Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Surg ; 111(4)2024 Apr 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662462

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare 3-year overall survival after simultaneous portal (PVE) and hepatic vein (HVE) embolization versus PVE alone in patients undergoing liver resection for primary and secondary cancers of the liver. METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective study, all DRAGON 0 centres provided 3-year follow-up data for all patients who had PVE/HVE or PVE, and were included in DRAGON 0 between 2016 and 2019. Kaplan-Meier analysis was undertaken to assess 3-year overall and recurrence/progression-free survival. Factors affecting survival were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: In total, 199 patients were included from 7 centres, of whom 39 underwent PVE/HVE and 160 PVE alone. Groups differed in median age (P = 0.008). As reported previously, PVE/HVE resulted in a significantly higher resection rate than PVE alone (92 versus 68%; P = 0.007). Three-year overall survival was significantly higher in the PVE/HVE group (median survival not reached after 36 months versus 20 months after PVE; P = 0.004). Univariable and multivariable analyses identified PVE/HVE as an independent predictor of survival (univariable HR 0.46, 95% c.i. 0.27 to 0.76; P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Overall survival after PVE/HVE is substantially longer than that after PVE alone in patients with primary and secondary liver tumours.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Hepatectomía , Venas Hepáticas , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Regeneración Hepática , Vena Porta , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Regeneración Hepática/fisiología , Anciano , Hepatectomía/métodos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto
2.
J Surg Oncol ; 129(3): 499-508, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38050894

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) constitute a heterogeneous group of rare tumor entities. Treatment relies on challenging patient-tailored surgical resection. Real-time intraoperative lipid profiling of electrosurgical vapors by rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS) may aid in achieving successful surgical R0 resection (i.e., microscopically negative-tumor margin resection). Here, we evaluate the ex vivo accuracy of REIMS to discriminate and identify various STS from normal surrounding tissue. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients undergoing surgery for STS at Maastricht University Medical Center+ were included in the study. Samples of resected STS specimens were collected and analyzed ex vivo using REIMS. Electrosurgical cauterization of tumor and surrounding was generated successively in both cut and coagulation modes. Resected specimens were subsequently processed for gold standard histopathological review. Multivariate statistical analysis (principal component analysis-linear discriminant analysis) and leave-one patient-out cross-validation were employed to compare the classifications predicted by REIMS lipid profiles to the pathology classifications. Electrosurgical vapors produced during sarcoma resection were analyzed in vivo using REIMS. RESULTS: In total, 1200 histopathologically-validated ex vivo REIMS lipid profiles were generated from 27 patients. Ex vivo REIMS lipid profiles classified STS and normal tissues with 95.5% accuracy. STS, adipose and muscle tissues were classified with 98.3% accuracy. Well-differentiated liposarcomas and adipose tissues could not be discriminated based on their respective lipid profiles. Distinction of leiomyosarcomas from other STS could be achieved with 96.6% accuracy. In vivo REIMS analyses generated intense mass spectrometric signals. CONCLUSION: Lipid profiling by REIMS is able to discriminate and identify STS with high accuracy and therefore constitutes a potential asset to improve surgical resection of STS in the future.


Asunto(s)
Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Humanos , Electrocirugia/métodos , Sarcoma/cirugía , Espectrometría de Masas/métodos , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Márgenes de Escisión , Lípidos
3.
Lab Invest ; 101(3): 381-395, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33483597

RESUMEN

Real-time tissue classifiers based on molecular patterns are emerging tools for fast tumor diagnosis. Here, we used rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS) and multivariate statistical analysis (principal component analysis-linear discriminant analysis) to classify tissues with subsequent comparison to gold standard histopathology. We explored whether REIMS lipid patterns can identify human liver tumors and improve the rapid characterization of their underlying metabolic features. REIMS-based classification of liver parenchyma (LP), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and metastatic adenocarcinoma (MAC) reached an accuracy of 98.3%. Lipid patterns of LP were more similar to those of HCC than to those of MAC and allowed clear distinction between primary and metastatic liver tumors. HCC lipid patterns were more heterogeneous than those of MAC, which is consistent with the variation seen in the histopathological phenotype. A common ceramide pattern discriminated necrotic from viable tumor in MAC with 92.9% accuracy and in other human tumors. Targeted analysis of ceramide and related sphingolipid mass features in necrotic tissues may provide a new classification of tumor cell death based on metabolic shifts. Real-time lipid patterns may have a role in future clinical decision-making in cancer precision medicine.


