Tacrolimus's Time Below Therapeutic Range Is Associated With Acute Pancreatic Graft Rejection and the Development of De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies.

Tacrolimus is pivotal in pancreas transplants but poses challenges in maintaining optimal levels due to recipient differences. This study aimed to explore the utility of time spent below the therapeutic range and intrapatient variability in predicting rejection and de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development in pancreas graft recipients. This retrospective unicentric study included adult pancreas transplant recipients between January 2006 and July 2020. Recorded variables included demographics, immunosuppression details, HLA matching, biopsy results, dnDSA development, and clinical parameters. Statistical analysis included ROC curves, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. A total of 131 patients were included. Those with biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR, 12.2%) had more time (39.9% ± 24% vs. 25.72% ± 21.57%, p = 0.016) and tests (41.95% ± 13.57% vs. 29.96% ± 17.33%, p = 0.009) below therapeutic range. Specific cutoffs of 31.5% for time and 34% for tests below the therapeutic range showed a high negative predictive value for BPAR (93.98% and 93.1%, respectively). Similarly, patients with more than 34% of tests below the therapeutic range were associated with dnDSA appearance (38.9% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.012; OR 6.135, 1.346-27.78). In pancreas transplantation, maintaining optimal tacrolimus levels is crucial. Suboptimal test percentages below the therapeutic range prove valuable in identifying acute graft rejection risk.

Most recently developed polyester polymer alloy dialyzer: A new medium cut-off membrane?

BACKGROUND: New versions of the polyester polymer alloy (PEPA) membrane have appeared over the years, with increases in both the pore size and the amount of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) to optimize hydrophilicity performance. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of the most recently developed PEPA dialyzer, the FDY series, in hemodialysis (HD) modality in terms of uremic toxin removal and albumin loss and to compare it with that of several high-flux dialyzers currently used in HD and post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments. METHODS: A prospective study was carried out in 21 patients. All patients underwent six dialysis sessions with the same routine dialysis parameters; only the dialyzer and/or the dialysis modality varied: FX80 in HD, FDY 180 in HD, Clearum HS17 in HDF, Elisio 19H in HDF, Vitapes 180 in HDF, and FX80 in post-dilution HDF. The reduction ratios (RR) of urea, creatinine, ß2-microglobulin, myoglobin, κFLC, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, α1-acid glycoprotein, λFLC, and albumin were compared intraindividually. Dialysate albumin loss was also measured. RESULTS: Both membranes FDY and FX80 are high-flux dialyzers and are applied here in high-flux HD. The average RR of ß2-microglobulin was slightly lower in the two HD treatments than in the HDF treatments. Comparison of dialysis treatments revealed that the PEPA FDY dialyzer in the HD modality was more effective than the FX80 dialyzer in high-flux HD and was as effective as post-dilution HDF, especially in terms of myoglobin, κFLC, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, and λFLC RRs. The FDY treatments obtained similar albumin RR in blood and slightly higher dialysate albumin loss, although the values were clinically acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The most recently developed PEPA dialyzers in the HD modality were as effective as all treatments in the HDF modality and were clearly superior to high-flux helixone HD treatment. These results confirm that this dialyzer should be categorized within the medium cut-off (MCO) membrane classification.

Metabolomics of Plasma in XLH Patients with Arterial Hypertension: New Insights into the Underlying Mechanisms.

X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) is a rare genetic disorder that increases fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23). XLH patients have an elevated risk of early-onset hypertension. The precise factors contributing to hypertension in XLH patients have yet to be identified. A multicenter cross-sectional study of adult patients diagnosed with XLH. Metabolomic analysis was performed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled to a high-resolution mass spectrometer. Twenty subjects were included, of which nine (45%) had hypertension. The median age was 44 years. Out of the total, seven (35%) subjects had a family history of hypertension. No statistically significant differences were found between both groups for nephrocalcinosis or hyperparathyroidism. Those with hypertension exhibited significantly higher levels of creatinine (1.08 ± 0.31 mg/dL vs. 0.78 ± 0.19 mg/dL; p = 0.01) and LDL-C (133.33 ± 21.92 mg/dL vs. 107.27 ± 20.12 mg/dL, p = 0.01). A total of 106 metabolites were identified. Acetylcarnitine (p = 0.03), pyruvate p = (0.04), ethanolamine (p = 0.03), and butyric acid (p = 0.001) were significantly different between both groups. This study is the first to examine the metabolomics of hypertension in patients with XLH. We have identified significant changes in specific metabolites that shed new light on the potential mechanisms of hypertension in XLH patients. These findings could lead to new studies identifying associated biomarkers and developing new diagnostic approaches for XLH patients.

Results of Salt Intake Restriction Monitored with the New Sodium Control Biosensor.

INTRODUCTION: Adherence to a low-sodium (Na) diet is crucial in patients under hemodialysis, as it improves cardiovascular outcomes and reduces thirst and interdialytic weight gain. Recommended salt intake is lower than 5 g/day. The new 6008 CAREsystem monitors incorporate a Na module that offers the advantage of estimating patients' salt intake. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of dietary Na restriction for 1 week, monitored with the Na biosensor. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 48 patients who maintained their usual dialysis parameters and were dialyzed with a 6008 CAREsystem monitor with activation of the Na module. Total Na balance, pre-/post-dialysis weight, serum Na (sNa), changes in pre- to post-dialysis sNa (ΔsNa), diffusive balance, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure were compared twice, once after 1 week of patients' usual Na diet and again after another week with more restricted Na intake. RESULTS: Restricted Na intake increased the percentage of patients on a low-Na diet (<85 Na mmol/day) from 8% to 44%. Average daily Na intake decreased from 149 ± 54 to 95 ± 49 mmol, and interdialytic weight gain was reduced by 460 ± 484 g per session. More restricted Na intake also decreased pre-dialysis sNa and increased both intradialytic diffusive balance and ΔsNa. In hypertensive patients, reducing daily Na by more than 3 g Na/day lowered their systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The new Na module allowed objective monitoring of Na intake, which in turn could permit more precise personalized dietary recommendations in patients under hemodialysis.

Efficacy and Safety of the Medium Cut-Off Elisio HX Dialyzer.

INTRODUCTION: The medium cut-off Elisio HX dialyzer by Nipro became commercially available in Europe in 2021, but there are still no reports of in vivo data. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of it compared with previously evaluated hemodialysis (HD), expanded HD (HDx), and postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments. METHODS: A prospective study was carried out on 18 patients who underwent 5 dialysis sessions: FX80 Cordiax in HD, Elisio H19 in HD, Elisio HX19 in HDx, Theranova 400 in HDx, and FX80 Cordiax in HDF. The reduction ratios of urea, creatinine, ß2-microglobulin, myoglobin, kappa FLC, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, α1-acid glycoprotein, lambda FLC, and albumin were compared. Dialysate albumin loss was measured. RESULTS: The comparison between the different dialysis modalities revealed no difference for small molecules, but HDx and HDF were significantly more efficient than HD for medium and large molecule removal. The efficacy of Elisio HX19 dialyzer in HDx was similar to the Theranova 400, superior to both dialyzers in HD, and slightly lower than HDF. Albumin losses in dialysate with HD dialyzers were less than 1 g, but between 1.5 and 2.5 g in HDx and HDF. The global removal score (GRS) values with HDx treatments were statistically significantly higher than those with HD. The highest GRS was obtained with the helixone dialyzer in HDF. CONCLUSIONS: The new MCO dialyzer, Elisio HX, performs with excellent behavior and tolerance. It represents an upgrade compared to their predecessor and is very close to the removal capacity of HDF treatment.

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) versus expanded hemodialysis (HDx).

Medium cutoff (MCO) membranes have resulted in a novel dialyzer class designed to improve membrane permeability and have been postulated as an alternative to online hemodiafiltration since MCO membranes may achieve similar solute clearances. These membranes have been incorporated into clinical practice, and the term expanded HD (HDx) has been proposed to differentiate from high-flux hemodialysis. Efficacy, safety, and quality of life comparison of HDF versus HDx have been reviewed in this article.

Distinct Solute Removal Patterns by Similar Surface High-Flux Membranes in Haemodiafiltration: The Adsorption Point of View.

