Truncated G-Quadruplex Isomers Cross-Talk with the Transcription Factors To Maintain Homeostatic Equilibria in c-MYC Transcription.

The nuclease hypersensitive element III1 (NHE III1) upstream c-MYC promoter harbors a transcription-silencing G-quadruplex (Pu27) element. Dynamic turnover of various transcription factors (TFs) across Pu27 to control c-MYC transcription homeostasis is enigmatic. Here, we reveal that native Pu27 evolves truncated G-quadruplex isomers (Pu19, Pu22, Pu24, and Pu25) in cells that are optimal intracellular targets of specific TFs in a sequence- and structure-dependent manner. Nuclear magnetic resonance and isothermal titration calorimetry envisaged that NM23-H2 (nucleoside diphosphate kinase) and nucleolin induce conformational fluctuations in Pu27 to sample specific conformationally restricted conformer(s). Structural investigations revealed that the flanking guanines at 5'-Pu27 control solvent exposure at G-quartets upon NM23-H2 and nucleolin binding driving Pu27 unfolding and folding, respectively. Transient chromatin immunoprecipitations confirmed that NM23-H2 drives the conformation switch to Pu24 that outcompetes nucleolin recruitment. Similarly, nucleolin arrests Pu27 in the Pu22 conformer minimizing NM23-H2 binding at Pu27. hnRNPK (heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K) positively regulates NM23-H2 and nucleolin association at Pu27 despite their antagonism. On the basis of these results, we simulated the transcription kinetics in a feed-forward loop in which the transcription output responds to hnRNPK-induced early activation via NM23-H2 association, which favors Pu24 formation at NHE III1 reducing nucleolin occupancy and driving quadruplex unfolding to initiate transcription. NM23-H2 further promotes hnRNPK deposition across NHE III1 altering Pu27 plasticity that finally enriches the nucleolin abundance to drive Pu22 formation and weaken NM23-H2 binding to extinguish transcription. This mechanism involves three positive feedback loops (NM23-H2-hnRNPK, NM23-H2-CNBP, and hnRNPK-nucleolin) and one negative feedback loop (NM23-H2-nucleolin) controlling optimal turnover and residence time of TFs at Pu27 to homeostatically regulate c-MYC transcription.

A prismatic view of the epigenetic-metabolic regulatory axis in breast cancer therapy resistance.

Epigenetic regulation established during development to maintain patterns of transcriptional expression and silencing for metabolism and other fundamental cell processes can be reprogrammed in cancer, providing a molecular mechanism for persistent alterations in phenotype. Metabolic deregulation and reprogramming are thus an emerging hallmark of cancer with opportunities for molecular classification as a critical preliminary step for precision therapeutic intervention. Yet, acquisition of therapy resistance against most conventional treatment regimens coupled with tumor relapse, continue to pose unsolved problems for precision healthcare, as exemplified in breast cancer where existing data informs both cancer genotype and phenotype. Furthermore, epigenetic reprograming of the metabolic milieu of cancer cells is among the most crucial determinants of therapeutic resistance and cancer relapse. Importantly, subtype-specific epigenetic-metabolic interplay profoundly affects malignant transformation, resistance to chemotherapy, and response to targeted therapies. In this review, we therefore prismatically dissect interconnected epigenetic and metabolic regulatory pathways and then integrate them into an observable cancer metabolism-therapy-resistance axis that may inform clinical intervention. Optimally coupling genome-wide analysis with an understanding of metabolic elements, epigenetic reprogramming, and their integration by metabolic profiling may decode missing molecular mechanisms at the level of individual tumors. The proposed approach of linking metabolic biochemistry back to genotype, epigenetics, and phenotype for specific tumors and their microenvironment may thus enable successful mechanistic targeting of epigenetic modifiers and oncometabolites despite tumor metabolic heterogeneity.

UBR7 in concert with EZH2 inhibits the TGF-ß signaling leading to extracellular matrix remodeling.

The intricate interplay between resident cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM) profoundly influences cancer progression. In triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), ECM architecture evolves due to the enrichment of lysyl oxidase, fibronectin, and collagen, promoting distant metastasis. Here we uncover a pivotal transcription regulatory mechanism involving the epigenetic regulator UBR7 and histone methyltransferase EZH2 in regulating transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß/Smad signaling, affecting the expression of ECM genes. UBR7 loss leads to a dramatic reduction in facultative heterochromatin mark H3K27me3, activating ECM genes. UBR7 plays a crucial role in matrix deposition in adherent cancer cells and spheroids, altering collagen content and lysyl oxidase activity, directly affecting matrix stiffness and invasiveness. These findings are further validated in vivo in mice models and TNBC patients, where reduced UBR7 levels are accompanied by increased ECM component expression and activity, leading to fibrosis-mediated matrix stiffness. Thus, UBR7 is a master regulator of matrix stiffening, influencing the metastatic potential of TNBC.

Epigenetic-Metabolic Interplay in the DNA Damage Response and Therapeutic Resistance of Breast Cancer.

Therapy resistance is imposing a daunting challenge on effective clinical management of breast cancer. Although the development of resistance to drugs is multifaceted, reprogramming of energy metabolism pathways is emerging as a central but heterogenous regulator of this therapeutic challenge. Metabolic heterogeneity in cancer cells is intricately associated with alterations of different signaling networks and activation of DNA damage response pathways. Here we consider how the dynamic metabolic milieu of cancer cells regulates their DNA damage repair ability to ultimately contribute to development of therapy resistance. Diverse epigenetic regulators are crucial in remodeling the metabolic landscape of cancer. This epigenetic-metabolic interplay profoundly affects genomic stability of the cancer cells as well as their resistance to genotoxic therapies. These observations identify defining mechanisms of cancer epigenetics-metabolism-DNA repair axis that can be critical for devising novel, targeted therapeutic approaches that could sensitize cancer cells to conventional treatment strategies.

The paradigm of drug resistance in cancer: an epigenetic perspective.

Innate and acquired resistance towards the conventional therapeutic regimen imposes a significant challenge for the successful management of cancer for decades. In patients with advanced carcinomas, acquisition of drug resistance often leads to tumor recurrence and poor prognosis after the first therapeutic cycle. In this context, cancer stem cells (CSCs) are considered as the prime drivers of therapy resistance in cancer due to their 'non-targetable' nature. Drug resistance in cancer is immensely influenced by different properties of CSCs such as epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a profound expression of drug efflux pump genes, detoxification genes, quiescence, and evasion of apoptosis, has been highlighted in this review article. The crucial epigenetic alterations that are intricately associated with regulating different mechanisms of drug resistance, have been discussed thoroughly. Additionally, special attention is drawn towards the epigenetic mechanisms behind the interaction between the cancer cells and their microenvironment which assists in tumor progression and therapy resistance. Finally, we have provided a cumulative overview of the alternative treatment strategies and epigenome-modifying therapies that show the potential of sensitizing the resistant cells towards the conventional treatment strategies. Thus, this review summarizes the epigenetic and molecular background behind therapy resistance, the prime hindrance of present day anti-cancer therapies, and provides an account of the novel complementary epi-drug-based therapeutic strategies to combat drug resistance.

Stress Responses as Master Keys to Epigenomic Changes in Transcriptome and Metabolome for Cancer Etiology and Therapeutics.

From initiation through progression, cancer cells are subjected to a magnitude of endogenous and exogenous stresses, which aid in their neoplastic transformation. Exposure to these classes of stress induces imbalance in cellular homeostasis and, in response, cancer cells employ informative adaptive mechanisms to rebalance biochemical processes that facilitate survival and maintain their existence. Different kinds of stress stimuli trigger epigenetic alterations in cancer cells, which leads to changes in their transcriptome and metabolome, ultimately resulting in suppression of growth inhibition or induction of apoptosis. Whether cancer cells show a protective response to stress or succumb to cell death depends on the type of stress and duration of exposure. A thorough understanding of epigenetic and molecular architecture of cancer cell stress response pathways can unveil a plethora of information required to develop novel anticancer therapeutics. The present view highlights current knowledge about alterations in epigenome and transcriptome of cancer cells as a consequence of exposure to different physicochemical stressful stimuli such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), hypoxia, radiation, hyperthermia, genotoxic agents, and nutrient deprivation. Currently, an anticancer treatment scenario involving the imposition of stress to target cancer cells is gaining traction to augment or even replace conventional therapeutic regimens. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of stress response pathways is crucial for devising and implementing novel therapeutic strategies.

Pyridoxine enhances chemo-responsiveness of breast cancer stem cells via redox reconditioning.

