Texting in the Fourth Trimester: mHealth for Postpartum Care.

Objective Rising maternal morbidity and mortality in the US is a complex problem and is often tied to the postpartum period. Postpartum visits are poorly attended leading to gaps in contraception, mental healthcare, and care for chronic conditions. mHealth, healthcare supported by mobile technologies, has been shown to improve antenatal care adherence. Our study aims to determine whether an mHealth intervention of interactive, educational text messages can improve care for women postpartum. Study Design We conducted a randomized-control trial of 191 women receiving OB/GYN care in our clinic from November 2019-April 2020. Patients were randomized postpartum to receive either routine care or routine care with mHealth text messages and appointment reminders specific to delivery type. The primary endpoint was attendance to the six-week postpartum visit with secondary endpoints of breastfeeding, contraception use, emergency visits, and postpartum depression scores (EPDS). A subgroup analysis was additionally conducted to assess the impact of some visits shifting to telehealth due to the timing of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results Patient demographics were similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in postpartum appointment attendance between text message (n=57, 59%) and control groups (n=62, 66%, p=0.31). 117 patients were scheduled for in-person postpartum visits, and 74 for telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, with no significant difference in attendance rate between groups for either visit modality. Conclusion Automated text messages alone did not increase our primary outcome of adherence to postpartum care, even when visits were conducted by telehealth. While mHealth has proven successful in other care areas, such as antepartum follow-up, further research is needed to determine whether it is an effective method to improve adherence to postpartum care, or whether other strategies must be developed, including augmentation with human navigators.

Stress and the Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Frontline Obstetrics and Gynecology Providers.

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic rapidly overwhelmed global health care systems in 2020, with New York City (NYC) marking the first epicenter in the United States. High levels of stress amongst health care workers have been reported in pandemics, but less is known about stress amongst Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) providers. We sought to describe levels of stress, anxiety, depression, and other aspects of mental health among OB/GYN health care workers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional electronic survey of a wide range of OB/GYN clinicians in a large NYC hospital system in the spring of 2020. We used both original survey questions and validated screening tools to assess stress, anxiety, depression, and burnout. We calculated median scores for these tools and compared median score between provider types. We also adapted questions on pandemic-related stressors from the MERS and SARS pandemics to fit the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and OB/GYN providers. RESULTS: A total of 464 providers met study inclusion criteria, and 163 providers completed the survey (response rate = 35.1%). Approximately 35% of providers screened positive for anxiety and 21% for depression. Scores for depression, burnout, and fulfillment varied by provider type, with nurses scoring higher than physicians (p <0.05). The majority of respondents reported stress from pandemic and OB-specific stressors, including the possibility of transmitting COVID-19 to friends and family (83.9%, [95% confidence interval or CI 78.0-89.8%]), uncertainty regarding the pandemic's trajectory (91.3% [86.7-95.8%]), and frequent policy changes on labor and delivery (72.7% [65.1-80.3%]). CONCLUSION: OB/GYN providers reported high levels of stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. The stress of caring for laboring patients during a pandemic may disproportionately affect nurses and trainees and highlights the need to provide interventions to ameliorate the negative impact of a pandemic on the mental health of our OB/GYN health care workers. KEY POINTS: · COVID-19 led to stress amongst OB/GYN providers.. · Some stressors were unique to providing obstetric care.. · Nurses and trainees were more affected by this stress..

Mobile Health Apps for Pregnant Women: Systematic Search, Evaluation, and Analysis of Features.

BACKGROUND: Many pregnant women use the internet to obtain information about pregnancy and childbirth. Over 50% of pregnant women use pregnancy apps and must search through thousands of pregnancy or women's health-related apps available on app stores. The COVID-19 pandemic is changing how women receive prenatal care. Mobile health apps may help maintain women's satisfaction with their prenatal care. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to identify pregnancy mobile apps and to evaluate the apps using a modified APPLICATIONS (app comprehensiveness, price, privacy, literature used, in-app purchases, connectivity, advertisements, text search field, images/videos, other special features, navigation ease, subjective presentation) scoring system. METHODS: A list of pregnancy apps was identified in the first 20 Google search results using the search term "pregnancy app." After excluding irrelevant, inaccurate, malfunctioning, or no longer available apps, all unique apps were downloaded and evaluated with the modified APPLICATIONS scoring system, which includes both objective and subjective criteria and evaluation of special features. RESULTS: A list of 57 unique pregnancy apps was generated. After 28 apps were excluded, the remaining 29 apps were evaluated, with a mean score of 9.4 points out of a maximum of 16. The highest scoring app scored 15 points. Over 60% (18/29) of apps did not have comprehensive information for every stage of pregnancy or did not contain all four desired components of pregnancy apps: health promotion/patient education, communication, health tracking, and notifications and reminders. Only 24% (7/29) of apps included a text search field, and only 28% (8/29) of apps cited literature. CONCLUSIONS: Our search yielded many high-scoring apps, but few contained all desired components and features. This list of identified and rated apps can lessen the burden on pregnant women and providers to find available apps on their own. Although health care providers should continue to vet apps before recommending them to patients, these findings also highlight that a Google search is a successful way for patients and providers to find useful and comprehensive pregnancy apps.

Dilation and evacuation for fetal demise in a patient with presumed erythema multiforme major: A case report.

Background: Erythema multiforme is a rare dermatologic condition. There is limited data on the effects of erythema multiforme on the vulva, vagina, and pregnancy. Case: This case report describes a 32-year-old woman with erythema multiforme major with vulvovaginal involvement, found to have a fetal demise measuring 16 weeks' gestation. Dilation and evacuation was performed and was complicated by vaginal adhesions. The adhesions were lysed intraoperatively and managed postoperatively with vaginal dilators and topical corticosteroids for three months. At six weeks postoperatively, the vulvovaginal lesions had completely healed with no residual scarring or stenosis. Conclusion: Erythema multiforme with vulvovaginal involvement can complicate obstetrical procedures and requires a multidisciplinary approach. In this instance, pain control, topical corticosteroids, and vaginal dilators produced favorable clinical outcomes.

Gynecologic care utilization in asylum-seeking women in New York City.

Introduction: Over 25,000 individuals are granted asylum status in the United States annually. Gender-based violence (GBV) has historically been supported as a claim for persecution to apply for asylum. In women, GBV is a known risk factor for sexually transmitted infections, poor mental health, and worse perinatal outcomes. Less is known about the links between GBV, asylum seekers, and gynecologic outcomes or care utilization. Reported rates of gynecologic care-seeking are low in asylum-seeking women and women with histories of GBV often experience barriers to care. We hypothesized that asylum-seeking women with a history of GBV at the Libertas Center, a comprehensive center for survivors of torture in New York City, would receive low rates of recommended gynecologic screening and infrequent gynecologic care. Materials and methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included adult self-identified female patients who had completed intake at the Libertas Center from 2005-2020. In order to examine the relationship between GBV and gynecologic care use, patients were included if they had an electronic medical record (EMR) at Elmhurst Hospital, were female, 18 years of age and older, and had ever experienced GBV in their lifetime. EMRs were reviewed for medical and psychiatric diagnoses as well as routine components of gynecologic care and were linked to intake data from the Libertas Center characterizing patients' torture history. The primary outcome of this study was whether or not patients attended a gynecology visit. Demographic characteristics, medical histories, adequacy of gynecologic care, and gynecologic care-seeking behavior were compared between the gynecologic care group and the no gynecologic care group. Results: A total of 249 female patients were seen at the Libertas Center from December 2005 until January 2020 at the time of data collection. The prevalence of GBV in this population was 48%. Among women who suffered GBV, 81 received medical care at Elmhurst Hospital and 44 (54%) received gynecologic care. Nearly 50% of those patients who sought care at Elmhurst carried a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder or depression. Women who received gynecologic care were significantly more likely than those who did not receive gynecologic care to have had an Emergency Room visit (68% vs. 41%), an obstetric visit (32% vs 3%), and/or have been seen by a social worker (46% vs 24%; all p < 0.05). Women who saw a gynecologist were significantly more likely to have completed four basic gynecologic care measures (Pap smear, gonorrhea/chlamydia screen, pelvic exam, and mammogram if applicable) compared to women who did not (77% vs 8%, p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study characterizes the gynecologic care utilization of female patients within a comprehensive care center for survivors of torture. We found a high lifetime rate of gender-based violence of 48% in this population. Adequate gynecologic care was uncommon among those who experienced GBV. However, gynecologic care was significantly more likely in patients receiving gynecologic specialty care, which frequently occurred after initial interaction with another provider (i.e. Emergency Department providers). These findings highlight the importance of trauma-informed care and establishing pathways to help asylum seeking and refugee women receive adequate gynecologic care. Further research is needed to explore specific barriers to gynecologic care in this population, how programs for asylum-seekers can integrate gynecologic care into existing structures for medical and mental healthcare, and how to increase awareness amongst providers on the prevalence of GBV and the gynecologic needs of these patients.

Contained aortic rupture in a term pregnant patient during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Aortic dissection and rupture is a rare occurrence in pregnant and postpartum patients. This case discusses the presentation and diagnosis of a patient with an acute contained thoracic aortic aneurysm rupture at 38 weeks of gestation, after presenting with throat pain and syncope during the COVID-19 pandemic. The patient underwent emergent caesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal heart tracing, following which continued syncope workup revealed an aortic aneurysm and pericardial effusion. Diagnosis in this case was finalised with multimodality imaging, including transthoracic echocardiogram, and the patient underwent surgical aortic repair.

Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection among pregnant women at Elmhurst Hospital Center, Queens, New York.

BACKGROUND: Universal screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection on Labor and Delivery (L&D) units is a critical strategy to manage patient and health worker safety, especially in a vulnerable high-prevalence community. We describe the results of a SARS-CoV-2 universal screening program at the L&D Unit at Elmhurst Hospital in Queens, NY, a 545-bed public hospital serving a diverse, largely immigrant and low-income patient population and an epicenter of the global pandemic. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study. All pregnant women admitted to the L&D Unit of Elmhurst Hospital from March 29, 2020 to April 22, 2020 were included for analysis. The primary outcomes of the study were: (1) SARS-CoV-2 positivity among universally screened pregnant women, stratified by demographic characteristics, maternal comorbidities, and delivery outcomes; and (2) Symptomatic or asymptomatic presentation at the time of testing among SARS-CoV-2 positive women. A total of 126 obstetric patients were screened for SARS-CoV-2 between March 29 and April 22. Of these, 37% were positive. Of the women who tested positive, 72% were asymptomatic at the time of testing. Patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were more likely to be of Hispanic ethnicity (unadjusted difference 24.4 percentage points, CI 7.9, 41.0) and report their primary language as Spanish (unadjusted difference 32.9 percentage points, CI 15.8, 49.9) than patients who tested negative. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study of data from a universal SARS-Cov-2 screening program implemented in the L&D unit of a safety-net hospital in Queens, New York, we found over one-third of pregnant women testing positive, the majority of those asymptomatic. The rationale for universal screening at the L&D Unit at Elmhurst Hospital was to ensure safety of patients and staff during an acute surge in SARS-Cov-2 infections through appropriate identification and isolation of pregnant women with positive test results. Women were roomed by their SARS-CoV-2 status given increasing space limitations. In addition, postpartum counseling was tailored to infection status. We quickly established discharge counseling and follow-up protocols tailored to their specific social needs. The experience at Elmhurst Hospital is instructive for other L&D units serving vulnerable populations and for pandemic preparedness.

Clinician attendance and delivery practices at hospital-based vaginal deliveries in Western Kenya.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize delivery practices and factors associated with respectful, evidence-based care at a referral hospital in Western Kenya. METHODS: An exploratory observational study used a standardized birth-observation form to record information on patient characteristics and healthcare practitioner behaviors during uncomplicated vaginal deliveries between June 30, 2014 and July 17, 2014. All deliveries were monitored for whether healthcare staff performed six specific evidence-based practices (three maternal and three neonatal practices). RESULTS: In total, 75 vaginal deliveries were observed. In 48 (64%) deliveries, nursing students were the only practitioners present. The mean number of evidence-based practices performed at each delivery was 3.58. The number of evidence-based practices performed by junior practitioners was higher when a nurse educator was assessing their performance (4.47 vs 3.36, P<0.001). Lower mean respectful-care scores were recorded when delivery teams comprised three or more practitioners (1.38; 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.84 vs 2.74; 95% confidence interval 2.16-3.31, P=0.002). CONCLUSION: The present study found low rates of evidence-based practice and respectful maternity care; this could serve as a deterrent for women seeking care at the study facility. These findings emphasize the need for a comprehensive approach in increasing the quality of patient care to improve maternal and newborn health outcomes.