Asymptomatic transmission of Treponema pallidum (syphilis) through deceased donor liver transplantation.

A 55-year-old woman underwent liver transplantation (LT) with a graft from a deceased donor. Mandatory pre-donation investigations showed positive syphilis serology that was available only after the transplant, with high Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay titer compatible with donor syphilis infection. Despite the institution of appropriate post-exposure prophylaxis, the recipient demonstrated latent seroconversion; however, liver graft function improved without evidence of syphilitic hepatitis or other manifestations of the disease. Through this first reported case of asymptomatic transmission of syphilis following LT, we highlight the investigations and treatment strategies for donor-derived syphilis in liver transplant recipients. This report supplements the existing limited evidence on safe use of infected grafts from syphilitic donors through appropriate post-exposure prophylaxis.

Laparoscopic posterior sectoral bile duct injury: the emerging role of nonoperative management with improved long-term results after delayed diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Right posterior sectoral bile duct (RPSD) anomalies seen in up to 8% of the population rarely are injured at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Paucity of data on the management of these injuries led the authors to conduct this study aimed at reviewing management strategies for laparoscopic RPSD injuries at a specialist center. METHODS: Of 221 patients, 15 (6.7%; 4 men; mean age, 51 years; range, 21-75 years) treated between 1992 and 2009 for injuries to the RPSD were followed up for a median of 58 months (range, 7-208 months). Case notes, imaging, and follow-up data were reviewed. RESULTS: The RPSD injury was immediately recognized in 3 (20%) of the 15 patients, whereas in the remaining patients, biliary injury was suspected on day 1 (range, 1-18 days) due to bile leak/biloma. The diagnosis of RPSD injury was made by a combination of investigations including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (n = 11), drain tube cholangiogram (n = 10), on-table cholangiogram (n = 3), and nuclear scan (n = 3). An intact common bile duct and absence of RPSD were identified on cholangiography (ERCP and on-table cholangiogram), whereas drain tube cholangiogram demonstrated a leaking RPSD in all cases. The majority of the patients (8/15, 53%) were managed nonoperatively with combined percutaneous drainage and endoscopic stenting, whereas six patients (40%) were managed with biliary reconstruction (immediate: n = 2; delayed 14-87 days: n = 4). Clinical and radiologic confirmation of complete cessation of bile leak was demonstrated 56 days (range, 7-62 days) after injury. The long-term outcome included a dilated right duct system with transient elevation of liver function tests in two patients (1 each in the nonoperative and surgical management groups), whereas the remaining patients all remain well at this writing. CONCLUSION: Bile leak in the presence of an intact common duct shown on cholangiogram should raise the suspicion of an RPSD injury. Expertise is needed to interpret the absence of RPSD in these cases. Drain tube cholangiogram is an important adjunctive investigation. In selected cases, the results of nonoperative management alone is comparable with the results of reconstruction.

Risk factors for litigation following major transectional bile duct injury sustained at laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy often cause long-term morbidity, with a number of patients resorting to litigation. The present study aimed to analyze risk factors for litigation and to quantify the subsequent medicolegal burden. METHODS: A total of 67/106 patients (26 male) with major laparoscopic cholecystectomy bile duct injuries (LCBDI) and a minimum 2-year follow-up, replied to a questionnaire covering patient perception toward the complication, physical/psychological recovery, and subsequent litigation. These data were collated with prospectively collected data related to the LCBDI and subsequent management, and a multivariate regression model was designed to identify potential risk factors associated with litigation. RESULTS: Most patients felt they had been inadequately informed prior to surgery [47/67 (70%)] and after the LCBDI [50/67 (75%)], and a majority remained psychologically traumatized at the time of evaluation [50/67 (75%)]. Of these, 22 patients had started litigation by means of a "letter of demand" (LOD; n = 10) or prosecution (n = 12). Nineteen (19/22%) cases have been closed in favor of the plaintiff. There was no difference between the awards for LOD versus prosecution cases, and average compensation was £40,800 versus £89,875, respectively (p = n.s). On multivariate analysis, age < 52 years (p = 0.03), associated vascular injury (p = 0.014), immediate nonspecialist repair (p = 0.009), and perceived incomplete recovery following LCBDI (p = 0.017) were identified as independent predictors for possible litigation. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the present study, nearly one third of patients with major transectional LCBDI are likely to resort to litigation. Younger patients and those in whom repair is attempted prior to specialist referral are likely to initiate litigation.

An unusual case of duodenal obstruction-gangliocytic paraganglioma.