Asunto(s)
Lípidos/análisis , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Hígado , Necrosis , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Hígado/química , Hígado/metabolismo , Hígado/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/química , Neoplasias Hepáticas/clasificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Necrosis/clasificación , Necrosis/metabolismo , Necrosis/patología , Análisis de Componente Principal , Espectrometría de Masa por Ionización de Electrospray
4.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 27(7): 2389-2401, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32172334

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tumor assessments after first-line therapy of RAS wild-type mCRC with cetuximab (cet) versus bevacizumab (bev) in combination with FOLFIRI were evaluated for factors influencing resectability, conversion to resectability, and survival after best response. METHODS: Conversion to resectability was defined as conversion of initially unresectable to resectable disease at best response as determined by retrospective assessment. Univariate and multivariate logistic models were fitted with resectability at best response as response variable. A Cox model comparing the survival from best response was used to measure the influence of treatment, resectability at best response, and resection. Interaction of resection and treatment arm on survival was tested by likelihood ratio test. RESULTS: Overall, 270 patients were evaluable (127 cet-arm, 143 bev-arm). Lung metastases (odds ratio [OR] 0.35, 95% confidence response [CI] 0.19-0.63), BRAF mutation (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.82), and elevated alkaline phosphatase (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.9) before randomization were associated with less chance of successful conversion and were integrated into a nomogram. Early tumor shrinkage (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.06-3.3; p 0.034) and depth of response (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03; p < 0.001) were associated with successful conversion therapy. Resection of metastases improved post-best-response survival (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.97; p = 0.039), predominantely in cet-treated patients (interaction test, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Conversion to resectability is significantly associated with baseline characteristics that can be used in a nomogram to predict conversion. Moreover, early efficacy parameters (ETS and DpR) are associated with successful conversion therapy. In FIRE-3, resection of metastases was associated with improved post-best response survival, this effect originated predominantly from the cetuximab-based study arm.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Cetuximab/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Neoplasias Colorrectales/metabolismo , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Proteínas ras/genética , Proteínas ras/metabolismo
5.
HPB (Oxford) ; 21(12): 1734-1743, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31235430

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While most of the evidence on minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) is derived from expert centers, nationwide outcomes remain underreported. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation and outcome of MILS on a nationwide scale. METHODS: Electronic patient files were reviewed in all Dutch liver surgery centers and all patients undergoing MILS between 2011 and 2016 were selected. Operative outcomes were stratified based on extent of the resection and annual MILS volume. RESULTS: Overall, 6951 liver resections were included, with a median annual volume of 50 resections per center. The overall use of MILS was 13% (n = 916), which varied from 3% to 36% (P < 0.001) between centers. The nationwide use of MILS increased from 6% in 2011 to 23% in 2016 (P < 0.001). Outcomes of minor MILS were comparable with international studies (conversion 0-13%, mortality <1%). In centers which performed ≥20 MILS annually, major MILS was associated with less conversions (14 (11%) versus 41 (30%), P < 0.001), shorter operating time (184 (117-239) versus 200 (139-308) minutes, P = 0.010), and less overall complications (37 (30%) versus 58 (42%), P = 0.040). CONCLUSION: The nationwide use of MILS is increasing, although large variation remains between centers. Outcomes of major MILS are better in centers with higher volumes.


Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Hígado/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirujanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
Ann Surg ; 267(4): 743-748, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28207436

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare adhesion formation after laparoscopic and open colorectal cancer resection. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: After colorectal surgery, most patients develop adhesions, with a high burden of complications. Laparoscopy seems to reduce adhesion formation, but evidence is poor. Trials comparing open- and laparoscopic colorectal surgery have never assessed adhesion formation. METHODS: Data on adhesions were gathered during resection of colorectal liver metastases. Incidence of adhesions adjacent to the original incision was compared between patients with previous laparoscopic- and open colorectal resection. Secondary outcomes were incidence of any adhesions, extent and severity of adhesions, and morbidity related to adhesions or adhesiolysis. RESULTS: Between March 2013 and December 2015, 151 patients were included. Ninety patients (59.6%) underwent open colorectal resection and 61 patients (40.4%) received laparoscopic colorectal resection. Adhesions to the incision were present in 78.9% after open and 37.7% after laparoscopic resection (P < 0.001). The incidence of abdominal wall adhesions and of any adhesion was significantly higher after open resection; the incidence of visceral adhesions did not significantly differ. The extent of abdominal wall and visceral adhesions and the median highest Zühlke score at the incision were significantly higher after open resection. There were no differences in incidence of small bowel obstruction during the interval between the colorectal and liver operations, the incidence of serious adverse events, and length of stay after liver surgery. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection is associated with a lower incidence, extent, and severity of adhesions to parietal surfaces. Laparoscopy does not reduce the incidence of visceral adhesions.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Adherencias Tisulares/etiología , Pared Abdominal/patología , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Intestino Delgado/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Adherencias Tisulares/cirugía , Vísceras/patología
7.
HPB (Oxford) ; 20(7): 631-640, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29456199

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of the liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has been established. We sought to assess the short-term and long-term outcomes for these patients. METHODS: Outcomes of patients who underwent a liver-first approach for CRLM between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated from a prospective database. RESULTS: Of the 92 patients planned to undergo the liver-first strategy, the paradigm could be completed in 76.1%. Patients with concurrent extrahepatic disease failed significantly more often in completing the protocol (67% versus 21%; p = 0.03). Postoperative morbidity and mortality were 31.5% and 3.3% following liver resection and 30.9% and 0% after colorectal surgery. Of the 70 patients in whom the paradigm was completed, 36 patients (51.4%) developed recurrent disease after a median interval of 20.9 months. The median overall survival on an intention-to-treat basis was 33.1 months (3- and 5-year overall survival: 48.5% and 33.1%). Patients who were not able to complete their therapeutic paradigm had a significantly worse overall outcome (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The liver-first approach is feasible with acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality rates. Despite the considerable overall-survival-benefit, recurrence rates remain high. Future research should focus on providing selection tools to enable the optimal treatment sequence for each patient with synchronous CRLM.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Países Bajos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Dig Surg ; 34(5): 411-420, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28343221

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Routine prophylactic abdominal drainage after hepatic surgery is still being debated, as it may be unnecessary, possibly harmful, and uncomfortable for patients. This study evaluated the safety of a no-drain policy after liver resection within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) programme. METHODS: All hepatectomies performed without prophylactic drainage during 2005-2014 were included. Primary end points were resection-surface-related (RSR) morbidity, defined as the presence of postoperative biloma, hemorrhage or abscess, and reinterventions. Secondary end points were length of stay, total postoperative morbidity, the composite end point of liver surgery-specific complications, readmissions, and 90-day mortality. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for RSR morbidity. A systematic search was performed to compare the results of this study to literature. RESULTS: A total of 538 resections were included in the study. The RSR complication and reintervention rate was 15 and 12%, respectively. Major liver resection (≥3 segments) was an independent risk factor for the development of RSR morbidity (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.61-5.62; p = 0.001) and need for RSR reintervention (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.59-5.73; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: RSR morbidity, mortality, and reintervention rates after liver surgery without prophylactic drainage in patients, treated within an ERAS programme, were comparable to previously published data. A no-drain policy after partial hepatectomy seems safe and feasible.


