Predicting Postoperative Speech Perception and Audiometric Thresholds Using Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Electrocochleography (ECochG) appears to offer the most accurate prediction of post-cochlear implant hearing outcomes. This may be related to its capacity to interrogate the health of underlying cochlear tissue. The four major components of ECochG (cochlear microphonic [CM], summating potential [SP], compound action potential [CAP], and auditory nerve neurophonic [ANN]) are generated by different cochlear tissue components. Analyzing characteristics of these components can reveal the state of hair and neural cell in a cochlea. There is limited evidence on the characteristics of intracochlear (IC) ECochG recordings measured across the array postinsertion but compared with extracochlear recordings has better signal to noise ratio and spatial specificity. The present study aimed to examine the relationship between ECochG components recorded from an IC approach and postoperative speech perception or audiometric thresholds. DESIGN: In 113 human subjects, responses to 500 Hz tone bursts were recorded at 11 IC electrodes across a 22-electrode cochlear implant array immediately following insertion. Responses to condensation and rarefaction stimuli were then subtracted from one another to emphasize the CM and added to one another to emphasize the SP, ANN, and CAP. Maximum amplitudes and extracochlear electrode locations were recorded for each of these ECochG components. These were added stepwise to a multi-factor generalized additive model to develop a best-fit model predictive model for pure-tone audiometric thresholds (PTA) and speech perception scores (speech recognition threshold [SRT] and consonant-vowel-consonant phoneme [CVC-P]) at 3- and 12-month postoperative timepoints. This best-fit model was tested against a generalized additive model using clinical factors alone (preoperative score, age, and gender) as a null model proxy. RESULTS: ECochG-factor models were superior to clinical factor models in predicting postoperative PTA, CVC-P, and SRT outcomes at both timepoints. Clinical factor models explained a moderate amount of PTA variance ( r2 = 45.9% at 3-month, 31.8% at 12-month, both p < 0.001) and smaller variances of CVC-P and SRT ( r2 range = 6 to 13.7%, p = 0.008 to 0.113). Age was not a significant predictive factor. ECochG models explained more variance at the 12-month timepoint ( r2 for PTA = 52.9%, CVC-P = 39.6%, SRT = 36.4%) compared with the 3-month one timepoint ( r2 for PTA = 49.4%, CVC-P = 26.5%, SRT = 22.3%). The ECochG model was based on three factors: maximum SP deflection amplitude, and electrode position of CM and SP peaks. Adding neural (ANN and/or CAP) factors to the model did not improve variance explanation. Large negative SP deflection was associated with poorer outcomes and a large positive SP deflection with better postoperative outcomes. Mid-array peaks of SP and CM were both associated with poorer outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Postinsertion IC-ECochG recordings across the array can explain a moderate amount of postoperative speech perception and audiometric thresholds. Maximum SP deflection and its location across the array appear to have a significant predictive value which may reflect the underlying state of cochlear health.

Characteristics of the Summating Potential Measured Across a Cochlear Implant Array as an Indicator of Cochlear Function.

OBJECTIVES: The underlying state of cochlear and neural tissue function is known to affect postoperative speech perception following cochlear implantation. The ability to assess these tissues in patients can be performed using intracochlear electrocochleography (IC ECochG). One component of ECochG is the summating potential (SP) that appears to be generated by multiple cochlear tissues. Its qualities may be able to detect the presence of functional inner hair cells, but evidence for this is limited in human cochleae. This study aimed to examine the IC SP characteristics in cochlear implantation recipients, its relationship to preoperative speech perception and audiometric thresholds, and to other IC ECochG components. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of 113 patients' IC ECochG recordings across the array in response to a 500 Hz tone burst stimulus. Responses to condensation and rarefaction stimuli were then subtracted from one another to emphasize the cochlear microphonic and added to one another to emphasize the SP, auditory nerve neurophonic, and compound action potential. Patients were grouped based on their maximum SP deflection being large and positive (+SP), large and negative (-SP), or minimal (0 SP) to further investigate these relationships. RESULTS: Patients in the +SP group had better preoperative speech perception (mean consonant-vowel-consonant phoneme score 46%) compared to the -SP and 0 SP groups (consonant-vowel-consonant phoneme scores 34% and 36%, respectively, difference to +SP: p < 0.05). Audiometric thresholds were lowest for +SP (mean pure-tone average 50 dB HL), then -SP (65 dB HL), and highest for 0 SP patients (70 dB HL), but there was not a statistical significance between +SP and -SP groups ( p > 0.1). There were also distinct differences between SP groups in the qualities of their other ECochG components. These included the +SP patients having larger cochlear microphonic maximum amplitude, more apical SP peak electrode locations, and a more spatially specific SP magnitude growth pattern across the array. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with large positive SP deflection in IC ECochG have preoperatively better speech perception and lower audiometric thresholds than those without. Patterns in other ECochG components suggest its positive deflection may be an indicator of cochlear function.

