Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Oral Sci ; 130(4): e12884, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35781706

RESUMEN

This study assessed whether systemic antibiotics are beneficial or harmful in patients who present with an acute periodontal abscess or pericoronitis, with or without systemic involvement, and, if antibiotics are beneficial, which type, dosage, and duration are the most effective. Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were screened from 1948 up to 1 April 2022 for systematic reviews, randomised clinical trials (RCTs), and other studies. Dedicated websites were consulted for systematic reviews, clinical practice guidelines, and health technology assessments on the topic. Outcomes of interest comprised tooth survival, swelling, pain, tooth mobility, periodontal probing depth, suppuration, adverse effects, quality of life measurements, and medication required for pain relief. Overall, five guidelines, seven systematic reviews, 15 RCTs, and 34 other studies were identified and selected for full-text assessment, but none of them fulfilled the inclusion criteria. At present there is no single randomised or non-randomised controlled trial assessing the harms and clinical effectiveness of systemic antibiotics in adults with a periodontal abscess or pericoronitis.


Asunto(s)
Pericoronitis , Absceso Periodontal , Adulto , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Dolor , Pericoronitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Absceso Periodontal/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
J Evid Based Dent Pract ; 22(2): 101706, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35718435

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: At present there is no clear consensus whether systemic antibiotics should be administered at replantation of an avulsed permanent tooth. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the evidence on effectiveness and harms of the administration of systemic antibiotics at replantation of avulsed permanent teeth. METHODS: In August 2020 a systematic literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, for systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational controlled studies in MEDLINE, PreMedline, Embase, and the Cochrane databases. The population of interest were medically fit patients with a replanted avulsed tooth. Main outcomes were tooth survival, periodontal healing, pulpal revascularization as well as (severe) adverse events. These outcomes were compared in patients who did and who did not receive systemic antibiotics. The GRADE methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS: The search yielded no RCTs, and none of the 7 included observational studies had the prime intent to investigate the effectiveness or harms of antibiotics. According to GRADE, the overall level of evidence was very low. The meta-analyses showed non-significant associations between the administration of systemic antibiotics on the one hand and tooth survival (1 study, RR = 3.70, 95% CI: 0.63-21.69), periodontal healing (meta-analysis of 6 studies RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.80-1.45), and pulpal revascularization (meta-analysis of 2 studies, RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.05-2.41) on the other hand. CONCLUSION: Currently there is no high-quality evidence to support the use of systemic antibiotics at replantation of avulsed permanent teeth. Hence, their routine use cannot be recommended in medically fit patients. Well-designed RCTs should be a priority on the research agenda.


Asunto(s)
Avulsión de Diente , Diente , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Dentición Permanente , Humanos , Avulsión de Diente/cirugía , Reimplante Dental/métodos
3.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 182(11): 1127-1134, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34192688

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide, polyvalent immunoglobulin (Ig) use is rising. Together with the limited supply, this puts pressure on Ig availability. A clear overview on a country's usage pattern helps in forecasting future needs. This research aims to provide an overview of Ig use in Belgium on the different indications, including an estimation of off-label use. METHODS: Multiple data sources were used. Existing claims data were explored for reimbursed Ig use between 2010 and 2018. General 2018 sales data from the firms were compared to the reimbursed use to serve as a proxy for off-label use. Indication-specific information was retrieved via a proxy: diagnostic codes available during day-care and inpatient hospitalization. RESULTS: In 2018, 7,556 patients had reimbursed Ig. The most prevalent indication, both in terms of patient numbers and volume, was primary immunodeficiency (PID). In Belgian hospitals, the currently reimbursed indications represented 84.4% of patients (PID [≈35%], secondary immunodeficiency [SID] [≈21%], primary immune thrombocytopenia [≈10%], chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy [CIDP] [≈8%], Guillain-Barre syndrome [≈6%], Kawasaki [≈2%], streptococcal toxic shock [≈2%] and multiple motor neuropathy [≈1%]), and 82.4% of Ig use (predominantly PID [≈33%] and CIDP [≈21%]). Although no direct data on off-label use were available, crude estimates derived from indirect sources showed a proportion of around 15.4%. CONCLUSION: Our research offers the first comprehensive overview on Ig use in Belgium, including a detailed description of reimbursed use, as well as approximations to off-label use. In view of increasing pressure on Ig availability, better understanding Ig needs and trends, would benefit from an effective indication-specific national registry system (ideally covering both reimbursed and nonreimbursed use).


Asunto(s)
Inmunoglobulinas/uso terapéutico , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Bélgica , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado
4.
Clin Oral Investig ; 25(5): 2537-2544, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33791867

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to assess (1) whether systemic antibiotics are beneficial or harmful in healthy children who present with an odontogenic abscess in the primary dentition with or without systemic involvement and (2) if antibiotics are beneficial, which type, dosage and duration are the most effective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) were screened from 1948 up to August 2020. No filters with respect to study design were applied. Outcomes of interest included pain, swelling, pain relief, adverse effects, signs of infection, quality-of-life measurements and medication required for pain relief. RESULTS: Altogether, 352 titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility; of these, 19 were selected for full text assessment. All were excluded because none of them fulfilled the inclusion criteria and addressed the (adjunctive) use of antibiotics in children who present with an odontogenic abscess in the primary dentition. CONCLUSIONS: At present, there is no single randomised or non-randomised clinical study evaluating the effectiveness and harms of systemic antibiotics administered in children who present with an odontogenic abscess in the primary dentition. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There is no clinical evidence to support nor to refute the use of antibiotics in children who present with an odontogenic abscess in the primary dentition without signs of local spread or systemic involvement. Given this lack of scientific evidence, the use of antibiotics cannot be recommended in these children. Well-designed clinical trials are indicated to fully understand the impact and necessity of antibiotics in these situations.


Asunto(s)
Absceso , Antibacterianos , Diente Primario , Absceso/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Humanos
5.
Hum Psychopharmacol ; 30(2): 85-93, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25639725

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Chronic use of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs (BZD/Zs) has been linked to cognitive decline. In this one-year prospective cohort study, we explored the impact of chronic BZD/Z use on cognitive decline compared to nonusers. METHODS: In cognitively capable BZD/Z users and nonusers in 10 Belgian nursing homes, we investigated cognition with the MiniMentalStateExamination(MMSE) at baseline and one year. A decrease of ≥ 4 points on the MMSE (clinically relevant decrease) was used in multiple logistic regression. We collected baseline demographics, functional, psychometric and social characteristics potentially influencing cognition. RESULTS: In both the 131 BZD/Z users and 95 nonusers, the cognition decreased significantly over time, but without significant difference between the groups. Clinically relevant decrease was present in 34% BZD/Z users and 27% nonusers (NS). Controlled for age, gender, education and BZD/Z use, the significant risk factors for clinically relevant cognitive decline were depression, hearing and functional impairment. Frequent reading was associated with less MMSE decrease. Our findings could not demonstrate with statistical significance that BZD/Z use was associated with fast cognitive decline. The risk factors for fast decline were depression, hearing and functional impairment, and the absence of a reading attitude. In addition, BZD/Z use and depression were associated, indicating a complex relationship.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Trastornos del Conocimiento/inducido químicamente , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Casas de Salud , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bélgica , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Psicometría , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/tratamiento farmacológico , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
6.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 70(10): 1251-60, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25098683

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Guidelines discourage chronic benzodiazepines and related Z drugs (BZD/Zs) for sleep problems. However, prevalence among nursing home residents remains high. Discontinuing these drugs is widely recommended but seems difficult to implement. The aim of our study was to evaluate the overall feasibility in the nursing home, in terms of willingness towards discontinuation and success rate at 8 months, together with the impact on withdrawal symptoms, change in sleep quality, quality of life and medication use. METHODS: In a convenience sample of five nursing homes (823 residents), we included cognitively competent residents with chronic BZD/Z use for insomnia. We investigated sleep quality [with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)], quality of life (EQ-5D) and withdrawal symptoms [Benzodiazepine Withdrawal Symptom Questionnaire (BWSQ)]. Success rate was analysed with survival analysis. RESULTS: Of the 135 eligible residents, both general physician (GP) and resident were willing to initiate discontinuation in 38 residents. Reasons for refusing to initiate discontinuation among GPs was the unmotivated patient and among residents the reluctance towards change. At 8 months, 66.0% were successful discontinuers, with the subjective PSQI component evolving favourably (p = 0.013) and a decreasing number of midnight awakenings (p = 0.041). In the relapse group (n = 13), the quality of life decreased (p = 0.012), with mainly an increase of problems with activities and pain/discomfort. In both groups, the withdrawal symptoms, functionality and medication use did not change. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of chronic BZD/Z use is feasible in the nursing home setting without noticeable withdrawal symptoms, without a switch in medication use, without detrimental effect on quality of life and with a positive effect on the self-perceived sleep quality.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Casas de Salud , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 50(3): 107978, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38306864

