MR-guided prostate SBRT in prostate cancer patients with low-volume metastatic disease.

BACKGROUND: Recent data have found an overall survival benefit from prostate-directed radiotherapy in patients with low-volume metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate SBRT is an attractive treatment in this setting and may be optimised with MR-guided adaptive treatment. Here, we share our institutional experience delivering stereotactic MR-guided adaptive prostate SBRT (SMART) for patients with low-volume metastatic disease. METHODS: We reviewed patients with low-volume metastatic disease who received prostate SMART from October 2019 to December 2021 on a 0.35T MR-Linac. The cohort included 14 patients. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were assessed using CTCAE v 5.0. Progression was defined as a change in systemic or hormonal therapy regimen as a result of PSA rise or disease progression. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 29 months. Seven patients had hormone sensitive prostate cancer and 7 had castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). 13 patients received 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions and one patient received 33 Gy in 5 fractions. At the time of last follow-up, 11 patients had not experienced progression and three patients, all with CRPC, had experienced progression. No patients developed local progression in the prostate after SMART. One patient experienced acute grade 2 urinary toxicity (7%) and no patients experienced acute grade 2 GI toxicity (0%). No grade 3 + acute toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate SMART was found to be well tolerated and all patients had local control of disease within the prostate at the time of last follow-up. Prostate SMART may represent a low-risk and well-tolerated approach for delivering prostate-directed radiotherapy for patients with limited metastatic disease.

Response rate and local recurrence after concurrent immune checkpoint therapy and radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Prior literature has suggested synergy between immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) and radiotherapy (RT) for the treatment of brain metastases (BrM), but to the authors' knowledge the optimal timing of therapy to maximize this synergy is unclear. METHODS: A total of 199 patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer with BrM received ICT and RT between 2007 and 2016 at the study institution. To reduce selection biases, individual metastases were included only if they were treated with RT within 90 days of ICT. Concurrent treatment was defined as RT delivered on the same day as or in between doses of an ICT course; all other treatment was considered to be nonconcurrent. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess time to response and local disease recurrence on a per-metastasis basis, using a sandwich estimator to account for intrapatient correlation. RESULTS: The final cohort included 110 patients with 340 BrM, with 102 BrM treated concurrently and 238 BrM treated nonconcurrently. Response rates were higher with the use of concurrent treatment (70% vs 47%; P < .001), with correspondingly lower rates of progressive disease (5% vs 26%; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, concurrent treatment was found to be associated with improved time to response (hazard ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.18-2.63 [P = .006]) and decreased local recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.78 [P = .006]). This effect appeared to be greater for melanoma than for non-small cell lung cancer, although interaction tests were not statistically significant. Only 1 of 103 metastases which had a complete response later developed disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent RT and ICT may improve response rates and decrease local recurrence of brain metastases compared with treatment that was nonconcurrent but delivered within 90 days. Further study of this combination in prospective, randomized trials is warranted.

Breast cancer subtype and intracranial recurrence patterns after brain-directed radiation for brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Brain metastases from breast cancer are frequently managed with brain-directed radiation but the impact of subtype on intracranial recurrence patterns after radiation has not been well-described. We investigated intracranial recurrence patterns of brain metastases from breast cancer after brain-directed radiation to facilitate subtype-specific management paradigms. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 349 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases from breast cancer treated with brain-directed radiation at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2000 and 2015. Patients were stratified by subtype: hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-), HER2+ positive (HER2+), or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). A per-metastasis assessment was conducted. Time-to-event analyses were conducted using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Of the 349 patients, 116 had HR+/HER2- subtype, 164 had HER2+ subtype, and 69 harbored TNBC. Relative to HR+/HER2- subtype, local recurrence was greater in HER2+ metastases (HR 3.20, 95% CI 1.78-5.75, p < 0.001), while patients with TNBC demonstrated higher rates of new brain metastases after initial treatment (HR 3.16, 95% CI 1.99-5.02, p < 0.001) and shorter time to salvage whole brain radiation (WBRT) (HR 3.79, 95% CI 1.36-10.56, p = 0.01) and salvage stereotactic radiation (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.11-3.10, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a strong association between breast cancer subtype and intracranial recurrence patterns after brain-directed radiation, particularly local progression for HER2+ and distant progression for TNBC patients. If validated, the poorer local control in HER2+ brain metastases may support evaluation of novel local therapy-based approaches, while the increased distant recurrence in TNBC suggests the need for improved systemic therapy and earlier utilization of WBRT.

