Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 85
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 119(4): 646-654, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37983769

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Antibiotic resistance is one of the main factors that determine the efficacy of treatments to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of first-line and rescue treatments against H. pylori in Europe according to antibiotics resistance. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, international registry on the management of H. pylori (European Registry on H. pylori Management). All infected and culture-diagnosed adult patients registered in the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology-Research Electronic Data Capture from 2013 to 2021 were included. RESULTS: A total of 2,852 naive patients with culture results were analyzed. Resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and quinolones was 22%, 27%, and 18%, respectively. The most effective treatment, regardless of resistance, were the 3-in-1 single capsule with bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline (91%) and the quadruple with bismuth, offering optimal cure rates even in the presence of bacterial resistance to clarithromycin or metronidazole. The concomitant regimen with tinidazole achieved an eradication rate of 99% (90/91) vs 84% (90/107) with metronidazole. Triple schedules, sequential, or concomitant regimen with metronidazole did not achieve optimal results. A total of 1,118 non-naive patients were analyzed. Resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and quinolones was 49%, 41%, and 24%, respectively. The 3-in-1 single capsule (87%) and the triple therapy with levofloxacin (85%) were the only ones that provided encouraging results. DISCUSSION: In regions where the antibiotic resistance rate of H. pylori is high, eradication treatment with the 3-in-1 single capsule, the quadruple with bismuth, and concomitant with tinidazole are the best options in naive patients. In non-naive patients, the 3-in-1 single capsule and the triple therapy with levofloxacin provided encouraging results.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Adulto , Humanos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Levofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Bismuto/uso terapéutico , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Tinidazol , Estudios Prospectivos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana
2.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 2024 Mar 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38546459

RESUMEN

GOALS AND BACKGROUND: Gluten-free diet (GFD) includes a higher intake of sugars and fats. Previous studies have investigated its effect on body mass index (BMI) in celiac disease (CD) patients but had contradictive conclusions. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of GFD on BMI in CD patients. STUDY: Systematically, we conducted literature research using Medline, Scopus, and Embase, and we identified 1565 potential studies/abstracts. Only studies of patients with CD under a GFD with recorded BMI before and after dietary intervention were included. Subgroup analyses based on study design and BMI categories were performed. We calculated the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cls) for the number of patients in each BMI group according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definitions after GFD using fixed and random effect meta-analysis. RESULTS: The analysis included 10 studies and 38 sub-studies/data sets, which encompassed 2450 patients from 5 countries. We found nonsignificant odds for changing the BMI group (pooled OR 0.972, 95% CI: 0.858-1.101, P=0.65) after GFD. However, looking specifically at BMI subgroups, we found higher odds for BMI category change after GFD in underweight patients (OR 0.588, 95% CI: 0.479-0.723, P <0.001), and overweight patients,25

3.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 89(12): 3539-3550, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37463830

RESUMEN

AIMS: To investigate the potential association of chronic use of omeprazole with the occurrence of osteoporotic fractures (OF) in community-dwelling elderly subjects. METHODS: The cohort consisted of community-dwelling residents aged >65 years registered with a large health maintenance organization in Israel between January 2002 and December 2016. Data were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical files on demographics, parameters known to be associated with OF, diagnoses of osteoporotic hip, wrist, and vertebral fractures, and chronic use of omeprazole (>11 prescriptions/year). Time to OF/death/end of study was calculated from the beginning of the study (2002). The risk of fractures in the chronic users of omeprazole was analyzed by multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: In total, 46 805 subjects were included (41% men), mean age 83.4±6.4 years, of whom 10 272 (21.9%) were chronic users of omeprazole. During 14 years of follow-up, OF were diagnosed in 414 (4.0%) omeprazole users and 1007 (2.8%) omeprazole nonusers (p < 0.001). In a Cox regression model adjusted for age and gender only, chronic use of omeprazole was associated with a 16% excess of OF. However, when parameters known to be associated with OF were entered into the multivariate Cox regression model, chronic use of omeprazole was not found to be an independent risk factor for OF, either overall (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.965, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.08, P = .55) or specifically, in the ≥85 years age group (adjusted hazard ration = 0.780, 95% confidence interval 0.635-0.958, P < .05) in which an inverse correlation between omeprazole use and OF, was demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic use of omeprazole was not associated with the occurrence of OF in elders.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera , Fracturas Osteoporóticas , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Anciano , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/epidemiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/etiología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Omeprazol/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Fracturas de Cadera/etiología
4.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 25(11): 729-734, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37980617

