Progesterone from ovulatory menstrual cycles is an important cause of breast cancer.

Many factors, including reproductive hormones, have been linked to a woman's risk of developing breast cancer (BC). We reviewed the literature regarding the relationship between ovulatory menstrual cycles (MCs) and BC risk. Physiological variations in the frequency of MCs and interference with MCs through genetic variations, pathological conditions and or pharmaceutical interventions revealed a strong link between BC risk and the lifetime number of MCs. A substantial reduction in BC risk is observed in situations without MCs. In genetic or transgender situations with normal female breasts and estrogens, but no progesterone (P4), the incidence of BC is very low, suggesting an essential role of P4. During the MC, P4 has a strong proliferative effect on normal breast epithelium, whereas estradiol (E2) has only a minimal effect. The origin of BC has been strongly linked to proliferation associated DNA replication errors, and the repeated stimulation of the breast epithelium by P4 with each MC is likely to impact the epithelial mutational burden. Long-lived cells, such as stem cells, present in the breast epithelium, can carry mutations forward for an extended period of time, and studies show that breast tumors tend to take decades to develop before detection. We therefore postulate that P4 is an important factor in a woman's lifetime risk of developing BC, and that breast tumors arising during hormonal contraception or after menopause, with or without menopausal hormone therapy, are the consequence of the outgrowth of pre-existing neoplastic lesions, eventually stimulated by estrogens and some progestins.

Women's experiences of receiving a diagnosis of premenstrual dysphoric disorder: a qualitative investigation.

BACKGROUND: Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a complex and disabling condition that affects women of reproductive age, characterised by severe physical and psychological symptoms that occur cyclically and remit following the onset of menses. As the psychological nature and consequences of PMDD often seem indistinguishable from symptoms of other mental health difficulties, this condition presents distinct diagnostic challenges for healthcare professionals. Therefore, this study aimed to explore women's experiences of both having PMDD and of receiving this diagnosis. METHODS: Participant recruitment took place in the United Kingdom during 2018. Seventeen women who had been diagnosed with PMDD by a medical specialist and met the clinical criteria for PMDD on the premenstrual symptoms screening tool were interviewed. The data from these semi-structured interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and inductively analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twelve subthemes were identified and organised around four main themes: (1) A broken woman, (2) Misdiagnosis and the lost decades, (3) A life transformed and (4) Negotiating the aftermath. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study highlight the critical importance of the accurate and timely detection of PMDD, with the aim of preventing women from experiencing severe and prolonged psychological distress. In order to achieve this, there needs to be a greater understanding and awareness of PMDD within both the medical and lay communities, alongside training for healthcare practitioners in PMDD assessment.

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: Evaluation of symptoms, using a questionnaire, in a research setting, before and after treatment.

BACKGROUND: Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a common condition, yet there is no defined, objective, and reproducible intervention with which to make a diagnosis. There are many different treatment options available, but without the correct diagnosis, affected women are unable to access the right therapy. This paper reports on the questionnaire arm of the VAN study (VAginal Health - What's Normal?) which aimed to evaluate the performance and acceptability of the methods of assessment of GSM, described below. OBJECTIVES: To determine the value of the Day-to-Day Impact of Vaginal Aging (DIVA) questionnaire: a multidimensional measure of the impact of vaginal symptoms on functioning and well-being in postmenopausal women, in a prospective, observational, feasibility study. METHODS: 60 women were recruited to the study (20 premenopausal, asymptomatic women (control group) and 40 peri- and postmenopausal, symptomatic women). All women had a baseline assessment, using three different interventions, in addition to the DIVA questionnaire and symptomatic women were offered treatment, followed by a second assessment undertaken at 16 weeks, using the same interventions. This paper focusses on the outcomes for the questionnaire and specifically on the paired data sets, before and after treatment. RESULTS: An improvement in the score for all four sections of DIVA (Activities of daily living, Emotions, Sexual Activity, and Feelings about yourself and your body (female embodiment)) was observed, following any treatment. Additional questions were added to DIVA, to assess patient preference in relation to the different diagnostic interventions. These included a speculum examination as part of the clinical assessment, a smear taken from the lateral vaginal wall to assess the vaginal maturation index, both undertaken by a clinician and a self-administered tampon to collect vaginal secretions, to determine the small molecule metabolite profile, using NMR spectroscopy, and to enable analysis of the vaginal microbiome. The medical standard tampon was the preferred intervention, before and after treatment, for women eligible for treatment. CONCLUSION: The VAN study demonstrates that DIVA, a previously tested questionnaire, is an easily accessible intervention, to assess the impact of urogenital symptoms on quality-of-life indicators in women in the United Kingdom with GSM and that women prefer to use a tampon themselves, rather than have a clinician performed vaginal speculum examination or a vaginal smear.

