Pharmacokinetic interaction between etravirine or rilpivirine and telaprevir in healthy volunteers: A randomized, two-way crossover trial.

Coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) may require treatment with an HIV non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), for example, rilpivirine or etravirine, and an HCV direct-acting antiviral drug such as telaprevir. In a two-panel, two-way, crossover study, healthy volunteers were randomized to receive etravirine 200 mg twice daily ± telaprevir 750 mg every 8 hours or rilpivirine 25 mg once daily ± telaprevir 750 mg every 8 hours. Pharmacokinetic assessments were conducted for each drug at steady-state when given alone and when coadministered; statistical analyses were least-square means with 90% confidence intervals. Telaprevir minimum plasma concentration (Cmin), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) decreased 25%, 10%, and 16%, respectively, when coadministered with etravirine and 11%, 3%, and 5%, respectively, when coadministered with rilpivirine. Telaprevir did not affect etravirine pharmacokinetics, but increased rilpivirine Cmin, Cmax, and AUC by 93%, 49%, and 78%, respectively. Both combinations were generally well tolerated. The small decrease in telaprevir exposure when coadministered with etravirine is unlikely to be clinically relevant. The interaction between telaprevir and rilpivirine is not likely to be clinically relevant under most circumstances. No dose adjustments are deemed necessary when they are coadministered.

A brief survey of first-in-human studies.

First-in-human (FIH) studies are a critical step in the drug development process and typically aim to characterize a compound's pharmacokinetics, potential effective concentration or dose, and safety or tolerability margins. Although effort continues to enhance the predictive quality of the selection of FIH doses from preclinical data, and little consensus is available on the design and conduct of FIH studies, detailed surveys describing general approaches taken in FIH studies are useful in the optimization of early-phase clinical drug development. Although allometric scaling techniques continue to provide poor predictive estimates for human pharmacokinetic parameters, FIH starting doses are selected with substantial safety factors applied to human equivalent dose, often in excess of regulatory guidelines. Based on these examples, it appears that relatively conservative 2-fold dose escalations are the most common escalation approach within FIH single ascending dose studies. The combination of conservative dose escalations with low starting doses can result in large FIH trials, consuming both time and resources. Approaches that could enhance the predictive nature of a compound's disposition and adaptive nature of FIH studies could provide a tremendous benefit for drug development.

Apparent active transport of MDMA is not mediated by P-glycoprotein: a comparison with MDCK and Caco-2 monolayers.

Amphetamines and their methylenedioxy derivatives generically display similar behavioral, physiologic and toxic effects. Inconsistent pharmacokinetic and toxicity data for methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) may suggest that active drug transporters are interacting with these compounds, and thus altering drug absorption and tissue distribution. In vitro models of CNS accumulation and intestinal drug transport were used to assess efflux transport of MDMA. Madin-Darby kidney cell epithelial (MDCK) monolayers displayed a 4-fold increase in accumulation in the basolateral to apical orientation relative to the apical to basolateral orientation, although no differential accumulation was noted between MDCK-WT and MDCK-MDR1 monolayers. Caco-2 monolayers demonstrated an approximate 2-fold increase in accumulation of MDMA. Exposure of various inhibitors of active drug transporters demonstrated mixed results; ritonavir, progesterone and indomethacin produced an approximately 50% reduction of MDMA transport, while verapamil, MK-571 and probenecid had no effect. Based on these data, it is concluded that MDMA efflux is mediated via the activity of a transporter distinct from P-glycoprotein. The possible inhibitory effects of amphetamines on rhodamine-123 transport were also assessed. MDMA, methylenedioxyamphetamine, amphetamine and methamphetamine, at physiologically relevant concentrations, did not significantly alter the transport of rhodamine-123 in Caco-2 monolayers or the LS180 cell line, suggesting that these compounds do not alter the function of P-glycoprotein.

Apparent mechanism-based inhibition of human CYP2D6 in vitro by paroxetine: comparison with fluoxetine and quinidine.

Paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) activity, but the mechanism of inhibition is not established. To determine whether preincubation affects the inhibition of human liver microsomal dextromethorphan demethylation activity by paroxetine, we used a two-step incubation scheme in which all of the enzyme assay components, minus substrate, are preincubated with paroxetine. The kinetic parameters of inhibition were also estimated by varying the time of preincubation as well as the concentration of inhibitor. From these data, a Kitz-Wilson plot was constructed, allowing the estimation of both an apparent inactivator concentration required for half-maximal inactivation (K(I)) and the maximal rate constant of inactivation (k(INACT)) value for this interaction. Preincubation of paroxetine with human liver microsomes caused an approximately 8-fold reduction in the IC(50) value (0.34 versus 2.54 microM). Time-dependent inhibition was demonstrated with an apparent K(I) of 4.85 microM and an apparent k(INACT) value of 0.17 min(-1). Spectral scanning of CYP2D6 with paroxetine yielded an increase in absorbance at 456 nm suggesting paroxetine inactivation of CYP2D6 via the formation of a metabolite intermediate complex. This pattern is consistent with the metabolism of the methylenedioxy substituent in paroxetine; such substituents may produce mechanism-based inactivation of cytochrome P450 enzymes. In contrast, quinidine and fluoxetine, both of which are inhibitors of CYP2D6 activity, did not exhibit a preincubation-dependent increase in inhibitory potency. These data are consistent with mechanism-based inhibition of CYP2D6 by paroxetine but not by quinidine or fluoxetine.