Gangliocytic paragangliomas are rare tumors located in the gastrointestinal tract that are considered to be benign. They are composed of spindle-shaped cells, epithelioid cells, and ganglion-like cells. They usually present with abdominal pain, and/or gastrointestinal bleeding, and occasionally with obstructive jaundice. We report a case of obstruction in a 17-year-old female, which on histology was found to be a gangliocytic paraganglioma, with an extremely unusual presentation. Intraoperatively, the patient was found to have local tumor extension and regional lymph node invasion, and so she underwent a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, with local lymph node clearance. We discuss the management of this unusual case and review the literature.

Antiangiogenic therapy and surgical practice.

BACKGROUND: Antiangiogenic therapy has become a reality with the recent introduction of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. METHODS: Relevant medical literature from PubMed, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and National Institutes of Health websites to August 2007 was reviewed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Although often described as the fourth modality of treatment after surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, many antiangiogenic drugs have failed to live up to expectations. Nevertheless, research continues and there are reasons to believe that antiangiogenic therapy may yet have a future in the clinical setting.

Cholangiocarcinoma complicating primary sclerosing cholangitis: a 24-year experience.

AIM: To report the prevalence and outcome of cholangiocarcinoma arising in primary sclerosing cholangitis for a British tertiary referral centre. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with primary sclerosing cholangitis and concurrent cholangiocarcinoma were identified from a prospectively maintained departmental database, and the mode of presentation, management and outcome were determined. RESULTS: Of 370 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, 48 patients (13%) were diagnosed with a cholangiocarcinoma within a median time of 0.51 months (range: 0-73.12) from presentation to the unit. Mode of presentation included: inoperable tumours (n = 14); incidental findings in transplant hepatectomy specimens (n = 13); primary sclerosing cholangitis follow-up (n = 9); transplant work-up (n = 5); transplant waiting list (n = 5); suspected tumour confirmed at transplant (n = 1), and incidental finding at cholecystectomy (n = 1). The diagnosis was confirmed by: radiology-guided biopsy (n = 27); MRI (n = 3); CT (n = 2); laparoscopy or laparotomy (n = 2), and frozen section at transplant (n = 1). Management consisted of: transplantation (n = 14, including 1 abandoned); hepatic resection (n = 8), and palliation through stenting (n = 26). The overall median survival of the cohort was 4.9 months (range: 0.09-104.5). Median survival ranged from 2.6 months (range: 0.09-35.3) for palliation to 7.6 months (range: 0.6-99.6) for transplantation and 52.8 months (range: 3.7-104.5) for resection. There was no difference in survival between the transplant and resection groups (p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Cholangiocarcinoma is a common finding in primary sclerosing cholangitis and regular screening of this cohort of patients at referring centres is advocated to detect early tumours, as surgical treatment at an early stage offers significantly better outcomes for this cohort of patients.

Orthotopic liver transplantation for epithelioid haemangioendothelioma.

AIMS: To report seven cases of epithelioid haemangioendothelioma (EHE) of the liver, a rare, low-grade malignant neoplasm of vascular origin that have been treated in our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with ages ranging from 25 to 60 years presenting mainly with non-specific symptoms, such as right upper quadrant abdominal pain or weight loss. The tumours presented as multiple, nodular lesions involving both lobes of the liver. This type of tumour is often difficult to diagnose, with the final diagnosis being established only by histological examination. The key to diagnosis was the demonstration of cells containing factor VIII-related antigen. RESULTS: Five patients underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), four of whom are alive at a median follow up 38 months (11-88 months). One patient died of recurrent of disease at 88 months. Two patients did not receive an OLT since they presented with extrahepatic metastatic disease; they died at 21 and 25 months from diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Orthotopic liver transplantation may be considered as a potentially curative treatment for this rare form of tumour when the disease is confined to the liver.

Prophylactic antibiotics in acute pancreatitis: endless debate.