Exploring the potential for a set of UK hormone replacement therapy eligibility guidelines: A suggested proposal on the topic of venous thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility for a set of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) eligibility guidelines that follow a similar structure and appearance to the UKMEC guidance for contraception. To enable non-specialists to feel confident in safely prescribing HRT and to aid selection of the most appropriate first line treatment. METHODS: A literature review was undertaken with evidence summarised on the topic of venous thromboembolism (VTE) which is an area frequently considered a barrier to prescribing. Medical eligibility tables which separated HRT by type were then produced for a set of VTE-related topics. RESULTS: The literature search confirmed the importance of distinguishing between different types and routes of administration when considering the suitability of HRT. Much of the evidence has been based on older synthetic types of HRT and whilst they still have a role in management, these medications carry different risks to the now more accepted use of body identical types. The search also highlighted the nuances involved, increasing the complexity of forming guidelines, with the need for consideration to be given to an individual's own perception of risks and benefits. CONCLUSION: The demand for HRT has risen in recent years and there is a need for this to be managed effectively, particularly for patients in primary care. The production of this type of guidance will enable the non-specialist to feel confident in safe and evidence-based prescribing. The guidelines are also designed to demonstrate to prescribers which complex patients should be referred onto menopause specialists.

Impact of UK Medical Eligibility Criteria implementation on prescribing of combined hormonal contraceptives.

OBJECTIVES: Combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) are the most widely prescribed contraceptive methods in the UK; however, their use is associated with significant cardiovascular risk for women with some medical conditions and risk factors. The objective of this study was to assess the potential change in CHC prescribing among higher-risk women following publication of the UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (UKMEC) in 2006. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using the General Practice Research Database to analyse UK women aged 15-49 years who were prescribed CHCs during the period 2004-2010. Of women prescribed CHCs, those at higher risk of cardiovascular events (with UKMEC Category 3 or 4 risk factors) were identified. The percentage of higher-risk CHC users, among all CHC users, in 2005 (pre-UKMEC) was compared to that in 2010 (post-UKMEC). RESULTS: The percentage of higher-risk CHC users significantly decreased by 0.8% (95% CI 0.68% to 1.02%) following publication of UKMEC [8.1% (95% CI 7.98% to 8.22%) in 2005 vs 7.3% (95% CI 7.14% to 7.38%) in 2010; p<0.001]. However, an estimated 1 74 472 women in the UK were prescribed CHCs in 2010 despite having Category 3 or 4 risk factors. The most common Category 3 or 4 risk factors were body mass index ≥35 kg/m(2), hypertension and smoking in women aged ≥35 years. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the observed reduction in prescribing of CHCs to higher-risk women after publication of UKMEC, a large number of women with Category 3 or 4 risk factors are still prescribed CHCs. The increased risk of cardiovascular events is unnecessary for many of these women given the availability of alternative contraceptive methods.

Methods of assessment of urogenital atrophy and the implication of these in estimated prevalence rates: A review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Urogenital atrophy is caused by lack of estrogen, most commonly due to the menopause. Symptoms frequently experienced include vaginal dryness, itching, burning, sexual difficulties and urinary problems, all of which can have a significant adverse effect on quality of life. Effective treatments are available for women with a confirmed diagnosis. The aim of this review is to determine whether a consistent diagnostic intervention exists, to support an accurate indication of prevalence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a review of the literature. RESULTS: A total of 1469 papers were identified on an initial search, including randomised controlled trials, cross sectional and cohort studies. By adoption of a systematic process, the number of papers in the final review was eight.There is inconsistent use of available assessment methods to diagnose urogenital atrophy in symptomatic women. There are no validated clinical assessment tools. CONCLUSION: Absence of a defined intervention with which to confirm a diagnosis of urogenital atrophy, based on symptoms, influences research outcomes, but more importantly affects access to an accurate diagnosis and treatment, for affected women. This would ideally take place in a primary care setting.

Consensus statement - Urogenital atrophy.

This guidance refers to urogenital atrophy, a chronic and progressive condition due to estrogen deficiency, most commonly associated with the menopause. There is a potential negative impact on all urogenital tissue quality including the vulva, vagina, bladder and urethra. Symptoms may not become apparent for several years after the menopause and therefore any association is lost, with women accepting symptoms as a normal part of the aging process. There may be reluctance to discuss symptoms with a clinician and this is likely to be linked with under diagnosis and under treatment. Urogenital atrophy has been described as a silent epidemic with lack of awareness affecting an accurate diagnosis and access to treatment. Whilst vaginal estrogen (also referred to as local estrogen) therapy is the best-known treatment, newer drugs and interventions are now available.

Consensus-led recommendations supporting choice and personalisation of Hormone replacement therapy in menopause care.

OBJECTIVE: Inequity of access and choice to different hormone replacement therapy (HRT) products across the UK has been suggested (Hillman, 2020). While, the cause is not entirely understood, potential contributors include conflicting national guidance, economic deprivation and a local formulary approach. With a diverse and growing population of women reaching and living well beyond the menopause, the impact of this inequity is becoming more pronounced, and challenges the goal of providing personalised care. The study objective is to establish a consensus that supports a greater equity of access and choice of HRT and provision of individualised care. STUDY DESIGN: Modified Delphi study designed by UK HCPs with expertise in menopause care. This group identified 40 consensus statements over four key topics, related to access and choice of different HRT products. An online 4-point Likert scale questionnaire, sent to UK HCPs, was used to assess agreement, with a consensus threshold set at 75%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 150 HCP responses between June and September 2021. RESULTS: A total of 137 responses were received. Analysis identified 37/40 statements attaining very high agreement (≥ 90%) and 3/40 statements attaining high agreement (< 90% and ≥75%). Nine recommendations were developed with the intent to inform potential improvements to menopause care in the UK. CONCLUSIONS: The high levels of agreement displayed suggest a desire to change the way menopause care is delivered in the UK. Implementation of the suggested recommendations has the potential to improve equity of access to licensed treatment options, compliant with the NICE recommendation for personalisation of care.

Urogenital atrophy: The 'unknown factors' challenging current practice.

Urogenital atrophy occurs as a result of the effect of estrogen deficiency on the tissue quality in the vulva, vagina, urethra and bladder. It is a common consequence of the menopause, with possibly up to 80% of women experiencing symptoms. Despite a number of different diagnostic methods, there is no validated objective method by which to confirm the diagnosis in clinical practice and research settings. Education, for women and clinicians, is called for to support diagnosis and treatment. However, before this can be of global benefit, development of an accessible and reproducible diagnostic test is required. Current assessment methods include routine history and clinical examination, with the clinician's opinion based on their subjective observations. A vaginal smear to assess the ratio of superficial to parabasal cells and measurement of the pH of the vaginal secretions is more commonly used in research settings. A number of formulae have been postulated to facilitate the diagnosis including the Vaginal Health Index, the Vulval Health Index, the Genitourinary Syndrome of the Menopause assessment tool, the Genital Health Clinical Evaluation and vaginal biopsy and assessment of the vaginal microbiome. However, none of these potential methods of assessment has been validated. This article focuses on what we do not know about urogenital atrophy including the prevalence, the most appropriate terminology, aetiology, pathogenesis and the most objective and reproducible method of assessment.

A randomized, double-blind study on efficacy and safety of sepranolone in premenstrual dysphoric disorder.

Women with premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) experience mood symptoms related to the increase in progesterone and the neuroactive steroid allopregnanolone. Our hypothesis is that allopregnanolone is the symptom provoking factor. The rationale for the present study was to treat PMDD patients with the GABAA receptor modulating steroid antagonist, sepranolone (isoallopregnanolone). Patients (n = 206) with PMDD from 12 European centers were randomized in a parallel double-blind study and treated with placebo, sepranolone 10 mg and 16 mg. Patients administered sepranolone subcutaneously every 48 h during the 14 premenstrual days of three consecutive menstrual cycles. After obtaining informed consent, the PMDD diagnosis was confirmed according to DSM-5 and verified with two menstrual cycles of daily symptom ratings using the Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP) scale in an eDiary. Inclusion and exclusion criteria stipulated that the women should be essentially healthy, not pregnant, have no ongoing psychiatric disorder or take interfering medications, and have regular menstrual cycles. The study's primary endpoint was the Total symptom score (Sum21, the score for all 21 symptom questions in the DRSP). In the prespecified statistical analysis the average score of the 5 worst premenstrual days in treatment cycles 2 and 3 were subtracted from the corresponding average score in the two diagnostic cycles. The treatment effects were tested using analysis of variance in a hierarchal order starting with the combined active sepranolone treatments vs. placebo. The prespecified analysis of Sum21 showed a large treatment effect of all three treatments but no statistically significant difference to placebo. However, the ratings of distress showed a significant treatment effect of sepranolone compared to placebo (p = 0.037) and the ratings of impairment showed a trend to greater treatment effect of sepranolone compared to placebo. Many women with PMDD had symptoms during a longer period than the late luteal phase. It has previously been shown that 9 premenstrual days may be more representative for comparison of PMDD symptom periods than the 5 worst premenstrual days. A post hoc analysis was undertaken in the per protocol population investigating the treatment effect during 9 premenstrual days in the third treatment cycle. The Sum21 results of this analysis showed that the sepranolone 10 mg was significantly better than placebo (p = 0.008). Similar significant treatment effects were found for the impairment and distress scores. A significantly larger number of individuals experienced no or minimal symptoms (Sum21 <42 points) with the 10 mg sepranolone treatment compared to placebo (p = 0.020). The results indicate that there is an attenuating effect by sepranolone on symptoms, impairment, and distress in women with PMDD especially by the 10 mg dosage. Sepranolone was well tolerated, and no safety concerns were identified.

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause affects approximately 50% of women post-menopause and is under-reported. This review of the condition including established and newer treatment options aspires to empower clinicians to ask about symptoms and be more proactive in their management.