Causative Mutations and Mechanism of Androgenetic Hydatidiform Moles.

Androgenetic complete hydatidiform moles are human pregnancies with no embryos and affect 1 in every 1,400 pregnancies. They have mostly androgenetic monospermic genomes with all the chromosomes originating from a haploid sperm and no maternal chromosomes. Androgenetic complete hydatidiform moles were described in 1977, but how they occur has remained an open question. We identified bi-allelic deleterious mutations in MEI1, TOP6BL/C11orf80, and REC114, with roles in meiotic double-strand breaks formation in women with recurrent androgenetic complete hydatidiform moles. We investigated the occurrence of androgenesis in Mei1-deficient female mice and discovered that 8% of their oocytes lose all their chromosomes by extruding them with the spindles into the first polar body. We demonstrate that Mei1-/- oocytes are capable of fertilization and 5% produce androgenetic zygotes. Thus, we uncover a meiotic abnormality in mammals and a mechanism for the genesis of androgenetic zygotes that is the extrusion of all maternal chromosomes and their spindles into the first polar body.

Correction: Comprehensive analysis of 204 sporadic hydatidiform moles: revisiting risk factors and their correlations with the molar genotypes.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Comprehensive analysis of 204 sporadic hydatidiform moles: revisiting risk factors and their correlations with the molar genotypes.

Hydatidiform mole (HM) is an aberrant human pregnancy characterized by excessive trophoblastic proliferation and abnormal embryonic development. HM has two morphological types, complete (CHM) and partial (PHM), and non-recurrent ones have three genotypic types, androgenetic monospermic, androgenetic dispermic, and triploid dispermic. Most available studies on risk factors predisposing to different types of HM and their malignant transformation mainly suffer from the lack of comprehensive genotypic analysis of large cohorts of molar tissues combined with accurate postmolar hCG follow-up. Moreover, 10-20% of patients with one HM have at least one non-molar miscarriage, which is higher than the frequency of two pregnancy losses in the general population (2-5%), suggesting a common genetic susceptibility to HM and miscarriages. However, the underlying causes of the miscarriages in these patients are unknown. Here, we comprehensively analyzed 204 HM, mostly from patients referred to the Quebec Registry of Trophoblastic Diseases and for which postmolar hCG monitoring is available, and 30 of their non-molar miscarriages. We revisited the risk of maternal age and neoplastic transformation across the different HM genotypic categories and investigated the presence of chromosomal abnormalities in their non-molar miscarriages. We confirm that androgenetic CHM is more prone to gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) than triploid dispermic PHM, and androgenetic dispermic CHM is more prone to high-risk GTN and choriocarcinoma (CC) than androgenetic monospermic CHM. We also confirm the association between increased maternal age and androgenetic CHM and their malignancies. Most importantly, we demonstrate for the first time that patients with an HM and miscarriages are at higher risk for aneuploid miscarriages [83.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.653-0.944] than women with sporadic (51.5%, 95% CI: 50.3-52.7%, p value = 0.0003828) or recurrent miscarriages (43.8%, 95% CI: 40.7-47.0%, p value = 0.00002). Our data suggest common genetic female germline defects predisposing to HM and aneuploid non-molar miscarriages in some patients.

The genetics of recurrent hydatidiform moles: new insights and lessons from a comprehensive analysis of 113 patients.

Hydatidiform mole is an aberrant human pregnancy characterized by early embryonic arrest and excessive trophoblastic proliferation. Recurrent hydatidiform moles are defined by the occurrence of at least two hydatidiform moles in the same patient. Fifty to eighty percent of patients with recurrent hydatidiform moles have biallelic pathogenic variants in NLRP7 or KHDC3L. However, in the remaining patients, the genotypic types of the moles are unknown. We characterized 80 new hydatidiform mole tissues, 57 of which were from patients with no mutations in the known genes, and we reviewed the genotypes of a total of 123 molar tissues. We also reviewed mutation analysis in 113 patients with recurrent hydatidiform moles. While all hydatidiform moles from patients with biallelic NLRP7 or KHDC3L mutations are diploid biparental, we demonstrate that those from patients without mutations are highly heterogeneous and only a small minority of them are diploid biparental (8%). The other mechanisms that were found to recur in patients without mutations are diploid androgenetic monospermic (24%) and triploid dispermic (32%); the remaining hydatidiform moles were misdiagnosed as moles due to errors in the analyses and/or their unusual mechanisms. We compared three parameters of genetic susceptibility in patients with and without mutations and show that patients without mutations are mostly from non-familial cases, have fewer reproductive losses, and more live births. Our data demonstrate that patients with recurrent hydatidiform moles and no mutations in the known genes are, in general, different from those with mutations; they have a milder genetic susceptibility and/or a multifactorial etiology underlying their recurrent hydatidiform moles. Categorizing these patients according to the genotypic types of their recurrent hydatidiform moles may facilitate the identification of novel genes for this entity.

Gestational Trophoblastic Disease: Opportunities for a National Registry Collaboration.

OBJECTIVE: In rare entities such as gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD), only multi-institutional registries can gather significant number of patients to build up valuable clinical databases. No Canada-wide GTD registry currently exists. We conducted a survey among members of the Canadian Society of Gynecologic Oncology (GOC) to investigate their interest in a pan-Canadian GTD registry. We also took the opportunity to explore their management of GTD. METHODS: An electronic survey was conducted. The target group was the entire GOC Canadian Membership. The survey consisted of 25 questions. RESULTS: The survey participation rate was 39% (67/171). Seventy-six percent of responders treat patients with molar pregnancy or gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), and the majority treat only 5 or less cases of molar pregnancy and 5 or less cases of GTN per year. In cases of low-risk GTN, 80% of responders use generally recommended single-agent chemotherapy regimens. In cases of high-risk GTN, 76% use generally recommended multiagent chemotherapy regimens. Most respondents do not submit either molar pregnancy or GTN patients to any formal registry, although the vast majority (92%) would do so if they had access to a registry, given that most believe that a registry can or probably can help patients with GTD. Responders indicated that the jurisdiction of such a registry should be national (59%), provincial (25%), and regional (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite some variation, responders were generally knowledgeable about contemporary management issues. Canadian Society of Gynecologic Oncology members acknowledge generally low exposure to GTD patients in Canada and support the creation of a national GTD registry to facilitate optimal patient care, education, and research.

Quebec Trophoblastic Disease Registry: how to make an easy-to-use dynamic database.

OBJECTIVE: To create an easy-to-use dynamic database designed specifically for the Quebec Trophoblastic Disease Registry (RMTQ). INTRODUCTION: It is now well established that much of the success in managing trophoblastic diseases comes from the development of national and regional reference centers. Computerized databases allow the optimal use of data stored in these centers. METHODS: We have created an electronic data registration system by producing a database using FileMaker Pro 12. It uses 11 external tables associated with a unique identification number for each patient. Each table allows specific data to be recorded, incorporating demographics, diagnosis, automated staging, laboratory values, pathological diagnosis, and imaging parameters. RESULTS: From January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2013, we used our database to register 311 patients with 380 diseases and have seen a 39.2% increase in registrations each year between 2009 and 2012. This database allows the automatic generation of semilogarithmic curves, which take into account ß-hCG values as a function of time, complete with graphic markers for applied treatments (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery). It generates a summary sheet for a synthetic vision in real time. CONCLUSIONS: We have created, at a low cost, an easy-to-use database specific to trophoblastic diseases that dynamically integrates staging and monitoring. We propose a 10-step procedure for a successful trophoblastic database. It improves patient care, research, and education on trophoblastic diseases in Quebec and leads to an opportunity for collaboration on a national Canadian registry.