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Different sets of quality indicators are used to identify areas for improvement in ovarian cancer care. This study reports transparently on how (surgical) indicators were measured and on the association between hospital volume and indicator results in Belgium, a country setting without any centralisation of ovarian cancer care. METHODS: From the population-based Belgian Cancer Registry, patients with a borderline malignant or invasive epithelial ovarian tumour diagnosed between 2014 and 2018 were selected and linked to health insurance and vital status data (n = 5119). Thirteen quality indicators on diagnosis and treatment were assessed and the association with hospital volume was analysed using logistic regression adjusted for case-mix. RESULTS: The national results for most quality indicators on diagnosis and systemic therapy were around the predefined target value. Other indicators showed results below the benchmark: genetic testing, completeness of staging surgery, lymphadenectomy with at least 20 pelvic/para-aortic lymph nodes removed, and timely start of chemotherapy after surgery (within 42 days). Ovarian cancer care in Belgium is dispersed over 100 hospitals. Lower volume hospitals showed poorer indicator results compared to higher volume hospitals for lymphadenectomy, staging, timely start of chemotherapy and genetic testing. In addition, surgery for advanced stage tumours was performed less often in lower volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The indicators that showed poorer results on a national level were also those with poorer results in lower-volume hospitals compared to higher-volume hospitals, consequently supporting centralisation. International benchmarking is hampered by different (surgical) definitions between countries and studies.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Bélgica/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Estadificación de Neoplasias
8.
Eur J Cancer ; 195: 113402, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37922631

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To study the association between hospital volume and outcomes in patients with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: This study included 3988 patients diagnosed with invasive EOC between 2014 and 2018, selected from the population-based database of the Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR), and coupled with health insurance and vital status data. The associations between hospital volume and observed survival since diagnosis were assessed with Cox proportional hazard models, while volume associations with 30-day post-operative mortality and complicated recovery were evaluated using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Treatment for EOC was very dispersed with half of the 100 centres treating fewer than six patients per year. The median survival of patients treated in centres with the highest-volume quartile was 2.5 years longer than in those with the lowest-volume quartile (4.2 years versus 1.7 years). When taking the case-mix of hospitals into account, patients treated in the lowest volume centres had a 47% higher hazard to die than patients treated in the highest volume centres (HR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.11-1.93, p = 0.006) over the first five years after incidence. A similar association was found when focussing on the surgical volume of the hospitals and considering only operated patients with invasive EOC. Lastly, the 30-day post-operative mortality decreased significantly with increasing surgical volume. CONCLUSIONS: The large dispersion of care and expertise within Belgium and the volume-outcome associations observed in this study support the implementation of the concentration of care for patients with invasive EOC in reference centres.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Bélgica/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Hospitales , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
9.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 68(5): 833-44, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22189673

RESUMEN

AIM: (1) To describe the prevalence of benzodiazepine use in Belgian nursing homes, with specific attention to indications and dosages. (2) To compare actual and recommended dosages of benzodiazepines for anxiety and insomnia. (3) To explore the risk profile for chronic benzodiazepine use in institutionalised older adults. METHODS: Medication charts of 1,730 residents from 76 nursing homes in Belgium were collected and analysed, using the ATC classification. Drug name, indication and daily dosage were recorded. From authoritative international sources, we extracted for each drug and each indication a daily dosage recommended not to be exceeded in older adults for comparison with observed actual dosages. RESULTS: Among the chronic benzodiazepine or z-drug (BZD/Z) users (50% of the residents), the leading indication was 'insomnia' (59% of the users) followed by 'anxiety' (17%) and 'unrest' (10%). In the chronic prescriptions of BZD/Zs indicated for insomnia, the actual daily dose exceeded the geriatric upper limit in 95% of lormetazepam prescriptions, 82% of zolpidem, 78% of zopiclone and 35% of lorazepam prescriptions. For anxiety, daily doses also exceeded the limit but not to the same extent. Multivariate analysis showed BZD/Z use was positively associated with pain (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.27-1.97), constipation (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.16-1.76) and depression (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.35-2.08). Residents with dementia were less likely to receive a BZD/Z (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48-0.74). CONCLUSION: Efforts to reduce the use of BZD/Zs in nursing homes should concentrate on insomnia, with interventions aimed at reducing too high prevalence of chronic use and too high daily dosages in this indication.


Asunto(s)
Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Ansiedad/tratamiento farmacológico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Utilización de Medicamentos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiolíticos/administración & dosificación , Ansiolíticos/efectos adversos , Bélgica , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Estreñimiento/inducido químicamente , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Hogares para Ancianos , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Casas de Salud , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Agitación Psicomotora/tratamiento farmacológico
10.
Drugs Aging ; 31(9): 677-82, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25145751

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Chronic use of benzodiazepines and z-drugs (BZD/Zs), the most commonly used symptomatic treatment for sleep problems, is discouraged because of the unproven long-term effectiveness. In this study, we evaluated 1-year evolution of subjective sleep quality of chronic BZD/Z users compared with nonusers. METHODS: All cognitively competent residents from ten Belgian nursing homes were screened and compiled in a group of chronic BZD/Z users or nonusers, based on the medication chart. We collected demographic, functional and psychometric characteristics (depressive symptoms with the 8-item Geriatric Depression Scale), sleep parameters (with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index-PSQI) and medication use. We analysed evolution of sleep quality with nonparametric statistics. Associations with worsening of sleep quality were analysed with linear regression. RESULTS: We collected data of 131 BZD/Z users and 95 nonusers. The mean age in both groups was 85 years and 77 % was female. Over a period of 1 year, the PSQI score evolved from 5.2 to 5.8 (p = 0.035) in the BZD/Z users, and from 4.3 to 4.7 (p = 0.078) in the nonusers. Though the mean deterioration in 1 year did not differ significantly between both groups, the BZD/Z users had a significantly worse sleep quality compared with nonusers at both time points. Depressive symptoms were significantly associated with worsening sleep quality (ß = -0.243, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sleep quality in chronic BZD/Z users significantly decreased over 1 year and was significantly worse than in nonusers at the end of this period. This study suggests that using BZD/Zs chronically does not maintain or improve sleep quality. Depressive symptoms are an important factor in the deterioration of sleep quality.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bélgica , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/complicaciones , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Casas de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/complicaciones , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 15(5): 313-25, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24767432
12.
Sleep Med ; 14(7): 614-21, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23692988

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We aim to describe subjective sleep quality among long-term users of benzodiazepines (BZDs) in Belgian nursing homes, to compare it to nonusers, and to investigate determinants of poor sleep quality. METHODS: All mentally competent residents from 10 nursing homes were screened and compiled in a group of long-term BZD users or in a group of nonusers based on the medication chart. We collected demographic, functional, and medication characteristics and global and specific sleep parameters using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Linear regression was used to investigate which parameters were associated with sleep quality. RESULTS: Of the 300 residents, 178 (59%) were long-term BZD users and 122 were nonusers. The 2 groups did not differ in demographic and functional characteristics (mean age, 85.5 y; range, 57-100; 75% women). The users reported significantly more difficulties with falling asleep, had more midnight awakenings, felt less rested in the morning, and had a poorer self-perceived sleep quality compared to nonusers. Sleep duration and time to fall asleep did not differ. The self-perceived sleep quality was mainly determined by difficulties during initiation of sleep. After controlling for demographic, medication, and functional characteristics, BZD use remained strongly associated with poor sleep (r=0.173; P=.003), and a study centre effect (differences among nursing homes) was observed (r=0.229; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support long-term effectiveness of BZDs; long-term users slept more poorly than nonusers and were even more outspoken in users of long-acting BZDs. In future longitudinal comparative studies of sleep quality, unexplained variability needs further assessment with medical, psychologic, and institutional parameters.


Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Casas de Salud , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/inducido químicamente , Sueño/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología
13.
Drugs Aging ; 29(9): 759-69, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23018612

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since antidepressants are prescribed for multiple indications, the use of an antidepressant cannot be equated with a diagnosis of depression. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the quality of antidepressant prescribing in Belgian nursing homes, with a critical evaluation of indications and dosages, to see whether depression was appropriately treated in terms of drug choice, the indications for which antidepressants were being prescribed and whether there was underdosing. METHODS: This analysis was based on data obtained in the Prescribing in Homes for the Elderly in Belgium (PHEBE) study, a cross-sectional, descriptive study of a representative, stratified, random sample of 1,730 residents from 76 Belgian nursing homes. The PHEBE study investigated overall drug utilization in Belgian nursing homes in 2006. Clinical and medication data for the present study were obtained from this study. A 28-item checklist of clinical conditions was designed ad hoc for the PHEBE study and sent to the residents' general practitioners (GPs) to collect clinical information. We copied the residents' medication charts, classified the drugs using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system codes and transferred the drug names and dosages into a database. Information on indications was retrospectively obtained from the GPs, so that we could link the indication to each medication. Minimum effective doses (MEDs) of antidepressants to treat major depression were obtained from the literature to assess underdosing. RESULTS: The overall use of antidepressants in nursing homes was 39.5 % (95 % CI 37.2, 41.8). The physicians classified 34.2 % (95 % CI 32.0, 36.4) of the residents as having depression, and 80.9 % of these patients were treated with an antidepressant. Indications among the single antidepressant users (n = 551) were depression (66.2 %), insomnia (13.4 %), anxiety (6.2 %) and neuropathic pain (1.6 %). In the indication of depression, 74.8 % used a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), predominantly citalopram, sertraline and escitalopram. Venlafaxine was used by 10.7 % of the residents. Dosages for these antidepressants were equal to or higher than the MED. But when trazodone, amitriptyline or mirtazapine were used to treat depression, respectively, 92.3, 55.5 and 44.5 % of prescribed dosages were below the MED. In the indication of insomnia, most of the time, trazodone (90.5 %) or mirtazapine (5.4 %) were used, and in lower dosages than those required for depression treatment (

Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Casas de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bélgica , Estudios Transversales , Demencia/complicaciones , Depresión/complicaciones , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
14.
Ageing Res Rev ; 11(1): 78-86, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21856452

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Within the treatment of dementia, management of behavioural and psychological symptoms (BPSD) is a complex component. PURPOSE: We wanted to offer a pragmatic synthesis of existing specific practice recommendations for managing BPSD, based on agreement among systematically appraised dementia guidelines. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a systematic search in MEDLINE and guideline organisation databases, supplemented by a hand search of web sites. STUDY SELECTION: Fifteen retrieved guidelines were eligible for quality appraisal by the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation instrument (AGREE), performed by 2 independent reviewers. DATA EXTRACTION: From the 5 included guidelines, 18 specific practice recommendations for BPSD were extracted and compared for their level of evidence and strength. DATA SYNTHESIS: No agreement was found among dementia guidelines for the majority of specific practice recommendations with regard to non-pharmacological interventions, although these were recommended as first-line treatment. Pharmacological specific practice recommendations were proposed as second-line treatment, with agreement for the use of a selection of antipsychotics based on strong supporting evidence, but with guidance for timely discontinuation. LIMITATIONS: The appraisal of the level of agreement between guidelines for each specific practice recommendation was complicated by variation in grading systems, and was performed with criteria developed a posteriori. CONCLUSION: Despite the limited number of recommendations for which agreement was found, guidelines did agree on careful antipsychotic use for BPSD. Adverse events might outweigh the supporting evidence of efficacy, weakening the recommendation. More pivotal trials on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions, as well as guidelines specifically focusing on BPSD, are needed.


Asunto(s)
Síntomas Conductuales/terapia , Demencia/psicología , Demencia/terapia , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Trastornos Neurocognitivos/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Síntomas Conductuales/etiología , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Demencia/complicaciones , Psiquiatría Geriátrica/métodos , Psiquiatría Geriátrica/normas , Psiquiatría Geriátrica/tendencias , Humanos , Trastornos Neurocognitivos/etiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/tendencias
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA