Prescribing Patterns of Oral Opioid Analgesic for Acute Pain at a Tertiary Care Children's Hospital Emergency Departments and Urgent Cares.

OBJECTIVES: Despite Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines on adult opioid prescribing, there is a paucity of evidence and no guidelines to inform opioid prescribing in pediatrics. To develop guidelines on pediatric prescribing, it is imperative to evaluate current practice on opioid use. The objectives were to describe prescribing patterns of opioids for acute pain at a children's hospital and to compare clinical characteristics of patients who received less or greater than 3 days. METHODS: A retrospective review of oral opioid analgesics prescribed for acute pain at a tertiary care children's hospital emergency department and urgent care from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017. Patients younger than 22 years who received an opioid prescription upon discharge were included. Patients with hematology/oncology or chronic pain diagnosis were excluded. RESULTS: Opioids were prescribed for a median of 2.2 days (interquartile range, 1.4-3.0 days). Most opioids were prescribed for ≤3 days (1326; 79.3%), and there were 44 (2.6%) prescriptions for >7 days. Twenty-two opioid formulations were prescribed. Single-ingredient oxycodone was the most commonly prescribed (877; 52.5%); there were 724 (43.3%) acetaminophen combination products. Common diagnoses were orthopedic (973; 58.2%), surgery/burn/trauma (195; 11.7%), and ear/nose/throat (143; 8.6%). Patients who received >3 days of opioids were younger (P < 0.001), and there was no differences in sex, ethnicity, insurance, or provider qualifications. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, prescribing patterns for the duration of opioid analgesics were ≤3 days, with a median of 2 days. There was a large range of days prescribed, with variations in prescribing characteristics among patients and providers.

Prescribing Patterns of Oral Opioid Analgesic for Long Bone Fracture at Tertiary Care Children's Hospital Emergency Departments and Urgent Cares.

OBJECTIVES: Disparities in opioid prescribing in children can lead to underprescribing and poorly controlled pain. On the contrary, unnecessary overprescribing can increase the risk for misuse, abuse, and diversion. The primary objective of this study was to compare the demographics and clinical characteristics of children with an extremity fracture who did and did not receive an opioid prescription from a tertiary care children's hospital. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of children younger than 22 years with extremity fracture evaluated at a tertiary care children's hospital emergency department (ED) and surrounding satellite locations (3 EDs and 4 urgent cares), from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017. RESULTS: There were 3325 patients younger than 22 years who were seen for evaluation of an extremity fracture. The overall median age of patients was 8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 4-11), and 1976 (59.4%) were male. Patients with extremity fractures who received opioid analgesics were older than those who did not receive opioids (median age of 10 years [IQR, 6-13 years] vs 7 years [IQR, 4-11 years], P < 0.001). There was a significant difference found between insurance types, specifically those patients receiving Medicaid and private insurance. Patients who received opioid analgesics had a higher initial pain score (7 [IQR, 4-9] vs 5 [IQR, 2-7], P < 0.001), were more likely to have an physician (MD/DO) provider (P < 0.001), and were more likely to present to the ED (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients, patients with Medicaid insurance, patients treated by an advanced care provider, and patients who presented to an urgent care were less likely to receive opioid analgesics upon discharge. These findings demonstrate that more standardization and guidance on opioid prescribing are needed in pediatrics, to both adequately treat pain and reduce harms from overprescribing of opioid analgesics.

Perioperative Management and In-Hospital Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum: A Multicenter Registry Report From the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia Improvement Network.

BACKGROUND: There are few comparative data on the analgesic options used to manage patients undergoing minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum (MIRPE). The Society for Pediatric Anesthesia Improvement Network was established to investigate outcomes for procedures where there is significant management variability. For our first study, we established a multicenter observational database to characterize the analgesic strategies used to manage pediatric patients undergoing MIRPE. Outcome data from the participating centers were used to assess the association between analgesic strategy and pain outcomes. METHODS: Fourteen institutions enrolled patients from June 2014 through August 2015. Network members agreed to an observational methodology where each institution managed patients based on their institutional standards and protocols. There was no requirement to standardize care. Patients were categorized based on analgesic strategy: epidural catheter (EC), paravertebral catheter (PVC), wound catheter (WC), no regional (NR) analgesia, and intrathecal morphine techniques. Primary outcomes, pain score and opioid consumption by postoperative day (POD), for each technique were compared while adjusting for confounders using multivariable modeling that included 5 covariates: age, sex, number of bars, Haller index, and use of preoperative pain medication. Pain scores were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. Opioid consumption was analyzed using a multivariable quantile regression. RESULTS: Data were collected on 348 patients and categorized based on primary analgesic strategy: EC (122), PVC (57), WC (41), NR (120), and intrathecal morphine (8). Compared to EC, daily median pain scores were higher in patients managed with PVC (POD 0), WC (POD 0, 1, 2, 3), and NR (POD 0, 1, 2), respectively (P < .001-.024 depending on group). Daily opioid requirements were higher in patients managed with PVC (POD 0, 1), WC (POD 0, 1, 2), and NR (POD 0, 1, 2) when compared to patients managed with EC (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate variation in pain management strategies for patients undergoing MIRPE within our network. The results indicate that most patients have mild-to-moderate pain postoperatively regardless of analgesic management. Patients managed with EC had lower pain scores and opioid consumption in the early recovery period compared to other treatment strategies.

A retrospective cohort study of children with spinal muscular atrophy type 2 receiving anesthesia for intrathecal administration of nusinersen.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal muscular atrophy is characterized by loss of motor neurons in the anterior horn of the spinal cord with resultant proximal muscle weakness. Intrathecal nusinersen has revolutionized the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy. We reviewed the perioperative care of 61 anesthetics performed on eight patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 2 who received nusinersen over 30 months in conjunction with nusinersen's phase 3 clinical trials. METHODS: Anesthesia was induced in all patients with sevoflurane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen (30%) via facemask. A peripheral intravenous line was placed after the loss of consciousness in all but three procedures. General anesthesia was maintained in 58 anesthetics with a propofol infusion at 250-300 µg/kg/min, while the remainder was maintained with inhalational anesthetics. The airway was managed via facemask or nasal cannula in all but two procedures, in whom a laryngeal mask airway was placed. We analyzed patient demographics, duration of anesthesia and of postanesthesia care unit stay, discharge destination, preprocedure oxygen saturation (SaO2 ), postanesthesia care unit discharge oxygen saturation, and occurrence of unanticipated admission or postdischarge hospitalization. RESULTS: Eight American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status three patients (3 male: 5 female) with a median age of 4.1 (2.1-7.8) years and median weight of 13.2 (10-24.7) kg, underwent 61 anesthetics for nusinersen administration or sham procedure. There were no intraoperative anesthetic complications of unanticipated cardiovascular instability, major neurologic events, respiratory failure, or death. Anesthesiologists performed 83% of the procedures. CONCLUSION: Nusinersen has revolutionized the care of patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 2 and anesthesiologists will be involved in its administration. We found that routine anesthetic care was safe and effective.

Nutritional Wellness for the Busy Health Care Provider: Small Everyday Wins.

When describing health care provider wellness, diet and nutrition are typically not addressed. This, in combination with the lack of decent food and diet resources typically available to the typically busy health care provider, exposes a significant gap in the road to advancing clinician wellness. This article aims to describe the relationship between nutrition and well-being, and potential barriers to optimal nutrition encountered by health care providers in the workplace. Readily available and practical strategies to improve physician diet and nutrition include: mindful eating practices, home meal preparation, food journaling, and mobile applications. From an organizational level, once physicians are making more informed food choices it is the hospital's responsibility to make nutritional options available in the workplace.

Randomized controlled trial of NSAID prior to cystoscopic ureteral stent removal in a pediatric population.

INTRODUCTION: Ureteral spasm, common with ureteral stents, is partially mediated by prostaglandins and may be suppressed by cyclooxygenase inhibitors like non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAIDs). Practices currently vary widely for pain management in patients with ureteral stents, sometimes including opioids. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine if NSAID given prior to stent removal would reduce postoperative pain. We hypothesized there would be at least a 75% reduction in postoperative severe pain (pain score ≥7) in patients receiving ibuprofen compared to placebo. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial on pediatric urology patients with an indwelling ureteral stent undergoing removal in the operating room from 2014 to 2019. 20 patients in each arm were needed to achieve 80% power to detect a 75% reduction in the estimated 55% incidence of severe postoperative pain (α = 0.05). Patients ≥4 years old who had a unilateral stent placed after treatment of urolithiasis or ureteropelvic junction obstruction were randomized to NSAID or placebo in a 1:1 ratio at least 15 min prior to scheduled stent removal. Patients estimated pain using Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) or visual analogue scale (VAS) prior to and 24 h after stent removal. RESULTS: 254 patients undergoing stent removal were assessed for eligibility, and 44 randomized patients were analyzed using intention to treat analysis. The cohorts were demographically similar and received similar anesthesia treatment. There was no significant difference in maximum post anesthesia care unit pain score (p = 0.269) or use of in-hospital opioids (p = 0.626) between the two groups. No difference was seen in the incidence of severe postoperative pain (p = 1.0), thus rejecting the hypothesis. Significant worsened postoperative pain (pain score increases of ≥2 between time points) decreased from 22.7% to 13.6% between placebo and NSAID, but this did not reach significance (p = 0.410). DISCUSSION: There was no difference in postoperative pain for patients undergoing ureteral stent removal given preoperative NSAID versus placebo. The incidence of severe pain before and after stent removal was low, ranging from 4.5 to 9.1%. CONCLUSION: Research to understand the etiology of pain after stent removal and techniques to minimize or prevent discomfort should continue in order to optimize patient outcomes.

Pain Management for Pediatric Burns in the Outpatient Setting: A Changing Paradigm?

Childhood burns are common and distressing for children and their parents. Pain is the most common complaint and often thought to be undertreated, which can negatively influence the child's care and increase the risk of posttraumatic stress disorder. There is limited literature on the role of opioids and multimodal therapy in the treatment of pediatric outpatient burns. We sought to evaluate the current use of opioids (including the use of multimodal therapies), storage, and disposal of opioids in this patient population. Parents of burn-injured children 8 months to 18 years old, who were seen in an outpatient setting within 2 weeks of their burn injury, were queried from April to December 2019 regarding their child's pain control, opioid medication use, over-the-counter pain medication use, opioid storage, and disposal. A total of 142 parents of burn-injured children and their parents were surveyed. The median age of the burn-injured children was 2.7 years old and the majority (54.2%; 77/142) were male. The mean total body surface area (TBSA) was 1.8% and half sustained burn injuries to one or both hands. The most frequently used regimens for constant and/or breakthrough pain control were acetaminophen (62.7%) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; 68.3%). Less than one fifth (26/142;18%) of patients were prescribed opioids and 88% filled their prescription. The median number of doses of opioids prescribed was eight doses, with a median of four doses of opioids unused. Only three patients used all of their prescribed opioids and no patient ≥12 years old used their entire prescription. Burns greater than 3% TBSA, irrespective of burn injury location, were associated with opioid prescription (P = .003). Approximately 40% (10/26) of parents who filled their child's opioid prescription stored the opioid in a locked area. Fewer than one third (7/26) of patients were educated on how to dispose of excess opioid pain medication. Overall, most pediatric outpatient burn injuries can be successfully managed with over-the-counter medications. Providers, who care for burn-injured children ≤ 12 years old with burns that cover ≥3% TBSA in the outpatient setting, should consider no more than four opioid doses for initial pain control. This guideline, coupled with family and provider-centered education on multimodal therapy at the time of initial presentation and safe use of opioids, are important first steps to minimizing the use of opioids in the management of small area burns in children.

Evaluation of prolonged epidural chloroprocaine for postoperative analgesia in infants.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the use and adverse effects of chloroprocaine for epidural analgesia in young infants for infusion durations greater than 3.5 hours. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort review of the electronic medical record over a 14-month period. SETTING: The level IV neonatal intensive care unit of a 414-bed free-standing children's hospital. PATIENTS: Eighteen infants (mean age, 1.7 ± 1.8 months [0.03-6.3]; mean weight, 3.8 ± 1.3 kg [1.56-6.9]; n = 10 [55%] males) received 1% chloroprocaine for epidural analgesia postoperatively for up to 96-hour duration and met criteria for inclusion. MEASUREMENTS: Dosing requirements, placement of epidural catheter, supplementary analgesic therapy, respiratory support, vital signs, and incidence of adverse events associated with local anesthetics were collected. MAIN RESULTS: Epidural catheter placement was caudal (n = 8), lumbar (n = 6), or thoracic (n = 4). Mean operative time was 2.48 ± 1 hour (1-5). Initial chloroprocaine dose was 1.3 ± 0.5 mL/h (0.4-2.5) (3.5 ± 1 mg/kg per hour [1.4-5]) with a maximum dose of 1.5 ± 0.6 mL/h (0.4-3) (4.2 ± 1.1 mg/kg per hour [2.2-6.1]). Duration of epidural analgesia was 48.3 ± 21.5 hours (10-96). Duration of epidural infusion did not influence dosing requirement, suggesting the absence of drug tachyphylaxis. All patients received intermittent doses of opioid and nonopioid pain medications while receiving chloroprocaine. Two mechanically ventilated patients required continuous infusion of opioids. No adverse events were directly attributed to chloroprocaine use. CONCLUSION: Epidural 1% chloroprocaine, in doses of 0.4-3 mL/h (1.5-6.1 mg/kg per hour), was well tolerated in both mechanically ventilated and spontaneously breathing infants for up to 96 hours with no identified adverse effects or tachyphylaxis.