Electrocochleographic Patterns Predicting Increased Impedances and Hearing Loss after Cochlear Implantation.

OBJECTIVES: Different patterns of electrocochleographic responses along the electrode array after insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array have been described. However, the implications of these patterns remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of the study was to correlate different peri- and postoperative electrocochleographic patterns with four-point impedance measurements and preservation of residual hearing. DESIGN: Thirty-nine subjects with residual low-frequency hearing which were implanted with a slim-straight electrode array could prospectively be included. Intracochlear electrocochleographic recordings and four-point impedance measurements along the 22 electrodes of the array (EL, most apical EL22) were conducted immediately after complete insertion and 3 months after surgery. Hearing preservation was assessed after 3 months. RESULTS: In perioperative electrocochleographic recordings, 22 subjects (56%) showed the largest amplitude around the tip of the electrode array (apical-peak, AP, EL20 or EL22), whereas 17 subjects (44%) exhibited a maximum amplitude in more basal regions (mid-peak, MP, EL18 or lower). At 3 months, in six subjects with an AP pattern perioperatively, the location of the largest electrocochleographic response had shifted basally (apical-to-mid-peak, AP-MP). Latency was analyzed along the electrode array when this could be discerned. This was the case in 68 peri- and postoperative recordings (87% of all recordings, n = 78). The latency increased with increasing insertion depth in AP recordings (n = 38, median of EL with maximum latency shift = EL21). In MP recordings (n = 30), the maximum latency shift was detectable more basally (median EL12, p < 0.001). Four-point impedance measurements were available at both time points in 90% (n = 35) of all subjects. At the 3-month time point, recordings revealed lower impedances in the AP group (n = 15, mean = 222 Ω, SD = 63) than in the MP (n = 14, mean = 295 Ω, SD= 7 6) and AP-MP groups (n = 6, mean = 234 Ω, SD = 129; AP versus MP p = 0.026, AP versus AP-MP p = 0.023, MP versus AP-MP p > 0.999). The amplitudes of perioperative AP recordings showed a correlation with preoperative hearing thresholds ( r2 =0.351, p = 0.004). No such correlation was detectable in MP recordings ( r2 = 0.033, p = 0.484). Audiograms were available at both time points in 97% (n = 38) of all subjects. The mean postoperative hearing loss in the AP group was 13 dB (n = 16, SD = 9). A significantly larger hearing loss was detectable in the MP and AP-MP groups with 28 (n = 17, SD = 10) and 35 dB (n = 6, SD = 13), respectively (AP versus MP p = 0.002, AP versus AP-MP p = 0.002, MP versus AP-MP p = 0.926). CONCLUSION: MP and AP-MP response patterns of the electrocochleographic responses along the electrode array after cochlear implantation are correlated with higher four-point impedances and poorer postoperative hearing compared to AP response patterns. The higher impedances suggest that MP and AP-MP patterns are associated with increased intracochlear fibrosis.

Toward a Better Understanding of Electrocochleography: Analysis of Real-Time Recordings.

OBJECTIVES: Real-time electrocochleography (ECochG) has been used as a monitoring tool during cochlear implantation (CI), whereby, amplitude drops have been correlated with postoperative acoustic hearing results. However, no consensus has been reached as to how a single event of an amplitude drop should be characterized. The aim of this study was to identify ECochG events that predict loss of hearing 1 month after surgery. DESIGN: Fifty-five patients were included in this prospective cohort study. Real-time ECochG measurements were performed during CI electrode insertion. Single ECochG events were characterized according to their amplitude loss and slope steepness. RESULTS: Using receiver operating characteristic analyses, the most efficient cut-off criterion for a relative hearing loss of 25% was an amplitude loss of 61% at a fixed slope steepness of 0.2 µV/sec. Three-quarters of our population had at least one such event during implantation. Most events occurred shortly before full insertion. With increasing number of events, median residual hearing thresholds deteriorated for all frequencies. Larger amplitude drops trended toward worse hearing preservation. Signal recovery after an ECochG event could not be correlated to acoustic hearing outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that amplitude drops exceeding 61% of the ongoing signal at a slope steepness of 0.2 µV/sec are correlated with worse acoustic hearing preservation. Clearly defined ECochG events have the potential to guide surgeons during CI in the future. This is essential if a fully automated data analysis is to be employed or benchmarking undertaken.

Electrophysiological Evidence of the Basilar-Membrane Travelling Wave and Frequency Place Coding of Sound in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

AIM: To obtain direct evidence for the cochlear travelling wave in humans by performing electrocochleography from within the cochlea in subjects implanted with an auditory prosthesis. BACKGROUND: Sound induces a travelling wave that propagates along the basilar membrane, exhibiting cochleotopic tuning with a frequency-dependent phase delay. To date, evoked potentials and psychophysical experiments have supported the presence of the travelling wave in humans, but direct measurements have not been made. METHODS: Electrical potentials in response to rarefaction and condensation acoustic tone bursts were recorded from multiple sites along the human cochlea, directly from a cochlear implant electrode during, and immediately after, its insertion. These recordings were made from individuals with residual hearing. RESULTS: Electrocochleography was recorded from 11 intracochlear electrodes in 7 ears from 6 subjects, with detectable responses on all electrodes in 5 ears. Cochleotopic tuning and frequency-dependent phase delay of the cochlear microphonic were demonstrated. The response latencies were slightly shorter than those anticipated which we attribute to the subjects' hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: Direct evidence for the travelling wave was observed. Electrocochleography from cochlear implant electrodes provides site-specific information on hair cell and neural function of the cochlea with potential diagnostic value.

Selective attentional processes in cochlear implant recipients: Measurements of the attentional filter.

In normal hearing subjects, detection of near-threshold tones in noise is influenced by signal certainty. Thus, tones that are presented more frequently than others, and/or are preceded by a clearly audible cue tone of the same frequency (target tones) are detected better than other tones (probe tones). This auditory attentional filter was examined in six cochlear implant (CI) recipients, using acoustic stimuli and direct programmed electrode stimulation. Three of the subjects showed no evidence of an attentional filter. Three subjects showed a relatively higher detection rate of the target frequency or electrode stimulated during the attentional task, and in two of these subjects the target benefit was influenced by stimulus certainty. The absence of an attentional filter in some CI recipients is consistent with suggestions that the attentional filter may be generated by efferent modulation of outer hair cells, which would presumably be absent in CI recipients, however, the presence of some frequency-selective attentional effects and a near-normal attentional filter in two CI subjects imply that central processes can modulate signal detection in CI recipients according to stimulus certainty. Such central processes might serve as a neural substrate to improve signal detection in CI recipients.