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) prevalence varies according to both geographical region and ethnicity. The interplay between these two factors has been poorly studied. OBJECTIVES: To determine the positivity rate of H. pylori infection among Jewish and Arab patients who live in a mixed urban center in Israel. METHODS: Between November 2009 and September 2014, dyspeptic patients referred to a gastroenterology clinic in Lod, Israel, were enrolled in a prospective study. For each patient, clinical and epidemiological data were collected and a noninvasive or endoscopy-based test for H. pylori was performed. RESULTS: A total of 429 consecutive patients (322 Jewish and 107 Arabs), mean age 45 years (range 15-91 years) were included; 130 males. Overall positivity for H. pylori was 42.4% (182/429). The positivity rate of H. pylori was 38.8% for Jews (125/322) and 53.2% for Arabs (57/107) in Lod (P < 0.01). When immigrants were excluded, the difference in H. pylori positivity did not reach statistical significance (45.0% [77/171] vs. 53.2% [57/107], P = 0.217, in Jews and Arabs, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori infection was more common in Arabs that Jews in the mixed city of Lod, Israel. This finding may suggest that non-environmental factors were responsible for the observed difference in H. pylori positivity.


Asunto(s)
Dispepsia , Helicobacter pylori , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Etnicidad , Israel/epidemiología , Dispepsia/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos
5.
Gut ; 2022 Dec 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36591610

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use, effectiveness and safety of Helicobacter pylori empirical rescue therapy in third and subsequent treatment lines in Europe. DESIGN: International, prospective, non-interventional registry of the clinical practice of European gastroenterologists. Data were collected and quality reviewed until October 2021 at Asociación Española de Gastroenterología-Research Electronic Data Capture. All cases with three or more empirical eradication attempts were assessed for effectiveness by modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 2144 treatments were included: 1519, 439, 145 and 41 cases from third, fourth, fifth and sixth treatment lines, respectively. Sixty different therapies were used; the 15 most frequently prescribed encompassed >90% of cases. Overall effectiveness remained <90% in all therapies. Optimised treatments achieved a higher eradication rate than non-optimised (78% vs 67%, p<0.0001). From 2017 to 2021, only 44% of treatments other than 10-day single-capsule therapy used high proton-pump inhibitor doses and lasted ≥14 days. Quadruple therapy containing metronidazole, tetracycline and bismuth achieved optimal eradication rates only when prescribed as third-line treatment, either as 10-day single-capsule therapy (87%) or as 14-day traditional therapy with tetracycline hydrochloride (95%). Triple amoxicillin-levofloxacin therapy achieved 90% effectiveness in Eastern Europe only or when optimised. The overall incidence of adverse events was 31%. CONCLUSION: Empirical rescue treatment in third and subsequent lines achieved suboptimal effectiveness in most European regions. Only quadruple bismuth-metronidazole-tetracycline (10-day single-capsule or 14-day traditional scheme) and triple amoxicillin-levofloxacin therapies reached acceptable outcomes in some settings. Compliance with empirical therapy optimisation principles is still poor 5 years after clinical practice guidelines update. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02328131.

6.
Clin Lab ; 68(7)2022 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35975516

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fecal pancreatic elastase 1 (FPE1) is an established screening test for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI), a condition that is underdiagnosed and if not treated may cause significant morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare a new FPE1 machine based CLIA kit to an ELISA assay which is considered the de facto gold standard in our laboratory for FPE1 measurement. METHODS: Levels of FPE1 from the 227 stool samples were analyzed by the ScheBo ELISA kit and the CLIA Liaison XL system simultaneously with the same cutoff values for both assays. Performance of the Liaison XL system was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. RESULTS: The comparison between the Liaison XL system performance and the ScheBo ELISA kit as reference revealed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 86.8%, 94.3%, and 92.1%, respectively, using a cutoff of 100 µg FPE1/g stool. When the cutoff is 200 µg FPE1/g stool the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 86.6%, 97.1%, and 90.7%, respectively. Furthermore, linear correlation of FPE1 levels between the two assays were found to be significant by Pearson's correlation coefficient test (R = 0.85, p-values < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The Liaison XL system showed good laboratory performance with our pre-determined cutoff values when compared to our previous assay. An important advantage of this system is its semi-automated mechanism that enables large scale analysis of FPE1. In addition to that, the Liaison XL system is ideal for both qualitative and quantitative analysis of FPE1 allowing for its application to the clinical setting.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Pancreática Exocrina , Elastasa Pancreática , Pruebas Enzimáticas Clínicas , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Insuficiencia Pancreática Exocrina/diagnóstico , Heces/química , Humanos , Elastasa Pancreática/análisis
7.
Gerontology ; 68(12): 1375-1383, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35316810

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The association of anemia with dementia in elders is controversial. We examined the potential association of anemia with dementia in a large population of elders. METHODS: Historical-prospective registry-based study. Included 36,951 community-dwelling elders (65-113 years) that were followed during 2002-2012. Anemia of all kinds was defined according to Clalit Health Services (CHS) definitions: hemoglobin (HGB) <14 g/dL men, <12 g/dL women; and World Health Organization (WHO): HGB <13 g/dL men, <12 g/dL women. Anemia was categorized as mild (HGB 11-13 g/dL men, 11-12 g/dL women) or moderate-severe (HGB <8-10.9 g/dL men and women). Background data, laboratory values, and diagnosis of dementia and cognitive decline (DCD) were reviewed. RESULTS: During the 10-year follow-up period, DCD was newly diagnosed in 7,180 subjects (19.4%). Subjects with DCD had a higher rate of anemia than those without DCD. Time to development of DCD was 1.5 years shorter in those with than without anemia. On multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for age and sex, the hazard ratio (HR) for DCD was 1.45 (95% CI: 1.37-1.54) by CHS and 1.51 (95% CI: 1.41-1.61) WHO anemia criteria. The more severe the anemia, the greater the risk of DCD development (HGB 13-14 g/dL [men only], HR = 1.20 [95% CI: 1.09-1.32]; mild anemia, HR = 1.38 [95% CI: 1.28-1.49]; moderate-severe anemia, HR = 1.64 [CI: 1.41-1.90]). Every decrease in 1 standard deviation of HGB (1.4 g/dL) increased the DCD risk by 15%. A competing risk model has weakened the association of anemia with DCD risk. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Anemia in community-dwelling elders appears to be associated with an increased DCD risk in a dose-response manner. Application of the WHO anemia criteria in men may miss patients with mild anemia that places them at DCD risk. Further research should look at anemia as a cause of reversible dementia.


Asunto(s)
Anemia , Disfunción Cognitiva , Demencia , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Vida Independiente , Anemia/complicaciones , Anemia/epidemiología , Hemoglobinas , Disfunción Cognitiva/complicaciones , Demencia/complicaciones
8.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 19(1): 202-204, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31712082

RESUMEN

Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) can arise from missed cancers, missed premalignant lesions, incomplete resection, and new cancers with an accelerated route to cancer.1.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Pólipos , Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
9.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 87(3): 1187-1193, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32692459

RESUMEN

AIM: Data on cardiovascular outcomes in elderly using proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are scant. We aimed to test the association between PPI use and the occurrence of first-time ischemic stroke (FTIS) among elderly. METHODS: The electronic database of a centrally located district branch of a large health maintenance organization in Israel was retrospectively screened (2002-2016) for community-dwelling individuals (≥65-95 years) for demographics and co-morbidities. Follow-up was until FTIS, death or end of study. Findings were analyzed by PPI use and occurrence of FTIS. RESULTS: 29,639 subjects (without history of stroke and use of antiplatelet aggregation drugs) mean age of 82.2 ± 5.5 years (range: 65-95 years, 38% male) were analyzed: 8,600 (29%) used PPIs. Mean follow up was 10.58 years (SD ± 5.44). Similar total and annual occurrence rates of FTIS were depicted in PPI users and non-users (20.9% vs. 21% and 2% vs. 2.1%, respectively). On a Cox regression analysis, upon adjustment for age, gender and cardiovascular disease related risk factors, PPI use was significantly associated with lower rates of FTIS (HR 0.73, 95% C.I. 0.69-0.77, p < 0.001). The risk for FTIS was significantly lower in subjects using PPI at any dose and for any time period compared to non-users (HR 0.9, 95% C.I. 0.85-0.96 for 7-48 yearly prescriptions and HR 0.51, 95% C.I. 0.46-0.55 for ≥49 yearly prescriptions). CONCLUSIONS: PPI use was associated with lower rates of FTIS in community-dwelling elders. Prospective large-scale studies are needed to fully elucidate the effect of PPI in this aging population.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Vida Independiente , Israel/epidemiología , Masculino , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
10.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 36(10): 2649-2658, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34114673

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Empirical therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection is limited by increasing antibiotic resistance and suboptimal eradication rates. Studies of the relative effectiveness of susceptibility-guided therapy have produced conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether susceptibility-guided therapy is superior to empirical therapy for H. pylori infection. METHODS: We searched articles listed in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science through May 25, 2020, RCTs comparing susceptibility-guided versus empirical therapy for H. pylori infection. Outcomes, including effectiveness and safety, were analyzed in a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Our final analysis included 16 studies, comprising 2374 patients who received susceptibility-guided therapy and 2451 patients who received empirical treatment. In previously untreated subjects, susceptibility-guided therapy was slightly more effective than empirical therapy (intent to treat risk ratio [RR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.21; P < 0.0001, I2  = 75%). Susceptibility-guided therapy was superior to first-line clarithromycin-based triple therapy only when clarithromycin resistance exceeded 20% (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.30; P = 0.001, I2  = 81%). Susceptibility-guided therapy was not more effective than empirical quadruple therapy (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.13; P = 0.759, I2  = 80%). Three RCTs were performed exclusively among previously treated subjects, and were highly heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that susceptibility-guided treatment may be slightly superior to empirical first line triple therapy. Susceptibility- guided treatment does not appear to be superior to empirical first-line quadruple therapy or empirical rescue therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/efectos adversos , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 36(6): 1392-1402, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33037845

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Due to the increasing resistance of Helicobacter pylori, there is a need for novel antibiotic treatment protocols. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to determine the effectiveness and safety of rifabutin triple therapy for H. pylori infection. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of prospective clinical trials with a treatment arm consisting of proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, and rifabutin and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS: Thirty-three prospective studies including 44 datasets were identified. Meta-analysis of four RCTs for rescue treatment found no difference between treatment groups (odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.437-1.791, I2  = 68.1%, P = 0.733). Only one RCT compared rifabutin therapy with control for first-line treatment of H. pylori infection (OR 3.78, 95% CI 2.44-5.87, P < 0.0001). Treatment was more likely to be successful in Asian versus non-Asian populations (81.0% vs 72.4%, P = 0.001) and when daily amoxicillin dose was ≥ 3000 mg or proton pump inhibitor dose was ≥ 80 mg or treatment duration was 14 days (80.6% vs 66.0%, P = 0.0001). The overall event rate for adverse effects was 24.8% (729/2937) (95% CI 0.23-0.26), and the pooled OR for adverse effects in the treatment versus control group was 0.93 (95% CI 0.50-1.75) (I2  = 79.76, P = 0.82). CONCLUSION: Evidence for the effectiveness of rifabutin for the first-line treatment of H. pylori infection in adults is limited, and studies comparing rifabutin with conventional first-line treatments are lacking.


Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Gastritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Gastritis/microbiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Rifabutina/administración & dosificación , Amoxicilina/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Rifabutina/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 23(1): 38-42, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33443341

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The antibiotic resistance profile of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is constantly changing. Up-to-date and reliable data for the effectiveness of first-line H. pylori treatment protocols are necessary to provide evidence-based best-practice guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness, compliance and safety of first-line treatment for H. pylori in Israel. METHODS: An observational, prospective, multicenter study was conducted in tertiary referral centers in Israel, as part of the European registry on H. pylori management (Hp-EuReg). H. pylori-infected patients were included from 2013 to March 2020. Data collected included demographics, clinical data, diagnostic tests, previous eradication attempts, current treatment, compliance, adverse events, and treatment outcome result. RESULTS: In total, 242 patients were registered, including 121 (50%) who received first-line therapy, 41% of these individuals received clarithromycin based triple therapy and 58.9% received a four-drug regimen. The overall effectiveness of first-line therapy was 85% and 86% by modified intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. The effectiveness of both sequential and concomitant therapies was 100% while clarithromycin-based triple therapy achieved an eradication rate of 79%. Treatment eradication was higher among patients who received high dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) compared to those treated with low dose PPI (100% vs. 81.5% respectively, P < 0.01). No difference in treatment effectiveness was found between 7-, 10-, and 14-day treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of clarithromycin-based triple therapy is suboptimal. First-line treatment of H. pylori infection should consist of four drugs, including high dose PPI, according to international guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Claritromicina/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/clasificación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Quimioterapia Combinada/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/epidemiología , Humanos , Israel/epidemiología , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Retratamiento/métodos , Retratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(10)2021 May 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34069715

RESUMEN

Intestinal metaplasia (IM) is an intermediate step in the progression from premalignant to malignant stages of gastric cancer (GC). The Popeye domain containing (POPDC) gene family encodes three transmembrane proteins, POPDC1, POPDC2, and POPDC3, initially described in muscles and later in epithelial and other cells, where they function in cell-cell interaction, and cell migration. POPDC1 and POPDC3 downregulation was described in several tumors, including colon and gastric cancers. We questioned whether IM-to-GC transition involves POPDC gene dysregulation. Gastric endoscopic biopsies of normal, IM, and GC patients were examined for expression levels of POPDC1-3 and several suggested IM biomarkers, using immunohistochemistry and qPCR. Immunostaining indicated lower POPDC1 and POPDC3 labeling in IM compared with normal tissues. Significantly lower POPDC1 and POPDC3 mRNA levels were measured in IM and GC biopsies and in GC-derived cell lines. The reduction in focal IM was smaller than in extensive IM that resembled GC tissues. POPDC1 and POPDC3 transcript levels were highly correlated with each other and inversely correlated with LGR5, OLFM4, CDX2, and several mucin transcripts. The association of POPDC1 and POPDC3 downregulation with IM-to-GC transition implicates a role in tumor suppression and highlights them as potential biomarkers for GC progression and prospective treatment targets.


Asunto(s)
Moléculas de Adhesión Celular/metabolismo , Proteínas Musculares/metabolismo , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Anciano , Moléculas de Adhesión Celular/genética , Línea Celular Tumoral , Movimiento Celular/genética , Supervivencia Celular/genética , Femenino , Mucosa Gástrica/patología , Expresión Génica/genética , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica/genética , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Metaplasia/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Musculares/genética , Lesiones Precancerosas/genética , Lesiones Precancerosas/metabolismo , Estudios Prospectivos , ARN Mensajero/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología
14.
Int J Cancer ; 146(6): 1532-1540, 2020 03 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31173655