INTRODUCTION: Haemodialysis (HD) allow depuration of uraemic toxins by diffusion, convection, and adsorption. Online haemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments add high convection to enhance removal. There are no prior studies on the relationship between convection and adsorption in HD membranes. The possible benefits conferred by intrinsic adsorption on protein-bound uraemic toxins (PBUTs) removal are unknown. METHODS: Twenty-two patients underwent their second 3-days per week HD sessions with randomly selected haemodialysers (polysulfone, polymethylmethacrylate, cellulose triacetate, and polyamide copolymer) in high-flux HD and HDF. Blood samples were taken at the beginning and at the end of the treatment to assess the reduction ratio (RR) in a wide range of molecular weight uraemic toxins. A mid-range removal score (GRS) was also calculated. An elution protocol was implemented to quantify the amount of adsorbed mass (Mads) for each molecule in every dialyser. RESULTS: All synthetic membranes achieved higher RR for all toxins when used in HDF, specially the polysulfone haemodialyser, resulting in a GRS = 0.66 ± 0.06 (p < 0.001 vs. cellulose triacetate and polyamide membranes). Adsorption was slightly enhanced by convection for all membranes. The polymethylmethacrylate membrane showed expected substantial adsorption of ß2-microglobulin (MadsHDF = 3.5 ± 2.1 mg vs. MadsHD = 2.1 ± 0.9 mg, p = 0.511), whereas total protein adsorption was pronounced in the cellulose triacetate membrane (MadsHDF = 427.2 ± 207.9 mg vs. MadsHD = 274.7 ± 138.3 mg, p = 0.586) without enhanced PBUT removal. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Convection improves removal and slightly increases adsorption. Adsorbed proteins do not lead to enhanced PBUTs depuration and limit membrane efficiency due to fouling. Selection of the correct membrane for convective therapies is mandatory to optimize removal efficiency.

Impact of Acetate versus Citrate Dialysates on Intermediary Metabolism-A Targeted Metabolomics Approach.

Acetate is widely used as a dialysate buffer to avoid the precipitation of bicarbonate salts. However, even at low concentrations that wouldn't surpass the metabolic capacity of the Krebs tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, other metabolic routes are activated, leading to undesirable clinical consequences by poorly understood mechanisms. This study aims to add information that could biologically explain the clinical improvements found in patients using citrate dialysate. A unicentric, cross-over, prospective targeted metabolomics study was designed to analyze the differences between two dialysates, one containing 4 mmol/L of acetate (AD) and the other 1 mmol/L of citrate (CD). Fifteen metabolites were studied to investigate changes induced in the TCA cycle, glycolysis, anaerobic metabolism, ketone bodies, and triglyceride and aminoacidic metabolism. Twenty-one patients completed the study. Citrate increased during the dialysis sessions when CD was used, without surpassing normal values. Other differences found in the next TCA cycle steps showed an increased substrate accumulation when using AD. While lactate decreased, pyruvate remained stable, and ketogenesis was boosted during dialysis. Acetylcarnitine and myo-inositol were reduced during dialysis, while glycerol remained constant. Lastly, glutamate and glutarate decreased due to the inhibition of amino acidic degradation. This study raises new hypotheses that need further investigation to understand better the biochemical processes that dialysis and the different dialysate buffers induce in the patient's metabolism.

Humoral and Cellular Responses to mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Administered to Hemodialysis Patients.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Patients with kidney failure who are receiving maintenance dialysis have a higher risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and worse clinical outcomes after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) than the general population. Therefore, immunization against SARS-CoV-2 with effective vaccines is an important component of health-maintenance strategies for these patients. This study evaluated the humoral and cellular responses to messenger RNA (mRNA) SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in this population. STUDY DESIGN: Observational prospective multicenter cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 205 patients treated at 3 dialysis units at the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (Spain) were vaccinated from February 3 to April 4, 2021, and followed until April 23, 2021. EXPOSURE: Immunization with either the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. OUTCOME: Seroconversion, defined as the detection of IgG antibodies to the receptor-binding domain of the S1 spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 (anti-S1-RBD IgG), and the identification of activated CD4+T cells 3 weeks after completing vaccination. Anti-S1-RBD IgG levels were also analyzed as a secondary outcome. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Univariate and multivariable logistic and multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the associations between vaccination and study outcomes. RESULTS: We found that 97.7% of 175 vaccinated patients who were seronegative at baseline developed a response (humoral, cellular, or both); 95.4% of these patients seroconverted, while 62% of those tested for cellular immunity had a positive response. Greater age and immunosuppressive treatment were associated with lower antibody levels. LIMITATIONS: Mandatory vaccine administration by health authorities. Anti-S1-RBD IgG levels were reported up to 150U/mL and cellular immune responses were characterized qualitatively. Antibody assay and cellular response assessment may not be comparable with previously published laboratory approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Immunization with mRNA vaccines generated a humoral and cellular immune response in a high proportion of patients with kidney failure receiving maintenance dialysis. These findings as well as the high risk of infection and poor clinical outcomes among these patients make their vaccination a health priority.

