Randomised clinical trial of group-based physiotherapy in extremely low birthweight children with minimal/mild motor impairment: A preliminary study.

AIM: Extremely low birthweight infants often present with mild neurodevelopmental impairments in gross motor function and postural stability in early childhood. The aim of the study was to undertake a randomised controlled trial to determine the short- and longer-term effects of group-based physiotherapy compared to standard care on performance in extremely low birthweight children with minimal/mild impairment. METHODS: Fifty children aged 4 years, born <28 weeks gestation and/or birthweight <1000 g with minimal/mild motor impairment were enrolled in a randomised controlled trial and randomly allocated to 6 weeks of group-based intervention (n = 24) or standard care (n = 26). The intervention consisted of a combination of traditional physiotherapy and task-oriented approaches of approximately 1 h in duration and varied according to each child's strengths and weaknesses. Baseline, post intervention and 1 year post baseline assessments included Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2), single leg stance, lateral reach and long jump. RESULTS: Forty-eight (96%) children completed the study, which demonstrated no significant differences between the intervention and standard care groups on any of the assessments. Both groups improved initially from baseline to initial reassessment on the MABC-2 (P < 0.001). For both groups, however, MABC-2 manual dexterity, aiming/catching and total score declined from baseline to 1 year follow-up. However, for both groups, single leg stance and limb strength were significantly improved from baseline to 1 year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in outcomes between groups. Both approaches may contribute to improved short-term performance and longer-term improvements on functional skills in extremely preterm children.

Are behaviour problems in extremely low-birthweight children related to their motor ability?

AIM: To investigate whether behaviour problems are independently related to mild motor impairment in 11-13-year-old children born preterm with extremely low birthweight (ELBW). METHODS: The cross-sectional study included 48 (27 males) non-disabled, otherwise healthy ELBW children (<1000 g) and 55 (28 males) term-born peers. Parents reported behaviour using the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL). Children completed the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (Movement ABC). RESULTS: Extremely low birthweight children had poorer behaviour scores (CBCL Total Problem T score: mean difference = 5.89, 95% confidence interval = 10.29, 1.49, p = 0.009) and Movement ABC Total Motor Impairment Scores (ELBW group median = 17.5, IQR = 12.3; term-born group median = 7.5, IQR = 9, p < 0.01) than term-born peers. Behaviour was related to motor score (regression coefficient 2.16; 95% confidence interval 0.34, 3.97, p = 0.02) independent of gender, socio-economic factors or birthweight. Motor score had the strongest association with attention (ρ = 0.51; p < 0.01) and social behaviours (ρ = 0.50; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Behaviour problems of otherwise healthy 11- to 13-year-old ELBW children are not related to prematurity independent of their motor difficulties. Supporting improved motor competence in ELBW preteen children may support improved behaviour, particularly attention and social behaviours.

Goal Attainment Scaling to Evaluate Intervention on Individual Gains for Children Born Extremely Preterm.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of group-based physical therapy on individual gains among preterm and/or extremely low-birth-weight children with minimal or mild impairment at 4 years using Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS). To explore the relationship between GAS with motor and postural outcomes and effect of gender on GAS scores. METHODS: Twenty-four 4-year-old children (born <28 weeks' gestation and/or birth weight <1000 g) with minimal or mild motor impairment completed 6 group-based weekly intervention sessions and a goal-based home program. Assessments included GAS, Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2), postural stability, and limb strength after intervention. RESULTS: GAS group T score improved, exceeding expected goal of "0" score after intervention (mean = 58.2, standard deviation = 0.82). GAS mean T-score and MABC-2 percentile were moderately correlated (r = 0.42, P = .04). Females improved more than males (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Goals were achieved above expected level after intervention and were related to motor coordination. Male gender is a risk factor for less favorable outcomes.

Fitness limitations in non-disabled extremely low birthweight adolescents.

AIM: This study aims to compare non-disabled otherwise healthy extremely low birthweight (ELBW) (<1000 g) children and term-born peers in an investigation of relationship between cardiorespiratory endurance and parent report of competence. METHODS: Forty-eight of 105 eligible ELBW 11- to 13-year-old children (27 male) and 55 term-born school peers (28 male) completed a 20-m shuttle run, anthropometric measures, respiratory function tests and the Motor Assessment Battery for Children. Parents completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). RESULTS: The ELBW group had poorer cardiorespiratory endurance (P = 0.002), growth (P = 0.002), respiratory function (P = 0.003) and motor ability (P < 0.001) than term-born peers. Parents reported the ELBW children to be less competent than term-born peers: CBCL total T score mean difference -9, 95% confidence interval -14, -5 (P < 0.001). Cardiorespiratory endurance predicted competence (regression coefficient 0.865; 95% confidence interval 0.352, 1.378; P = 0.001) independent of prematurity, growth, respiratory function, motor score, gender and socio-economic status. Cardiorespiratory endurance had association with social competence for all participating children, but was related to CBCL Activities Competence only for the ELBW children who were the significantly less fit group. CONCLUSIONS: The poor cardiorespiratory endurance prevalent in non-disabled otherwise healthy ELBW children is associated with general competence independent of prematurity and of the impact of other mild physical deficits, gender or socio-economic status. The relationship demonstrated between cardiorespiratory endurance and competence to engage in general activities of daily living, seen only in the less fit ELBW children, identifies the fitness levels in non-disabled ELBW children as a barrier to participation.

Motor coordination difficulties and physical fitness of extremely-low-birthweight children.

Motor coordination difficulties and poor fitness exist in the extremely low birthweight (ELBW) population. This study investigated the relative impact of motor coordination on the fitness of ELBW children aged 11 to 13 years. One hundred and nine children were recruited to the study: 54 ELBW participants (mean age at assessment 12y 6mo; 31 male, 23 female; mean birthweight 769g, SD 148g; mean gestational age 26.6 weeks, SD 2.1 weeks) and 55 comparison children (mean age at assessment 12y 5mo; 28 males, 27 females; at least 37 weeks' gestation). All children completed the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC), functional tests of postural stability and strength, growth measures, and tests of respiratory function. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max) was calculated from a 20m shuttle run test as a measure of fitness. The ELBW group had greater problems with postural stability (p=0.001) and motor coordination (p=0.001), with 70% rated as having a definite motor problem on the MABC brackets (those who scored less than the 5(th) centile on the MABC). The ELBW was also less fit than the comparison group (p=0.001), with 45% below the 10th centile for VO(2)max. There were differences between the groups for growth, strength, and particularly respiratory function. However, respiratory function did not significantly correlate with VO(2)max in the ELBW group. Motor coordination was the most powerful predictor of VO(2)max in both the ELBW (p=0.001) and the comparison groups (p=0.001).

Motor performance, postural stability and behaviour of non-disabled extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight children at four to five years of age.

BACKGROUND: Extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight (ELBW) children who are non-disabled and otherwise healthy are at risk of neurodevelopmental impairments. Further understanding of these impairments is needed before commencement of formal education to optimise participation levels at a critical time point for these children. AIMS: To explore motor co-ordination, postural stability, limb strength and behaviour of non-disabled four to five year old children with a history of extreme prematurity or ELBW. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective-descriptive-cohort-study. SUBJECTS: 50 children born at less than 28 weeks gestation or who had a birth weight less than 1000g with minimal/mild motor impairments and no significant neurological/cognitive impairments. OUTCOME MEASURES: Movement Assessment Battery for Children second-edition (MABC-2), single leg stance test (SLS), lateral reach test, standing long jump test and Child Behaviour Checklist for preschool children (CBCL). RESULTS: The mean percentile rank of the extremely preterm or ELBW sample on MABC-2 was 31% (SD 23%). SLS right (mean ± SD; 4.6 ± 2.5s) and lateral reach to the right (10.0 ± 3.9 cm) were slightly stronger than SLS left (4.4 ± 3.3s) and lateral reach left (9.9 ± 3.5 cm). The average for standing long jump was 71.6 cm (SD 21.0 cm). All participants were classified as 'normal' on CBCL syndrome scale scores, internalizing and externalizing syndrome T scores and total problem T score. CONCLUSIONS: This sample of non-disabled extremely preterm or ELBW children performed in the lower range of normal. These children continue to be at risk of impairments, therefore, ongoing monitoring and tailored intervention may optimise development.