Local control after brain-directed radiation in patients with cystic versus solid brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Brain metastases can be radiographically cystic or solid. Cystic metastases are associated with a greater intracranial disease burden and poorer oncologic outcomes, but the impact of cystic versus solid appearance on local control after radiation remains unknown. We investigated whether cystic versus solid nature is predictive of local control after management with stereotactic or whole brain radiation (WBRT) and whether the radiation modality utilized is an effect modifier. METHODS: We identified 859 patients with 2211 newly-diagnosed brain metastases managed with upfront stereotactic radiation or WBRT without preceding resection/aspiration at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2000 and 2015. Multivariable Cox regression with an interaction term and sandwich covariance matrix was used to quantify local failure. RESULTS: Cystic lesions were more likely to recur than solid ones when managed with stereotactic radiation (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.32-4.10, p = 0.004) but not WBRT (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.62-1.36, p = 0.67), p-interaction = 0.007. 1 year local control rates for cystic versus solid metastases treated with stereotactic radiation were 75% versus 88%, respectively; estimates with WBRT were 76% versus 76%, respectively. However, no significant differences were noted between the two cohorts in post-radiation outcomes including all-cause mortality and neurologic death (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with brain metastases, stereotactic radiation yields improved local control and less morbidity than WBRT, and consequently for many patients the cystic versus solid designation does not impact treatment selection. However, our results suggest that in patients with a large number of cystic brain metastases, a lower threshold to consider WBRT, as opposed to stereotactic radiation, should be employed. If our results can be confirmed, further investigation into the underlying mechanism(s) would be warranted.

Heterogeneity in high-risk prostate cancer treated with high-dose radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to assess the heterogeneity of high-risk (HR) prostate cancer managed with high-dose external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS: We identified 547 patients who were treated with modern EBRT from 1997 to 2013, of whom 98% received ADT. We analyzed biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS). RESULTS: Median EBRT dose was 74 Gy, and median ADT duration was 8 months. At 5 years, the DMFS was 85%. On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of shorter bRFS were biopsy Gleason score (bGS) of 8 to 10, higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, shorter duration of ADT and lower radiation dose while predictors of shorter DMFS were bGS of 8 to 10, higher PSA level, and lower radiation dose. We identified an unfavorable high-risk (UHR) group of with 2-3 HR factors based on 2015 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria and a favorable high-risk (FHR) group, with 1 HR feature. Comparing very-HR prostate cancer, UHR & FHR, 5 year bRFS rates were 58.2%, 66.2%, and 69.2%, and 5 year DMFS rates were 78.4%, 81.2%, and 88.0%. CONCLUSION: Patients with multiple HR factors have worse outcome than patients with 1 HR factor. Future studies should account for this heterogeneity in HR prostate cancer.

Rapid progression of intracranial melanoma metastases controlled with combined BRAF/MEK inhibition after discontinuation of therapy: a clinical challenge.

Novel systemic therapies with anti-tumor activity in the brain including small molecules targeting BRAF and MEK, and immune checkpoint inhibition, offer the possibility of improved control of intracranial disease. A number of prospective trials support the judicious use of modern systemic therapies in patients with melanoma and limited brain metastases .The intracranial clinical course of patients who progress extracranially on BRAF/MEK inhibition remains poorly described in the literature. In this report, we highlight a series of clinical cases, with rapid progression of intracranial disease following discontinuation of dabrafenib/trametinib for extracranial disease progression or toxicity, a previously unreported finding in the medical literature with significant implications for patient care.

Widening the therapeutic window for central and ultra-central thoracic oligometastatic disease with stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART).

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Central/ultra-central thoracic tumors are challenging to treat with stereotactic radiotherapy due potential high-grade toxicity. Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) may improve the therapeutic window through motion control with breath-hold gating and real-time MR-imaging as well as the option for daily online adaptive replanning to account for changes in target and/or organ-at-risk (OAR) location. MATERIALS/METHODS: 26 central (19 ultra-central) thoracic oligoprogressive/oligometastatic tumors treated with isotoxic (OAR constraints-driven) 5-fraction SMART (median 50 Gy, range 35-60) between 10/2019-10/2022 were reviewed. Central tumor was defined as tumor within or touching 2 cm around proximal tracheobronchial tree (PBT) or adjacent to mediastinal/pericardial pleura. Ultra-central was defined as tumor abutting the PBT, esophagus, or great vessel. Hard OAR constraints observed were ≤ 0.03 cc for PBT V40, great vessel V52.5, and esophagus V35. Local failure was defined as tumor progression/recurrence within the planning target volume. RESULTS: Tumor abutted the PBT in 31 %, esophagus in 31 %, great vessel in 65 %, and heart in 42 % of cases. 96 % of fractions were treated with reoptimized plan, necessary to meet OAR constraints (80 %) and/or target coverage (20 %). Median follow-up was 19 months (27 months among surviving patients). Local control (LC) was 96 % at 1-year and 90 % at 2-years (total 2/26 local failure). 23 % had G2 acute toxicities (esophagitis, dysphagia, anorexia, nausea) and one (4 %) had G3 acute radiation dermatitis. There were no G4-5 acute toxicities. There was no symptomatic pneumonitis and no G2 + late toxicities. CONCLUSION: Isotoxic 5-fraction SMART resulted in high rates of LC and minimal toxicity. This approach may widen the therapeutic window for high-risk oligoprogressive/oligometastatic thoracic tumors.

Lung sparing in MR-guided non-adaptive SBRT treatment of peripheral lung tumors.

Objective.We aim to: (1) quantify the benefits of lung sparing using non-adaptive magnetic resonance guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) with advanced motion management for peripheral lung cancers compared to conventional x-ray guided SBRT (ConvSBRT); (2) establish a practical decision-making guidance metric to assist a clinician in selecting the appropriate treatment modality.Approach.Eleven patients with peripheral lung cancer who underwent breath-hold, gated MRgSBRT on an MR-guided linear accelerator (MR linac) were studied. Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT)-based retrospective planning using an internal target volume (ITV) was performed to simulate ConvSBRT, which were evaluated against the original MRgSBRT plans. Metrics analyzed included planning target volume (PTV) coverage, various lung metrics and the generalized equivalent unform dose (gEUD). A dosimetric predictor for achievable lung metrics was derived to assist future patient triage across modalities.Main results.PTV coverage was high (median V100% > 98%) and comparable for both modalities. MRgSBRT had significantly lower lung doses as measured by V20 (median 3.2% versus 4.2%), mean lung dose (median 3.3 Gy versus 3.8 Gy) and gEUD. Breath-hold, gated MRgSBRT resulted in an average reduction of 47% in PTV volume and an average increase of 19% in lung volume. Strong correlation existed between lung metrics and the ratio of PTV to lung volumes (RPTV/Lungs) for both modalities, indicating that RPTV/Lungsmay serve as a good predictor for achievable lung metrics without the need for pre-planning. A threshold value of RPTV/Lungs< 0.035 is suggested to achieve V20 < 10% using ConvSBRT. MRgSBRT should otherwise be considered if the threshold cannot be met.Significance.The benefits of lung sparing using MRgSBRT were quantified for peripheral lung tumors; RPTV/Lungswas found to be an effective predictor for achievable lung metrics across modalities. RPTV/Lungscan assist a clinician in selecting the appropriate modality without the need for labor-intensive pre-planning, which has significant practical benefit for a busy clinic.

A genomic score to predict local control among patients with brain metastases managed with radiation.

BACKGROUND: Clinical predictors of local recurrence following radiation among patients with brain metastases (BrM) provide limited explanatory power. We developed a DNA-based signature of radiotherapeutic efficacy among patients with BrM to better characterize recurrence risk. METHODS: We identified 570 patients with 1487 BrM managed with whole-brain (WBRT) or stereotactic radiation therapy at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (2013-2020) for whom next-generation sequencing panel data (OncoPanel) were available. Fine/Gray's competing risks regression was utilized to compare local recurrence on a per-metastasis level among patients with versus without somatic alterations of likely biological significance across 84 genes. Genes with a q-value ≤ 0.10 were utilized to develop a "Brain-Radiation Prediction Score" ("Brain-RPS"). RESULTS: Genomic alterations in 11 (ATM, MYCL, PALB2, FAS, PRDM1, PAX5, CDKN1B, EZH2, NBN, DIS3, and MDM4) and 2 genes (FBXW7 and AURKA) were associated with decreased or increased risk of local recurrence, respectively (q-value ≤ 0.10). Weighted scores corresponding to the strength of association with local failure for each gene were summed to calculate a patient-level RPS. On multivariable Fine/Gray's competing risks regression, RPS [1.66 (1.44-1.91, P < .001)], metastasis-associated edema [1.60 (1.16-2.21), P = .004], baseline size [1.02 (1.01-1.03), P < .001] and receipt of WBRT without local therapy [4.04 (2.49-6.58), P < .001] were independent predictors of local failure. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a genomic score to quantify local recurrence risk following brain-directed radiation. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the first study to systematically correlate DNA-based alterations with radiotherapeutic outcomes in BrM. If validated, Brain-RPS has potential to facilitate clinical trials aimed at genome-based personalization of radiation in BrM.

Incidence proportion and prognosis of leptomeningeal disease among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries.

BACKGROUND: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a relatively uncommon manifestation of advanced cancer. Patients with LMD carry a poor prognosis and often decline rapidly, complicating inclusion in clinical trials. Identification of LMD subsets of greater incidence and more favorable prognosis might facilitate dedicated clinical trials in the future. We hypothesized that patients with breast cancer may represent such a population and sought to assess the relative incidence and prognosis of LMD secondary to breast vs. non-breast primaries. METHODS: We identified 2411 patients with intracranial metastases secondary to breast (N = 501) and non-breast (N = 1910) primaries at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 1996 and 2020, of whom 112 presented with and an additional 161 subsequently developed LMD. A log-rank test and Cox modeling were used to compare outcomes in patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries. RESULTS: Among patients with newly diagnosed intracranial disease, the incidence proportion of concurrent LMD was 11.4% vs. 2.9% among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries (P < .001). Development of LMD among initially LMD-naïve patients was also more common among patients with breast vs. non-breast primaries (HR = 1.49 [1.05-2.11], P = .03). Patients with LMD secondary to breast vs. non-breast primaries displayed lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.70 [0.52-0.93], P = .01; median survival: 5.2 vs. 2.4 months, respectively), with a greater numerical difference observed in patients with LMD at intracranial involvement (7.4 vs. 2.6 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with breast cancer and LMD may represent an ideal population for clinical trials given the higher incidence and potentially more favorable prognosis seen in this population.

Evaluation of Standard Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology, Modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology, and Immunotherapy Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology in Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria are widely used in high-grade glioma clinical trials. We compared the RANO criteria with updated modifications (modified RANO [mRANO] and immunotherapy RANO [iRANO] criteria) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM) and recurrent GBM (rGBM) to evaluate the performance of each set of criteria and inform the development of the planned RANO 2.0 update. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evaluation of tumor measurements and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences were performed by blinded readers to determine disease progression using RANO, mRANO, iRANO, and other response assessment criteria. Spearman's correlations between progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty-six nGBM and 580 rGBM cases were included. Spearman's correlations were similar between RANO and mRANO (0.69 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.75] v 0.67 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.73]) in nGBM and rGBM (0.48 [95% CI, 0.40 to 0.55] v 0.50 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.57]). In nGBM, requirement of a confirmation scan within 12 weeks of completion of radiotherapy to determine progression was associated with improved correlations. Use of the postradiation magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as baseline scan was associated with improved correlation compared with use of the pre-radiation MRI (0.67 [95% CI, 0.60 to 0.73] v 0.53 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.62]). Evaluation of FLAIR sequences did not improve the correlation. Among patients who received immunotherapy, Spearman's correlations were similar among RANO, mRANO, and iRANO. CONCLUSION: RANO and mRANO demonstrated similar correlations between PFS and OS. Confirmation scans were only beneficial in nGBM within 12 weeks of completion of radiotherapy, and there was a trend in favor of the use of postradiation MRI as the baseline scan in nGBM. Evaluation of FLAIR can be omitted. The iRANO criteria did not add significant benefit in patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Comparison of first-line radiosurgery for small-cell and non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases (CROSS-FIRE).

INTRODUCTION: Historical reservations regarding stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) brain metastases include concerns for short-interval and diffuse central nervous system (CNS) progression, poor prognoses, and increased neurological mortality specific to SCLC histology. We compared SRS outcomes for SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) where SRS is well established. METHODS: Multicenter first-line SRS outcomes for SCLC and NSCLC from 2000 to 2022 were retrospectively collected (n = 892 SCLC, n = 4785 NSCLC). Data from the prospective Japanese Leksell Gamma Knife Society (JLGK0901) clinical trial of first-line SRS were analyzed as a comparison cohort (n = 98 SCLC, n = 814 NSCLC). Overall survival (OS) and CNS progression were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard and Fine-Gray models, respectively, with multivariable adjustment for cofactors including age, sex, performance status, year, extracranial disease status, and brain metastasis number and volume. Mutation-stratified analyses were performed in propensity score-matched retrospective cohorts of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive NSCLC, mutation-negative NSCLC, and SCLC. RESULTS: OS was superior for patients with NSCLC compared to SCLC in the retrospective dataset (median OS = 10.5 vs 8.6 months; P < .001) and in the JLGK0901 dataset. Hazard estimates for first CNS progression favoring NSCLC were similar in both datasets but reached statistical significance in the retrospective dataset only (multivariable hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% confidence interval = 0.73 to 0.92, P = .001). In the propensity score-matched cohorts, there were continued OS advantages for NSCLC patients (median OS = 23.7 [EGFR and ALK positive NSCLC] vs 13.6 [mutation-negative NSCLC] vs 10.4 months [SCLC], pairwise P values < 0.001), but no statistically significant differences in CNS progression were observed in the matched cohorts. Neurological mortality and number of lesions at CNS progression were similar for NSCLC and SCLC patients. Leptomeningeal progression was increased in patients with NSCLC compared to SCLC in the retrospective dataset only (multivariable hazard ratio = 1.61, 95% confidence interval = 1.14 to 2.26, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: After SRS, SCLC histology was associated with shorter OS compared to NSCLC. CNS progression occurred earlier in SCLC patients overall but was similar in patients matched on baseline factors. SCLC was not associated with increased neurological mortality, number of lesions at CNS progression, or leptomeningeal progression compared to NSCLC. These findings may better inform clinical expectations and individualized decision making regarding SRS for SCLC patients.

Update on Radiation Therapy for Central Nervous System Tumors.

Radiation therapy has long been a critical modality of treatment of patients with central nervous system tumors, including primary brain tumors, brain metastases, and meningiomas. Advances in radiation technology and delivery have allowed for more precise treatment to optimize patient outcomes and minimize toxicities. Improved understanding of the molecular underpinnings of brain tumors and normal brain tissue response to radiation will allow for continued refinement of radiation treatment approaches to improve clinical outcomes for brain tumor patients. With continued advances in precision and delivery, radiation therapy will continue to be an important modality to achieve optimal outcomes of brain tumor patients.

Frequency, etiologies, risk factors, and sequelae of falls among patients with brain metastases: A population- and institutional-level analysis.

