Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Anesth Analg ; 129(1): 141-146, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30004933

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Virtually all anesthesiologists care for patients who sustain traumatic injuries; however, the frequency with which operative anesthesia care is provided to this specific patient population is unclear. We sought to better understand the degree to which anesthesia providers participate in operative trauma care and how this differs by trauma center designation (levels I-V), using data from a comprehensive, regional database-the Washington State Trauma Registry (WSTR). We also sought to specifically assess operative anesthesia care frequency vis a vis the American College of Surgeons guidelines for continuous anesthesiology coverage for Level II trauma center accreditation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis measuring the frequency of operative anesthesia care among patients enrolled in the WSTR. Univariate comparisons were made between trauma patients who had surgery during their admission and those who did not (medical management only). In addition, clinical factors associated with surgical intervention were measured. We also measured the average times from hospital admission to surgery and compared these times across trauma centers, grouped level I, II, and III-V. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2014, there were approximately 176,000 encounters meeting WSTR inclusion criteria. Approximately 60% of these trauma encounters included exposure to operative anesthesia during the admission. Among all surgical procedures during the trauma admission, approximately 33% occurred within a level I trauma center, 23% occurred within a level II trauma center, and 44% occurred in a trauma center with a III, IV, or V designation. The predominant procedure category during a trauma admission was orthopedic. The presence of hypotension on admission (P < .01), increasing injury severity score (P < .01) and higher emergency department Glasgow Coma Score (P < .01) were all associated with surgical intervention during the trauma hospitalization, after adjustment for potential confounders. In level I trauma centers, for general surgical procedures, the median time to surgery was 2.5 hours; in level II trauma centers, the median time was 1.7 hours. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the frequent role anesthesiologists play in caring for patients who sustain traumatic injuries, in trauma centers levels I-V. In level II trauma centers, in-house anesthesiology coverage might have benefit for those patients requiring surgery within 1 hour, whereas the former American College of Surgeons requirement of 30-minute response time for out-of-hospital anesthesiology coverage is likely sufficient to provide satisfactory care to patients requiring surgery within 3 hours. Whether the increased cost of such in-house anesthesiology coverage at level II trauma centers is justified by its clinical benefit remains an unanswered question.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia/tendencias , Anestesiólogos/tendencias , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/tendencias , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quirófanos , Tempo Operativo , Rol del Médico , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Cirujanos , Factores de Tiempo , Centros Traumatológicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Washingtón
2.
J Orthop Res ; 24(6): 1261-70, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16652342

RESUMEN

Traumatic articular cartilage injuries heal poorly and may predispose patients to the early onset of osteoarthritis. One current treatment relies on surgical delivery of autologous chondrocytes that are prepared, prior to implantation, through ex vivo cell expansion of cartilage biopsy cells. The requirement for cell expansion, however, is both complex and expensive and has proven to be a major hurdle in achieving a widespread adoption of the treatment. This study presents evidence that autologous chondrocyte implantation can be delivered without requiring ex vivo cell expansion. The proposed improvement relies on mechanical fragmentation of cartilage tissue sufficient to mobilize embedded chondrocytes via increased tissue surface area. Our outgrowth study, which was used to demonstrate chondrocyte migration and growth, indicated that fragmented cartilage tissue is a rich source for chondrocyte redistribution. The chondrocytes outgrown into 3-D scaffolds also formed cartilage-like tissue when implanted in SCID mice. Direct treatment of full-thickness chondral defects in goats using cartilage fragments on a resorbable scaffold produced hyaline-like repair tissue at 6 months. Thus, delivery of chondrocytes in the form of cartilage tissue fragments in conjunction with appropriate polymeric scaffolds provides a novel intraoperative approach for cell-based cartilage repair.


Asunto(s)
Cartílago Articular/trasplante , Trasplante de Células/métodos , Condrocitos/trasplante , Ingeniería de Tejidos/métodos , Cicatrización de Heridas , Animales , Cartílago Articular/citología , Bovinos , Movimiento Celular/fisiología , Proliferación Celular , Condrocitos/citología , Condrocitos/fisiología , Cabras , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones SCID , Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos/cirugía , Trasplante Autólogo/fisiología , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología
3.
J Neurotrauma ; 30(2): 67-75, 2013 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22989254

RESUMEN

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability among United States adolescents. The authors sought to determine causes and trends for TBI-related hospitalizations in the United States adolescent population (10-19 years). The authors identified common causes and trends of adolescent TBI, overall and within 2-year age categories, using hospitalization data from 2005 to 2009 in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. The leading cause of adolescent TBI overall was motor vehicle occupant accidents (35%), which are also the leading cause in the 14-15, 16-17, and 18-19 year age groups. Falls were the cause of most TBI in the 10-11 year (23%) and 12-13 year (20%) age groups. For both unintentional and intentional mechanisms of injury, there was evidence of increasing hospitalizations with increasing age. From 2005 to 2009, the overall annual incidence of adolescent TBI hospitalizations decreased 21% from an estimated 75.5-59.3 per 100,000 (p<0.001). These rates declined for mild, moderate, and severe TBI, and decreased for 2-year age groups, except for the 18-19 year-old group. For TBI attributable to motor vehicle occupants, rates declined 27% from 27.6 to 20.2 per 100,000 (p<0.001). Motor vehicle occupant injuries account for 42% of in-hospital mortality from adolescent TBI; however, firearms are the most lethal mechanism with 46% proportional mortality among victims of firearm-related TBI. Rates of adolescent TBI-related hospitalizations have decreased overall. Motor vehicle accidents and firearms were identified as leading causes of injury and mortality for adolescent TBI, and represent potential targets for intervention.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/epidemiología , Accidentes por Caídas/mortalidad , Accidentes de Tránsito/mortalidad , Accidentes de Tránsito/tendencias , Adolescente , Niño , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA