Finding the Way Forward: The Lived Experience of People With Stroke After Participation in a Complex Psychosocial Intervention.

Stroke patients' well-being is threatened after stroke. A psychosocial intervention was developed for Norwegian stroke patients living in the community. Eight individual sessions between people with stroke and a trained health care professional were conducted 1 to 6 months post-stroke with one group of participants and 6 to 12 months post-stroke with another group. Subsequently, 19 of these stroke patients were interviewed to gain an in-depth understanding of their lived experience of the influence of the intervention on their adjustment process. Interview texts were analyzed using Ricoeur's interpretation theory. Two participants did not personally find the intervention useful. The remaining participants greatly appreciated dialogues with the empathetic intervention personnel, feeling free to discuss their fears and worries. The intervention raised these participants' awareness of their needs and resources. They were guided to resume their everyday life and adopt a future-oriented attitude. The intervention facilitated their meaning-making endeavors and post-stroke adjustment.

Effect of a dialogue-based intervention on psychosocial well-being 6 months after stroke in Norway: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a dialogue-based intervention on psychosocial well-being 6 months after stroke. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS: Adults (aged ≥ 18 years) who had their first or recurrent stroke within the last month, were medically stable, had sufficient cognitive functioning to participate and understood and spoke Norwegian. METHODS: A total of 322 participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 166) or control (n = 156) group. Participants in the intervention group received up to 8 individual sessions aimed at supporting the coping and life skills of stroke survivors in addition to usual care. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with normal mood measured by the General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28). The secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life (Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale; SAQOL-39g), depression (Yale-Brown single-item questionnaire; Yale) and sense of coherence (SOC-13). RESULTS: After controlling for the baseline values, no significant benefit was found in the intervention group over the control group (odds ratio (OR): 0.898: 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.54-1.50, p = 0.680) 6 months post-stroke. CONCLUSION: Psychosocial well-being improved during the first 6 months after stroke in both arms of the trial, but no statistically significant benefit of the dialogue-based intervention was found compared with usual care.

Promoting psychosocial well-being following stroke: study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a major public health threat globally. Psychosocial well-being may be affected following stroke. Depressive symptoms, anxiety, general psychological distress and social isolation are prevalent. Approximately one third report depressive symptoms and 20% report anxiety during the first months or years after the stroke. Psychosocial difficulties may impact significantly on long-term functioning and quality of life, reduce the effects of rehabilitation services and lead to higher mortality rates. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of a previously developed and feasibility tested dialogue-based psychosocial intervention aimed at promoting psychosocial well-being and coping following stroke among stroke survivors with and without aphasia. METHODS: The study will be conducted as a multicenter, randomized, single blind controlled trial with one intervention and one control arm. It will include a total of 330 stroke survivors randomly allocated into either an intervention group (dialogue-based intervention to promote psychosocial well-being) or a control group (usual care). Participants in the intervention group will receive eight individual sessions of supported dialogues in their homes during the first six months following an acute stroke. The primary outcome measure will be psychosocial well-being measured by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Secondary outcome measures will be quality of life (SAQoL), sense of coherence (SOC), and depression (Yale). Process evaluation will be conducted in a longitudinal mixed methods study by individual qualitative interviews with 15-20 participants in the intervention and control groups, focus group interviews with the intervention personnel and data collectors, and a comprehensive analysis of implementation fidelity. DISCUSSION: The intervention described in this study protocol is based on thorough development and feasibility work, guided by the UK medical research council framework for developing and testing complex interventions. It combines classical effectiveness evaluation with a thorough process evaluation. The results from this study may inform the development of further trials aimed at promoting psychosocial well-being following stroke as well as inform the psychosocial follow up of stroke patients living at home. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02338869 ; registered 10/04/2014 (On-going trial).

Promoting psychosocial well-being following a stroke: developing a theoretically and empirically sound complex intervention.

BACKGROUND: The psychosocial consequences of stroke are complex and comprehensive and include substantial and longlasting impacts on mood, identity, social relationships, return to work and quality of life. Many studies have explored possible interventions to prevent or treat psychosocial problems, but the results have generally been disappointing. Very few studies have provided adequate theoretical accounts of the mechanisms assumed to contribute to positive outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To describe the development of a psychosocial nursing intervention aimed at promoting psychosocial health and well-being and to stimulate dialogue about how to develop and report theoretically and empirically sound complex interventions in nursing. DESIGN: A systematic, stepwise approach was used, consistent with the framework recommended for developing and evaluating complex interventions by the UK Medical Research Council. DATA SOURCES: Systematic reviews of empirical studies regarding the psychosocial consequences and needs of patients following stroke; qualitative, experiential studies of stroke and stroke recovery; theories of psychosocial well-being, coping, life skills, narrative approaches to rehabilitation and guided self-determination. REVIEW METHODS: Each systematic review was examined to determine the major psychosocial challenges and needs experienced by stroke survivors, focusing on how these challenges and needs developed over the illness trajectory, how previous interventions had sought to address them and the effective mechanisms assumed to affect the level of success of interventions. Qualitative studies were examined to reveal the subjective experiences of stroke and stroke recovery, paying particular attention to the development of needs across time and context. A qualitative synthesis of the major characteristics of the trajectory of stroke rehabilitation and recovery during the first year was developed. Theories were examined to illuminate possible effective mechanisms and actions aimed at promoting psychosocial well-being during the stroke recovery process. RESULTS: A dialogue-based intervention comprising eight encounters between stroke survivors and trained health care workers was designed, based on narrative theories, empowerment philosophy and guided self determination. Worksheets and a guiding topical outline were developed to support the dialogue. CONCLUSIONS: The UK Medical Research Council framework facilitated the systematic development of an empirically and theoretically informed complex nursing intervention aimed at promoting post-stroke psychosocial well-being.