Background: Falls in patients with cancer harbor potential for serious sequelae. Patients with brain metastases (BrM) may be especially susceptible to falls but supporting investigations are lacking. We assessed the frequency, etiologies, risk factors, and sequelae of falls in patients with BrM using 2 data sources. Methods: We identified 42 648 and 111 patients with BrM utilizing Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data (2008-2016) and Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (BWH/DFCI) institutional data (2015), respectively, and characterized falls in these populations. Results: Among SEER-Medicare patients, 10 267 (24.1%) experienced a fall that prompted medical evaluation, with cumulative incidences at 3, 6, and 12 months of 18.0%, 24.3%, and 34.1%, respectively. On multivariable Fine/Gray's regression, older age (≥81 or 76-80 vs 66-70 years, hazard ratio [HR] 1.18 [95% CI, 1.11-1.25], P < .001 and HR 1.10 [95% CI, 1.04-1.17], P < .001, respectively), Charlson comorbidity score of >2 vs 0-2 (HR 1.08 [95% CI, 1.03-1.13], P = .002) and urban residence (HR 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01-1.16], P = .03) were associated with falls. Married status (HR 0.94 [95% CI, 0.90-0.98], P = .004) and Asian vs white race (HR 0.90 [95% CI, 0.81-0.99], P = .03) were associated with reduced fall risk. Identified falls were more common among BWH/DFCI patients (N = 56, 50.4% of cohort), resulting in emergency department visits, hospitalizations, fractures, and intracranial hemorrhage in 33%, 23%, 11%, and 4% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Falls are common among patients with BrM, especially older/sicker patients, and can have deleterious consequences. Risk-reduction measures, such as home safety checks, physical therapy, and medication optimization, should be considered in this population.

Incidence and Predictors of Neurologic Death in Patients with Brain Metastases.

OBJECTIVE: Neurologic death is the most serious consequence of intracranial disease among patients with brain metastases. Identifying patients with brain metastases at increased risk of neurologic death can improve care and guide further research. We sought to delineate factors predictive of neurologic death among patients with brain metastases. METHODS: We identified 1218 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases managed at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 2008-2015. Factors predictive of neurologic death were assessed via univariable and multivariable Fine and Gray competing risks regression. RESULTS: On multivariable analysis, neurologic death was associated with number of brain metastases (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01 per 1 metastasis increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.02, P < 0.001) and 3 primary tumor sites (reference=non-small cell lung cancer): melanoma (HR 4.67, 95% CI 3.27-6.68, P < 0.001), small cell lung cancer (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.47-3.68, P < 0.001), and gastrointestinal cancer (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.28-3.82, P = 0.005). Conversely, a reduction in neurologic death was found in patients with good Karnofsky performance status (90-100 vs. 30-80, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.95, P = 0.03) and progressive extracranial metastases at diagnosis of intracranial disease (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.67, P = 0.001). Among patients with breast primaries, HER2+ patients displayed increased neurologic death relative to the reference of HR+/HER2- (univariable analysis only: HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.00-5.84, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with melanoma, small cell lung cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, and HER2+ breast cancer primaries, as well as greater intracranial versus extracranial disease burden, harbor significant risk of neurologic death. Future research investigating novel intracranial approaches should focus on these populations.

Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) for Abdominopelvic Oligometastases.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy can be an effective treatment for oligometastases. However, safe delivery of ablative radiation is frequently limited by the proximity of mobile organs sensitive to high radiation doses. The goal of this study was to determine the feasibility, safety, and disease control outcomes of stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) in patients with abdominopelvic oligometastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 101 patients with abdominopelvic oligometastases, including 20 patients enrolled on phase 1 protocols, who were consecutively treated with SMART on a 0.35T magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR linac) at a single institution from October 2019 to September 2021. Local control and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Overall, 114 tumors were treated. The most common histology was prostate adenocarcinoma (60 tumors [53.5%]), and 65 sites (57.0%) were centered in the pelvis. Ninety-one sites (79.8%) were treated to 8 Gy × 5, and 49 (43.0%) were treated with breath-hold respiratory gating. Online adaptation resulted in a clinically significant improvement in coverage or organ sparing in 86.6% of delivered fractions. The median time required for adaptation was 24 minutes, and the median time in the treatment room was 58 minutes. With median follow-up of 11.4 months, the 12-month local control was 93% and was higher for prostate adenocarcinoma versus other histologies (100% vs 84%; P = .009). The 12-month overall survival was 96% and was higher for prostate adenocarcinoma versus other histologies (100% vs 91%; P = .046). Three patients (3.0%) developed grade 3 toxic effects (colonic hemorrhage at 3.4 months and urinary tract obstructions at 10.1 and 18.4 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, SMART was feasible, safe, and effective for delivering ablative radiation therapy to abdominopelvic metastases. Adaptive planning was necessary in the large majority of cases. The advantages of SMART warrant its further investigation as a standard option for the treatment of abdominopelvic oligometastases.

Patient specific distortion detection and mitigation in MR images used for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Objective.In MRI-based radiation therapy planning, mitigating patient-specific distortion with standard high bandwidth scans can result in unnecessary sacrifices of signal to noise ratio. This study investigates a technique for distortion detection and mitigation on a patient specific basis.Approach.Fast B0 mapping was performed using a previously developed technique for high-resolution, large dynamic range field mapping without the need for phase unwrapping algorithms. A phantom study was performed to validate the method. Distortion mitigation was validated by reducing geometric distortion with increased acquisition bandwidth and confirmed by both the B0 mapping technique and manual measurements. Images and contours from 25 brain stereotactic radiosurgery patients and 95 targets were analyzed to estimate the range of geometric distortions expected in the brain and to estimate bandwidth required to keep all treatment targets within the ±0.5 mm iso-distortion contour.Main Results.The phantom study showed, at 3 T, the technique can measure distortions with a mean absolute error of 0.12 mm (0.18 ppm), and a maximum error of 0.37 mm (0.6 ppm). For image acquisition at 3 T and 1.0 mm resolution, mean absolute distortion under 0.5 mm in patients required bandwidths from 109 to 200 Hz px-1for patients with the least and most distortion, respectively. Maximum absolute distortion under 0.5 mm required bandwidths from 120 to 390 Hz px-1.Significance.The method for B0 mapping was shown to be valid and may be applied to assess distortion clinically. Future work will adapt the readout bandwidth to prospectively mitigate distortion with the goal to improve radiosurgery treatment outcomes by reducing healthy tissue exposure.

Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Daily Online Plan Adaptation: Results of a Prospective Phase 1 Trial and Supplemental Cohort.

Purpose: Stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for prostate cancer allows for MR-based contouring, real-time MR motion management, and daily plan adaptation. The clinical and dosimetric benefits associated with prostate SMART remain largely unknown. Methods and Materials: A phase 1 trial of prostate SMART was conducted with primary endpoints of safety and feasibility. An additional cohort of patients similarly treated with prostate SMART were included in the analysis. SMART was delivered to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions to the prostate ± seminal vesicles using the MRIdian linear accelerator system (ViewRay, Inc). Rates of urinary and gastrointestinal toxic effects and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed. Dosimetric analyses were conducted to evaluate the specific benefits of daily plan adaptation. Results: The cohort included 22 patients (n = 10 phase 1, n = 12 supplemental) treated in 110 fractions. Median follow-up was 7.9 months. Acute grade 2 urinary and gastrointestinal toxic effects were observed in 22.7% and 4.5%, respectively, and 4.5% and 0%, respectively, at last follow-up. No grade 3+ events were observed. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-26 urinary obstructive scores decreased during SMART (mean, 9.3 points; P = .03) and returned to baseline by 3 months. No other significant changes in patient-reported outcome measures were observed. One-hundred percent of fractions required plan adaptation owing to exceeding organ-at-risk metrics (68%) or suboptimal target coverage (33%) resulting from anatomic changes. Minimum acceptable planning target volume, rectal, bladder, and urethra/bladder neck metrics were violated in 24%, 20%, 24%, and 33% of predicted plans, respectively; 0% of reoptimized plans violated metrics. Underlying causes for deficient dosimetry before reoptimization included changes in bladder filling, seminal vesicle position, prostate volume (median 4.7% increase by fraction 3; range, 0%-56%), and hotspots shifting into urethra/bladder neck. Conclusions: Prostate SMART results in low risk of acute toxic effects with improvements in target and organ-at-risk dosimetry. The clinical benefits resulting from daily plan adaptation, including urethra/bladder neck protection, warrant further investigation.