Evaluation and comparison of polysulfone TS-UL and PMMA NF-U dialyzers versus expanded hemodialysis and postdilution hemodiafiltration.

Toray has created a new generation of dialyzers, the polysulphone (TS) UL series, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) NF-U series, which offer enhanced efficacy over the previous TS-S series and NF-H series. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these dialyzer series versus contrasted expanded hemodialysis (HDx) and postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDF). We conducted a prospective study in 12 patients. Each patient underwent six dialysis sessions: FX80 Cordiax in HD, Toraysulfone TS-1.8 UL in HD, Theranova 400 in HDx, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) NF-2.1 U in HDF, Toraysulfone TS-2.1 UL in HDF, and FX80 Cordiax in HDF. The removal ratios (RRs) of urea, creatinine, ß2 -microglobulin, myoglobin, prolactin, α1 -microglobulin, α1 -acid glycoprotein, and albumin were compared intraindividually. Dialysate albumin loss was also measured. The RRs for ß2 -microglobulin, myoglobin, prolactin, α1 -microglobulin, and α1 -acid glycoprotein were higher with the TS-2.1 UL and FX80 Cordiax dialyzers in HDF than those obtained with HD treatments and NF-2.1 U in HDF. The ß2 -microglobulin, myoglobin, and prolactin RRs were also higher with HDx than those obtained with HD treatments. The myoglobin and prolactin RRs were higher with TS-1.8 UL in HD than those obtained with helixone dialyzers in HD. Dialysate albumin loss was less than 3 g in all situations except in TS-2.1 UL in HDF. The highest global removal score values were obtained with the TS-2.1 UL and helixone dialyzers in HDF. Significant differences were found between all study situations. In conclusion, the new generation dialyzers, Toraysulfone TS Series UL and PMMA NF-U series, show excellent behaviour and tolerance in HD and HDF, representing an upgrade versus their predecessor series. The higher permeability of the TS UL series has been proven with higher efficiency in HD and maximum performance in HDF. The new PMMA NF-U series allows the use of HDF with good efficiency and complete safety.

Efficacy and safety of the Clearum dialyzer.

The Clearum dialyzer, built by Medtronic, became commercially available in several European countries in 2020, but there are still no reports of in vivo data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and risk of hypoalbuminemia of this dialyzer compared with previously evaluated hemodialysis (HD), expanded hemodialysis (HDx), and postdilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments. A prospective study was carried out in 15 patients. Each patient underwent seven dialysis sessions: FX80 Cordiax in HD, Clearum HS17 in HD, Phylther 17-SD in HDx, Theranova 400 in HDx, Phylther 17-G in postdilution HDF, Clearum HS17 in postdilution HDF, and FX80 Cordiax in postdilution HDF. The reduction ratios of urea, creatinine, ß2 -microglobulin, myoglobin, prolactin, α1 -microglobulin, α1 -acid glycoprotein, and albumin were compared intraindividually. Dialysate albumin loss was also measured. Comparison of dialysis techniques revealed no differences between small molecules, but HDx and HDF were significantly higher than HD with medium and large molecular weights. The Clearum dialyzer in HDF obtained similar results to FX80 Cordiax in HDF, was slightly superior to Phylther 17-G in HDF, and was statistically superior to both dialyzers in HDx. Albumin losses with the Clearum dialyzer were among the lowest, both in HD and HDF treatments. The highest global removal score (GRS) values were obtained with the helixone and Clearum dialyzers in HDF, with similar results both in HD and HDF. In addition, the GRS values with HDx treatments were statistically significantly higher than those with HD. The new Clearum dialyzer has excellent behavior and tolerance in HD and HDF. Its adequate permeability has been proven with its maximal performance in HDF, which could represent an upgrade versus its predecessor polyphenylene dialyzers.

Improvements in Inflammation and Calcium Balance of Citrate versus Acetate as Dialysate Buffer in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Unicentric, Cross-Over, Prospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: The composition of the dialysate is a crucial feature in the dialysis treatment. Two of its most debated elements are the optimal calcium concentration and the use of acetate as a buffer. Moreover, among the different alternatives to achieve acetate-free dialysis, the use of citrate is postulated as the most suitable option. The objective of this study is to identify the potential beneficial effects of citrate when compared to acetate dialysate (AD) both in short-term effects (especially regarding intradialytic calcium balance and cardiac damage biomarkers) and in medium-term ones with CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) and inflammatory biomarkers measured after twelve sessions performed with each dialysate. METHODS: This is a unicentric, cross-over, prospective study. Each patient underwent 24 dialysis sessions, 12 with each dialysate buffer. Blood samples were taken in 2 different sessions with each acidifier. They include CKD-MBD and inflammatory biomarkers. The calcium concentration of both dialysates was 1.5 mmol/L, while all other dialysis parameters and patients' treatment remained unchanged during the study period. RESULTS: When comparing AD and citrate dialysate (CD), there were no differences in pre-dialysis ionized calcium (iCa) (1.11 vs. 1.08 mmol/L) in both groups. However, there was a significant increase in iCa with the use of AD in immediate and 30-min post-dialysis blood samples. In contrast, iCa levels remained stable with the use of citrate. Inflammatory biomarkers were also reduced after the use of CD. CONCLUSIONS: The use of citrate provides interesting advantages when compared to acetate. It maintains iCa levels stable during dialysis sessions with a neutral or negative effect on calcium balance, and it improves the chronic inflammatory condition that comes with long-time hemodialysis treatment. These beneficial effects may lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes.

SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Spanish Cohort of CKD-5D Patients: Prevalence, Clinical Presentation, Outcomes, and De-Isolation Results.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 is a highly contagious disease that has easily spread worldwide. Outpatient maintenance hemodialysis seems to entail an increased risk of contagion, and previous reports inform of increased mortality among this population. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory parameters, outcomes, and management once discharged of CKD-5D patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 from our health area. RESULTS: Out of the 429 CKD-5D population, 36 were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection (8%): 34 on in-center hemodialysis and 2 on peritoneal dialysis. Five were asymptomatic. The most common symptom was fever (70%), followed by dyspnea and cough. History of cardiovascular disease and elevation of LDH and C-reactive protein during admission were associated with higher mortality. Thirteen patients died (36%), 8 patients were admitted to an ICU, and survival was low (38%) among the latter. The mean time to death was 12 days. Most discharged patients got negative rRT-PCR in nasopharyngeal swabs within 26 days of diagnosis. However, there is a portion of cured patients that continue to have positive results even more than 2 months after the initial presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on dialysis have an increased mortality risk if infected with SARS-CoV-2. Preventive measures have proven useful. Thus, proper ones, such as universal screening of the population and isolation when required, need to be generalized. Better de-isolation criteria are necessary to ensure an appropriate use of public health resources.

Rapid re-transplantation safety following early kidney graft loss.

INTRODUCTION: Early graft loss is a devastating kidney transplant complication associated with high mortality and an increased risk of sensitization to antigens from the failed graft. Moreover, if rapid re-transplantation were to occur, given that the human leukocyte antigen antibodies identification may not be reliable until several weeks after transplantation, the recipient's immunological status would be uncertain. Hence, there could be an increased immunological risk. To date, there is no information on whether a rapid re-transplantation after early graft loss, without a new reliable anti-HLA determination, is safe. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the number of rejections and the graft survival of re-transplanted patients with early graft loss (defined as graft failure before 30 days from transplant) from our centre between June 2003 and November 2019. The studied population was divided into rapid re-transplantation (performed within 30 days of early graft loss) and late re-transplantation (performed beyond those 30 days). RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were re-transplanted after early graft loss. There were nine rapid re-transplantation cases with an 89% five-year graft survival and one antibody-mediated rejection episode. Furthermore, we identified 38 cases of late re-transplantation with a 69% five-year graft survival, 4 T cell-mediated, and 11 antibody-mediated rejections. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid re-transplantation appears to be safe and does not entail increased rejection risk, nor does it impact long-term graft survival when compared to late re-transplantation.

Determining factors for hemodiafiltration to equal or exceed the performance of expanded hemodialysis.

The aim of the study was to compare expanded hemodialysis (HDx) with hemodiafiltration (HDF) at different infusion flows to identify the main determinants, namely blood flow (Qb), replacement volume, infusion flow (Qi), ultrafiltration flow (Quf ), filtration fraction (FF), and the point at which the effectiveness of HDF equals or exceeds that of HDx. We conducted a prospective, single-center study in 12 patients. Each patient underwent 12 dialysis sessions: six sessions with Qb 350 and six with Qb 400 mL/min; with each Qb, one session was with HDx and five sessions were with FX80 (one in HD, and four with Qi 50, 75, 90/100 mL/min or autosubstitution in postdilution HDF). The reduction ratios (RR) of urea, creatinine, ß2 -microglobulin, myoglobin, prolactin, α1 -microglobulin, α1 -acid glycoprotein, and albumin were compared intraindividually and the global removal score (GRS) was calculated. The mean replacement volume with Qb 350 mL/min was 13.77 ± 0.92 L with Qi 50 mL/min, 20.75 ± 1.17 L with Qi 75, 23.83 ± 1.92 L with Qi 90, and 27.51 ± 2.77 L with autosubstitution. Similar results were obtained with Qb 400 mL/min, and the results were only slightly higher with Qi 100 mL/min or in autosubstitution. The GRS was positively correlated with replacement volume with Qb 350 (R2  = 0.583) and with Qb 400 (R2  = 0.584); with Quf with Qb 350 (R2  = 0.556) and with Qb 400 (R2  = 0.604); and also with FF with Qb 350 (R2  = 0.556) and with Qb 400 mL/min (R2  = 0.603). The minimum convective volume in HDF from which it is possible to overcome the efficacy of HDx was 19.2 L with Qb 350 and 17.6 L with Qb 400 mL/min. The cut-off point of Quf at which HDF exceeded the effectiveness of HDx was 80.6 mL/min with Qb 350 and 74.1 mL/min with Qb 400 mL/min. The cut-off point at which FF in HDF exceeded the effectiveness of the HDx was 23.0% with Qb 350 and 18.6% with Qb 400 mL/min. In conclusion, this study confirms the superiority of postdilution HDF over HDx when replacement volume, convective volume, Quf , or FF exceeds certain values. Increasing the Qb in postdilution HDF manages to increase the convective dose and more easily overcome the HDx.

High-permeability alternatives to current dialyzers performing both high-flux hemodialysis and postdilution online hemodiafiltration.

Most high-flux dialyzers can be used in both hemodialysis (HD) and online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). However, some of these dialyzers have higher permeability and should not be prescribed for OL-HDF to avoid high albumin losses. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of a currently used dialyzer in HD and OL-HDF with those of several other high permeability dialyzers which should only be used in HD. A prospective, single-center study was carried out in 21 patients. Each patient underwent 5 dialysis sessions with routine dialysis parameters: 2 sessions with Helixone (HD and postdilution OL-HDF) and 1 session each with steam sterilized polyphenylene, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and medium cut-off (MCO) dialyzers in HD treatment. The removal ratios (RR) of urea, creatinine, ß2 -microglobulin, myoglobin, prolactin, α1 -microglobulin, α1 -acid glycoprotein, and albumin were compared intraindividually. A proportional part of the dialysate was collected to quantify the loss of various solutes, including albumin. Urea and creatinine RRs with the Helixone-HDF and MCO dialyzers were higher than with the other 3 dialyzers in HD. The ß2 -microglobulin, myoglobin and prolactin RRs with Helixone-HDF treatment were significantly higher than those obtained with all 4 dialyzers in HD treatment. The ß2 -microglobulin value obtained with the MCO dialyzer was also higher than that obtained with the other 3 dialyzers in HD treatment. The myoglobin RR with MCO was higher than those obtained with Helixone and PMMA in HD treatment. The prolactin RR with Helixone-HD was significantly lower than those obtained in the other 4 study sessions. The α1 -microglobulin and α1 - acid glycoprotein RRs with Helixone-HDF were significantly higher than those obtained with Helixone and PMMA in HD treatment. The albumin loss varied from 0.54 g with Helixone-HD to 3.3 g with polyphenylene. The global removal score values ((UreaRR + ß2 -microglobulinRR + myoglobinRR + prolactinRR + α1 -microglobulinRR + α1 -acid glycoproteinRR - albuminRR )/6) were 43.7% with Helixone-HD, 47.7% with PMMA, 54% with polyphenylene, 54.8% with MCO and 59.6% with Helixone-HDF, with significant differences. In conclusion, this study confirms the superiority of OL-HDF over HD with the high-flux dialyzers that allow both treatments. Although new dialyzers with high permeability can only be used in HD, they are in an intermediate position and some are very close to OL-HDF.

Medium Cut-Off Dialyzer versus Eight Hemodiafiltration Dialyzers: Comparison Using a Global Removal Score.

BACKGROUND: A novel class of membranes, medium cut-off (MCO) membranes, has recently been designed to achieve interesting removal capacities for middle and large middle molecules in hemodialysis (HD) treatments. The few studies published to date have reported contradictory results regarding middle-sized molecules when comparing MCO dialyzers versus dialyzers used in online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF). METHODS: A prospective, single-center study was carried out in 22 patients. Each patient underwent 9 dialysis sessions with routine dialysis parameters, one with an MCO dialyzer in HD and the other 8 with different dialyzers in OL-HDF. The removal ratio (RR) of urea, creatinine, ß2-microglobulin, myoglobin, prolactin, α1-microglobulin, α1-acid glycoprotein, and albumin was intraindividually compared. Albumin loss in dialysate was measured. We propose a global removal score ([ureaRR + ß2-microglobulinRR + myoglobinRR + prolactinRR + α1-microglobulinRR + α1-acid glycoproteinRR]/6 - albuminRR) as a new tool for measuring dialyzer effectiveness. RESULTS: No significant differences in the RRs of small and middle molecular range molecules were observed between the MCO vs. OL-HDF dialyzers (range 60-80%). Lower RRs were found for α1-microglobulin and α1-acid glycoprotein without significant differences. The albumin RR was < 11% and dialysate albumin loss was < 3.5 g in all situations without significant differences. The global removal score was 54.9 ± 4.8% with the MCO dialyzer without significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of a wide range of molecular weights, calculated with the proposed global removal score, was almost equal with the MCO dialyzer in HD treatment compared with 8 high-flux dialyzers in high-volume OL-HDF without relevant changes in albumin loss. The global removal score could be a new tool to evaluate the effectiveness of dialyzers and/or different treatment modalities.

Improved Control of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Hemodialysis Patients Switching from Oral Cinacalcet to Intravenous Etelcalcetide, Especially in Nonadherent Patients.

BACKGROUND: Etelcalcetide is a novel second-generation calcimimetic that, because of its intravenous administration, could improve treatment adherence in secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of etelcalcetide compared with that of cinacalcet in controlling SHPT in patients under hemodialysis. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in 29 patients with SHPT under hemodialysis who switched from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide with a follow-up of 6 months. A survey was conducted of adherence to the oral calcimimetic. The primary end-point of the study was to assess whether etelcalcetide was more effective than cinacalcet in controlling SHPT. RESULTS: After the switch of treatment, none of the patients developed clinical intolerance or new adverse effects. Etelcalcetide was more effective than cinacalcet in controlling intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), with an overall decrease in iPTH levels that was significant from the second month. Average calcium levels remained within the normal range, with a higher percentage of hypocalcemia with etelcalcetide (6.9 vs. 13.8%), which was asymptomatic in all cases. Patients who were nonadherent to cinacalcet (38%) showed a significant reduction in calcium and iPTH during follow-up with etelcalcetide. The adherent group (62%) also showed a trend to lower iPTH levels reaching statistical significance after 5 months of follow-up. The dose conversion factor for the switch from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide was etelcalcetide/session = 0.111*mg cinacalcet/day + 0.96, R2 = 0.57. CONCLUSIONS: Etelcalcetide was more effective than cinacalcet in this patient population, especially in the nonadherent subgroup, leading to better SHPT control without adverse effects.