RESUMEN
The precise prediction of molecular properties can greatly accelerate the development of new drugs. However, in silico molecular property prediction approaches have been limited so far to assays for which large amounts of data are available. In this study, we develop a new computational approach leveraging both the textual description of the assay of interest and the chemical structure of target compounds. By combining these two sources of information via self-supervised learning, our tool can provide accurate predictions for assays where no measurements are available. Remarkably, our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on the FS-Mol benchmark for zero-shot prediction, outperforming a wide variety of deep learning approaches. Additionally, we demonstrate how our tool can be used for tailoring screening libraries for the assay of interest, showing promising performance in a retrospective case study on a high-throughput screening campaign. By accelerating the early identification of active molecules in drug discovery and development, this method has the potential to streamline the identification of novel therapeutics.
Asunto(s)
Descubrimiento de Drogas , Descubrimiento de Drogas/métodos , Bioensayo , Ensayos Analíticos de Alto Rendimiento , Estructura MolecularRESUMEN
Efficient prioritization of bioactive compounds from high throughput screening campaigns is a fundamental challenge for accelerating drug development efforts. In this study, we present the first data-driven approach to simultaneously detect assay interferents and prioritize true bioactive compounds. By analyzing the learning dynamics during training of a gradient boosting model on noisy high throughput screening data using a novel formulation of sample influence, we are able to distinguish between compounds exhibiting the desired biological response and those producing assay artifacts. Therefore, our method enables false positive and true positive detection without relying on prior screens or assay interference mechanisms, making it applicable to any high throughput screening campaign. We demonstrate that our approach consistently excludes assay interferents with different mechanisms and prioritizes biologically relevant compounds more efficiently than all tested baselines, including a retrospective case study simulating its use in a real drug discovery campaign. Finally, our tool is extremely computationally efficient, requiring less than 30 s per assay on low-resource hardware. As such, our findings show that our method is an ideal addition to existing false positive detection tools and can be used to guide further pharmacological optimization after high throughput screening campaigns.
RESUMEN
Natural products are a diverse class of compounds with promising biological properties, such as high potency and excellent selectivity. However, they have different structural motifs than typical drug-like compounds, e.g., a wider range of molecular weight, multiple stereocenters and higher fraction of sp3-hybridized carbons. This makes the encoding of natural products via molecular fingerprints difficult, thus restricting their use in cheminformatics studies. To tackle this issue, we explored over 30 years of research to systematically evaluate which molecular fingerprint provides the best performance on the natural product chemical space. We considered 20 molecular fingerprints from four different sources, which we then benchmarked on over 100,000 unique natural products from the COCONUT (COlleCtion of Open Natural prodUcTs) and CMNPD (Comprehensive Marine Natural Products Database) databases. Our analysis focused on the correlation between different fingerprints and their classification performance on 12 bioactivity prediction datasets. Our results show that different encodings can provide fundamentally different views of the natural product chemical space, leading to substantial differences in pairwise similarity and performance. While Extended Connectivity Fingerprints are the de-facto option to encoding drug-like compounds, other fingerprints resulted to match or outperform them for bioactivity prediction of natural products. These results highlight the need to evaluate multiple fingerprinting algorithms for optimal performance and suggest new areas of research. Finally, we provide an open-source Python package for computing all molecular fingerprints considered in the study, as well as data and scripts necessary to reproduce the results, at https://github.com/dahvida/NP_Fingerprints .