Four-Point Impedance: A Potential Biomarker for Residual Hearing After Cochlear Implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation allows for electroacoustic stimulation, which leads to better music appreciation, noise localization, and speech comprehension in noisy environments. Real-time intraoperative electrocochleography (rt-ECochG) monitoring has shown promise in improving residual hearing rates. Four-point impedance (4PI) is being explored as a potential biomarker in cochlear implantation that has been associated with fibrotic tissue response, hearing loss, and dizziness. In this study, we explore whether monitoring both rt-ECochG intraoperatively and postoperative 4PI improves predictions of the preservation of residual hearing. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. Adults with residual acoustic hearing underwent cochlear implantation with intraoperative intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) monitoring. The surgeon responded to a drop in ECochG signal amplitude of greater than 30% by a standardized manipulation of the electrode with the aim of restoring the ECochG. At the end of the procedure, the ECochG signal was categorized as being maintained or having dropped more than 30%. 4PI was measured on 1 day, 1 week, and 1 and 3 months after cochlear implantation. Residual hearing was measured by routine pure-tone audiogram at 3 months postoperatively. The ECochG category and 4PI impedance values were entered as factors in a multiple linear regression predicting the protection of residual hearing. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were recruited. Rt-ECochG significantly predicted residual hearing at 3 months (t test; mean difference, 37.7%; p = 0.002). Inclusion of both 1-day or 3-month 4PI in a multiple linear regression with rt-ECochG markedly improved upon correlations with residual hearing compared with the rt-ECochG-only model (rt-ECochG and 1-d 4PI model, R2 = 0.67; rt-ECochG and 3-mo 4PI model, R2 = 0.72; rt-ECochG-only model, R2 = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Both rt-ECochG and 4PI predict preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation. These findings suggest that the biological response of the cochlea to implantation, as reflected in 4PI, is an important determinant of residual hearing, independent of the acute effects on hearing during implant surgery seen with rt-ECochG. We speculate that 4PI relates to inflammation 1 day after implantation and fibrosis at 3 months.

Intraoperative Measured Electrocochleography and Fluoroscopy Video to Detect Cochlea Trauma.

HYPOTHESIS: Gross electrode movements detected with intraoperative, real-time X-ray fluoroscopy will correlate with fluctuations in cochlear output, as measured with intraoperative electrocochleography (ECochG). BACKGROUND: Indications for cochlear implantation (CI) are expanding to include patients with residual hearing; however, implant recipients often lose residual hearing after CI. The objective of this study was to identify probable traumatic events during implantation by combining electrophysiological monitoring of cochlear function with simultaneous X-ray monitoring. The surgical timing of these apparently traumatic events was then investigated. METHODS: For 19 adult patients (21 surgeries, 2 bilateral), the ECochG responses were measured during implantation of a cochlear nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532/CI632, Cochlear Ltd Australia Nucleus slim modiolar). Simultaneous fluoroscopy was performed, as well as a postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CT) scan. For all patients, pre- and postoperative audiograms were recorded up to 1 year after surgery to record the loss of residual hearing. RESULTS: Electrode insertions for 21 surgeries were successfully monitored. A drop in ECochG response was significantly correlated with reduced hearing preservation compared with patients with preserved responses throughout. Drops in the ECochG response were measured to occur during insertion, because of movement of the array after insertion was complete, including while sealing of the electrode array at the round window or coiling of the array lead within the mastoid cavity. In some patients, a reduction in cochlear output, resulting in poor ECochG response, was inferred to occur before the beginning of implantation. CONCLUSION: The combination of perioperative ECochG measurements, microscope video, fluoroscopy, and postoperative CT scan may inform on what causes the loss of residual hearing after implantation. These findings will be used to improve the surgical procedure in future.

Intra-cochlear Flushing Reduces Tissue Response to Cochlear Implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative trauma leading to bleeding during cochlear implantation negatively impacts residual hearing of cochlear implant recipients. There are no clinical protocols for the removal of blood during implantation, to reduce the consequential effects such as inflammation and fibrosis which adversely affect cochlear health and residual hearing. This preclinical study investigated the implementation of an intra-cochlear flushing protocol for the removal of blood. METHODS: Three groups of guinea pigs were studied for 28 days after cochlear implantation; cochlear implant-only (control group); cochlear implant with blood injected into the cochlea (blood group); and cochlear implant, blood injection, and flushing of the blood from the cochlea intraoperatively (flush group). Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) in addition to tissue response volumes were analyzed and compared between groups. RESULTS: After implantation, the blood group exhibited the highest ABR thresholds when compared to the control and flush group, particularly in the high frequencies. On the final day, the control and blood group had similar ABR thresholds across all frequencies tested, whereas the flush group had the lowest thresholds, significantly lower at 24 kHz than the blood and control group. Analysis of the tissue response showed the flush group had significantly lower tissue responses in the basal half of the array when compared with the blood and control group. CONCLUSIONS: Flushing intra-cochlear blood during surgery resulted in better auditory function and reduced subsequent fibrosis in the basal region of the cochlea. This finding prompts the implementation of a flushing protocol in clinical cochlear implantation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 134:1410-1416, 2024.

Using Four-Point Impedance to Detect and Locate Blood during Cochlear Implantation.

Biosensing technologies are emerging as an important consideration when designing implantable medical devices. For cochlear implants, biosensors may help preserve the natural hearing a patient has prior to implantation by detecting blood in the cochlea during insertion. If blood enters the cochlea, it creates a hostile environment leading to further hearing loss and reduced device function. Here we present four-point impedance, measured directly from a commercial cochlear implant, as a biosensor for real-time detection of blood in the cochlea. The four-point impedance of different concentrations of whole blood in saline were measured using the impedance-measuring capabilities of a cochlear implant with a square-wave stimulation. Impedance derived from a cochlear implant succeeded in differentiating concentrations of blood in saline with results from a sensitivity analysis showing the lowest concentration the system could detect was between 12 % to 21 % of whole blood. In a subsequent in-vitro study, continuous four-point impedance was measured from a cochlear implant while it was inserted into a 3D printed cochlear model, followed by an injection of blood to emulate surgical events. These results demonstrated four-point impedance from a cochlear implant can instantaneously detect the addition of blood within the cochlea and localize it along the electrode array. The adaptation of a biosensing tool using a cochlear implant provides more information that can be relayed to the surgeon intraoperatively to potentially enhance hearing outcomes with the implant.Clinical Relevance - Using the cochlear implant itself to detect intra-cochlear bleeding may open therapeutic avenues to prevent further hearing loss.

Four-Point Impedance and Utricular Dysfunction Is Associated with Postoperative Dizziness after Cochlear Implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Postimplantation dizziness is common, affecting approximately 50% of patients. Theories for dizziness include utricular inflammation, endolymphatic hydrops, and loss of perilymph. Four-point impedance (4PI) is a novel impedance measurement in cochlear implantation that shows potential to predict hearing loss, inflammation, and fibrotic tissue response. Here, we associate 4PI with dizziness after implantation and explore the link with utricular function. METHODS: Subjective visual vertical (SVV) as a measure of utricular function was recorded preoperatively as a baseline. 4PI was measured immediately postinsertion. Ongoing follow-up was performed at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month, postoperatively. At each follow-up, 4PI, SVV, and the patients' subjective experience of dizziness were assessed. DISCUSSION: Thirty-eight adults were recruited. One-day 4PI was significantly higher in patients dizzy within the next week (254 Ω vs 171 Ω, p = 0.015). The optimum threshold on receiver operating characteristic curve was 190 Ω, above which patients had 10 times greater odds of developing dizziness (Fisher exact test, OR = 9.95, p = 0.0092). This suggests that 4PI varies with changes in the intracochlear environment resulting in dizziness, such as inflammation or hydrops. SVV significantly deviated away from the operated ear at 1 day (fixed effect estimate = 2.6°, p ≤ 0.0001) and 1 week (fixed effect estimate 2.7°, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: One-day 4PI is a potentially useful marker for detecting postoperative dizziness after cochlear implantation. Of the current theories for postoperative dizziness, inflammation might explain the findings seen here, as would changes in hydrostatic pressure. Future research should focus on detecting and exploring these labyrinthine changes in further detail.

Speech-in-noise performance in objectively determined cochlear implant maps, including the effect of cognitive state.

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear Implant (CI) programming based on subjective psychophysical fine-tuning of loudness scaling involves active participation and cognitive skills and thus may not be appropriate for difficult-to-condition populations. The electrically evoked stapedial reflex threshold (eSRT) is an objective measure that is suggested to provide clinical benefit to CI programming. This study aimed to compare speech reception outcomes between subjective and eSRT objectively determined CI maps for adult MED-EL recipients. The effect of cognitive skills on these skills was further assessed. METHODS: Twenty-seven post lingually hearing-impaired MED-EL CI recipients were recruited, 6 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI- 4 male, 79 years ± 5), 21 with normal cognitive function (5 male, 63 years ± 12). Two MAPs were generated: a subjective MAP and an objective MAP in which eSRTs determined maximum comfortable levels (M-Levels). Participants were randomly divided into two groups. Group A trialled the objective MAP for two weeks before returning for outcome assessment. During the following two weeks, Group A trialled the subjective MAP before returning for outcome assessment. Group B trialled MAPs in reverse. Outcome measures included the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI), Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word test, and Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise (BKB-SIN) test. RESULTS: eSRT based MAPS were obtained in 23 of the participants. A strong relationship was demonstrated between global charge between eSRT-based and psychophysical-based M-Levels (r = 0.89, p < .001). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment for the Hearing Impaired (MoCA-HI) testing identified 6 CI recipients with MCI (MoCA-HI total score ≤23). The MCI group was older (63, 79 years), but were not otherwise different in sex, duration of hearing loss or duration of CI use. For all patients, no significant differences were found for sound quality or speech in quiet scores between eSRT-based and psychophysical-based MAPs. However, psychophysically determined MAPs showed significantly better speech-in-noise reception (6.74 vs 8.20-dB SNR, p = .34). MoCA-HI scores showed a significant, moderate negative correlation with BKB SIN for both MAP approaches (Kendall's Tau B, p = .015 and p = .008), with no effect on the difference between MAP approaches. CONCLUSION: Results indicate eSRT-based methods provide poorer outcomes than psychophysical-based method. While speech-in-noise reception is correlated with MoCA-HI score, this affected both behaviourally and objectively determined MAPs. The results suggest fair confidence in the eSRT-based method as a guide for setting M-Level for difficult-to-condition CI populations in simple listening conditions.

Four-point Impedance Changes in the Early Post-Operative Period After Cochlear Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: Monitoring four-point impedance changes after cochlear implantation with comparison to conventional impedance measurements. Four-point impedance provides information regarding the bulk biological environment surrounding the electrode array, which is not discernible with conventional impedances. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational. SETTING: Hospital. PATIENTS: Adult cochlear implant recipients with no measurable hearing before implantation and implanted with a perimodiolar cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean values for four-point and common ground impedances were calculated for all electrode contacts at intra-operative, 1 day, 1 week, 4 to 6 weeks, and 3 months post implantation. Linear mixed models were applied to the impedance data to compare between impedances and time points. Furthermore, patients were divided into groups dependent on the normalized change in four-point impedance from intra-operative to 1 day post-operative. The normalized change was then calculated for all other time points and compared across the two groups. RESULTS: Significant increases in four-point impedance occurred 1 day and 3 months after surgery, particularly in the basal half of the array. Four-point impedance at 1 day was highly predictive of four-point impedance at 3 months. Four-point impedance at the other time points showed marginal or no increases from intra-operative. Patients with an average increase higher than 10% in four-point impedance from intra-operative to 1 day, had significantly higher values at 3 months ( p = 0.012). These patterns were not observed in common ground impedance. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report increases in four-point impedance within 24 hours of cochlear implantation. The increases at 1 day and 3 months align with the natural timeline of an acute and chronic inflammatory responses.

Four-Point Impedance Changes After Cochlear Implantation for Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Implants.

OBJECTIVE: Monitor four-point impedance in cochlear implant recipients over time and determine if implant type, surgical approach, and electrode positioning affected impedance measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational. SETTING: Hospital. PATIENTS: Adult cochlear implant recipients implanted with a perimodiolar or lateral wall cochlear implant. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean values for four-point impedances were calculated for all electrode contacts at perioperative and 3 months after surgery. Linear mixed models were applied to the impedance data to compare between implant types and time points. The angular insertion depth and electrode position relative to the medial and lateral wall, commonly termed the Intracochlear Position Index (ICPI), were collected and compared with impedance measurements. RESULTS: Perioperatively, the four-point impedance was similar between implant types, with perimodiolar implants having marginally higher impedance values in the basal region. At 3 months after surgery, impedances significantly increased in the basal half of the electrode array for both implants, with higher impedance values for CI532 implants. There were no significant differences in insertion angle depth between implant types. The ICPI values for the seven most basal electrodes were similar for both implants; however, CI532 arrays were significantly more medially placed along the remaining apical portion of the array, which is expected. ICPI values did not correlate with impedance measurements for either implant. CONCLUSIONS: Four-point impedance increases at 3 months after surgery may reflect fibrous tissue formation after cochlear implantation. The higher impedance values in perimodiolar implants may reflect a more extensive fibrosis formation as a result of surgical approaches used, requiring drilling of the cochlea bone.

