RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Wide variations exist in the use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) and echocardiography in the field of cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A national survey promoted by the Italian Association of Cardio-Thoracic Anesthesiologists and Intensive Care was conducted. SETTING: The study occurred in Italian cardiac surgery centers (n = 71). PARTICIPANTS: Anesthesiologists-intensivists were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Anonymous questionnaires were used to investigate the use of PACs and echocardiography in the operating room (OR) and intensive care unit (ICU). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 257 respondents (32.2% response rate) from 59 centers (83.1% response rate) participated. Use of PACs seems less common in ORs (median insertion in 20% [5-70] of patients), with slightly higher use in ICUs; in about half of cases, it was the continuous cardiac output monitoring system of choice. Almost two-thirds of respondents recently inserted at least one PAC within a few hours of ICU admission, despite its need being largely preoperatively predictable. Protocols regulating PAC insertion were reported by 25.3% and 28% of respondents (OR and ICU, respectively). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed intraoperatively in >75% of patients by 86.4% of respondents; only 23.7% stated that intraoperative TEE relied on anesthesiologists. Tissue Doppler and/or 3D imaging were widely available (87.4% and 82%, respectively), but only 37.8% and 24.3% of respondents self-declared skills in these modalities, respectively; 77.1% of respondents had no echocardiography certification, nor were pursuing certification (various reasons); 40.9% had not attended recent echocardiography courses. Lower PAC use was associated with university hospitals (OR: p = 0.014, ICU: p = 0.032) and with lower interventions/year (OR: p = 0.023). Higher independence in performing TEE was reported in university hospitals (OR: p < 0.001; ICU: p = 0.006), centers with higher interventions/year (OR: p = 0.019), and by respondents with less experience in cardiology (ICU: p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Variability in the use of PACs and echocardiography was found. Protocols regulating the use of PACs seem infrequent. University centers use PACs less and have greater skills in TEE. Training and certifications in echocardiography should be encouraged.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz , Humanos , Italia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Cateterismo de Swan-Ganz/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Arteria Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica/estadística & datos numéricos , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica/métodos , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica/normas , Ecocardiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Ecocardiografía/tendencias , Ecocardiografía/normas , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Livers from donations after circulatory death (DCDs) are very sensitive to ischemia/reperfusion injury and thus need careful reconditioning, such as normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). So far, its impact on DCDs has not been thoroughly investigated. This pilot cohort study aimed to explore the NRP impact on liver function by evaluating dynamic changes of circulating markers and hepatic gene expression in 9 uncontrolled DCDs (uDCDs) and 10 controlled DCDs. At NRP start, controlled DCDs had lower plasma levels of inflammatory and liver damage markers, including α-glutathione s-transferase, sorbitol-dehydrogenase, malate dehydrogenase 1, liver-type arginase-1, and keratin-18, but higher levels of osteopontin, sFas, flavin mononucleotide, and succinate than uDCDs. During 4-hour NRP, some damage and inflammatory markers increased in both groups, while IL-6, HGF, and osteopontin increased only in uDCDs. At the NRP end, the tissue expression of early transcriptional regulators, apoptosis, and autophagy mediators was higher in uDCDs than in controlled DCDs. In conclusion, despite initial differences in liver damage biomarkers, the uDCD group was characterized by a major gene expression of regenerative and repair factors after the NRP procedure. Correlative analysis among circulating/tissue biomarkers and the tissue congestion/necrosis degree revealed new potential candidate biomarkers.