Real benefits of ultrasound evaluation of hand and foot synovitis for better characterisation of the disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Optimal management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) depends on accurate evaluation of disease activity. Foot synovitis is not included in the most used RA outcome measure (DAS-28 score). The aim of this study was to investigate how musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK-US) examination of hand and feet correlate with the disease activity score (DAS-28 score). We also explored whether performing MSK-US assessments of hands alone compared with hands and feet underestimates the disease activity in RA. METHODS: This is a real-life cross-sectional study of 101 patients (51 with RA and 50 with other musculoskeletal conditions) with inflammatory small joint pain, who underwent MSK-US examination of hands and feet. RESULTS: MSK-US-detected hand synovitis was found in 18/51 (35.3%) RA patients and 16/50 (32%) of those with other musculoskeletal conditions (p = 0.96), while foot synovitis was detected in 18/51 (35.3%) and 12/50 (24%) patients, respectively (p = 0.78). DAS-28 did not correlate with any of the US outcome measures in patients with RA. Six out of 13 (46.1%) RA patients in remission, 7/14 (50%) with low disease activity and 18/32 (56.2%) with moderate disease activity (according to DAS-28 definition) had active synovitis as assessed by the MSK-US examination of their hands and feet. MSK-US-detected synovitis led to treatment escalation in 26/51 (51%) RA patients. CONCLUSION: This study emphasises that MSK-US examination of hands and feet has led to optimised management of the majority of RA patients, which would have not been possible otherwise, because of the lack of correlation between DAS-28 assessment and MSK-US outcomes. KEY POINTS: • The most used disease activity score in rheumatoid arthritis (DAS-28) did not correlate with US outcome measures derived from hands and feet examination. • DAS-28 did not differentiate between RA patients with subclinical active synovitis versus well-controlled disease on US. • As a result of US examination of the hands and feet, 51% RA patients had their immunosuppressive treatment optimised.

Outcome measures of disease activity in inflammatory arthritis.

The most common types of chronic inflammatory arthritis are rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. In order to assess the activity of these diseases and tailor therapy, several outcome measures have been developed. They include composite scores based on clinical findings, biochemical markers and patient questionnaires. This article discusses the most commonly used outcome measures and looks at their limitations in quantifying the complex clinical features of different types of inflammatory arthritis, focusing in particular on rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis.

Targeting cytokines as a treatment for patients with sepsis: A lost cause or a strategy still worthy of pursuit?

Despite often knowing the aetiology of sepsis and its clinical course there has not been the anticipated advances in treatment strategies. Cytokines are influential mediators of immune/inflammatory reactions and in patients with sepsis high circulating levels are implicated in the onset and perpetuation of organ failure. Antagonising the activities of pro-inflammatory cytokines enhances survival in animal models of sepsis but, so far, such a therapeutic strategy has not improved patient outcome. This article addresses the questions of why encouraging laboratory findings have failed to be translated into successful treatments of critically ill patients and whether modifying cytokine activity still remains a promising avenue for therapeutic advance in severe sepsis. In pursuing this task we have selected reports that we believe provide an incisive, critical and balanced view of the topic.

Using patient stories to inspire quality improvement within the NHS Modernization Agency collaborative programmes.

The importance of obtaining the opinions of service users has long been recognized and, traditionally, most contact has focused on measuring their satisfaction with the services they receive. However, there is little evidence that this has had much impact on improving care. The Discovery Interview Process, a technique for listening to patients and carers and using their narratives to improve care, is discussed in this article. This approach has been used in the pilot phases of the UK Coronary Heart Disease Collaborative and Critical Care Collaborative. These narratives develop understanding grounded in experience. Those delivering care can interpret the narratives using their own clinical and professional knowledge and experience to create better or new ways of meeting patients' and carers' needs. Using their own expert knowledge they can identify needs within the narratives, including those that patients and carers did not know they had. The principal techniques for gathering these narratives are outlined, and ways of using such data to inform patient-focused service improvements are discussed. Various locally sensitive methods for presenting the narratives to expert interprofessional teams are also described along with emerging experience of this feedback. We consider the Discovery Interview technique for gathering patient and carer narratives to be a potentially powerful method for informing quality improvements, discovering what really matters to patients and their carers. This pragmatic approach could prove manageable within local quality improvement projects.