Differences in postural control and movement performance during goal directed reaching in children with developmental coordination disorder.

Poor upper-limb coordination is a common difficulty for children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD). One hypothesis is that deviant muscle timing in proximal muscle groups results in poor postural and movement control. The relationship between muscle timing, arm motion and children's upper-limb coordination deficits has not previously been studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between functional difficulties with upper-limb motor skills and neuromuscular components of postural stability and coordination. Sixty-four children aged 8-10 years, 32 with DCD and 32 without DCD, participated in the study. The study investigated timing of muscle activity and resultant arm movement during a rapid, voluntary, goal-directed arm movement. Results showed that compared to children without DCD, children with DCD took significantly longer to respond to visual signals and longer to complete the goal-directed movement. Children with DCD also demonstrated altered activity in postural muscles. In particular, shoulder muscles, except for serratus anterior, and posterior trunk muscles demonstrated early activation. Further, anterior trunk muscles demonstrated delayed activation. In children with DCD, anticipatory function was not present in three of the four anterior trunk muscles. These differences support the hypothesis that in children with DCD, altered postural muscle activity may contribute to poor proximal stability and consequently poor arm movement control when performing goal-directed movement. These results have educational and functional implications for children at school and during activities of daily living and leisure activities and for clinicians assessing and treating children with DCD.

The long-term predictive validity of early motor development in "apparently normal" ELBW survivors.

BACKGROUND: Within the able majority of ELBW survivors, there is a lack of identified predictors of which children will require extra support despite having escaped significant disability. AIMS: Investigate the predictive validity of early motor scores, compared to that of perinatal descriptors or early growth, on long-term motor impairment in non-disabled ELBW (<1000g) children. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study. OUTCOME MEASURES: 48 non-disabled ELBW children (27 male) completed the Neurosensory Motor Developmental Assessment (NSMDA) at 8 months, 2 years and 4 years post term and The Motor Assessment Battery for Children (MABC) at 11-13 years of age. Other possible predictors of long-term outcomes (gestational age, birthweight, multiple birth, head circumference measures and gender) were retrieved from the records. RESULTS: Early motor assessment (NSMDA score) independently predicted the MABC total score at 11-13 years of age with a positive predictive value of 87% by 4 years post term. There was increased risk of long-term motor impairment associated with male gender but the degree of prematurity, multiple birth status or early growth measures did not predict motor outcome. Postural control and sensory motor scores at 4 years post term, rather than neurological score, were associated with long-term motor outcomes for the ELBW children at 11-13 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Early motor scores are valid markers of long-term motor outcomes for "apparently normal" ELBW children. Early postural competence and sensory motor function are discriminating in regards to long-term motor function in neurologically normal ELBW children.

The influence of preparedness on rapid stepping in young and older adults.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of age and preparation level on postural muscle activation and step completion time during a rapid step task. DESIGN: Postural muscle onset times (EMG) and ground reaction forces were recorded from healthy young (n = 20, age 21 +/- 3 years) and older (n = 25, age 71 +/- 5 years) female adults during a choice reaction-time stepping paradigm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Onset times of six trunk and hip muscles, reaction time and components of the step (weight shift time, step time and task time) were recorded. RESULTS: Muscle activation was delayed and movement time was lengthened in both young and older adults when poorly prepared for a stepping task. While reduced preparation did not influence older adults to a greater extent than young adults, the slowest step response and completion time was evident in older adults when poorly prepared to move. CONCLUSIONS: A late postural response when poorly prepared to move may be a contributing factor to an increased risk of overbalancing in older adults. Future assessment of and intervention to improve postural stability in older adults should be expanded to incorporate tasks performed at various levels of preparation.