INTRODUCTION The development of pancreatic infection is associated with the development of a deteriorating disease with subsequent high morbidity and mortality. There is agreement that in mild pancreatitis there is no need to use antibiotics; in severe pancreatitis it would appear to be a logical choice to use antibiotics to prevent secondary pancreatic infection and decrease associated mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS A non-systematic review of current evidence, meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials was conducted to assess the role of prophylactic antibiotics in acute pancreatitis and whether it might improve morbidity and mortality in pancreatitis. RESULTS Mixed evidence was found to support and refute the role of prophylactic antibiotics in acute pancreatitis. Most studies have failed to demonstrate much benefit from its routine use. Data from our unit suggested little benefit of their routine use, and showed that the mortality of those treated with antibiotics was significantly higher compared with those not treated with antibiotics (9% vs 0%, respectively, P = 0.043). In addition, the antibiotic group had significantly higher morbidity (36% vs 5%, respectively, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Antibiotics should be used in patients who develop sepsis, infected necrosis-related systemic inflammatory response syndrome, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome or pancreatic and extra-pancreatic infection. Despite the many other factors that should be considered, prompt antibiotic therapy is recommended once inflammatory markers are raised, to prevent secondary pancreatic infection. Unfortunately, there remain many unanswered questions regarding the indications for antibiotic administration and the patients who benefit from antibiotic treatment in acute pancreatitis.

Diabetic control after total pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes after total pancreatectomy is commonly described as 'brittle' with most series reporting outcomes after resection for pancreatitis alone. The aim of this study was to determine glycaemic control in patients resected for benign and malignant disease. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing total pancreatectomy (1989-2003) from a single institution was done. Data of diabetic control were obtained from case notes, general practitioners and telephonic consultation. Comparison was made against a matched type 1 diabetic population. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with a median age of 59 years (range 17-85 years) and median follow-up of 50 months (range 5-136 months) were identified. Thirty-five underwent primary resection with 11 receiving completion procedures. Thirty were for malignancy (19 deceased) and 17 for benign/indeterminate histology (2 deceased). Thirty-three patients were available for detailed follow-up. There was no significant difference between median HbA(1c) of the study group and the control (8.2% versus 8.1%). The majority of patients reported diabetic control and daily performance as excellent or good. Resection for pancreatitis gave poorer subjective control (p < 0.05) than those resected for malignancy. Two patients required in-patient treatment for diabetic complications, with no deaths related to diabetes observed. CONCLUSION: Diabetes after total pancreatectomy is not necessarily associated with poor glycaemic control and in the majority results in equivalent biochemical control compared to a normal type 1 diabetic population.

Marimastat as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: The prognosis for unresectable pancreatic cancer remains dismal (1-year survival rate, < 10%; 5-year survival rate, < 5%). Recent advances in conventional chemotherapy and novel molecular treatment strategies warrant investigation. This, the largest randomized study in pancreatic cancer performed to date, compares marimastat, the first of a new class of agents, with gemcitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred fourteen patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer were randomized to receive marimastat 5, 10, or 25 mg bid or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2. The primary end point was survival. Progression-free survival, patient benefit, and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in survival between 5, 10, or 25 mg of marimastat and gemcitabine (P =.19). Median survival times were 111, 105, 125, and 167 days, respectively, and 1-year survival rates were 14%, 14%, 20%, and 19%, respectively. There was a significant difference in survival rates between patients treated with gemcitabine and marimastat 5 and 10 mg (P <.003). Both agents were well tolerated, although grade 3 or 4 toxicities were reported in 22% and 12% of the gemcitabine- and marimastat-treated patients, respectively. The major toxicity of marimastat was musculoskeletal (44% of marimastat patients, compared with 12% of gemcitabine patients; musculoskeletal toxicity was severe in only 8% of marimastat patients). CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide evidence of a dose response for marimastat in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The 1-year survival rate for patients receiving marimastat 25 mg was similar to that of patients receiving gemcitabine. In view of the manageable tolerability of marimastat and its ease of administration, further studies are warranted.

Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma; a 10 year experience of a tertiary referral centre in the UK.

OBJECTIVE: To review the outcome of patients operated for hilar cholangiocarcinoma and analyse prognostic variables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospectively collected database on patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, between 1992 and 2003, and relevant clinical notes were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 174 patients, 96 male, median age 63 years (27-86), were referred. Jaundice was the initial presentation in 167. RESULTS: ERCP was the initial interventional investigation at the referring centre in 150, of which only 30 were stented successfully. PTC and decompression was carried out on 120. In 17, combined PTC and ERCP were required for placement of stents. Seventy-two underwent laparotomy at which 27 had locally advanced disease. Forty-five had potentially curative resections. Extra hepatic bile duct resection was done in 14 patients of which four were R0 resections. Thirty-one had bile duct resection including partial hepatectomy with 19 R0 resections (P=0.042). Post-operative complications developed in 19 patients, and there were 4 30 day mortalities [hepatic insufficiency:/sepsis (n=3), thrombosis of the reconstructed portal vein (n=1)]. Among the patients with R0 resections, the cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 year; was 83, 58, 41%, respectively, and in those with R1 resections were 71, 24, 24%, respectively, (P=0.021). Overall survival was shorter in patients with positive perineural invasion (P=0.066: NS). There was no significant difference in survival between the node positive and negative group. Median survival of patients who underwent liver resection was longer than those with bile duct resection only (30 vs 24 months P=0.43: NS). CONCLUSIONS: ERCP was associated with a high failure rate in achieving pre-operative biliary decompression which was subsequently achieved by PTC. Clear histological margins were associated with improved survival and were better achieved by liver resection as compared to extra hepatic bile duct resection. Positive level I lymph nodes did not adversely impact survival.

