Eosinopenia is a reliable marker of severe disease and unfavourable outcome in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Viral pneumonia is the most relevant clinical presentation of COVID-19 which may lead to severe acute respiratory syndrome and even death. Eosinopenia was often noticed in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, but its role is poorly investigated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and eosinopenia. METHODS: We revised the records of consecutive patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to our ER-COVID-19 area in order to compare clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without eosinopenia. We considered the following clinical outcomes: 4-weeks survival; need for intensive respiratory support; and hospital discharge. RESULTS: Out of first 107 consecutive patients with pneumonia and a positive COVID-19 nasopharyngeal swab, 75 patients showed undetectable eosinophil count (absolute eosinopenia). At 4 weeks, 38 patients (38.4%) had required intensive respiratory treatment, 25 (23.4%) deceased and 42 (39.2%) were discharged. Compared with patients without absolute eosinopenia, patients with absolute eosinopenia showed higher need of intensive respiratory treatment (49.3% vs 13.3%, P < .001), higher mortality (30.6% vs 6.2%, P .006) and lower rate of hospital discharge (28% vs 65.6%, P < .001). Binary logistic regression analyses including neutrophil, lymphocyte, eosinophil, basophil and monocyte counts showed that absolute eosinopenia was an independent factor associated with 4-weeks mortality, need for intensive respiratory support and hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Absolute eosinopenia is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and might be used as a marker to discriminate patients with unfavourable prognosis.

Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic incidentalomas. An overview.

AIM: The aim of this study is to describe the incidence, imaging characteristics and pathological features of pancreatic incidentalomas. Moreover, surgical indications are discussed according to the nature and location of the neoplasms. BACKGROUND: Pancreatic incidental lesions are more commonly diagnosed, due to the widespread of high quality cross sectional imaging. These lesions can be cystic or solid, benign, pre-malignant or already malignant and they cover a wide spectrum of histological diagnosis. Cystic lesions are more commonly benign or at least pre-malignant. Surgery should be reserved in case of unexpected changes in aspect during follow-up or for large cysts (>3 cm). Among solid pancreatic incidentalomas, ductal adenocarcinoma is the most common diagnosis, followed by neuroendocrine tumors. Surgical treatment of pancreatic incidentaloma depends on the location of the tumor: a Whipple's procedure should be performed for neoplasms of the head, while distal pancreatectomy is indicated for body and tail lesions. Pancreatic surgery is still delicate and burdened by serious complications. Both procedures can be performed with minimally-invasive technique which is connected to lower complications rate but, at present, they have shown no advantages in terms of mortality and oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic incidentalomas are becoming more and more common but when and how to operate them is still subject of debate. Precise criteria about treatment strategy are still lacking and definite guidelines are needed to clarify the best approach. KEY WORDS: Incidentaloma, Laparoscopy, Pancreatic tumors, Surgery.