Automatic analysis of cochlear response using electrocochleography signals during cochlear implant surgery.

Cochlear implants (CIs) provide an opportunity for the hearing impaired to perceive sound through electrical stimulation of the hearing (cochlear) nerve. However, there is a high risk of losing a patient's natural hearing during CI surgery, which has been shown to reduce speech perception in noisy environments as well as music appreciation. This is a major barrier to the adoption of CIs by the hearing impaired. Electrocochleography (ECochG) has been used to detect intra-operative trauma that may lead to loss of natural hearing. There is early evidence that ECochG can enable early intervention to save natural hearing of the patient. However, detection of trauma by observing changes in the ECochG response is typically carried out by a human expert. Here, we discuss a method of automating the analysis of cochlear responses during CI surgery. We establish, using historical patient data, that the proposed method is highly accurate (∼94% and ∼95% for sensitivity and specificity respectively) when compared to a human expert. The automation of real-time cochlear response analysis is expected to improve the scalability of ECochG and improve patient safety.

Electrocochleography triggered intervention successfully preserves residual hearing during cochlear implantation: Results of a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Preservation of natural hearing during cochlear implantation is associated with improved speech outcomes, however more than half of implant recipients lose this hearing. Real-time electrophysiological monitoring of cochlear output during implantation, made possible by recording electrocochleography using the electrodes on the cochlear implant, has shown promise in predicting hearing preservation. Sudden drops in the amplitude of the cochlear microphonic (CM) have been shown to predict more severe hearing losses. Here, we report on a randomized clinical trial investigating whether immediate surgical intervention triggered by these drops can save residual hearing. METHODS: A single-blinded placebo-controlled trial of surgical intervention triggered when CM amplitude dropped by at least 30% of a prior maximum amplitude during cochlear implantation. Intraoperative electrocochleography was recorded in 60 adults implanted with Cochlear Ltd's Thin Straight Electrode, half randomly assigned to a control group and half to an interventional group. The surgical intervention was to withdraw the electrode in ½-mm steps to recover CM amplitude. The primary outcome was hearing preservation 3 months following implantation, with secondary outcomes of speech-in-noise reception thresholds by group or CM outcome, and depth of implantation. RESULTS: Sixty patients were recruited; neither pre-operative audiometry nor speech reception thresholds were significantly different between groups. Post-operatively, hearing preservation was significantly better in the interventional group. This was the case in absolute difference (median of 30 dB for control, 20 dB for interventional, χ² = 6.2, p = .013), as well as for relative difference (medians of 66% for the control, 31% for the interventional, χ² = 5.9, p = .015). Speech-in-noise reception thresholds were significantly better in patients with no CM drop at any point during insertion compared with patients with a CM drop; however, those with successfully recovered CMs after an initial drop were not significantly different (median gain required for speech reception score of 50% above noise of 6.9 dB for no drop, 8.6 for recovered CM, and 9.8 for CM drop, χ² = 6.8, p = .032). Angular insertion depth was not significantly different between control and interventional groups. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration that surgical intervention in response to intraoperative hearing monitoring can save residual hearing during cochlear implantation.

Real Time Monitoring During Cochlear Implantation: Increasing the Accuracy of Predicting Residual Hearing Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Real-time electrocochleography (rt-ECochG) is a method to detect intracochlear potential changes during cochlear implantation (CI). Steep amplitude drops of the cochlear microphonic (CM) signal (so called "ECochG events") have been correlated with worse residual hearing outcomes. However, the sensitivity and specificity of monitoring CM amplitude on its own are too low to use it as a biomarker. The aim of this article was to establish if additional signal components would help to better predict postoperative hearing outcomes. DESIGN AND SETTING: Single-center, prospective cohort study at a tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Between 2017 and 2020, we included 73 adult patients receiving a lateral wall cochlear implant electrode. During electrode insertion, rt-ECochG measurements were performed. MAIN OUTCOMES: We calculated a multiple regression analysis for patients with one ECochG event. The dependant variable was the relative acoustic hearing result 4 weeks after surgery. Independent variables were CM latency, a ratio of the auditory nerve neurophonic to the CM (the ANN/CM index) as well as CM signal recovery. RESULTS: The change of the ANN/CM index linearly correlated with acoustic hearing outcomes 4 weeks after surgery. Adding this factor led to a statistically significant increase in the variance accounted for by the regression model. CONCLUSIONS: When monitoring the implantation process with rt-ECochG, prediction of postoperative hearing thresholds is improved by addition of the ANN/CM index to a model that includes CM amplitude fluctuation.

The Effect of Different Round Window Sealants on Cochlear Mechanics Over Time.

BACKGROUND: This project investigated the effects of round window membrane (RWM) sealants after surgical incision, with a focus on audiological thresholds, ossicular mechanics, and the impact upon cochlear function and pathology. METHODS: Twenty-eight guinea pigs were randomly allocated to one of three sealant groups (muscle, n = 7; fascia, n = 7, Tisseel, n = 8) or an unsealed control group (n = 6). Preoperative hearing was measured using auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). The ossicular chain and RWM were exposed surgically, and Laser Doppler Vibrometry (LDV) measurements were obtained from the long process of the incus. The RWM was incised then sealed (or left unsealed) according to group. ABR testing and LDV measurements were repeated 4 and 12 weeks after surgery. At 12 weeks all cochleae were harvested. RESULTS: ABR thresholds deteriorated over time in all groups. Overall, group was not statistically significant (p = 0.064). There was no significant effect by group on LDV measurements (p = 0.798). Histopathological analyses of the RWM showed that the fascia group had more extensive fibrosis than other groups (Independent-Samples Median Test, p = 0.001). However, there were minimal differences in the outer hair cell counts between the different intervention groups. CONCLUSIONS: All the interventions appeared to be safe while none affected the cochlear mechanics or hearing thresholds in a statistically significant manner.

Cochlear microphonic latency predicts outer hair cell function in animal models and clinical populations.

As recently reported, electrocochleography recorded in cochlear implant recipients showed reduced amplitude and shorter latency in patients with more severe high-frequency hearing loss compared with those with some residual hearing. As the response is generated primarily by receptor currents in outer hair cells, these variations in amplitude and latency may indicate outer hair cell function after cochlear implantation. We propose that an absence of latency shift when the cochlear microphonic is measured on two adjacent electrodes indicates an absence or dysfunction of outer hair cells between these electrodes. We test this preclinically in noise deafened guinea pigs (2 h of a 124 dB HL, 16-24 kHz narrow-band noise), and clinically, in electrocochleographic recordings made in cochlear implant recipients immediately after implantation. We found that normal hearing guinea pigs showed a progressive increase in latency from basal to apical electrodes. In contrast, guinea pigs with significantly elevated high-frequency hearing thresholds showed no change in cochlear microphonic latency measured on basal electrodes (located approximately at the 16-24 kHz location in the cochlea).. In the clinical cohort, a significant negative correlation existed between cochlear microphonic latency shifts and hearing thresholds at 1-, 2-, & 4 kHz when tested on electrodes located at the relevant cochlear tonotopic place. This reduction in latency shift was such that patients with no measurable hearing also had no detectable latency shift (place assessed by CT scan, r's of -.70 to -.83). These findings suggest that electrocochleography can be used as a diagnostic tool to detect cochlear regions with functioning hair cells, which may be important for defining cross-over point for electro-acoustic stimulation.

Four-point impedance as a biomarker for bleeding during cochlear implantation.

Cochlear implantation has successfully restored the perception of hearing for nearly 200 thousand profoundly deaf adults and children. More recently, implant candidature has expanded to include those with considerable natural hearing which, when preserved, provides an improved hearing experience in noisy environments. But more than half of these patients lose this natural hearing soon after implantation. To reduce this burden, biosensing technologies are emerging that provide feedback on the quality of surgery. Here we report clinical findings on a new intra-operative measurement of electrical impedance (4-point impedance) which, when elevated, is associated with high rates of post-operative hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction. In vivo and in vitro data presented suggest that elevated 4-point impedance is likely due to the presence of blood within the cochlea rather than its geometry. Four-point impedance is a new marker for the detection of cochlear injury causing bleeding, that may be incorporated into intraoperative monitoring protocols during CI surgery.