Surgical treatment of metastases to the pancreas.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Metastases to the pancreas are rare and their surgical treatment is not well reported. We present a considerable experience from a single centre analysing various prognostic factors. METHODS: Data were collected on 13 cases who underwent surgery between 1988 and 2002. Since 1997, data have been recorded prospectively on a dedicated database. Clinical and histopathological factors were reviewed. RESULTS: There were two women and 11 men with a median age of 62 years (range 40-73). There were seven cases of renal cell carcinomas, three colorectal carcinomas, two sarcomas and one lung carcinoma. A prolonged disease-free interval from primary surgery was characteristic for renal cell carcinoma cases (median = 10.8 years). The operative procedures performed included seven pancreatoduodenectomies, four total and two distal pancreatectomies. The operative mortality and morbidity was 7.7% and 46.1% respectively. The overall one- and two-year survival was 78.8% and 54% respectively. Median survival for renal cell carcinoma was 30.5 months and for non-renal cell carcinoma was 26.4 months (p = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatectomy should be considered for metastases to the pancreas in the absence of generalised metastatic disease. However, decision making and experience should be concentrated in centres with significant familiarity of this approach.

The use of liver grafts from donors with bacterial meningitis.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of suitable donors for transplantation is a worldwide problem. The use of cadaveric donors with bacterial meningitis may be associated with an increased risk of sepsis. We report the results of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) from 33 such donors between 1989 and 1999. METHODS: The hospital records of recipients from cadaveric donors with meningitis (study group) were retrospectively reviewed and compared with matched recipients from cadaveric donors dying from causes other than meningitis (recipient-matched control group). RESULTS: A total of 34 recipients underwent 21 whole, 10 reduced, and 3 split liver transplants from 33 cadaveric donor livers with bacterial meningitis. The donor meningitis pathogens were Neisseria meningitidis (n=14), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n=4), Haemophilus influenzae (n=1), Streptococcus species (n=2), and unknown (n=12). Twenty-seven patients had an elective OLT and seven patients had an emergency OLT. Adequate antimicrobial therapy before organ procurement and after transplant was administrated. The mean posttransplant follow-up was 37 months (range: 1 day-106 months). There was no difference in recipient and graft survival rates between the study and the recipient-matched groups. In the study group, there were no infectious complications caused by the meningeal pathogens. Overall patient survival rates were 79%, 76%, 72%, and 72% at 1, 6, 12, and 60 months, respectively. Graft survival was 77%, 70%, 65%, and 65% at 1, 6, 12, and 60 months, respectively. The survival rate in elective cases was significantly better than emergency cases (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Liver transplantation from donors with bacterial meningitis is a safe procedure provided both donors and recipients receive adequate antimicrobial therapy.

Novel non-operative treatment and treatment strategies in pancreatic cancer.

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have traditionally been treated with palliative care only. The last decade has seen significant improvements in the surgical treatment of this disease but until the late 1990s there was no effective non-surgical treatment for these tumours. The introduction of gemcitabine has given clinicians treating patients with pancreatic cancer a new option. The published randomised data of gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer has shown both a small survival advantage and significant improvements in quality of life indicators in these patients. These data have stimulated a resurgence of interest in pancreatic tumours and several studies have been or are currently investigating novel treatments or treatment strategies. The explosion in the molecular knowledge of cancer has led to the development of several 'molecular designer drugs' that have been tested in pancreatic cancer. The furthest advanced of these is a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor called marimastat. The first randomised data using this new class of agents is increasing and suggests that marimastat may have a role in the future treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer. Other agents such as gastrimmune, are about to enter Phase III studies and several other molecular treatment strategies are progressing from the in vitro stage towards the clinical arena. Each of these treatments and treatment regimens are discussed along with their current progress.

Liver transplantation in the UK.

INTRODUCTION: This paper provides a review of the practice of liver transplantation with the main emphasis on UK practice and indications for transplantation. REFERRAL AND ASSESSMENT: This section reviews the process of referral and assessment of patients with liver disease with reference to UK practice. DONOR ORGANS: The practice of brainstem death and cadaveric organ donation is peculiar to individual countries and rates of donation and potential areas of improvement are addressed. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: The technical innovations that have led to liver transplantation becoming a semi-elective procedure are reviewed. Specific emphasis is made to the role of liver reduction and splitting and living related liver transplantation and how this impacts on UK practice are reviewed. The complications of liver transplan-tation are also reviewed with reference to our own unit. Immunosuppression:The evolution of immunosuppression and its impact on liver transplantation are reviewed with some reference to future protocols. RETRANSPLANTATION: The role of retransplantation is reviewed. OUTCOME AND SURVIVAL: The results of liver transplantation are reviewed with specific emphasis on our own experience. FUTURE: The future of liver transplantation is addressed.

An improved method for oesophageal intubation.

The authors describe a method of inserting an Atkinson tube using a flexible upper gastrointestinal endoscope which does not require the use of X-ray screening. A retrospective review of 50 patients intubated by this technique has been undertaken and the results presented. Of the lesions, 40% were squamous cell carcinoma and 40% adenocarcinoma, with 84% being situated in the lower third of the oesophagus; 94% of patients only required one intubation. The two major complications of the procedure are tube displacement and oesophageal leak; a tube displacement rate of 13% was recorded, comparable with other series. Eleven patients (20.8%) were found to have an oesophageal leak, but this resulted in death in only three patients (6%). The reasons for these figures are explained. An operative mortality rate of 12% is comparable with series using other methods. The authors conclude that this method of intubation is as safe as Atkinson's original method but has the advantage that X-ray screening is not required.

Liver resection for colorectal metastases.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the second commonest malignancy in the UK. Metastases to the liver occur in greater than 50% of patients and remain the biggest determinant of outcome in these patients. Liver resection is a safe procedure that achieves good long-term survival, but surgery has traditionally been limited to select groups of patients. The improved outcome suggests that more patients could benefit from resection if more was known of what criteria are predictive of a good outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients undergoing surgical resection of the liver for colorectal metastases between March 1989 and March 2001 in the Birmingham Liver Unit. RESULTS: During this period, 212 liver resections for colorectal cancer metastases were performed in 82 females and 130 males. The median follow-up was 16 months with an overall actuarial survival of 86% at 1 year, 54% at 3 years, and 28% at 5 years. The peri-operative mortality was 2.8%. The number and timing (metachronous or synchronous) of metastatic lesions, the gender of the patient, pathological staging of the primary lesion or surgical resection margins had no significant influence on survival. Patients with lesions less than 5 cm in size had a significantly prolonged survival compared with patients with lesions greater than 5 cm in size (P < 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection is the only curative treatment for patients with colorectal metastases. The long-term survival reported in patients with resected colorectal metastases confined to the liver is comparable to primary surgery for solid gastrointestinal tumours. Every attempt must be made to increase the availability of liver resection to patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

Liver resection for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of prognostic factors.

AIM: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse the outcome following hepatic resection for metastatic STS and to identify factors predicting survival. METHODS: All patients who underwent hepatic resection for metastatic STS between August 1997 and April 2009 were included. The data was obtained from a prospectively maintained database. Patients' demographics, clinico-pathological parameters, overall survival and the factors predicting survival were analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients underwent hepatic resection for metastasis, with a median age of 58 years. The predominant site of primary tumour was the gastro-intestinal tract (50%). Leiomyosarcoma was the most common histological type (54%). The median interval between the primary and metastatic resections was 17 months. Thirteen patients had synchronous tumours. 24 patients had major liver resections and 10 patients had bi-lobar disease. The median number of liver lesions resected was 1(1-6) and the median maximum diameter was 11 cm (1-26 cm). R0 resection was performed in 31 patients. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival from the time of metastasectomy was 90.3%, 48.0% and 31.8% respectively, with a median survival of 24 months. Factors associated with poor survival on univariate analysis were the presence of high grade tumours (p = 0.04), primary leiomyosarcoma (p = 0.01) and positive resection margin of liver metastasis (p = 0.04), whilst multivariate analysis predicted primary leiomyosarcoma as a risk factor for poor survival (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Hepatic resection for metastatic STS appears to be valuable in carefully selected patients with acceptable long-term survival. The aim of surgery must be an R0 resection to offer a chance of cure.