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Osteopontina , Proyectos Piloto , Donantes de Tejidos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Perfusión/métodos , Hígado/cirugía , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Muerte , Supervivencia de InjertoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the role of regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) in predicting survival and neurologic outcomes after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). DESIGN: The study authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available literature. SETTING: The authors searched relevant databases (Pubmed, Medline, Embase) for studies measuring precannulation rSO2 in patients undergoing ECPR and reporting mortality and/or neurologic outcomes. PARTICIPANTS: The authors included both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients receiving ECPR. They identified 3 observational studies, including 245 adult patients. INTERVENTIONS: The authors compared patients with a low precannulation rSO2 (≤15% or 16%) versus patients with a high (>15% or 16%) precannulation rSO2. In addition, the authors carried out subgroup analyses on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A high precannulation rSO2 was associated with an overall reduced risk of mortality in ECPR recipients (98 out of 151 patients [64.9%] in the high rSO2 group, v 87 out of 94 patients [92.5%] in the low rSO2 group, risk differences [RD] -0.30; 95% CI -0.47 to -0.14), and in OHCA (78 out of 121 patients [64.5%] v 82 out of 89 patients [92.1%], RD 0.30; 95% CI -0.48 to -0.12). A high precannulation rSO2 also was associated with a significantly better neurologic outcome in the overall population (42 out of 151 patients [27.8%] v 2 out of 94 patients [2.12%], RD 0.22; 95% CI 0.13-0.31), and in OHCA patients (33 out of 121 patients [27.3%] v 2 out of 89 patients [2.25%] RD 0.21; 95% CI 0.11-0.30). CONCLUSIONS: A low rSO2 before starting ECPR could be a predictor of mortality and survival with poor neurologic outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Adulto , Humanos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/complicaciones , Saturación de Oxígeno , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar , Hospitales , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Background: The combination of surgery, bacterial spread-out, and artificial cardiopulmonary bypass surfaces results in a release of key inflammatory mediators leading to an overshooting systemic hyper-inflammatory condition frequently associated with compromised hemodynamics and organ dysfunction. A promising approach could be extracorporeal blood purification therapies in combination with IgM enriched immunoglobulin. This approach might perform a balanced control of both hyper and hypo-inflammatory phases as an immune-modulating intervention. Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study of patients with proven infection after cardiac surgery between January 2020 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) the first group (Control Group) followed a standard care approach as recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines; The second group (Active Group) underwent extracorporeal blood purification therapy (EBPT) in combination with intravenous administration of IgM enriched immunoglobulin 5 mL/kg die for at least three consecutive days, in conjunction with the standard approach (SSC Guidelines). In addition, ventriculo-arterial (V/A) coupling, Interleukin 6 (IL-6), Endotoxin Activity Assay (EAA), Procalcitonin, White Blood Cells (WBC) counts, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score and Inotropic Score were assessed in both two groups at different time points. Results: Fifty-four patients were recruited; 25 were in the Control Group, while 29 participants were in the Active Group. SOFA score significantly improved from baseline [12 (9-16)] until at T 3 [8 (3-13)] in the active group; it was associated with a median EAA reduction from 1.03 (0.39-1.20) at T 0 to 0.41 (0.2-0.9) at T 3 in the active group compared with control group 0.70 (0.50-1.00) at T 0 to 0.70 (0.50-1.00) at T 3 (p < 0.001). V/A coupling tended to be lower in patients of the active arm ranging from 1.9 (1.2-2.7) at T 0 to 0.8 (0.8-2.2) at T 3 than in those of the control arm ranging from 2.1 (1.4-2.2) at T0 to 1.75 (1.45-2.1) at T 3 (p = 0.099). The hemodynamic improvement over time was associated with evident but no significant decrease in inotropic score in the active group compared with the control group. Changes in EAA value from T 0 to T 4 were directly and significantly related (r = 0.39, p = 0.006) to those of V/A coupling. Conclusions: EBPT, in combination with IgM enriched immunoglobulin, was associated with a mitigated postoperative response of key cytokines with a significant decrease in IL-6, Procalcitonin, and EAA and was associated with improvement of clinical and metabolic parameters.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the survival rates of patients with COVID-19 supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and compare the survival rates of patients with COVID-19 supported with ECMO to patients with influenza supported with ECMO. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of ECMO as supportive therapy of COVID-19. SETTING: The authors performed a search through the Cochrane, EMBASE, and MEDLINE/PubMed databases from inception to February 19, 2021, for studies reporting hospitalized patients with COVID-19 managed with ECMO. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 134 studies were selected, including 6 eligible for the comparative meta-analysis of COVID-19 versus influenza. INTERVENTIONS: The authors pooled the risk ratio and random effects model. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint was the overall mortality of patients with COVID-19 receiving ECMO. Of the total number of 58,472 patients with COVID-19 reported, ECMO was used in 4,044 patients. The analysis suggested an overall in-hospital mortality of 39% (95% CI 0.34-0.43). In the comparative analysis, patients with COVID-19 on ECMO had a higher risk ratio (RR) for mortality when compared to influenza patients on ECMO: 72/164 (44%) v 71/186 (38%) RR 1.34; 95% CI 1.05-1.71; pâ¯=â¯0.03. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO could be beneficial in patients with COVID-19, according to the authors' meta-analysis. The reported mortality rate was 39%. This systematic analysis can provide clinical advice in the current era and ongoing pandemic.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Gripe Humana , COVID-19/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/terapia , PandemiasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of an awake venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) management strategy in preventing clinically relevant barotrauma in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at high risk for pneumothorax (PNX)/pneumomediastinum (PMD), defined as the detection of the Macklin-like effect on chest computed tomography (CT) scan. DESIGN: A case series. SETTING: At the intensive care unit of a tertiary-care institution. PARTICIPANTS: Seven patients with COVID-19-associated severe ARDS and Macklin-like radiologic sign on baseline chest CT. INTERVENTIONS: Primary VV-ECMO under spontaneous breathing instead of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). All patients received noninvasive ventilation or oxygen through a high-flow nasal cannula before and during ECMO support. The study authors collected data on cannulation strategy, clinical management, and outcome. Failure of awake VV-ECMO strategy was defined as the need for IMV due to worsening respiratory failure or delirium/agitation. The primary outcome was the development of PNX/PMD. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: No patient developed PNX/PMD. The awake VV-ECMO strategy failed in 1 patient (14.3%). Severe complications were observed in 4 (57.1%) patients and were noted as the following: intracranial bleeding in 1 patient (14.3%), septic shock in 2 patients (28.6%), and secondary pulmonary infections in 3 patients (42.8%). Two patients died (28.6%), whereas 5 were successfully weaned off VV-ECMO and were discharged home. CONCLUSIONS: VV-ECMO in awake and spontaneously breathing patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS may be a feasible and safe strategy to prevent the development of PNX/PMD in patients at high risk for this complication.
Asunto(s)
Barotrauma , COVID-19 , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Barotrauma/epidemiología , Barotrauma/etiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/terapia , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Humanos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , VigiliaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We describe the pathophysiology of cardiogenic shock (CS), from the main pathways to the inflammatory mechanisms and the proteomic features. RECENT FINDINGS: Although the classical pathophysiological pathways underlying CS, namely reduced organ perfusion due to inadequate cardiac output and peripheral vasoconstriction, have been well-established for a long time, the role of macro-and micro-hemodynamics in the magnitude of the disease and its prognosis has been investigated extensively only over the last few years. Moreover, to complete the complex picture of CS pathophysiology, the study of cytokine cascade, inflammation, and proteomic analysis has been addressed recently. SUMMARY: Understanding the pathophysiology of CS is important to treat it optimally.
Asunto(s)
Proteómica , Choque Cardiogénico , Hemodinámica , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to describe the features of right ventricular impairment and pulmonary hypertension in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and assess their effect on mortality. DESIGN: The authors carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. SETTING: The authors performed a search through PubMed, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the Cochrane Library for studies reporting right ventricular dysfunction in patients with COVID-19 and outcomes. PARTICIPANTS: The search yielded nine studies in which the appropriate data were available. INTERVENTIONS: Pooled odds ratios were calculated according to the random-effects model. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 1,450 patients were analyzed, and half of them were invasively ventilated. Primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up available. Mortality was 48.5% versus 24.7% in patients with or without right ventricular impairment (nâ¯=â¯7; ORâ¯=â¯3.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.72-5.58; pâ¯=â¯0.0002), 56.3% versus 30.6% in patients with or without right ventricular dilatation (nâ¯=â¯6; ORâ¯=â¯2.43; 95% CI 1.41-4.18; pâ¯=â¯0.001), and 52.9% versus 14.8% in patients with or without pulmonary hypertension (nâ¯=â¯3; ORâ¯=â¯5.75; 95% CI 2.67-12.38; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Mortality in patients with COVID-19 requiring respiratory support and with a diagnosis of right ventricular dysfunction, dilatation, or pulmonary hypertension is high. Future studies should highlight the mechanisms of right ventricular derangement in COVID-19, and early detection of right ventricular impairment using ultrasound might be important to individualize therapies and improve outcomes.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hipertensión Pulmonar , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha , Ventrículos Cardíacos , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
Lung ultrasound (LU) has a multitude of features and capacities that make it a useful medical tool to assist physicians contending with the pandemic spread of novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) caused by coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Thus, an LU approach to patients with suspected COVID-19 is being implemented worldwide. In noncritical COVID-19 patients, 2 new LU signs have been described and proposed, the "waterfall" and the "light beam" signs. Both signs have been hypothesized to increase the diagnostic accuracy of LU for COVID-19 interstitial pneumonia. In critically ill patients, a distinct pattern of LU changes seems to follow the disease's progression, and this information can be used to guide decisions about when a patient needs to be ventilated, as occurs in other disease states similar to COVID-19. Furthermore, a new algorithm has been published, which enables the automatic detection of B-lines as well as quantification of the percentage of the pleural line associated with lung disease. In COVID-19 patients, a direct involvement of cardiac function has been demonstrated, and ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction might be present due to the prolonged mechanical ventilation often involved, as reported for similar diseases. For this reason, cardiac and diaphragm ultrasound evaluation are highly important. Last but not least, due to the thrombotic tendency of COVID-19 patients, particular attention also should be paid to vascular ultrasound. This review is primarily devoted to the study of LU in COVID-19 patients. The authors explain the significance of its "light and shadows," bearing in mind the context in which LU is being used-the emergency department and the intensive care setting. The use of cardiac, vascular, and diaphragm ultrasound is also discussed, as a comprehensive approach to patient care.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diafragma , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
The European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA) and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) aimed to create joint recommendations for the perioperative management of patients with suspected or proven severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection undergoing cardiac surgery or invasive cardiac procedures. To produce appropriate recommendations, the authors combined the evidence from the literature review, reevaluating the clinical experience of routine cardiac surgery in similar cases during the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS-CoV) outbreak and the current pandemic with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, and the expert opinions through broad discussions within the EACTA and SCA. The authors took into consideration the balance between established procedures and the feasibility during the present outbreak. The authors present an agreement between the European and US practices in managing patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. The recommendations take into consideration a broad spectrum of issues, with a focus on preoperative testing, safety concerns, overall approaches to general and specific aspects of preparation for anesthesia, airway management, transesophageal echocardiography, perioperative ventilation, coagulation, hemodynamic control, and postoperative care. As the COVID-19 pandemic is spreading, it will continue to present a challenge for the worldwide anesthesiology community. To allow these recommendations to be updated as long as possible, the authors provided weblinks to international public and academic sources providing timely updated data. This document should be the basis of future task forces to develop a more comprehensive consensus considering new evidence uncovered during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia en Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Anestesiología , COVID-19 , Anestesiólogos , China , Consenso , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute left ventricular dysfunction is a major complication of cardiac surgery and is associated with increased mortality. Meta-analyses of small trials suggest that levosimendan may result in a higher rate of survival among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving patients in whom perioperative hemodynamic support was indicated after cardiac surgery, according to prespecified criteria. Patients were randomly assigned to receive levosimendan (in a continuous infusion at a dose of 0.025 to 0.2 µg per kilogram of body weight per minute) or placebo, for up to 48 hours or until discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU), in addition to standard care. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The trial was stopped for futility after 506 patients were enrolled. A total of 248 patients were assigned to receive levosimendan and 258 to receive placebo. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the levosimendan group and the placebo group (32 patients [12.9%] and 33 patients [12.8%], respectively; absolute risk difference, 0.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -5.7 to 5.9; P=0.97). There were no significant differences between the levosimendan group and the placebo group in the durations of mechanical ventilation (median, 19 hours and 21 hours, respectively; median difference, -2 hours; 95% CI, -5 to 1; P=0.48), ICU stay (median, 72 hours and 84 hours, respectively; median difference, -12 hours; 95% CI, -21 to 2; P=0.09), and hospital stay (median, 14 days and 14 days, respectively; median difference, 0 days; 95% CI, -1 to 2; P=0.39). There was no significant difference between the levosimendan group and the placebo group in rates of hypotension or cardiac arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who required perioperative hemodynamic support after cardiac surgery, low-dose levosimendan in addition to standard care did not result in lower 30-day mortality than placebo. (Funded by the Italian Ministry of Health; CHEETAH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00994825 .).
Asunto(s)
Gasto Cardíaco Bajo/tratamiento farmacológico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cardiotónicos/uso terapéutico , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Hidrazonas/uso terapéutico , Mortalidad , Piridazinas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Cardiotónicos/administración & dosificación , Cardiotónicos/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Hidrazonas/administración & dosificación , Hidrazonas/efectos adversos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Perioperatorio , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Piridazinas/administración & dosificación , Piridazinas/efectos adversos , Respiración Artificial , Simendán , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2020. Other selected articles can be found online at https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2020. Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901.
Asunto(s)
Fenómenos Fisiológicos Cardiovasculares , Resucitación/normas , Sepsis/terapia , Medicina de Emergencia/métodos , Humanos , Sustitutos del Plasma/uso terapéutico , Resucitación/métodos , Resucitación/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening disease difficult to diagnose and manage in severe hemodynamic unstable patients. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is considered useful to improve diagnosis, but such approach has physical limitations for the interposition of the airways preventing the clear assessment of the left pulmonary artery. Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), a recently developed technique carried out using a modified bronchoscope having a small ultrasound convex probe at the tip allowing to perform ultrasonography examination of the mediastinum, can extensively visualize the pulmonary arteries on both sides. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the first use of EBUS to rapidly diagnose and subsequently treat a 64 years old woman with history of lateral amyotrophic sclerosis admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for severe dyspnoea and rapidly experiencing a cardiac arrest. CONCLUSIONS: Combined bedside EBUS and echocardiography allowed to rapidly diagnose the cause of cardiac arrest and avoid risks related to transferring the critical patient to the radiology department.
Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía Transesofágica/métodos , Endosonografía/métodos , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Bronquios , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embolia Pulmonar/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that the cardiovascular responses to Surviving Sepsis Guidelines (SSG)-defined resuscitation are predictable based on the cardiovascular state. METHODS: Fifty-five septic patients treated by SSG were studied before and after volume expansion (VE), and if needed norepinephrine (NE) and dobutamine. We measured mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac index (CI), and right atrial pressure (Pra) and calculated pulse pressure and stroke volume variation (PPV and SVV), dynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn), arterial elastance (Ea) and left ventricular (LV) end-systolic elastance (Ees), Ees/Ea (VAC), LV ejection efficiency (LVeff), mean systemic pressure analogue (Pmsa), venous return pressure gradient (Pvr), and cardiac performance (Eh), using standard formulae. RESULTS: All patients were hypotensive (MAP 56.8 ± 3.1 mmHg) and tachycardic (113.1 ± 7.5 beat min-1), with increased lactate levels (lactate = 5.0 ± 4.2 mmol L-1) with a worsened VAC. CI was variable but > 2 L min-1 M-2 in 74%. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 48% and associated with admission lactate, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine levels but not cardiovascular state. In all patients, both MAP and CI improved following VE, as well as cardiac contractility (Ees). Fluid administration improved Pra, Pmsa, and Pvr in all patients, whereas both HR and Ea decreased after VE, thus normalizing VAC. CI increases were proportional to baseline PPV and SVV. CI increases proportionally decreased PPV and SVV. VE increased MAP > 65 mmHg in 35/55 patients. MAP responders had higher PPV, SVV, and Eadyn than non-responders. NE was given to 20/55 patients in septic shock, but increased MAP > 65 mmHg in only 12. NE increased Ea, Eadyn, Pra, Pmsa, and VAC while decreasing HR, PPV, SVV, and LVeff. MAP responders had higher pre-NE Ees and lower VAC. Dobutamine was given to 6/8 patients who remained hypotensive following NE. It increased Ees, MAP, CI, and LVeff, while decreasing HR, Pra, and VAC. At all times and all steps of the protocol, CI changes were proportional to Pvr changes independent of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The cardiovascular response to SSG-based resuscitation is highly heterogeneous but predictable from pre-treatment measures of cardiovascular state.
Asunto(s)
Fenómenos Fisiológicos Cardiovasculares , Resucitación/normas , Sepsis/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Gasto Cardíaco/fisiología , Cardiotónicos/uso terapéutico , Dobutamina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Hipotensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipotensión/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico , Resucitación/métodos , Resucitación/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/fisiopatología , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review analyses the application of perioperative echocardiography as an important tool in the management of haemodynamic impairment. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently, echocardiography has demonstrated utility in preoperative assessment for both cardiac and noncardiac surgery. There is also evidence that, using diagnostic methods, echocardiography could be used as an image-based technique comparable with standard catheter-based monitoring techniques in high-risk patients. Echocardiography can be performed both intraoperatively and during the postoperative period in the ICU and is therefore being considered a potential tool to assess haemodynamic instability. SUMMARY: Echocardiography has recently gained popularity among anaesthesiologists and intensive care practitioners because it provides a pathophysiological picture of haemodynamic impairment, allowing a more detailed understanding of the static or dynamic parameters on which clinicians usually rely when making decisions.
Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía , Hemodinámica , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Pruebas de Función Cardíaca , HumanosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Septic shock is the most severe manifestation of sepsis. It is characterized as a hypotensive cardiovascular state associated with multiorgan dysfunction and metabolic disturbances. Management of septic shock is targeted at preserving adequate organ perfusion pressure without precipitating pulmonary edema or massive volume overload. Cardiac dysfunction often occurs in septic shock patients and can significantly affect outcomes. One physiologic approach to detect the interaction between the heart and the circulation when both are affected is to examine ventriculoarterial coupling, which is defined by the ratio of arterial elastance (Ea) to left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees). In this study, we analyzed ventriculoarterial coupling in a cohort of patients admitted to ICUs who presented with vs without septic shock. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional opportunity study, we measured routine hemodynamics using indwelling arterial and pulmonary arterial catheters and transthoracic echocardiograms in 25 septic patients (group S) and 25 non-septic shock patients (group C) upon ICU admission. Ees was measured by echocardiography using a single-beat (EesSB) method. Ea was calculated as 0.9 systolic arterial pressure/stroke volume, and then the Ea/EesSB ratio was calculated (normal value <1.36). RESULTS: In group S, 21 patients had an Ea/EesSB ratio >1.36 (uncoupled). The four patients with Ea/EesSB ratios ≤1.36 had higher EesSB values than patients with Ea/EesSB ratios >1.36 (P = 0.007), although Ea measurements were similar in both groups (P = 0.4). In group C, five patients had uncoupled Ea/EesSB ratios. No correlation was found between EesSB and left ventricular ejection fraction and between Ea/EesSB ratio and mixed venous oxygen saturation in septic shock patients. CONCLUSIONS: Upon admission to the ICU, patients in septic shock often display significant ventriculoarterial decoupling that is associated with impaired left ventricular performance. Because Ea/Ees decoupling alters cardiovascular efficiency and cardiac energetic requirements independently of Ea or Ees, we speculate that septic patients with ventriculoarterial uncoupling may benefit from therapy aimed at normalizing the Ea/Ees ratio.
Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Choque Séptico/diagnóstico por imagen , Choque Séptico/fisiopatología , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study was to verify the efficacy of using internal jugular vein (IJV) size and distensibility as a reliable index of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis. METHODS: Hemodynamic data of mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis were collected through a radial arterial indwelling catheter connected to continuous hemodynamic monitoring system (Most Care®, Vytech Health, Padova, Italy), including cardiac index (CI) (L/min/M(2)), heart rate (beats/min), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (mmHg), central venous pressure (CVP) (mmHg) and arterial pulse pressure variation (PPV), coupled with ultrasound evaluation of IJV distensibility (%), defined as a ratio of the difference between IJV maximal antero-posterior diameter during inspiration and minimum expiratory diameter to minimum expiratory diameter x100. Patients were retrospectively divided into two groups; fluid responders (R), if CI increase of more than or equal to 15% after a 7 ml/kg crystalloid infusion, and non-responders (NR) if CI increased more than 15%. We compared differences in measured variables between R and NR groups and calculated receiver-operator-characteristic (ROC) curves of optimal IJV distensibility and PPV sensitivity and specificity to predicting R. We also calculated a combined inferior vena cava distensibility-PPV ROC curve to predict R. RESULTS: We enrolled 50 patients, of these, 30 were R. Responders presented higher IJV distensibility and PPV before fluid challenge than NR (P <0.05). An IJV distensibility more than 18% prior to volume challenge had an 80% sensitivity and 85% specificity to predict R. Pairwise comparison between IJV distensibility and PPV ROC curves revealed similar ROC area under the curve results. Interestingly, combining IJV distensibility more than 9.7% and PPV more than 12% predicted fluid responsiveness with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 95%. CONCLUSION: IJV distensibility is an accurate, easily acquired non-invasive parameter of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated septic patients with performance similar to PPV. The combined use of IJV distensibility with left-sided indexes of fluid responsiveness improves their predictive value.
Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia/métodos , Venas Yugulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Sepsis/diagnóstico por imagen , Sepsis/terapia , Vasodilatación , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Venas Yugulares/fisiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Vasodilatación/fisiologíaRESUMEN
The percutaneous mitral valve (MV) repair procedure performed with the MitraClip delivery system is increasingly used to treat severe mitral regurgitation in high-risk patients. The treatment involves percutaneous insertion and positioning of a clip between the MV leaflets. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) plays a key role in the procedure by providing information regarding clip navigation, clip alignment to the MV coaptation line, transmitral advancement of the system, leaflet grasping, confirmation of valve tissue catching, and assessment of the final result. Real-time 3-dimensional TEE has increasing value in percutaneous MV repair providing high-quality visualization of both the heart and the intravascular devices. Optimal visualization by 3-dimensional TEE is obtained through both the atrial and ventricular aspects. In contrast to MV surgery, where TEE is involved in the prebypass assessment phase and in evaluation of the final repair, TEE is mandatory to guide management during MitraClip repair. Cardiac anesthesiologists may provide assistance to interventional cardiologists during the procedure itself in addition to their anesthetic-related tasks.
Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía Transesofágica/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Ecocardiografía Tridimensional/métodos , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Monitoreo IntraoperatorioRESUMEN
Cardiac arrest is a hyper-acute condition with a high mortality that requires rapid diagnostics and treatment. As such, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has become a valuable tool in the assessment of these patients. While transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the more conventional modality used to find reversible causes of cardiac arrest, transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) has been increasingly utilised due to its superior image quality, continuous imaging, and ability to be operated away from the patient's chest. TOE also has a number of applications in the aftermath of cardiac arrest, such as during the initiation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and the subsequent monitoring of extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO). As TOE has evolved, multiple variations have been developed with different utilities. In this article, we will review the evidence supporting the use of TOE in cardiac arrest and where the different forms of TOE can be applied to evaluate the cardiac arrest patient in a timely and accurate manner.