yet, still comprised only 16% of rTKA over a 5-year period. Most of the increase was due to the utilization of tibial metaphyseal cones.

Can Abnormal Spinopelvic Relationships be Identified by Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs?

BACKGROUND: Abnormal spinopelvic relationships may place patients at an increased risk for instability after primary total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine if radiographic markers on a standing anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiograph could identify patients with sagittal spinopelvic imbalance or spinal stiffness. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty at a single institution from 2017 to 2020 with standing AP pelvis radiographs and sitting/standing lateral radiographs were identified. AP pelvis radiographs were assessed for the following: lumbosacral hardware, spine osteophytes, disc space narrowing, scoliosis>5°, pelvic obliquity>5°, and overlap of the sacrococcygeal junction/pubic symphysis. Patients with spinopelvic imbalance and/or spinopelvic stiffness were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-six patients were included. Prevalence of isolated sagittal spinopelvic imbalance and isolated spinopelvic stiffness was 12% and 21%, respectively; 11% of patients had sagittal imbalance and stiffness. Overlap of the sacrococcygeal junction/pubic symphysis (OR = 10.2, 95% CI = 5.3-19.8) and presence of lumbosacral hardware (OR = 4.4, 95% CI = 2.0-9.4) were markers of an increased risk of combined sagittal imbalance and stiffness. Seventy-nine percent of patients with overlap of the sacrococcygeal junction and pubic symphysis and 82% of patients with lumbosacral hardware had an abnormal spinopelvic relationship. CONCLUSION: Isolated sagittal imbalance and stiffness were difficult to predict on standing AP pelvis radiographs. Overlap of the sacrococcygeal junction/pubic symphysis and presence of lumbosacral hardware associated with a higher risk of combined sagittal imbalance/stiffness and were present in ≥79% of patients with an abnormal spinopelvic relationship. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective cohort study.

Outcomes Vary Significantly Using a Tiered Approach to Define Success After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) allow assessment of clinical outcomes following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to use progressively more stringent definitions of success to examine clinical outcomes of primary TKA at 1 year postoperatively and to determine which demographic variables were associated with achieving clinical success. METHODS: The American Joint Replacement Registry was queried from 2012 to 2020 for primary TKA. Patients who completed the following PROMs preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively were included: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and KOOS for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR). Mean PROM scores were determined for each visit and between-visit changes were evaluated using paired t-tests. Rates of achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) by distribution-based and anchor-based criteria, Patient Acceptable Symptom State, and substantial clinical benefit were calculated. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between demographic variables and odds of clinical success. RESULTS: In total, 12,341 TKAs were included. Mean improvement in PROM scores were as follows: KOOS JR, 29; WOMAC-Pain, 33; and WOMAC-Function, 31 (P < .0001 for all). Rates of achievement of each metric were the following: distribution-based MCID, 84%-87%; anchor-based MCID, 46%-79%; Patient Acceptable Symptom State, 54%-82%; and substantial clinical benefit, 68%-81%. Patient age and gender were the most influential demographic factors on achievement of clinical success. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes at 1 year following TKA vary significantly when using a tiered approach to define success. A tiered approach to interpretation of PROMs should be considered for future research and clinical assessment.

Are Body Mass Index Cutoffs Creating Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Eligibility for Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Unabated increases in the prevalence of obesity among American adults have disproportionately affected women, Black persons, and Hispanic persons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate for disparity in rates of patient eligibility for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on race and ethnicity and gender by applying commonly used body mass index (BMI) eligibility criteria to two large national databases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database for the years 2015-2019 for primary THA and TKA and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2011-2018. Designations of race and ethnicity were standardized between cohorts. BMI cutoffs of <50 kg/m2, <45 kg/m2, <40 kg/m2, and <35 kg/m2 were then applied. Rates of eligibility for surgery were examined for each respective BMI cutoff and stratified by age, race and ethnicity, and gender. RESULTS: 143,973 NSQIP THA patients, 242,518 NSQIP TKA patients, and 13,255 NHANES participants were analyzed. Female patients were more likely to be ineligible for surgery across all cohorts for all modeled BMI cutoffs (P < .001 for all). Black patients had relatively lower rates of eligibility across all cohorts for all modeled BMI cutoffs (P < .0001 for all). Hispanic patients had disproportionately lower rates of eligibility only at a BMI cutoff of <35 kg/m2. CONCLUSION: Using BMI cutoffs alone to determine the eligibility for primary THA and TKA may disproportionally exclude women, Black persons, and Hispanic persons. These data raise concerns regarding further disparity and restriction of arthroplasty care to vulnerable populations that are already marginalized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study, Level III.

Recent Increases in Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Have Not Increased Early Complications.

BACKGROUND: Outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased in recent years. Recent regulatory changes may allow and incentivize outpatient THA in more patients; however, there are concerns regarding safety. The purpose of this study is to assess early complications in outpatient THA compared to longer hospitalization. METHODS: We identified patients undergoing primary THA in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between 2015 and 2018. Patients were stratified by length of stay (LOS): 0 days (LOS 0), 1-2 days, and ≥3 days. Thirty-day rates of any complication, wound complications, readmissions, and reoperation were assessed. Multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: In total, 4813 (4%) patients underwent outpatient THA, 84,627 (64%) had LOS of 1-2 days, and 42,293 (32%) had LOS ≥3 days. LOS 0 patients were younger, had lower body mass index, and less medical comorbidities compared to those with postsurgical hospitalization. Any complication was experienced in 3.2% of the LOS 0 group, 5.3% of the LOS 1-2 group, and 15.6% for the LOS ≥3 group (P < .0001). Readmission rates were 1.6%, 2.6%, and 4.7% for the 3 groups, respectively (P < .0001). After controlling for confounding variables, patients with LOS 1-2 days had higher odds for any complication (odds ratio 1.56 [1.32-1.83) and readmission (odds ratio 1.41 [1.12-1.78]) compared to LOS 0 days. Patients with LOS ≥3 days had higher odds for complications compared to LOS 0 or 1-2 days. CONCLUSION: Outpatient THA had lower odds for readmission or complications compared to LOS 1-2 days. Despite increased outpatient surgery, many patients had postsurgical hospitalization and, due to patient factors, this remains an integral patient of post-THA care.

Projected Prevalence of Obesity in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: How Big Will the Problem Get?

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to utilize 3 national databases to develop projections of obesity within the general population and primary THA patients in the United States through 2029. METHODS: Data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were queried for years 1999-2019. Current Procedural Terminology code 27130 was used to identify primary THA patients in NSQIP. Individuals were categorized according to body mass index (kg/m2) by year: normal weight (≤24.9); overweight (25.0-29.9); obese (30.0-39.9); and morbidly obese (≥40). Multinomial logistic regression was used to project categorical body mass index data for years 2020-2029. RESULTS: A total of 8,222,013 individuals were included (7,986,414 BRFSS, 235,599 NSQIP THA). From 2011 to 2019, the prevalence of normal weight and overweight individuals declined in the general population (BRFSS) and in primary THA. Prevalence of obese/morbidly obese individuals increased in the general population from 31% to 36% and in primary THA from 42% to 49%. Projection models estimate that by 2029, 46% of the general population will be obese/morbidly obese and 55% of primary THA will be obese/morbidly obese. CONCLUSION: By 2029, we estimate ≥55% of primary THA to be obese/morbidly obese. Increased resources dedicated to care pathways and research focused on improving outcomes in obese arthroplasty patients will be necessary as this population continues to grow. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective Cohort Study.