Is Ovarian Cancer Being Managed According to Clinical Guidelines? Evidence From a Population-Based Clinical Audit.

BACKGROUND: In the northwestern Italian region of Piedmont, current statistics on hospitalizations show that surgical treatment for ovarian cancer (OC) is taking place in many small hospitals, as opposed to a more centralized approach. A population-based clinical audit was promoted to investigate whether OC is being managed according to clinical guidelines, identify determinants of lack of adherence to guidelines, and evaluate the association between adherence to guidelines and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Residents diagnosed with OC in 2009 were identified in the regional hospital discharge records database. All hospitalizations within 2 years from diagnosis were reviewed. Patients were classified according to their initial pattern of care, defined as "with curative intent" (CIPC) if including debulking surgery aimed at maximal cytoreduction. Adherence to guidelines for surgery and chemotherapy and the effects of this adherence on OC survival were investigated with logistic regression and Cox models. RESULTS: The final study sample consisted of 344 patients with OC, 215 (62.5%) of whom received CIPC. Increasing age, comorbidities, and metastases were negatively associated with receiving CIPC. In the CIPC group, surgical treatment was adherent to guidelines in 35.2%, whereas chemotherapy was adherent in 87.8%. Surgical treatment that was adherent to guidelines [hazard ratio (HR), 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-1.15] and absence of residual tumor (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94) were associated with better survival in the CIPC group, and chemotherapy that was adherent to guidelines was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of death (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Results support the need to reorganize the clinical pathway of patients with OC in the Piedmont Region and the need for better adherence to current guidelines.

Percutaneous cholecystostomy and acute cholecystitis: how, when and why.

AIM: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is one of the most frequent pathologies treated in urgency. An immediate surgical intervention for frail patients who are ineligible for surgery as a result of severe co-morbidities is questionable. The aim of this study is to investigate the safety and the management of percutaneous cholecistostomy (PC) in high-risk surgical patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period of time January 2015 - May 2021 we observed 1105 patients admitted with acute cholecystitis in our Department. In the group with severe cholecystitis (160 patients, 14.48%), 137 (12.39%) were submitted to immediate surgery, and 23 (4.8%) were treated with PC. All these patients were non-responding to conservative management. Initially, we used PC as a definitive treatment; from the second half of 2018 PC was implemented as a bridge to surgery. RESULTS: Clinically, symptoms resolved in all the 23 patients. Mortality was nihil and no complication was recorded. PC was used as definitive treatment in 14 cases, wheres in 9 patients PC was intended as a-bridge-to-surgery treatment, and was followed by cholecystectomy. DISCUSSION: 2017 guidelines, of World Society of Emergency Surgery recommended PC as a safe and effective management of AC in patients with multiple comorbidities. In this group of patients PC achieves a prompt resolution of clinical symptoms and is superior to conservative management. There are no absolute contraindications to PC. CONCLUSIONS: PC is a safe and less invasive treatment of AC for patients with prohibitive surgical risk. It may be used as bridge to surgery to switch high-risk for moderate-risk patients, more suitable for a safe and definitive surgical treatment. KEY WORDS: Acute cholecystitis, High-risk surgical patients, Percutaneous cholecystostomy.

Blunt splenic trauma 2.0. State of the art.

AIM: To evaluate the advantages and potential risks of "Non Operative Management" (NOM) in order to redifine the technique into the true gold standard and to extend its application to the emergency care of blunt splenic trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blunt trauma cases treated between 2004 and 2019 have been retrospectively evaluated. Every patient has been distributed at the hospital admission in 3 different groups: stable, unstable and transient responder according to ATLS. NOM exclusion criteria were only introduced in 2013: we therefore assessed datas before and after this year. RESULTS: Over a period of 15 years, approximately 6 patients per year were admitted to our hospital with a spleen injury. After the introduction of the NOM protocol in 2013, the proportion of splenectomies progressively decreased. This rate also increased for higher injury grades. The overall number of patients who underwent NOM was 40 (43%), but while between 2004 and 2012 only 25% of patients were managed with NOM, between 2013 and 2019 70.3% of patients were treated with NOM. CONCLUSIONS: Nowadays any blunt splenic trauma could, theoretically, undergo NOM, regardless of the grade of the injury; the only strict criteria for OM should be haemodynamic instability; this assumption depends, of course, on hospital's human and technological resources. KEY WORDS: Non operative management, Splenic trauma, Splenectomy.

Ideal level of ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery. An old debate for a current surgical approach.

AIM: The ideal level of ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) during resection for colorectal cancer is still controversial. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the real advantages and, above all, the adequacy of oncological staging after a low ligation of the IMA with additional LN retrieval in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2013 and December 2020, 157 patients who underwent curative resection of a primary colorectal tumor were retrospectively included: 64 patients underwent high ligation of the IMA and 93 patients underwent low ligation of the IMA with additional LN retrieval. Results - Mean number of lymphnodes harvested (the median number of harvested nodes was 16.2 in "high ligation" group vs 15.4 in "low ligation" group), operation time (272 minutes vs 293 minutes), intraoperative blood loss (40 cc vs 53 cc) and recovery time (median postoperative hospitalization was 6.4 days in both groups) were not significantly different between the groups. DISCUSSION: High ligation of the IMA preserves an adequate length of the colon to perform a successful anastomosis and facilitates apical LN dissection. However, it may be associated with an increased risk of anastomotic leakage. Low ligation of the IMA is less invasive and it is associated with a better preservation of genitourinary function and, futhermore, with an accurate oncological clearance. CONCLUSION: Low ligation of the IMA with additional LN retrieval might be an oncologically safe and less invasive procedure in the surgical management of patients with colorectal cancer. KEY WORDS: Colorectal cancer, Inferior mesenteric artery, Ligation.