Mechanisms and Delivery of tRNA Therapeutics.

Transfer ribonucleic acid (tRNA) therapeutics will provide personalized and mutation specific medicines to treat human genetic diseases for which no cures currently exist. The tRNAs are a family of adaptor molecules that interpret the nucleic acid sequences in our genes into the amino acid sequences of proteins that dictate cell function. Humans encode more than 600 tRNA genes. Interestingly, even healthy individuals contain some mutant tRNAs that make mistakes. Missense suppressor tRNAs insert the wrong amino acid in proteins, and nonsense suppressor tRNAs read through premature stop signals to generate full length proteins. Mutations that underlie many human diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases, cancers, and diverse rare genetic disorders, result from missense or nonsense mutations. Thus, specific tRNA variants can be strategically deployed as therapeutic agents to correct genetic defects. We review the mechanisms of tRNA therapeutic activity, the nature of the therapeutic window for nonsense and missense suppression as well as wild-type tRNA supplementation. We discuss the challenges and promises of delivering tRNAs as synthetic RNAs or as gene therapies. Together, tRNA medicines will provide novel treatments for common and rare genetic diseases in humans.

Histidine supplementation can escalate or rescue HARS deficiency in a Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease model.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are essential enzymes responsible for charging amino acids onto cognate tRNAs during protein synthesis. In histidyl-tRNA synthetase (HARS), autosomal dominant mutations V133F, V155G, Y330C and S356N in the HARS catalytic domain cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 W (CMT2W), while tRNA-binding domain mutation Y454S causes recessive Usher syndrome type IIIB. In a yeast model, all human HARS variants complemented a genomic deletion of the yeast ortholog HTS1 at high expression levels. CMT2W associated mutations, but not Y454S, resulted in reduced growth. We show mistranslation of histidine to glutamine and threonine in V155G and S356N but not Y330C mutants in yeast. Mistranslating V155G and S356N mutants lead to accumulation of insoluble proteins, which was rescued by histidine. Mutants V133F and Y330C showed the most significant growth defect and decreased HARS abundance in cells. Here, histidine supplementation led to insoluble protein aggregation and further reduced viability, indicating histidine toxicity associated with these mutants. V133F proteins displayed reduced thermal stability in vitro, which was rescued by tRNA. Our data will inform future treatment options for HARS patients, where histidine supplementation may either have a toxic or compensating effect depending on the nature of the causative HARS variant.

Development of an In Vitro Test Method to Replace an Animal-Based Potency Test for Pertactin Antigen in Multivalent Vaccines.

There is increasing interest to replace animal-based potency assays used routinely to test vaccines, since they are highly variable, are costly, and present ethical concerns. The development of relevant in vitro assays is part of the solution. Using pertactin (PRN) antigen as an example in DTaP-IPV (diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, and inactivated poliovirus) vaccines, a PRN antigenicity ELISA was developed using two monoclonal antibodies with a high affinity to unique PRN epitopes, relevance to human immune responses, and evidence of functionality. The ELISA measured consistent PRN antigenicity between the vaccine lots and was validated to demonstrate its accuracy, precision, linearity, and specificity. Notably, the PRN antigenicity ELISA was more sensitive than the mouse-based potency test and could more effectively differentiate between degraded and intact vaccine lots compared to the in vivo test. From these studies, the PRN antigenicity ELISA is proposed as an in vitro replacement for the in vivo potency test for PRN in DTaP-IPV-based formulations. Important considerations in this study included comprehensive antibody characterization, testing of multiple vaccine lots, method validation, and comparison to animal-based potency. Together, these factors form part of an overall strategy that ensures reliable and relevant in vitro assays are developed to replace animal tests.