A plethora of molecular strategies are employed by breast cancer stem cells (bCSCs) to evade chemotherapy-induced death signals, redox modulation being a crucial factor among those. Here, we observed that bCSCs are resistant to DNA damage and generate low ROS upon doxorubicin (Dox) treatment. Further exploration revealed inherently high NEIL2, a base excision repair (BER) enzyme that plays a key regulatory role in repairing DNA damage, in bCSCs. However, its role in modulating the redox status of bCSCs remains unexplored. In addition, Dox not only upregulates NEIL2 in bCSCs at both transcriptional and translational levels but also declines p300-induced acetylation thus activating NEIL2 and providing a protective effect against the stress inflicted by the genotoxic drug. However, when the redox status of bCSCs is altered by inducing high ROS, apoptosis of the resistant population is accomplished. Subsequently, when NEIL2 is suppressed in bCSCs, chemo-sensitization of the resistant population is enabled by redox reconditioning via impaired DNA repair. This signifies a possibility of therapeutically disrupting the redox balance in bCSCs to enhance their chemo-responsiveness. Our search for an inhibitor of NEIL2 revealed that vitamin B6, i.e., pyridoxine (PN), hinders NEIL2-mediated transcription-coupled repair process by not only decreasing NEIL2 expression but also inhibiting its association with RNA Pol II, thus stimulating DNA damage and triggering ROS. As a consequence of altered redox regulation, bCSCs become susceptible towards Dox, which then induces apoptosis via caspase cascade. These findings signify that PN enhances chemo-responsiveness of bCSCs via redox reconditioning.

SMAR1 repression by pluripotency factors and consequent chemoresistance in breast cancer stem-like cells is reversed by aspirin.

The high abundance of drug efflux pumps in cancer stem cells (CSCs) contributes to chemotherapy resistance. The transcriptional regulator SMAR1 suppresses CSC expansion in colorectal cancer, and increased abundance of SMAR1 is associated with better prognosis. Here, we found in breast tumors that the expression of SMAR1 was decreased in CSCs through the cooperative interaction of the pluripotency factors Oct4 and Sox2 with the histone deacetylase HDAC1. Overexpressing SMAR1 sensitized CSCs to chemotherapy through SMAR1-dependent recruitment of HDAC2 to the promoter of the gene encoding the drug efflux pump ABCG2. Treating cultured CSCs or 4T1 tumor-bearing mice with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug aspirin restored SMAR1 expression and ABCG2 repression and enhanced tumor sensitivity to doxorubicin. Our findings reveal transcriptional mechanisms regulating SMAR1 that also regulate cancer stemness and chemoresistance and suggest that, by restoring SMAR1 expression, aspirin might enhance chemotherapeutic efficacy in patients with stem-like tumors.

Aspirin enhances cisplatin sensitivity of resistant non-small cell lung carcinoma stem-like cells by targeting mTOR-Akt axis to repress migration.

Conventional chemotherapeutic regimens are unable to prevent metastasis of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) thereby leaving cancer incurable. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are considered to be the origin of this therapeutic limitation. In the present study we report that the migration potential of NSCLCs is linked to its CSC content. While cisplatin alone fails to inhibit the migration of CSC-enriched NSCLC spheroids, in a combination with non-steroidal anti inflammatory drug (NSAID) aspirin retards the same. A search for the underlying mechanism revealed that aspirin pre-treatment abrogates p300 binding both at TATA-box and initiator (INR) regions of mTOR promoter of CSCs, thereby impeding RNA polymerase II binding at those sites and repressing mTOR gene transcription. As a consequence of mTOR down-regulation, Akt is deactivated via dephosphorylation at Ser473 residue thereby activating Gsk3ß that in turn causes destabilization of Snail and ß-catenin, thus reverting epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). However, alone aspirin fails to hinder migration since it does not inhibit the Integrin/Fak pathway, which is highly activated in NSCLC stem cells. On the other hand, in aspirin pre-treated CSCs, cisplatin stalls migration by hindering the integrin pathway. These results signify the efficacy of aspirin in sensitizing NSCLC stem cells towards the anti-migration effect of cisplatin. Cumulatively, our findings raise the possibility that aspirin might emerge as a promising drug in combinatorial therapy with the existing chemotherapeutic agents that fail to impede migration of NSCLC stem cells otherwise. This may consequently lead to the advancement of remedial outcome for the metastatic NSCLCs.