RESUMEN

We evaluated time to colonoscopy after a positive guaiac-based fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) result and its association with the risk of overall colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced-stage disease at diagnosis. We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2011-2013) within the Clalit Health Services, Israel. Participants were patients between 50 and 74 years old with a positive gFOBT result who had follow-up colonoscopies within 24 months. The exposure was time to colonoscopy, and the main outcome measure was a risk for overall and advanced CRC (defined as Stages III-IV). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were adjusted for patient demographics and baseline risk factors. Of the 17,958 patients with positive gFOBT results (median age, 61 years [interquartile range, 56-67 years]; women, 52.2%), there were 685 cases of CRC and 156 cases of an advanced-stage disease diagnosed. The rate of cancer diagnosis at 0-3, 4-6, 7-9, 10-12 and 13-24 months was 3.9%, 2.5%, 3.5%, 4.2% and 7.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). Compared to colonoscopy follow-up within 0-3 months, risks for any CRC and advanced stage disease were higher for a follow-up of 12-24 months: OR, 1.97 (95% CI, 1.51-2.56) and 1.88 (95% CI, 1.43-2.46), respectively. For right-sided cancer (n = 194), an increased risk starts at 10 months, OR, 1.91 (95% CI 1.03-3.56). A result of 3-6 positive fields was significantly associated diagnosis of cancer (OR, 5.52; 95% CI, 4.71-6.46) and advanced stage disease (OR, 8.07; 95% CI, 5.74-11.36). Encouraging an early uptake of colonoscopy and targeting those with 10-24 months delay and a 3-6 positive fields is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Colonoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Guayaco , Humanos , Israel/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Sangre Oculta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
15.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 54(4): 333-337, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31305279

RESUMEN

GOALS: The goal of this study was to examine the impact of prior treatment with a nitroimidazole antibiotic on the success of Helicobacter pylori treatment. BACKGROUND: Prior nitroimidazole exposure may increase the likelihood of nitroimidazole-resistant H. pylori. Current H. pylori treatment guidelines recommend that, in the absence of susceptibility testing, patients with prior nitroimidazole exposure should not be treated with a nitroimidazole antibiotic. Data to support this recommendation are lacking. STUDY: We searched the Clalit Health Services database to identify subjects 25 to 60 years old who underwent a first-ever C-urea breath test between 2010 and 2015. Patients who underwent a previous H. pylori stool antigen test or gastroscopy were excluded. Pharmacy dispensation data were retrieved. RESULTS: A total of 1386 subjects (34.8% male individuals, age 40.7±10.7 y) received a nitroimidazole-containing regimen including 282 (20.4%) with prior nitroimidazole exposure. Successful eradication was achieved in 58.9% and 73.8% of subjects with and without prior nitroimidazole exposure, respectively (odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.67; P<0.0001). Nitroimidazole exposure adversely impacted the success of triple therapy with nitroimidazole, proton pump inhibitor, and amoxicillin or clarithromycin (39.4% vs. 63.4% and 54.4% vs. 73.6%, P<0.01, respectively), but not quadruple therapy. Following multivariate analysis, nitroimidazole exposure was significantly associated with eradication failure (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-2.50; P<0.0001). A greater time elapsed from nitroimidazole exposure, and a lower cumulative nitroimidazole dose were observed in subjects with successful eradication (P<0.0001 for both). CONCLUSION: Nitroimidazole exposure may adversely impact the success of nitroimidazole-based triple therapy, but not quadruple therapy. Clinicians should conduct a thorough patient drug history before administering empiric treatment for H. pylori infection.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Nitroimidazoles , Adulto , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nitroimidazoles/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Dig Dis ; 38(5): 408-414, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31910424

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Suppression of gastric acid secretion with proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) is an integral part of the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Esomeprazole has been shown to be superior to other PPIs when used in the context of triple therapy; however, comparative data for PPI efficacy in quadruple therapy are lacking. Current guidelines recommend H. pylori eradication with quadruple therapy in areas with high clarithromycin resistance. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether esomeprazole is more effective than other PPIs in the context of quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 25- to 60-year-old subjects with a positive 13C-urea breath test and no prior laboratory or endoscopic test for H. pylori infection. Pharmacy dispensation data were retrieved. RESULTS: A total of 7,896 subjects including 2,856 (36.2%) males, aged 40.4 ± 10.6 years, were identified. Of those, 78.1% received omeprazole, 20.1% received lansoprazole, 1.5% received esomeprazole, and 0.34% received pantoprazole together with antibiotics for H. pylori eradication. Esomeprazole was associated with a greater proportion of successful eradication (85.0 vs. 77.5%, esomeprazole vs. omeprazole, OR 1.64; 95% CI 0.99-2.72; p = 0.05). A nonsignificant trend favored esomeprazole over omeprazole among subjects receiving quadruple therapy (90.0 vs. 82.0%, respectively, OR 1.98; 95% CI 0.68-5.72; p = 0.16). Independent predictors of treatment success included older age and quadruple therapy. CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole is more beneficial than other PPIs for H. pylori eradication. Studies with larger subgroups are necessary to confirm our findings among subjects receiving quadruple therapy.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Pruebas Respiratorias , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 114(6): 900-906, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31095531

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) guidelines, including the recent ACG clinical guideline, recommend avoiding clarithromycin-based triple therapy (TT-C) among patients with past macrolide exposure. Data to support this recommendation are scarce, and the impact of macrolide exposure on quadruple therapies is unclear. We aimed to determine the impact of macrolide exposure on the efficacy of H. pylori treatment in our region. METHODS: We searched the Clalit Health Services database to identify subjects aged 25-60 years who underwent the first-ever C-urea breath test between 2010 and 2015. Patients who underwent a previous H. pylori stool antigen test or gastroscopy were excluded. Pharmacy dispensation data were retrieved. RESULTS: We identified 7,842 subjects (36.1% male individuals, age: 40.3 ± 10.5 years), including 3,062 (39.0%) with previous macrolide exposure. The efficacy of TT-C was 74.3% and 82.4% among subjects with and without macrolide exposure, respectively (odds ratio (OR), 0.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55-0.70; P < 0.0001). TT success was adversely affected by exposure to clarithromycin (55.5%; OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.24-0.39; P < 0.0001), roxythromycin (74.4%; OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.58-0.74; P < 0.0001), and erythromycin (73.9%; OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.89; P < 0.01) but not by exposure to azithromycin. A greater time elapsed because exposure to clarithromycin and roxythromycin was associated with higher eradication (OR, 1.007; 95% CI, 1.002-1.012; P < 0.01 and OR, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.002-1.006; P < 0.0001). A higher dose of clarithromycin and roxythromycin was associated with a lower likelihood of successful eradication (OR, 0.99988; 95% CI, 0.99982-0.99996; P < 0.01 and OR, 0.99981; 95% CI, 0.99971-0.99992; P < 0.001). The efficacies of sequential and concomitant therapies were 82.7% and 81.3%, respectively, and were not significantly affected by macrolide exposure. CONCLUSIONS: TT-C is adversely affected by previous exposure to macrolide antibiotics. Sequential, concomitant, and bismuth-based treatment may be preferred in this setting.


Asunto(s)
Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori/aislamiento & purificación , Macrólidos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Bismuto/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/patología , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Mucosa Intestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Mucosa Intestinal/microbiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
Helicobacter ; 24 Suppl 1: e12637, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31486237

RESUMEN

This review covers recent publications investigating the relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus, eosinophilic esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease (PUD), H pylori gastritis, and functional dyspepsia. In the area of gastroesophageal reflux disease, new data suggest that reflux may have a role in the transmission of H pylori infection. In addition to several observational studies, data on alterations in esophageal physiology in patients with H pylori infection are presented. Further evidence for the inverse relationship between H pylori infection and Barrett's esophagus is available in the form of a meta-analysis from the North American Barrett's and Esophageal Carcinoma Consortium. The relationship between H pylori infection and eosinophilic esophagitis remains uncertain. Although new data do not indicate a significantly lower prevalence of H pylori among patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, a meta-analysis showed a 37% reduced risk of eosinophilic esophagitis among H pylori-infected patients. Novel data are presented on the genetic variability of bacterial virulence factors and their relationship with PUD. We also report data on plasma biomarkers, which may detect progression to gastric cancer in H pylori-associated PUD. A new meta-analysis was published, which assessed the risk of PUD in low-dose aspirin users with H pylori infection. Finally, we report on the ongoing attempts to stratify patients with gastritis using endoscopic methods when compared to standard biopsy examination.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/etiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/patología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/epidemiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/patología , Helicobacter pylori/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Prevalencia
19.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 33(2): e22674, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30221401

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Threshold values for 13 C-urea breath test (13C-UBT) positivity may be affected by various sociodemographic, host, bacterial, and laboratory factors. Manufacturer recommended cutoffs for 13C-UBT assays may not be applicable in all settings. Optimizing 13C-UBT cutoffs may have profound public health ramifications. We aimed to determine the optimal threshold for 13C-UBT positivity in our population. METHODS: Consecutive test samples collected at our central laboratory from patients undergoing a first-time 13C-UBT between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015 were included. The difference between values at 30 minutes and at baseline (T30-T0) was expressed as delta over baseline (DOB). Cluster analysis was performed on the 13C-UBT test results to determine the optimal cutoff point with minimal interclass variance. RESULTS: Two lakhs thirty four thousand eight hundred thirty one patients (87 291 (37.2%) male, age 39.9 ± 19.9) underwent a first-time 13C-UBT, including 124 701 (53.1%) negative and 110 130 (46.9%) positive tests, using the manufacturer-recommended cutoff of 3.5 DOB. Cluster analysis determined an optimized cutoff of 2.74 DOB, representing an additional 2180 (0.93%) positive subjects who had been previously categorized as negative according to the manufacturer-specified cutoff of 3.5 DOB. Mean positive and negative DOB values were 19.54 ± 14.95 and 0.66 ± 0.51, respectively. The cutoffs for male and female subjects were 2.23 and 3.05 DOB, respectively. Threshold values for <45-year-olds, 45-60-year-olds and >60-year-olds were 2.67, 2.55, and 2.93 DOB, respectively. Of the 2180 (0.93%) patients with DOB 2.73-3.49, 289 (13.3%) performed a subsequent 13C-UBT and 140 (48.4%) remained positive when tested at 20.3 ± 14.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: Major referral laboratories should optimize threshold values for 13C-UBT positivity for their geographical location. Different cutoff values should be applied for male and female subjects.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Respiratorias/métodos , Isótopos de Carbono/análisis , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Helicobacter pylori , Urea/análisis , Adulto , Isótopos de Carbono/química , Análisis por Conglomerados , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Infecciones por Helicobacter/metabolismo , Humanos , Laboratorios , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Urea/química , Adulto Joven
20.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 21(3): 194-197, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30905106

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Temporal trends in the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the Arab and Jewish populations in Israel have been poorly described. OBJECTIVES: To compare the annual incidence and prevalence rates of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in the Arab and Jewish populations in Israel between the years 2003 and 2008. METHODS: We applied a common case identification algorithm to the Clalit Health Services database to both determine trends in age-adjusted incidence and prevalence rates for IBD in both populations during this period and estimate the burden of IBD in Israel. RESULTS: The incidence of CD in the Arab population increased from 3.1/100,000 in 2003 to 10.6/100,000 person-years in 2008, compared with a decrease in the Jewish population from 14.3/100,000 to 11.7/100,000 person-years for the same period. The incidence of UC in the Arab population increased from 4.1/100,000 in 2003 to 5.0/100,000 person-years in 2008, a low but stable rate, compared with a decrease from 16.4/100,000 to 9.5/100,000 person-years for the same time period in the Jewish population. The prevalence of both diseases increased due to the accumulation of incident cases but remained much lower among Arabs. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the factors underlying the differences in incidence and prevalence of IBD in the Jewish and Arab populations may shed light on the genetic and environmental factors associated with these diseases.


Asunto(s)
Árabes , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/etnología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Judíos , Algoritmos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Israel/epidemiología , Masculino , Prevalencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA