Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mult Scler ; 30(7): 820-832, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551315

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist regarding treatment response prediction to oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVES: We assessed the capacity of available scoring systems to anticipate disease activity parameters in naïve relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients initiating daily oral DMTs, hypothesizing that they exhibit different predictive potentials. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study and applied the Rio Score (RS), modified Rio Score (mRS), and MAGNIMS Score 12 months after DMT initiation. At 36 months, we examined their ability to predict evidence of disease activity (EDA) components and treatment failure by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Notably, 218 patients (62.4% females) initiating dimethyl fumarate, teriflunomide, and fingolimod were included. At 36 months, the RS high-risk group predicted evidence of clinical activity (odds ratio (OR) 10 [2.7-36.9]) and treatment failure (OR 10.6 [3.4-32.5]) but did not predict radiological activity (OR 1.9 [0.7-5]). The mRS non-responders group did not predict EDA and treatment failure. RS, mRS, and MAGNIMS 0 categories showed significantly lower EDA and treatment failure than the remainder. CONCLUSION: Scoring systems present different predictive abilities for disease activity parameters at 36 months in MS patients initiating daily oral therapies, warranting further adjustments (i.e. introduction of fluid biomarkers) to depict disease activity status fully.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Humanos , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Administración Oral , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clorhidrato de Fingolimod/administración & dosificación , Dimetilfumarato/administración & dosificación , Crotonatos/administración & dosificación , Hidroxibutiratos , Toluidinas/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Nitrilos/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Factores Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación
2.
Mult Scler ; 29(14): 1841-1848, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37728389

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mumps-Measles-Rubella (MMR) and Varicella zoster vaccines (VAR) are live attenuated vaccines, usually administered in a two-dose scheme at least 4 weeks apart. However, single-dose immunization schemes may also be effective and can reduce delays in immunosuppressive treatment initiation in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) who need to be immunized. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the immunogenicity of a single-dose attempt (SDA) versus the standard immunization scheme (SIS) with VAR and/or MMR in pwMS. METHODS: Retrospective observational study in pwMS vaccinated against VAR and/or MMR. We compared seroprotection rates and antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) between the two strategies. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were included. Thirty-one patients received VAR and 67 MMR. In the SDA group, the seroprotection rate was 66.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 53.3-78.3) versus 97.2% (95% CI: 85.5-99.9) in the SIS (p < 0.001). For the seroprotected patients, GMTs were similar for both schemes. CONCLUSION: An SDA of VAR and/or MMR vaccines could be sufficient to protect almost two-thirds of patients. Testing immunogenicity after a single dose of VZ and/or MMR could be included in routine clinical practice to achieve rapid immunization.


Asunto(s)
Sarampión , Esclerosis Múltiple , Paperas , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán) , Humanos , Lactante , Vacuna contra la Varicela , Vacunas Atenuadas , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Paperas/prevención & control , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacunación , Anticuerpos Antivirales
3.
Eur J Radiol ; 172: 111332, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38290202

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The optic chiasm (OC) is a central structure in the visual pathway and can be visualized in conventional MRI, but no consensus regarding its measurement has been defined. We aim to investigate the most reproducible manual approach to OC measurement and to explore associations of OC with optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters, and automatic brain segmentation (FreeSurfer) in subacute optic neuritis (sON), multiple sclerosis without optic neuritis (MSwoON), and healthy subjects (HS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reproduced two previously reported methodologies and implemented a new proposed simplified approach, entitled optic chiasm mean area (OCMA). The intra and inter-rater reliability and reproducibility were assessed through the intraclass correlation (ICC) and Dice similarity (DSC) coefficients. Partial correlations were calculated to gauge the associations between OCMA fraction (OCMA divided by total intracranial volume), brain regional segmentations derived from FreeSurfer, and OCT parameters. RESULTS: We have analysed 43 sON, 20 MSwoON, and 20 HS. OCMA presented better results for reliability in both intra- and inter-rater analysis (excellent ICC and DSC with over 80% overlap between masks), as compared to the other two approaches. OCMA fraction was associated with OC volume fraction obtained with Freesurfer in all groups, brain parenchymal fraction, and OCT parameters in MSwoON. CONCLUSIONS: The OCMA is a simplified approach to measure OC atrophy, has a higher reliability than the current approaches and shows association with an automated method. OC-derived measures seem to reflect diffuse neurodegenerative damage, whereas, in patients with subacute ON, it may be associated with local damage.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Neuritis Óptica , Humanos , Quiasma Óptico/diagnóstico por imagen , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Neuritis Óptica/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuritis Óptica/complicaciones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Esclerosis Múltiple/diagnóstico por imagen , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e246345, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38607624

RESUMEN

Importance: Vaccination in patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS) requiring prompt treatment initiation may result in impaired vaccine responses and/or treatment delay. Objective: To assess the immunogenicity and safety of inactivated vaccines administered during natalizumab treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This self-controlled, prospective cohort study followed adult patients with MS from 1 study center in Spain from September 2016 to February 2022. Eligible participants included adults with MS who completed immunization for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis A virus (HAV), and COVID-19 during natalizumab therapy. Data analysis was conducted from November 2022 to February 2023. Exposures: Patients were categorized according to their time receiving natalizumab treatment at the time of vaccine administration as short-term (≤1 year) or long-term (>1 year). Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics were collected during the year before vaccination (prevaccination period) and the year after vaccination (postvaccination period). Seroprotection rates and postvaccination immunoglobulin G titers were determined for each vaccine within both periods. Additionally, differences in annualized relapse rate (ARR), new T2 lesions (NT2L), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, and John Cunningham virus (JCV) serostatus between the 2 periods were assessed. Results: Sixty patients with MS (mean [SD] age, 43.2 [9.4] years; 44 female [73.3%]; 16 male [26.7%]; mean [SD] disease duration, 17.0 [8.7] years) completed HBV, HAV, and mRNA COVID-19 immunization during natalizumab treatment, with 12 patients in the short-term group and 48 patients in the long-term group. The global seroprotection rate was 93% (95% CI, 86%-98%), with individual vaccine rates of 92% for HAV (95% CI, 73%-99%), 93% for HBV (95% CI, 76%-99%), and 100% for the COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccine (95% CI, 84%-100%). Between the prevaccination and postvaccination periods there was a significant reduction in the mean (SD) ARR (0.28 [0.66] vs 0.01 [0.12]; P = .004) and median (IQR) NT2L (5.00 [2.00-10.00] vs 0.81 [0.00-0.50]; P = .01). No changes in disability accumulation were detected (median [IQR] EDSS score 3.5 [2.0-6.0] vs 3.5 [2.0-6.0]; P = .62). No differences in safety and immunogenicity were observed for all vaccines concerning the duration of natalizumab treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that immunization with inactivated vaccines during natalizumab therapy was both safe and immunogenic, regardless of the treatment duration. Natalizumab may be a valuable option for proper immunization, averting treatment delays in patients with highly active MS; however, this strategy needs to be formally evaluated.


Asunto(s)
Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Esclerosis Múltiple , Natalizumab , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios de Cohortes , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Natalizumab/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA