Ultrasound is safe and highly specific for confirmation of proper gastrostomy tube replacement in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Gastrostomy tube (GT) dislodgement is a common cause of Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) visits. Postoperative patients and those who require stoma dilation are more likely to have complications during emergent replacement. Although incorrect replacement can cause significant morbidity overall, the occurrence is infrequent. Contrast injection of the GT is considered the standard for confirming proper placement. Case reports in both pediatric and adult patients suggest that ultrasound can be used to confirm proper replacement. The objective of the present study was to assess the utility of ultrasound to confirm GT placement in pediatric patients most at risk for complications from incorrect replacement. METHODS: This is a non-randomized cohort pilot trial to determine the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound to confirm proper replacement of a GT in a Pediatric Emergency Department. RESULTS: We enrolled 55 pediatric subjects, of which 50 had ultrasound imaging after GT replacement in the PED prior to contrast injection. Ultrasound was found to have 96% sensitivity and 100% specificity for confirming GT placement. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound is a safe and reliable confirmatory study to confirm GT placement in pediatric patients, especially those at highest risk of complications from incorrect placement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

The use of an emergency physician-directed bedside ultrasound examination to clarify a diagnosis in an 8-year-old boy with chronic abdominal pain.

Abdominal pain is a common presenting complaint to the emergency department. Often, patients with chronic, intermittent histories of abdominal pain with multiple visits to medical providers find it difficult to be taken seriously. We describe a patient with a history of episodic abdominal pain who was found to have intermittent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after a timely ultrasound examination by the treating emergency physician.

Omental infarction: preoperative diagnosis and laparoscopic management in children.

BACKGROUND: Omental infarction (OI) is an unusual, poorly characterized cause of abdominal pain in children and is often mistaken for appendicitis preoperatively. We present our experience with this disease process over a 5-year period to identify preoperative factors to aid in timely diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all children that had OI and underwent laparoscopic omentectomy from November 2004 to June 2009. RESULTS: Ten patients with the diagnosis of OI were identified. OI occurred in 9 boys and 1 girl, with a median age at presentation of 8.5 years (range, 7-11). Median body mass index at presentation was 23.7 (range, 17-29), with 1 child categorized as healthy weight for age, 1 child as overweight for age, and 5 children as obese for age, based on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. All patients complained of right-sided abdominal pain; 4 patients complained of predominantly right-upper quadrant (RUQ) pain, 3 patients of right-lower quadrant (RLQ) pain, and 3 of combined RUQ/RLQ pain. On examination, 6 patients had RUQ tenderness and 4 patients had RLQ tenderness. The median duration of symptoms prior to seeking medical attention was 3 days (range, 2-7). All patients underwent computed tomography and the preoperative diagnosis of OI was established in 9 of 10 cases. Operative time was 48 ± 14 minutes. All patients underwent resection of the infarcted omentum; 2 patients underwent concurrent appendectomy. Median length of stay was 2 days (range, 2-4). CONCLUSIONS: OI occurs predominantly, but not exclusively, in obese preadolescent males. OI can be reliably distinguished from appendicitis on preoperative history, physical examination, laboratory analysis, and imaging. Laparoscopic omentectomy results in prompt resolution of symptoms and discharge.

C-reactive protein in the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis.

OBJECTIVE: In this prospective, observational study, we determined whether serum C-reactive protein (CRP) correlated with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) stages II and III. We hypothesized that serial CRP measurement if used as an adjunct to abdominal radiographs would improve the identification of infants with NEC. METHODS: Serum CRP level was measured every 12 hours for 3 measurements and, when abnormal, once daily. When clinical signs persisted and the initial abdominal radiographs were abnormal, follow-up radiographs were obtained. RESULTS: Of 241 infants who were evaluated for gastrointestinal signs, 11 had ileus or benign pneumatosis intestinalis with persistently normal CRP; gastrointestinal manifestations resolved within 48 hours, antibiotics were discontinued in <48 hours, and feedings were restarted early without complications. Fifty-five infants had NEC stages II and III; all had abnormal CRP regardless of their blood culture results. In infants with stage II NEC, CRP returned to normal at a mean of 9 days except in those who developed complications such as stricture or abscess formation. CONCLUSIONS: In infants with suspected NEC, normal serial CRP values would favor aborted antibiotic therapy and early resumption of feedings. CRP becomes abnormal in both stage II and stage III NEC. In infants with NEC, persistently elevated CRP after initiation of appropriate medical management suggests associated complications, which may require surgical intervention.