Ensifentrine, a Novel Phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 Inhibitor for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Phase III Trials (the ENHANCE Trials).

Rationale: Ensifentrine is a novel, selective, dual phosphodiesterase (PDE)3 and PDE4 inhibitor with bronchodilator and antiinflammatory effects. Replicate phase III trials of nebulized ensifentrine were conducted (ENHANCE-1 and ENHANCE-2) to assess these effects in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of ensifentrine compared with placebo for lung function, symptoms, quality of life, and exacerbations in patients with COPD. Methods: These phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trials were conducted between September 2020 and December 2022 at 250 research centers and pulmonology practices in 17 countries. Patients aged 40-80 years with moderate to severe symptomatic COPD were enrolled. Measurements and Main Results: Totals of 760 (ENHANCE-1) and 789 (ENHANCE-2) patients were randomized and treated, with 69% and 55% receiving concomitant long-acting muscarinic antagonists or long-acting ß2-agonists, respectively. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 percentage predicted values were 52% and 51% of predicted normal. Ensifentrine treatment significantly improved average FEV1 area under the curve at 0-12 hours versus placebo (ENHANCE-1, 87 ml [95% confidence interval, 55, 119]; ENHANCE-2, 94 ml [65, 124]; both P < 0.001). Ensifentrine treatment significantly improved symptoms (Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms) and quality of life (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire) versus placebo at Week 24 in ENHANCE-1 but not in ENHANCE-2. Ensifentrine treatment reduced the rate of moderate or severe exacerbations versus placebo over 24 weeks (ENHANCE-1, rate ratio, 0.64 [0.40, 1.00]; P = 0.050; ENHANCE-2, rate ratio, 0.57 [0.38, 0.87]; P = 0.009) and increased time to first exacerbation (ENHANCE-1, hazard ratio, 0.62 [0.39, 0.97]; P = 0.038; ENHANCE-2, hazard ratio, 0.58 [0.38, 0.87]; P = 0.009). Adverse event rates were similar to those for placebo. Conclusions: Ensifentrine significantly improved lung function in both trials, with results supporting exacerbation rate and risk reduction in a broad COPD population and in addition to other classes of maintenance therapies. Clinical trial registered with www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov and EudraCT (ENHANCE-1, www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier NCT04535986, EudraCT identifier 2020-002086-34; ENHANCE-2, www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier NCT04542057, EudraCT identifier 2020-002069-32).

Joint MRI T1 Unenhancing and Contrast-enhancing Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation with Deep Learning in OPERA Trials.

Background Deep learning-based segmentation could facilitate rapid and reproducible T1 lesion load assessments, which is crucial for disease management in multiple sclerosis (MS). T1 unenhancing and contrast-enhancing lesions in MS are those that enhance or do not enhance after administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent at T1-weighted MRI. Purpose To develop deep learning models for automated assessment of T1 unenhancing and contrast-enhancing lesions; to investigate if joint training improved performance; to reproduce a known ocrelizumab treatment response; and to evaluate the association of baseline T1-weighted imaging metrics with clinical outcomes in relapsing MS clinical trials. Materials and Methods Joint and individual deep learning models (U-Nets) were developed retrospectively on multimodal MRI data sets from large multicenter OPERA trials of relapsing MS (August 2011 to May 2015). The joint model included cross-network connections and a combined loss function. Models were trained on OPERA I data sets with three-fold cross-validation. OPERA II data sets were the internal test set. Dice coefficients, lesion true-positive and false-positive rates, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were used to evaluate model performance. Association of baseline imaging metrics with clinical outcomes was assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. Results A total of 796 patients (3030 visits; mean age, 37 years ± 9; 521 women) from the OPERA II trial were evaluated. The joint model achieved a mean Dice coefficient of 0.77 and 0.74, lesion true-positive rate of 0.88 and 0.86, and lesion false-positive rate of 0.04 and 0.19 for T1 contrast-enhancing and T1 unenhancing lesion segmentation, respectively. Joint training improved performance for smaller T1 contrast-enhancing lesions (≤0.06 mL; individual training AUC: 0.75; joint training AUC: 0.87; P < .001). A significant ocrelizumab treatment effect (P < .001) was seen in reducing the mean number of T1 contrast-enhancing lesions at 24, 48, and 96 weeks (manual assessment at 24 weeks: 10 lesions in 366 patients with ocrelizumab, 141 lesions in 355 patients with interferon, 93% reduction; manual assessment at 48 weeks: six lesions in 355 patients with ocrelizumab, 150 lesions in 317 patients with interferon, 96% reduction; manual assessment at 96 weeks: five lesions in 340 patients with ocrelizumab, 157 lesions in 294 patients with interferon, 97% reduction; joint model assessment at 24 weeks: 19 lesions in 365 patients with ocrelizumab, 128 lesions in 354 patients with interferon, 86% reduction; joint model assessment at 48 weeks: 14 lesions in 355 patients with ocrelizumab, 121 lesions in 317 patients with interferon, 90% reduction; joint model assessment at 96 weeks: 10 lesions in 340 patients with ocrelizumab, 144 lesions in 294 patients with interferon, 94% reduction) and the mean number of new T1 unenhancing lesions across all follow-up examinations (manual assessment: 504 lesions in 1060 visits for ocrelizumab-treated patients, 1438 lesions in 965 visits for interferon-treated patients, 68% reduction; joint model assessment: 205 lesions in 1053 visits for ocrelizumab-treated patients, 661 lesions in 957 visits for interferon-treated patients, 78% reduction). Baseline T1 unenhancing total lesion volume was associated with clinical outcomes (manual hazard ratio [HR]: 1.12, P = .02; joint model HR: 1.11, P = .03). Conclusion Joint architecture and training improved segmentation of MRI T1 contrast-enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions, and both deep learning models had sufficiently high performance to detect an ocrelizumab treatment response consistent with manual assessments. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01247324 and NCT01412333 © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Talbott in this issue.

Efficacy and safety of a novel mucoadhesive clobetasol patch for treatment of erosive oral lichen planus: A phase 2 randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the oral mucosa. Currently there is no approved treatment for OLP. We report on the efficacy and safety of a novel mucoadhesive clobetasol patch (Rivelin® -CLO) for the treatment of OLP. METHODS: Patients with confirmed OLP and measurable symptomatic ulcer(s) participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial testing a novel mucoadhesive clobetasol patch (Rivelin® -CLO) in OLP across Europe, Canada, and the United States. Patients were randomized to placebo (nonmedicated), 1, 5, 20 µg Clobetasol/patch, twice daily, for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in total ulcer area compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints included improvement from baseline in pain, disease activity, and quality of life. RESULTS: Data were analyzed and expressed as mean [SD]. One hundred thirty-eight patients were included in the study; 99 females and 39 males, mean age was 61.1 [11.6] years. Statistical analyses revealed that treatment with 20-µg Rivelin® -CLO patches demonstrated significant improvement with ulcer area (p = 0.047), symptom severity (p = 0.001), disease activity (p = 0.022), pain (p = 0.012), and quality of life (p = 0.003) as compared with placebo. Improvement in OLP symptoms from beginning to the end of the study was reported as very much better (best rating) in the 20-µg group (25/32) patients compared to the placebo group (11/30), (p = 0.012). Adverse events were mild/moderate. Candidiasis incidence was low (2%). CONCLUSIONS: Rivelin® -CLO patches were superior to placebo demonstrating statistically significant, clinically relevant efficacy in objective and subjective improvement and, with a favorable safety profile.

Heart and bladder detection and segmentation on FDG PET/CT by deep learning.

PURPOSE: Positron emission tomography (PET)/ computed tomography (CT) has been extensively used to quantify metabolically active tumors in various oncology indications. However, FDG-PET/CT often encounters false positives in tumor detection due to 18fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) accumulation from the heart and bladder that often exhibit similar FDG uptake as tumors. Thus, it is necessary to eliminate this source of physiological noise. Major challenges for this task include: (1) large inter-patient variability in the appearance for the heart and bladder. (2) The size and shape of bladder or heart may appear different on PET and CT. (3) Tumors can be very close or connected to the heart or bladder. APPROACH: A deep learning based approach is proposed to segment the heart and bladder on whole body PET/CT automatically. Two 3D U-Nets were developed separately to segment the heart and bladder, where each network receives the PET and CT as a multi-modal input. Data sets were obtained from retrospective clinical trials and include 575 PET/CT for heart segmentation and 538 for bladder segmentation. RESULTS: The models were evaluated on a test set from an independent trial and achieved a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.96 for heart segmentation and 0.95 for bladder segmentation, Average Surface Distance (ASD) of 0.44 mm on heart and 0.90 mm on bladder. CONCLUSIONS: This methodology could be a valuable component to the FDG-PET/CT data processing chain by removing FDG physiological noise associated with heart and/or bladder accumulation prior to image analysis by manual, semi- or automated tumor analysis methods.

A dose-ranging study of the inhaled dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibitor ensifentrine in COPD.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) still experience daily symptoms, exacerbations, and accelerated lung function decline, even when receiving maximal combined treatment with inhaled long-acting bronchodilators and corticosteroids. Novel treatment options are needed for these patients. Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are enzymes that impact a range of cellular functions by modulating levels of cyclic nucleotides, and there is evidence to suggest that combined inhibition of PDE3 and PDE4 can have additive (or perhaps synergistic) effects. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of ensifentrine, a first-in-class dual inhibitor of PDE 3 and 4, in patients with COPD. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging study recruited patients with COPD, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 40-80% predicted and FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio ≤ 0.7. Patients were randomised equally to inhale nebulised ensifentrine 0.75, 1.5, 3 or 6 mg or placebo, all twice daily. PRIMARY OUTCOME: placebo-adjusted difference in peak FEV1 (assessed over 3 h) at Week 4. RESULTS: The study took place between July 2017 and February 2018. Of 405 patients randomly assigned to medication, 375 (92.6%) completed the study. For peak FEV1 at Week 4, all four ensifentrine doses were superior to placebo (p ≤ 0.0001) with least squares mean differences of 146 (95% CI 75-216), 153 (83-222), 200 (131-270) and 139 (69-210) mL for ensifentrine 0.75, 1.5, 3 and 6 mg, respectively. Respiratory symptoms (assessed using the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms questionnaire) were also significantly improved with all ensifentrine doses at Week 4. Adverse events were reported by 33.3, 44.4, 35.4 and 36.3% patients with ensifentrine 0.75, 1.5, 3 and 6 mg, respectively, and 39.2% with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In this four-week Phase IIb study, all four ensifentrine doses significantly improved bronchodilation and symptoms, with a dose-ranging effect from 0.75 to 3 mg twice daily, and all doses well tolerated. The study supports the continuing development of ensifentrine in COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2016-005205-40, registered 30 May 2017.

Reduced risk of clinically important deteriorations by ICS in COPD is eosinophil dependent: a pooled post-hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND: Clinically Important Deterioration (CID) is a novel composite measure to assess treatment effect in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We examined the performance and utility of CID in assessing the effect of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in COPD. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis of four budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FORM) studies comprised 3576 symptomatic moderate-to-very-severe COPD patients with a history of exacerbation. Analysis of time to first CID event (exacerbation, deterioration in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] or worsening St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ] score) was completed using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with ≥1 CID in the four studies ranged between 63 and 77% and 69-84% with BUD/FORM and FORM, respectively, with an average 25% reduced risk of CID with BUD/FORM. All components contributed to the CID event rate. Experiencing a CID during the first 3 months was associated with poorer outcomes (lung function, quality of life, symptoms and reliever use) and increased risk of later CID events. The effect of BUD/FORM versus FORM in reducing CID risk was positively associated with the blood eosinophil count. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that BUD/FORM offers protective effects for CID events compared with FORM alone, with the magnitude of the effect dependent on patients' eosinophil levels. CID may be an important tool for evaluation of treatment effect in a complex, multifaceted, and progressive disease like COPD, and a valuable tool to allow for shorter and smaller future outcome predictive trials in early drug development.

Tumor Segmentation and Feature Extraction from Whole-Body FDG-PET/CT Using Cascaded 2D and 3D Convolutional Neural Networks.

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is commonly used in clinical practice and clinical drug development to identify and quantify metabolically active tumors. Manual or computer-assisted tumor segmentation in FDG-PET images is a common way to assess tumor burden, such approaches are both labor intensive and may suffer from high inter-reader variability. We propose an end-to-end method leveraging 2D and 3D convolutional neural networks to rapidly identify and segment tumors and to extract metabolic information in eyes to thighs (whole body) FDG-PET/CT scans. The developed architecture is computationally efficient and devised to accommodate the size of whole-body scans, the extreme imbalance between tumor burden and the volume of healthy tissue, and the heterogeneous nature of the input images. Our dataset consists of a total of 3664 eyes to thighs FDG-PET/CT scans, from multi-site clinical trials in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tumors were segmented and reviewed by board-certified radiologists. We report a mean 3D Dice score of 88.6% on an NHL hold-out set of 1124 scans and a 93% sensitivity on 274 NSCLC hold-out scans. The method is a potential tool for radiologists to rapidly assess eyes to thighs FDG-avid tumor burden.

[18F]GTP1 (Genentech Tau Probe 1), a radioligand for detecting neurofibrillary tangle tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease.

OBJECTIVE: Neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), consisting of intracellular aggregates of the tau protein, are a pathological hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here we report the identification and initial characterization of Genentech Tau Probe 1 ([18F]GTP1), a small-molecule PET probe for imaging tau pathology in AD patients. METHODS: Autoradiography using human brain tissues from AD donors and protein binding panels were used to determine [18F]GTP1 binding characteristics. Stability was evaluated in vitro and in vivo in mice and rhesus monkey. In the clinic, whole-body imaging was performed to assess biodistribution and dosimetry. Dynamic [18F]GTP1 brain imaging and input function measurement were performed on two separate days in 5 ß-amyloid plaque positive (Aß+) AD and 5 ß-amyloid plaque negative (Aß-) cognitive normal (CN) participants. Tracer kinetic modeling was applied and reproducibility was evaluated. SUVR was calculated and compared to [18F]GTP1-specific binding parameters derived from the kinetic modeling. [18F]GTP1 performance in a larger cross-sectional group of 60 Aß+ AD participants and ten (Aß- or Aß+) CN was evaluated with images acquired 60 to 90 min post tracer administration. RESULTS: [18F]GTP1 exhibited high affinity and selectivity for tau pathology with no measurable binding to ß-amyloid plaques or MAO-B in AD tissues, or binding to other tested proteins at an affinity predicted to impede image data interpretation. In human, [18F]GTP1 exhibited favorable dosimetry and brain kinetics, and no evidence of defluorination. [18F]GTP1-specific binding was observed in cortical regions of the brain predicted to contain tau pathology in AD and exhibited low (< 4%) test-retest variability. SUVR measured in the 60 to 90-min interval post injection correlated with tracer-specific binding (slope = 1.36, r2 = 0.98). Furthermore, in a cross-sectional population, the degree of [18F]GTP1-specific binding increased with AD severity and could differentiate diagnostic cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: [18F]GTP1 is a promising PET probe for the study of tau pathology in AD.

The short-term bronchodilator effects of the dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibitor RPL554 in COPD.

We investigated the short-term bronchodilator effects of RPL554 (an inhaled dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibitor) combined with other bronchodilators in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with reversibility (>150 mL to short-acting bronchodilators).Study 1 was a six-way, placebo-controlled crossover study (n=36) with single doses of RPL554 (6 mg), salbutamol (200 µg), ipratropium (40 µg), RPL554 (6 mg)+salbutamol (200 µg), RPL554 (6 mg)+ipratropium (40 µg) or placebo. Study 2 was a three-way crossover study (n=30) of tiotropium (18 µg) combined with RPL554 (1.5 or 6 mg) or placebo for 3 days. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), lung volumes and specific airway conductance (sG aw) were measured.In study 1, peak FEV1 change compared with placebo was similar with RPL554, ipratropium and salbutamol (mean 223, 199 and 187 mL, respectively). The peak FEV1 was higher for RPL554+ipratropium versus ipratropium (mean difference 94 mL; p<0.0001) and RPL554+salbutamol versus salbutamol (mean difference 108 mL; p<0.0001). In study 2 (day 3), both RPL554 doses caused greater peak FEV1 effects than placebo. The average FEV1 (0-12 h) increase was greater with RPL554 6 mg only versus placebo (mean difference 65 mL; p=0.0009). In both studies, lung volumes and sG aw showed greater RPL554 combination treatment effects versus monotherapy.RPL554 combined with standard bronchodilators caused additional bronchodilation and hyperinflation reduction.

Transient paradoxical bronchospasm associated with inhalation of the LAMA AZD9164: analysis of two Phase I, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

BACKGROUND: AZD9164 has demonstrated potential as an inhaled, long-acting, muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) bronchodilator. However, in patients with COPD, but not in healthy subjects, a transient initial drop in FEV1 was observed following inhalation of nebulised doses of AZD9164 in citrate buffer.Two additional studies were conducted to further assess the safety and tolerability of multiple ascending doses of AZD9164 in 27 white and 18 Japanese healthy subjects and in 4 patients with COPD. In these studies, AZD9164 was inhaled via Turbuhaler™. METHODS: These were Phase I, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose (MAD) studies conducted in Sweden and UK. Healthy subjects (mean age 25.9 yrs) and patients with COPD (mean age 66 yrs, mean post-bronchodilator FEV1 60.1% predicted normal value) were randomised 2:1 to active treatment (400, 1000 or 2800 µg delivered doses of AZD9164) or placebo. RESULTS: No safety or tolerability concerns were identified in the healthy subjects at doses up to and including 2800 µg and both studies confirmed the bronchodilator effect of AZD9164. However, the first 3 patients in the COPD cohort who received AZD9164 (1000 µg) experienced a transient fall in FEV1 5 to 15 minutes after inhalation of AZD9164 while the patient receiving placebo did not. The study safety review process then resulted in cessation of further activities on AZD9164. Retrospective analysis showed that two healthy subjects had also had transient falls in FEV1 shortly after inhalation of AZD9164 400 and 2800 µg respectively, although neither reported any related respiratory symptoms or other AEs. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that transient paradoxical bronchoconstriction can occur in some healthy subjects, in addition to patients with COPD, following inhalation of AZD9164 and that the citrate buffer used in the nebulised formulation cannot have been the only cause of the drop in FEV1 in previous studies. As preclinical data do not provide an explanation, the reasons for this brief post-dose drop in FEV1 remain unclear. However, these results highlight the importance of monitoring lung function immediately post-dose when investigating novel inhaled treatments, even when a rapid onset of effect is not expected. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01016951 and NCT01096563.

Utilizing venous occlusion plethysmography to assess vascular effects: A study with buloxibutid, an angiotensin II type 2 receptor agonist.

Buloxibutid (also known as C21) is a potent and selective angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2R) agonist, in development for oral treatment of fibrotic lung disease. This phase I, open-label, pharmacodynamic study investigated vascular effects of buloxibutid in five healthy male volunteers. Subjects were administered intra-arterial infusions of buloxibutid for 5 min in ascending doses of 3, 10, 30, 100, and 200 µg/min, infused sequentially in the forearm. Infusions of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) solution in doses of 0.8-3.2 µg/min were administered as a positive control. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography. Safety and tolerability of intra-arterial administrations of buloxibutid were evaluated. Following infusion of buloxibutid in doses of 3-200 µg/min, the range of increase in FBF was 27.8%, 17.2%, 37.0%, 28.5%, and 60.5%, compared to the respective baseline. The largest increase was observed in the highest dose group. Infusions of SNP as a positive control, increased FBF 230-320% compared to baseline. Three adverse events (AEs) of mild intensity, not related to buloxibutid or SNP, were reported for two subjects. Two of these AEs were related to study procedures. There were no clinically relevant changes in arterial blood pressure during the study period. Intra-arterial infusion of buloxibutid in low, ascending doses increased FBF, indicating that buloxibutid may be effective in conditions associated with endothelial dysfunction. Venous occlusion plethysmography was found to be a useful method to explore pharmacodynamic vascular effects of novel AT2R agonists, while avoiding systemic adverse effects.

Effect of ensifentrine on dyspnea in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pooled analysis of the ENHANCE trials.

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea is a critical component of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Ensifentrine, a novel PDE3/PDE4 inhibitor, was evaluated in the Phase 3 ENHANCE-1/2 clinical trials. Here, we report the effect of ensifentrine on dyspnea using pooled data from the ENHANCE trials. METHODS: The pooled population (ensifentrine, n = 975; placebo, n = 574) included patients aged 40-80 years with post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.7, FEV1 30-70% predicted, mMRC Dyspnea Scale score ≥ 2, and a smoking history ≥ 10 pack-years. Patients taking dual LAMA/LABA or LAMA/LABA/ICS triple therapy were excluded. Dyspnea measures included the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS), and rescue medication use. RESULTS: After 24 weeks, ensifentrine significantly improved TDI scores (least-squares mean difference, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.64, 1.30; p < 0.001) and across all TDI subdomains. Ensifentrine-treated patients were more likely to be TDI responders at week 24 (p < 0.001), which was consistent across clinically-relevant subgroups. Ensifentrine-treated patients had improved E-RS breathlessness subdomain scores (p = 0.053) and reduced rescue medication use (p = 0.002). The most common adverse reactions were back pain (ensifentrine, 1.8% vs placebo, 1.0%), hypertension (1.7% vs 0.9%), urinary tract infection (1.3% vs 1.0%), diarrhea (1.0% vs 0.7%). CONCLUSION: Ensifentrine produced clinically meaningful improvements in multiple dyspnea measures in patients with symptomatic, moderate-to-severe COPD. A limitation of this study was the exclusion of patients taking dual LAMA/LABA and LAMA/LABA/ICS triple therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifiers are ENHANCE-1: NCT04535986; ENHANCE-2: NCT04542057.

Use of CompEx in eosinophilic patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma on benralizumab.

Background: CompEx Asthma, a composite end-point for asthma exacerbations, captures clinically relevant, diary-based acute worsening events (AWEs) (defined as deterioration in daily peak expiratory flow concurrent with deterioration in asthma symptoms and/or rescue therapy use) and severe exacerbations (SevEx) (defined by American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines). We hypothesised that CompEx and SevEx would show similar benralizumab treatment effects and correlations to blood eosinophil counts in patients with severe asthma. Methods: This post hoc analysis of pooled 12-month data from two phase 3 studies included patients aged ≥16 years with severe, uncontrolled asthma who were randomised to benralizumab 30 mg or placebo. Annualised event rates were analysed using a negative binomial model. The impact of blood eosinophil count on treatment effect was assessed. Results: Among patients with a blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells·µL-1 (n=913), benralizumab reduced the annualised event rate versus placebo for CompEx (1.57 versus 2.57; risk ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.53-0.70, p<0.001), SevEx (0.94 versus 1.55; risk ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.52-0.70, p<0.001) and AWE (0.92 versus 1.57; risk ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.48-0.72, p<0.001), with greater treatment effects observed for higher blood eosinophil counts. In patients with blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells·µL-1, benralizumab was associated with shorter median event duration (CompEx: 10.5 days versus 17.0 days; SevEx: 10.0 days versus 15.0 days; AWE: 5.0 days versus 6.0 days). Conclusions: Benralizumab reduced the risk of CompEx events with treatment effects similar to those for SevEx and AWEs across a range of blood eosinophil counts. Use of CompEx supports the evaluation of benralizumab and other novel drugs in clinical studies.

Automated Lugano Metabolic Response Assessment in 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Avid Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma With Deep Learning on 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography.

PURPOSE: Artificial intelligence can reduce the time used by physicians on radiological assessments. For 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-avid lymphomas, obtaining complete metabolic response (CMR) by end of treatment is prognostic. METHODS: Here, we present a deep learning-based algorithm for fully automated treatment response assessments according to the Lugano 2014 classification. The proposed four-stage method, trained on a multicountry clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01287741) and tested in three independent multicenter and multicountry test sets on different non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes and different lines of treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02257567, NCT02500407, 20% holdout in ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01287741), outputs the detected lesions at baseline and follow-up to enable focused radiologist review. RESULTS: The method's response assessment achieved high agreement with the adjudicated radiologic responses (eg, agreement for overall response assessment of 93%, 87%, and 85% in ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01287741, NCT02500407, and NCT02257567, respectively) similar to inter-radiologist agreement and was strongly prognostic of outcomes with a trend toward higher accuracy for death risk than adjudicated radiologic responses (hazard ratio for end of treatment by-model CMR of 0.123, 0.054, and 0.205 in ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01287741, NCT02500407, and NCT02257567, compared with, respectively, 0.226, 0.292, and 0.272 for CMR by the adjudicated responses). Furthermore, a radiologist review of the algorithm's assessments was conducted. The radiologist median review time was 1.38 minutes/assessment, and no statistically significant differences were observed in the level of agreement of the radiologist with the model's response compared with the level of agreement of the radiologist with the adjudicated responses. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the proposed method can be incorporated into radiologic response assessment workflows in cancer imaging for significant time savings and with performance similar to trained medical experts.

Efficacy and safety of AZD3199 vs formoterol in COPD: a randomized, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and safety of AZD3199, a novel inhaled ultra-LABA, with the main aim of establishing a dose that would maintain 24-hour bronchodilation in patients with COPD. METHODS: Patients (n = 329) were randomized to AZD3199 (200, 400 or 800 µg o.d.), formoterol (9 µg b.i.d.) or placebo via Turbuhaler® in a parallel group study. The primary objective of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of three doses of AZD3199 inhaled once daily with 9 µg formoterol twice daily and placebo, over a 4-week treatment period in adults with moderate-to-severe COPD. After 4 weeks, peak (0-4 h) and trough (24-26 h) forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were assessed as the primary efficacy outcome variables. RESULTS: All AZD3199 doses significantly increased mean peak and trough FEV1 versus placebo (106-171 ml and 97-110 ml increases, respectively), but with no clear dose-response; the level of bronchodilation was comparable to or greater than that achieved with formoterol. Forced vital capacity (FVC) at peak bronchodilation also significantly increased with AZD3199 versus placebo (153-204 ml). COPD symptom scores and reliever use were reduced with AZD3199, while FEV1 reversibility was unaltered. Adverse events were mild-to-moderate, with no safety concerns identified. Drug exposure was dose-proportional, but lower than predicted from healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: All three doses of AZD3199 produced 24-hour bronchodilation, but with no clear dose-response, suggesting that doses of 200 µg or less may be sufficient to maintain bronchodilation over 24 hours in patients with COPD. No safety concerns were identified. Further studies are required to determine the once-daily AZD3199 dose for COPD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00929708.

Ensifentrine as a Novel, Inhaled Treatment for Patients with COPD.

Ensifentrine is a novel, potent, and selective dual inhibitor of phosphodiesterase (PDE)3 and PDE4 designed for delivery by inhalation that combines effects on airway inflammation, bronchodilation and ciliary function in bronchial epithelia. In Phase 2 studies in subjects with COPD, ensifentrine demonstrated clinically meaningful bronchodilation and improvements in symptoms and health-related quality of life when administered alone or in combination with current standard of care therapies. Ensifentrine is currently in late-stage clinical development for the maintenance treatment of patients with COPD. This review summarizes non-clinical data as well as Phase 1 and Phase 2 efficacy and safety results of nebulized ensifentrine relevant to the maintenance treatment of patients with COPD.

Deep Learning to Predict Geographic Atrophy Area and Growth Rate from Multimodal Imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To develop deep learning models for annualized geographic atrophy (GA) growth rate prediction using fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images and spectral-domain OCT volumes from baseline visits, which can be used for prognostic covariate adjustment to increase power of clinical trials. DESIGN: This retrospective analysis estimated GA growth rate as the slope of a linear fit on all available measurements of lesion area over a 2-year period. Three multitask deep learning models-FAF-only, OCT-only, and multimodal (FAF and OCT)-were developed to predict concurrent GA area and annualized growth rate. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were from prospective and observational lampalizumab clinical trials. METHODS: The 3 models were trained on the development data set, tested on the holdout set, and further evaluated on the independent test sets. Baseline FAF images and OCT volumes from study eyes of patients with bilateral GA (NCT02247479; NCT02247531; and NCT02479386) were split into development (1279 patients/eyes) and holdout (443 patients/eyes) sets. Baseline FAF images from study eyes of NCT01229215 (106 patients/eyes) and NCT02399072 (169 patients/eyes) were used as independent test sets. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Model performance was evaluated using squared Pearson correlation coefficient (r2) between observed and predicted lesion areas/growth rates. Confidence intervals were calculated by bootstrap resampling (B = 10 000). RESULTS: On the holdout data set, r2 (95% confidence interval) of the FAF-only, OCT-only, and multimodal models for GA lesion area prediction was 0.96 (0.95-0.97), 0.91 (0.87-0.95), and 0.94 (0.92-0.96), respectively, and for GA growth rate prediction was 0.48 (0.41-0.55), 0.36 (0.29-0.43), and 0.47 (0.40-0.54), respectively. On the 2 independent test sets, r2 of the FAF-only model for GA lesion area was 0.98 (0.97-0.99) and 0.95 (0.93-0.96), and for GA growth rate was 0.65 (0.52-0.75) and 0.47 (0.34-0.60). CONCLUSIONS: We show the feasibility of using baseline FAF images and OCT volumes to predict individual GA area and growth rates using a multitask deep learning approach. The deep learning-based growth rate predictions could be used for covariate adjustment to increase power of clinical trials. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Evaluation of Budesonide-Formoterol for Maintenance and Reliever Therapy Among Patients With Poorly Controlled Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IMPORTANCE: The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommends 2 alternative treatments for patients receiving treatment at steps 3 to 5: single inhaler combination inhaled corticosteroid-formoterol as both maintenance and reliever (SMART) or inhaled corticosteroid-long-acting ß2-agonist as maintenance plus short-acting ß2-agonist as reliever. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether switching to SMART is associated with longer time to first severe asthma exacerbation compared with a step up or continuation of GINA treatment step with maintenance inhaled corticosteroid-long-acting ß2-agonist plus short-acting ß2-agonist reliever among patients with poorly controlled asthma. DATA SOURCES: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, the literature, internal study databases at AstraZeneca and the Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, and references from a previous systematic review and meta-analysis on SMART were searched to identify randomized clinical trials published from January 1990 to February 2018, that compared budesonide-formoterol by SMART with maintenance inhaled corticosteroid-long-acting ß2-agonist plus short-acting ß2-agonist reliever. STUDY SELECTION: Trials of at least 24 weeks' duration were included if they reported baseline data on GINA treatment step, asthma control status, and efficacy measures of severe exacerbations. Included patients were adults and adolescents with asthma and baseline Asthma Control Questionnaire 5-item version scores of 1.5 or higher. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Patient-level data were identified by independent extraction, and analyses were performed using a fixed-effect model. Data analysis was performed from August 2018 to November 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was time to first severe asthma exacerbation associated with each treatment, analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Overall, 4863 patients were included (3034 [62.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 39.8 [16.3] years). Switching patients with uncontrolled asthma at GINA step 3 (n = 1950) to SMART at either step 3 or 4 was associated with a prolonged time to first severe asthma exacerbation, with a 29% reduced risk compared with stepping up to step 4 inhaled corticosteroid-long-acting ß2-agonist maintenance plus short-acting ß2-agonist reliever (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.97). For patients with uncontrolled asthma at step 3 and step 4 (n = 2913), switching to SMART was associated with a prolonged time to first severe asthma exacerbation and a 30% reduced risk compared with remaining at the same treatment step (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58-0.85). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, for patients with poorly controlled asthma, SMART was associated with longer time to first severe asthma exacerbation compared with a step up or continuation of GINA step with maintenance inhaled corticosteroid-long-acting ß2-agonist plus short-acting ß2-agonist reliever. These findings suggest that if an adult or adolescent receiving treatment at GINA step 3 or 4 has poorly controlled asthma, it is preferable to switch to the SMART regimen rather than to step up or continue the GINA treatment step with maintenance inhaled corticosteroid-long-acting ß2-agonist plus short-acting ß2-agonist reliever therapy.

Deformation-based morphometry identifies deep brain structures protected by ocrelizumab.

BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in treatments for multiple sclerosis, insidious disease progression remains an area of unmet medical need, for which atrophy-based biomarkers may help better characterize the progressive biology. METHODS: We developed and applied a method of longitudinal deformation-based morphometry to provide voxel-level assessments of brain volume changes and identified brain regions that were significantly impacted by disease-modifying therapy. RESULTS: Using brain MRI data from two identically designed pivotal trials of relapsing multiple sclerosis (total N = 1483), we identified multiple deep brain regions, including the thalamus and brainstem, where volume loss over time was reduced by ocrelizumab (p < 0.05), a humanized anti-CD20 + monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Additionally, identified brainstem shrinkage, as well as brain ventricle expansion, was associated with a greater risk for confirmed disability progression (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The identification of deep brain structures has a strong implication for developing new biomarkers of brain atrophy reduction to advance drug development for multiple sclerosis, which has an increasing focus on targeting the progressive biology.