Asunto(s)
Absceso Abdominal/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Drenaje , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Absceso Abdominal/cirugía , Anciano , Fuga Anastomótica/cirugía , Femenino , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
9.
BMC Cancer ; 16: 686, 2016 08 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27565718

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of the classical treatment modalities surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment of aggressive fibromatosis is presently disputed and there is a shift towards a more conservative approach. The aim of the present study is to objectify tumor growth in patients with extra-abdominal or abdominal wall aggressive fibromatosis, while adhering to a "watchful waiting" policy. Other objectives are to investigate quality of life and to identify factors associated with tumor growth, in particular the relation with the presence of a CTNNB1-gene mutation in the tumor. DESIGN AND METHODS: GRAFITI is a nationwide, multicenter, prospective registration trial. All patients with extra-abdominal or abdominal wall aggressive fibromatosis are eligible for inclusion in the study. Main exclusion criteria are: history of familiar adenomatous polyposis, severe pain, functional impairment, life/limb threating situations in case of progressive disease. Patients included in the study will be treated with a watchful waiting policy during a period of 5 years. Imaging studies with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging scan will be performed during follow-up to monitor possible growth: the first years every 3 months, the second year twice and the yearly. In addition patients will be asked to complete a quality of life questionnaire on specific follow-up moments. The primary endpoint is the rate of progression per year, defined by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). Secondary endpoints are quality of life and the rate of influence on tumor progression for several factors, such as CTNNB1-mutations, age and localization. DISCUSSION: This study will provide insight in tumor behavior, the effect on quality of life and clinicopathological factors predictive of tumor progression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The GRAFITI trial is registered in the Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR), number 4714 .


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Abdominales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Abdominales/patología , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/complicaciones , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/patología , Fibromatosis Agresiva/complicaciones , Fibromatosis Agresiva/patología , Proyectos de Investigación , Neoplasias Abdominales/genética , Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Fibromatosis Agresiva/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Países Bajos , Calidad de Vida , Espera Vigilante , beta Catenina/genética
10.
HPB (Oxford) ; 16(6): 550-9, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24246003

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Currently, resection criteria for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) are only limited by remnant liver function. Morbidity and survival after a partial hepatectomy with limited or extended indication criteria were compared. METHODS/DESIGN: Between 1991 and 2010, patients undergoing a liver resection for CRCLM with limited (n = 169) or extended indication criteria (n = 129) were retrospectively identified in a prospectively collected single-centre database. Limited indication criteria were defined as less than three unilateral, not centrally located liver metastases in the absence of extra hepatic metastases. The extended criteria were only limited by predicted remnant liver volume and patients fitness. Data on co-morbidity, resection margin, short- and long-term morbidity, disease-free (DFS) and overall survival were compared. RESULTS: Patients with limited indications had less major complications (19.5% vs. 33.1%, P < 0.01), longer overall survival of 68.8 months [confidence interval (CI) 46.5-91.1] vs. 41.4 months (CI 33.4-49.0, P ≤ 0.001) and longer median DFS of 22.0 months [confidence interval (CI) 15.8-28.2] vs 10.2 months (CI 8.4-11.9, P < 0.001) compared with the extended indication group. Cure rates, defined as 10-year DFS, were 35.5% and 15.8%, respectively. Fewer patients in the extended indication group underwent an R0 resection (92.9% vs. 77.5%, P < 0.001). Only 17% of all R1 resected patients had recurrences at the transection plane. CONCLUSION: A partial hepatectomy for CRCLM with extended indications seems justified but is associated with higher complication rates, earlier recurrence and lower overall survival compared with limited indications. However, the median 5-year survival was substantial and a cure was achieved in 15.8% of patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Hepatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Comorbilidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
11.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(3)2024 Jan 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38339298

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) during the diagnostic and treatment trajectory of high-grade extremity soft-tissue sarcoma (eSTS) has rarely been investigated for adults (18-65 y) and the elderly (aged ≥65 y), despite a potential variation in challenges from diverse levels of physical, social, or work-related activities. This study assesses HRQoL from time of diagnosis to one year thereafter among adults and the elderly with eSTS. METHODS: HRQoL of participants from the VALUE-PERSARC trial (n = 97) was assessed at diagnosis and 3, 6 and 12 months thereafter, utilizing the PROMIS Global Health (GH), PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and EQ-5D-5L. RESULTS: Over time, similar patterns were observed in all HRQoL measures, i.e., lower HRQoL scores than the Dutch population at baseline (PROMIS-PF:46.8, PROMIS GH-Mental:47.3, GH-Physical:46.2, EQ-5D-5L:0.76, EQ-VAS:72.6), a decrease at 3 months, followed by an upward trend to reach similar scores as the general population at 12 months (PROMIS-PF:49.9, PROMIS GH-Physical:50.1, EQ-5D-5L:0.84, EQ-VAS:81.5), except for the PROMIS GH-Mental (47.5), where scores remained lower than the general population mean (T = 50). Except for the PROMIS-PF, no age-related differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: On average, eSTS patients recover well physically from surgery, yet the mental component demonstrates no progression, irrespective of age. These results underscore the importance of comprehensive care addressing both physical and mental health.

12.
Neurooncol Adv ; 6(1): vdae083, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38946881

RESUMEN

Background: This study aimed to assess the performance of currently available risk calculators in a cohort of patients with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) and to create an MPNST-specific prognostic model including type-specific predictors for overall survival (OS). Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with MPNST from 11 secondary or tertiary centers in The Netherlands, Italy and the United States of America. All patients diagnosed with primary MPNST who underwent macroscopically complete surgical resection from 2000 to 2019 were included in this study. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model for OS was estimated with prespecified predictors (age, grade, size, NF-1 status, triton status, depth, tumor location, and surgical margin). Model performance was assessed for the Sarculator and PERSARC calculators by examining discrimination (C-index) and calibration (calibration plots and observed-expected statistic; O/E-statistic). Internal-external cross-validation by different regions was performed to evaluate the generalizability of the model. Results: A total of 507 patients with primary MPNSTs were included from 11 centers in 7 regions. During follow-up (median 8.7 years), 211 patients died. The C-index was 0.60 (95% CI 0.53-0.67) for both Sarculator and PERSARC. The MPNST-specific model had a pooled C-index of 0.69 (95%CI 0.65-0.73) at validation, with adequate discrimination and calibration across regions. Conclusions: The MPNST-specific MONACO model can be used to predict 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS in patients with primary MPNST who underwent macroscopically complete surgical resection. Further validation may refine the model to inform patients and physicians on prognosis and support them in shared decision-making.

13.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 20(5): 1462-9, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23463086

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A considerable number of patients develop sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). SOS is associated with adverse outcomes after major hepatectomy. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a marker of hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cell function and may serve as an accurate marker of SOS. This study aimed to assess the value of systemic HA levels and fractional extraction (FE) of HA by the splanchnic area and liver as markers of SOS after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for CLMs. METHODS: Forty patients were studied. The presence of SOS was assessed histopathologically. Blood samples from the radial artery and portal and hepatic veins were collected. HA levels were determined by ELISA and the FE of HA was estimated. RESULTS: SOS was present in 23 patients, 11 of whom demonstrated moderate or severe SOS. Preoperative HA levels were significantly higher in patients with moderate or severe SOS (group B, n = 11) compared to patients with no or mild SOS (group A, n = 29) (51.6 ± 10.2 ng/mL vs. 32.1 ± 3.5 ng/mL, p = 0.030). A cutoff HA level of 44.1 ng/mL yielded a sensitivity of 67 % and specificity of 83 % for detection of SOS. The positive predictive value was 50 % and the negative predictive value 91 %. Both groups exhibited a similar FE of HA by the splanchnic area (-7.9 ± 8.5 % in Group A vs. 7.3 ± 3.6 % in Group B, p = 0.422) and liver (-10.7 ± 6.2 % in Group A vs. 4.6 ± 2.3 % in Group B, p = 0.265). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic HA levels can be used to detect patients at risk of SOS after oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for CLMs. Additional investigations into the presence of SOS are indicated in patients with elevated HA levels.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/sangre , Ácido Hialurónico/sangre , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab , Biomarcadores/sangre , Capecitabina , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/análogos & derivados , Hepatectomía , Venas Hepáticas , Enfermedad Veno-Oclusiva Hepática/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Oxaliplatino , Vena Porta , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Arteria Radial , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
14.
HPB (Oxford) ; 15(3): 165-9, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23020663

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Sarcopenia may negatively affect short-term outcomes after liver resection. The present study aimed to explore whether total functional liver volume (TFLV) is related to sarcopenia in patients undergoing partial liver resection. METHODS: Analysis of total liver volume and tumour volume and measurements of muscle surface were performed in patients undergoing liver resection using OsiriX(®) and preoperative computed tomography. The ratio of TFLV to bodyweight was calculated as: [TFLV (ml)/bodyweight (g)]*100%. The L3 muscle index (cm(2) /m(2) ) was then calculated by normalizing muscle areas (at the third lumbar vertebral level) for height. RESULTS: Of 40 patients, 27 (67.5%) were classified as sarcopenic. There was a significant correlation between the L3 skeletal muscle index and TFLV (r= 0.64, P < 0.001). Median TFLV was significantly lower in the sarcopenia group than in the non-sarcopenia group [1396 ml (range: 1129-2625 ml) and 1840 ml (range: 867-2404 ml), respectively; P < 0.05]. Median TFLV : bodyweight ratio was significantly lower in the sarcopenia group than in the non-sarcopenia group [2.0% (range: 1.4-2.5%) and 2.3% (range: 1.5-2.5%), respectively; P < 0.05]. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenic patients had a disproportionally small preoperative TFLV compared with non-sarcopenic patients undergoing liver resection. The preoperative hepatic physiologic reserve may therefore be smaller in sarcopenic patients.


Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Hígado/cirugía , Músculo Esquelético/patología , Sarcopenia/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Composición Corporal , Peso Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/fisiopatología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tamaño de los Órganos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Factores de Riesgo , Sarcopenia/patología , Sarcopenia/fisiopatología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Carga Tumoral
15.
Dig Surg ; 29(1): 70-8, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22441623

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to provide a systematic review on the introduction of laparoscopic liver surgery in the Netherlands, to investigate the initial experience with laparoscopic liver resections and to report on the current status of laparoscopic liver surgery in the Netherlands. METHODS: A systematic literature search of laparoscopic liver resections in the Netherlands was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE. Analysis of initial experience with laparoscopic liver surgery was performed by case-control comparison of patients undergoing laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy matched with patients undergoing the open procedure in the Netherlands between the years 2000 and 2008. Furthermore, a nationwide survey was conducted in 2011 on the current status of laparoscopic liver surgery. RESULTS: The systematic review revealed only 6 Dutch reports on actual laparoscopic liver surgery. Matched case-control comparison showed significant differences in the length of hospital stay, blood loss and operation time. Complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (26 vs. 21%). The 2011 survey showed that 21 centers in the Netherlands performed formal liver resections and that 49 (5% of total) laparoscopic liver resections were performed in 2010. CONCLUSION: The systematic review revealed that very few laparoscopic liver resections were performed in the Netherlands in the previous millennium. The matched case-control comparison of laparoscopic and open left lateral resection showed a reduction in hospital length of stay with comparable morbidity. The laparoscopic technique has been slowly adopted in the Netherlands, but its popularity seems to increase in recent years.


Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía , Laparoscopía , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Países Bajos , Factores de Tiempo
16.
HPB (Oxford) ; 14(12): 818-27, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23134183

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Both laparoscopic techniques and multimodal enhanced recovery programmes have been shown to improve recovery and reduce length of hospital stay. Interestingly, evidence-based care programmes are not widely implemented, whereas new, minimally invasive surgical procedures are often adopted with very little evidence to support their effectiveness. The present survey aimed to shed light on experiences of the adoption of both methods of optimizing recovery. METHODS: An international, web-based, 18-question, electronic survey was composed in 2010. The survey was sent out to 673 hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) centres worldwide in June 2010 to investigate international experiences with laparoscopic liver surgery, fast-track recovery programmes and surgery-related equipoise in open and laparoscopic techniques and to assess opinions on strategies for adopting laparoscopic liver surgery in HPB surgical practice. RESULTS: A total of 507 centres responded (response rate: 75.3%), 161 of which finished the survey completely. All units reported performing open liver resections, 24.2% performed open living donor resections, 39.1% carried out orthotopic liver transplantations, 87.6% had experience with laparoscopic resections and 2.5% performed laparoscopic living donor resections. A median of 50 (range: 2-560) open and 9.5 (range: 1-80) laparoscopic liver resections per surgical unit were performed in 2009. Patients stayed in hospital for a median of 7 days (range: 2-15 days) after uncomplicated open liver resection and a median of 4 days (range: 1-10 days) after uncomplicated laparoscopic liver resection. Only 28.0% of centres reported having experience with fast-track programmes in liver surgery. The majority considered the instigation of a randomized controlled trial or a prospective register comparing the outcomes of open and laparoscopic techniques to be necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Worldwide dissemination of laparoscopic liver resection is substantial, although laparoscopic volumes are low in the majority of HPB centres. The adoption of enhanced recovery programmes in liver surgery is limited and should be given greater attention.


Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas , Hepatectomía , Laparoscopía , Trasplante de Hígado , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Difusión de Innovaciones , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Internet , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Hígado/estadística & datos numéricos , Donadores Vivos , Atención Perioperativa , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Desarrollo de Programa , Recuperación de la Función , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 48(5): 994-1000, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34848102

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Timely recognition of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) remains challenging, potentially leading to unplanned excisions (also known as 'whoops procedures'). This population-based study charted the occurrence of unplanned excisions and identified associated patient, tumour, and treatment-related characteristics. Furthermore, it presents an overview of the outcomes and clinical management following an unplanned excision. METHODS: From the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) database, information was obtained on 2187 adult patients diagnosed with STS in 2016-2019 who underwent surgery. Tumours located in the mediastinum, heart or retroperitoneum were excluded, as well as incidental findings. Differences between patients with planned and unplanned excisions were assessed with chi-square tests and a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Overall, unplanned excisions comprise 18.2% of all first operations for STS, with a quarter of them occurring outside a hospital. Within hospitals, the unplanned excision rate was 14.4%. Unplanned excisions were more often performed on younger patients, and tumours unsuspected of being STS prior to surgery were generally smaller (≤5 cm) and superficially located. Preoperative imaging was omitted more frequently in these cases. An unplanned excision more often resulted in positive margins, requiring re-excision. Patients who had an unplanned excision outside of a sarcoma centre were more often discussed at or referred to a sarcoma centre, particularly in case of residual tumour. DISCUSSION: Potential improvement in preventing unplanned excisions may be achieved by better compliance to preoperative imaging and referral guidelines, and stimulating continuous awareness of STS among general surgeons, general practitioners and private practices.


Asunto(s)
Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Adulto , Humanos , Incidencia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/diagnóstico , Sarcoma/epidemiología , Sarcoma/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía
18.
HPB (Oxford) ; 13(10): 745-52, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21929676

