Chronic renal failure in diabetic patients increases lipid risk factors for atherosclerosis.

Diabetic patients are at high risk of cardiovascular disease and the risk is amplified in the presence of nephropathy, which may be partially attributed to modifications in lipoproteins. Moreover, lipoprotein profile may be affected by incipient nephropathy, glomerulopathy, and mild or severe renal failure. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether chronic renal failure (CRF) changes lipoprotein profile and apo A-I urinary excretion in diabetic subjects with glomerulopathy in comparison with non-diabetic subjects with glomerulopathy and CRF. Diabetic (n=25) and non-diabetic (n=10) patients with glomerulopathy and CRF showed significantly higher LDL-cholesterol, non-HDL-cholesterol and HDL-triglyceride levels than diabetic individuals without CRF (n=10). Arylesterase and paraoxonase activities did not show any difference between groups. Apo A-I could not be detected in urine samples from diabetic patients without CRF. All diabetic subjects with glomerulopathy and CRF who presented proteinuria above 6.5 g/24 h showed detectable urinary apo A-I (range=13.1-61.0 mg/24 h). Similarly, all non-diabetic patients with glomerulopathy and CRF who had proteinuria above 8.0 g/24 h also evidenced detectable apo A-I in urine (range=25.6-557.3 mg/24 h). Urinary apo A-I showed positive and significant correlations with urea (r=0.73, p<0.05) and proteinuria (r=0.97, p<0.0001), and a negative correlation with albumin plasma levels (r=-0.68, p<0.05). In conclusion, the presence of CRF in diabetic patients was associated with a more atherogenic lipoprotein profile.

Prevalence of impaired fasting glycemia, impaired glucose tolerance, and type 2 diabetes in hemodialyzed patients when applying new diagnostic criteria.

OBJECTIVE: Recently, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) proposed a new diagnostic entity for diabetes mellitus that has not been applied in renal failure patients so far. Our goal was to apply the new impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) criteria in a group of hemodialyzed patients to provide data on glucose alterations in chronic renal failure. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: We evaluated 74 hemodialyzed patients, (38 women, 36 men) without diagnosed diabetes. Blood was collected at fasting and at 120 minutes after a 75-g glucose intake, and insulin levels were determined. The weight, height, waist circumference, and hip circumference of each patient were measured, and the body mass index (BMI) and waist-hip ratio were calculated. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Values of fasting plasma glycemia and 120-minute oral glucose tolerance test were (mean +/- SD) 78 +/- 9.4 mg/dL and 121 +/- 39 mg/dL, respectively. Among the 74 subjects studied, 5 patients had IFG, none of them showing a glucose level above 110 mg/dL. If the ADA 1997 criteria were applied, these patients would be classified as normal. On the other hand, 15 of the 74 patients showed IGT, this prevalence being higher compared with that of the general population. Finally, in 5 of the 74 patients the presence of type 2 diabetes was shown by the second test. According to sex, no differences were observed in the prevalence of IFG, IGT, or diabetes. Glucose alterations are characteristics that need to be identified in chronic renal failure patients. Our results suggests that the glucose tolerance test might be evaluated during hemodialysis treatment to define its prevalence.

Lipoprotein alterations in hemodialysis: differences between diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

Both renal failure and type 2 diabetes may contribute synergistically to the dyslipemia of diabetic renal failure with the development of atherosclerosis as the possible consequence. It has not yet been conclusively evaluated whether diabetic patients with end-stage renal failure under maintenance hemodialysis (HD) show accentuated alterations in plasma lipids and lipoproteins in comparison to nondiabetics under HD. These abnormalities would involve hepatic lipase activity and the regulation of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein metabolism. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether type 2 diabetic patients undergoing HD exhibited a lipid-lipoprotein profile different from that of nondiabetic hemodialyzed patients. We compared plasma lipids, apoprotein (apo) A-I and B, and lipoprotein parameters among 3 groups: 25 type 2 diabetics, 25 nondiabetics, both undergoing HD, and 20 healthy control subjects. Intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were isolated by sequential ultracentrifugation. Hepatic lipase activity was measured in postheparin plasma. Both groups of HD patients showed higher triglyceride and IDL cholesterol (P <.001), and lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (P <.01) and apo A-I (P <.001) levels compared to the control group, even after adjustment for age and body mass index (BMI). However, no differences were found in lipid, lipoprotein, and apoprotein concentrations between diabetic and nondiabetic HD patients, except for high LDL triglyceride content of diabetic HD patients (P <.01). Nondiabetics undergoing HD also presented higher LDL triglyceride levels than controls (P <.05). LDL triglyceride correlated with plasma triglycerides (r = 0.51, P <.001). A lower LDL cholesterol/apo B ratio was found in each group of HD patients in comparison to controls (P <.02). Comparing the diabetic and nondiabetic patients, hepatic lipase activity remained unchanged, but significantly lower than control subjects (P <.001). Hepatic lipase correlated with log-triglyceride (r = -0.31, P <.01), IDL cholesterol (r = -0.41, P <.001), and LDL triglyceride (r = -0.32, P <.01). In conclusion, both diabetic and nondiabetic HD patients shared unfavorable alterations in lipid-lipoprotein profile not different between them but different from a healthy control group. The only difference between the groups of HD patients was a significant LDL triglyceride enrichment, which correlated negatively with hepatic lipase activity. Lipoprotein abnormalities in HD patients would enhance their risk for the development of atherosclerosis.

[Effect of the temperature of the dialysis bath in diabetics]. / Efecto de la temperatura del baño de hemodiálisis en diabéticos.

During the dialysis procedure, arterial hypotension is one of the most common problems and it has been object of many studies. In hemodialysis, changes are produced in body volume through ultrafiltration that generate an increase in the production of thermic energy, which is removed during the treatment. The hypovolemia resulting from the removal of volume activates the sympathetic system, avoiding in this way heat loss and increasing body temperature that promotes vascular vasodilatation and interferes with the compensatory constrictive response to volume fall with consequent arterial hypotension. Patients with autonomic neuropathy would be the most affected by volume depletion and they are usually the ones that show the highest frecuency of hypotension episodes, typical of patients with diabetes. It has been proved before that the use of a cold bath does not decrease the efficiency of the dialysis treatment and improves the cardiovascular stability as well, mostly in patients proned to it, such as diabetics, elderly, and patients with cardiac failure. In this study, it was observed that patients showed low basal temperatures before dialysis treatment and that the use of bath temperature of 35.5 degrees C increased the temperature post dialysis less than with the standard bath at 37 degrees C. The bath at 35.5 degrees C decreased the episodes of arterial hypotension, with an improvement in patient's welfare, and lower requirement of attention and treatment costs.

Efecto de la temperatura del baño de hemodiálisis en diabéticos. / [Effect of the temperature of the dialysis bath in diabetics]

During the dialysis procedure, arterial hypotension is one of the most common problems and it has been object of many studies. In hemodialysis, changes are produced in body volume through ultrafiltration that generate an increase in the production of thermic energy, which is removed during the treatment. The hypovolemia resulting from the removal of volume activates the sympathetic system, avoiding in this way heat loss and increasing body temperature that promotes vascular vasodilatation and interferes with the compensatory constrictive response to volume fall with consequent arterial hypotension. Patients with autonomic neuropathy would be the most affected by volume depletion and they are usually the ones that show the highest frecuency of hypotension episodes, typical of patients with diabetes. It has been proved before that the use of a cold bath does not decrease the efficiency of the dialysis treatment and improves the cardiovascular stability as well, mostly in patients proned to it, such as diabetics, elderly, and patients with cardiac failure. In this study, it was observed that patients showed low basal temperatures before dialysis treatment and that the use of bath temperature of 35.5 degrees C increased the temperature post dialysis less than with the standard bath at 37 degrees C. The bath at 35.5 degrees C decreased the episodes of arterial hypotension, with an improvement in patients welfare, and lower requirement of attention and treatment costs.