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: For patients who present with synchronous colorectal carcinoma and colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), a reversed treatment sequence in which the CRLM are resected before the primary carcinoma has been proposed (liver-first approach). The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility and outcome of this approach for synchronous CRLM. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2010, 22 patients were planned to undergo the liver-first approach. Feasibility and outcomes were prospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 22 patients planned to undergo the liver-first strategy, the approach was completed in 18 patients (81.8%). The main reason for treatment failure was disease progression. Patients who completed treatment and patients who deviated from the protocol had a similar location of the primary tumour, as well as comparable size, number and distribution of CRLM (all P > 0.05). Post-operative morbidity and mortality were 27.3% and 0% following liver resection and 44.4% and 5.6% after colorectal surgery, respectively. On an intention-to-treat-basis, overall 3-year survival was 41.1%. However, 37.5% of patients who completed the treatment had developed recurrent disease at the time of the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The liver-first approach is feasible in approximately four-fifths of patients and can be performed with peri-operative mortality and morbidity similar to the traditional treatment paradigm. Patients treated with this novel strategy derive a considerable overall-survival-benefit, although disease-recurrence-rates remain relatively high, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/cirugía , Colectomía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma/mortalidad , Carcinoma/secundario , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Países Bajos , Estudios Prospectivos , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
HPB (Oxford) ; 13(5): 324-31, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21492332

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels increase during liver resection. The source of this IL-6 is hitherto unclear. It has been demonstrated that the hepatosplanchnic area takes up IL-6 but the role of the gut and liver is unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of the gut and liver in IL-6 homeostasis during liver surgery. METHODS: Before and after partial hepatectomy, IL-6 was measured in blood sampled from the radial artery, and the hepatic and portal vein. Blood flow was measured to assess IL-6 fluxes (flow times AV-differences) across the gut, liver and hepatosplanchnic area. RESULTS: In 22 patients undergoing liver resection, IL-6 release from the gut after transection was 90.9 (30.1) ng/min (P < 0.001), whereas net IL-6 uptake by the liver equalled 83.4 (41.7) ng/min (P < 0.01). Overall hepatosplanchnic flux was 7.3 (43.5) ng/min after transection and did not differ significantly from zero. Overall hepatosplanchnic flux was 87.8 (41.5) ng/min in the major resection group and -59.8 (67.5) ng/min in the minor resection group (P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: The gut releases IL-6 and the liver takes up IL-6 before and after liver resection. The loss of IL-6 uptake as a result of a small functional remnant liver could lead to higher IL-6 levels after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Tracto Gastrointestinal/metabolismo , Hepatectomía , Interleucina-6/sangre , Hígado/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Femenino , Tracto Gastrointestinal/irrigación sanguínea , Venas Hepáticas , Homeostasis , Humanos , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Hígado/irrigación sanguínea , Hígado/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vena Porta , Arteria Radial , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Análisis de Regresión , Circulación Esplácnica , Factores de Tiempo
20.
Eur J Cancer ; 110: 98-106, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30776758

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing and treating soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) remains challenging, stressing the urgency for centralisation. This nationwide survey aimed to evaluate the centralisation of STS surgery and its effect on survival. METHODS: Patients operated for primary STS from 2006 to 2015 were queried from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Hospitals in which STS surgery was performed were allocated into three categories: low-volume (1-9 resections per year), medium-volume (10-19 resections) or high-volume (≥20 resections). Differences in tumour characteristics and outcome were calculated. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to adjust for case-mix. RESULTS: Of the 5282 identified patients, 42% was treated in low-volume hospitals, 7.7% in medium-volume hospitals and 51% in high-volume hospitals, with a significant trend over time towards treatment in a high-volume hospital (p < 0.01). In high-volume hospitals, more often patients with non low-grade, large and deep-seated tumours were treated than in low-volume hospitals. For the whole group, there was no survival benefit for patients treated in high-volume hospitals, with 10-year net survival rates of 76% (low-volume), 68% (medium-volume) and 68% (high-volume). However, subgroup analysis for patients with non low-grade and deep-seated tumours did reveal a benefit from treatment in a high-volume hospitals with 10-year survival rates of 54% (high-volume), 49% (low-volume) and 42% (medium-volume) and a relative risk of 1.3 (high-volume versus low-volume, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Centralisation of STS surgery has increased in the past decade. Surgery in a high-volume hospital improved survival of patients with non low-grade and deep-seated tumours, and therefore these patients should be referred to such a hospital.


Asunto(s)
Sarcoma/cirugía , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Adulto , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Sarcoma/mortalidad , Sarcoma/patología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/mortalidad , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Carga Tumoral
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA