Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 64
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 37(13): 3346-3354, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34993865

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines, opioids, proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), and antibiotics are frequently prescribed inappropriately by primary care physicians (PCPs), without sufficient consideration of alternative options or adverse effects. We hypothesized that distinct groups of PCPs could be identified based on their propensity to prescribe these medications. OBJECTIVE: To identify PCP groups based on their propensity to prescribe benzodiazepines, opioids, PPIs, and antibiotics, and patient and PCP characteristics associated with identified prescribing patterns. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using VA data and latent class regression analyses to identify prescribing patterns among PCPs and examine the association of patient and PCP characteristics with class membership. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2524 full-time PCPs and their patient panels (n = 2,939,636 patients), from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. MAIN MEASURES: We categorized PCPs based on prescribing volume quartiles for the four drug classes, based on total days' supply dispensed of each medication by the PCP to their patients (expressed as days' supply per 1000 panel patient-days). We used latent class analysis to group PCPs based on prescribing and used multinomial logistic regression to examine patient and PCP characteristics associated with latent class membership. KEY RESULTS: PCPs were categorized into four groups (latent classes): low intensity (23% of cohort), medium-intensity overall/high-intensity PPI (36%), medium-intensity overall/high-intensity opioid (20%), and high intensity (21%). PCPs in the high-intensity group were predominantly in the highest quartile of prescribers for all four drugs (68% in the highest quartile for benzodiazepine, 86% opioids, 64% PPIs, 62% antibiotics). High-intensity PCPs (vs. low intensity) were substantially less likely to be female (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.21-0.42) or practice in the northeast versus other census regions (OR: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.06-0.17). CONCLUSIONS: VA PCPs can be classified into four clearly differentiated groups based on their prescribing of benzodiazepines, opioids, PPIs, and antibiotics, suggesting an underlying typology of prescribing. High-intensity PCPs were more likely to be male.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Clases Latentes , Masculino , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Salud de los Veteranos
2.
Cancer ; 127(18): 3476-3485, 2021 09 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34061986

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression is common after a diagnosis of prostate cancer and may contribute to poor outcomes, particularly among African Americans. The authors assessed the incidence and management of depression and its impact on overall mortality among African American and White veterans with localized prostate cancer. METHODS: The authors used the Veterans Health Administration Corporate Data Warehouse to identify 40,412 African American and non-Hispanic White men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer from 2001 to 2013. Patients were followed through 2019. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure associations between race and incident depression, which were ascertained from administrative and depression screening data. Cox proportional hazards models were used to measure associations between incident depression and all-cause mortality, with race-by-depression interactions used to assess disparities. RESULTS: Overall, 10,013 veterans (24.5%) were diagnosed with depression after a diagnosis of prostate cancer. Incident depression was associated with higher all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.32). African American veterans were more likely than White veterans to be diagnosed with depression (29.3% vs 23.2%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.09-1.21). Among those with depression, African Americans were less likely to be prescribed an antidepressant (30.4% vs 31.7%; aOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.93). The hazard of all-cause mortality associated with depression was greater for African American veterans than White veterans (aHR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.26-1.38] vs 1.15 [95% CI, 1.07-1.24]; race-by-depression interaction P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Incident depression is common among prostate cancer survivors and is associated with higher mortality, particularly among African American men. Patient-centered strategies to manage incident depression may be critical to reducing disparities in prostate cancer outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Depresión , Mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Depresión/etnología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Mortalidad/etnología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/etnología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Población Blanca/psicología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
Med Care ; 59(12): 1042-1050, 2021 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34670221

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Most states have recently passed laws requiring prescribers to use prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) before prescribing opioid medications. The impact of these mandates on discontinuing chronic opioid therapy among Veterans managed in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) is unknown. We assess the association between the earliest of these laws and discontinuation of chronic opioid therapy in Veterans receiving VA health care. METHODS: We conducted a comparative interrupted time-series study in the 5 states mandating PDMP use before August 2013 (Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, New Mexico, and Tennessee), adjusting for trends in the 17 neighboring control states without such mandates. We modeled 25 months of prescribing for each state centered on the month the mandate became effective. We included Veterans prescribed long-term outpatient opioid therapy (305 of the preceding 365 d). Our outcomes were discontinuation of chronic opioid therapy (primary outcome) and the average daily quantity of opioids per Veteran over the following 6 months (secondary outcome). RESULTS: We included 250 monthly cohorts with 225,665 unique Veterans and 3.4 million Veteran-months. Baseline discontinuation rates before the PDMP mandates were 0.4%-2.7% per month. Kentucky saw a discontinuation increase of 1 absolute percentage point following its PDMP mandate which decreased over time. The other 4 states had no significant association between their mandates and change in opioid discontinuation. There was no evidence of decreasing opioid quantities following PDMP mandates. CONCLUSION: We did not find consistent evidence that state laws mandating provider PDMP use were associated with the discontinuation of chronic opioid therapy within the VA for the time period studied.


Asunto(s)
Legislación como Asunto/tendencias , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/terapia , Programas de Monitoreo de Medicamentos Recetados/estadística & datos numéricos , Gobierno Estatal , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Kentucky , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/psicología , Programas de Monitoreo de Medicamentos Recetados/tendencias , Veteranos/psicología
4.
Ann Intern Med ; 170(7): 433-442, 2019 04 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30856660

RESUMEN

Background: More than half of enrollees in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) are also covered by Medicare and can choose to receive their prescriptions from VA or from Medicare-participating providers. Such dual-system care may lead to unsafe opioid use if providers in these 2 systems do not coordinate care or if prescription use is not tracked between systems. Objective: To evaluate the association between dual-system opioid prescribing and death from prescription opioid overdose. Design: Nested case-control study. Setting: VA and Medicare Part D. Participants: Case and control patients were identified from all veterans enrolled in both VA and Part D who filled at least 1 opioid prescription from either system. The 215 case patients who died of a prescription opioid overdose in 2012 or 2013 were matched (up to 1:4) with 833 living control patients on the basis of date of death (that is, index date), using age, sex, race/ethnicity, disability, enrollment in Medicaid or low-income subsidies, managed care enrollment, region and rurality of residence, and a medication-based measure of comorbid conditions. Measurements: The exposure was the source of opioid prescriptions within 6 months of the index date, categorized as VA only, Part D only, or VA and Part D (that is, dual use). The outcome was unintentional or undetermined-intent death from prescription opioid overdose, identified from the National Death Index. The association between this outcome and source of opioid prescriptions was estimated using conditional logistic regression with adjustment for age, marital status, prescription drug monitoring programs, and use of other medications. Results: Among case patients, the mean age was 57.3 years (SD, 9.1), 194 (90%) were male, and 181 (84%) were non-Hispanic white. Overall, 60 case patients (28%) and 117 control patients (14%) received dual opioid prescriptions. Dual users had significantly higher odds of death from prescription opioid overdose than those who received opioids from VA only (odds ratio [OR], 3.53 [95% CI, 2.17 to 5.75]; P < 0.001) or Part D only (OR, 1.83 [CI, 1.20 to 2.77]; P = 0.005). Limitation: Data are from 2012 to 2013 and cannot capture prescriptions obtained outside the VA or Medicare Part D systems. Conclusion: Among veterans enrolled in VA and Part D, dual use of opioid prescriptions was independently associated with death from prescription opioid overdose. This risk factor for fatal overdose among veterans underscores the importance of care coordination across health care systems to improve opioid prescribing safety. Primary Funding Source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/envenenamiento , Sobredosis de Droga/mortalidad , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare Part D/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Med Care ; 57(4): 270-278, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30789541

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2012, select Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities implemented a homeless-tailored medical home model, called Homeless Patient Aligned Care Teams (H-PACT), to improve care processes and outcomes for homeless Veterans. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to determine whether H-PACT offers a better patient experience than standard VHA primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN: We used multivariable logistic regressions to estimate differences in the probability of reporting positive primary care experiences on a national survey. SUBJECTS: Homeless-experienced survey respondents enrolled in H-PACT (n=251) or standard primary care in facilities with H-PACT available (n=1527) and facilities without H-PACT (n=10,079). MEASURES: Patient experiences in 8 domains from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems surveys. Domain scores were categorized as positive versus nonpositive. RESULTS: H-PACT patients were less likely than standard primary care patients to be female, have 4-year college degrees, or to have served in recent military conflicts; they received more primary care visits and social services. H-PACT patients were more likely than standard primary care patients in the same facilities to report positive experiences with access [adjusted risk difference (RD)=17.4], communication (RD=13.9), office staff (RD=13.1), provider ratings (RD=11.0), and comprehensiveness (RD=9.3). Standard primary care patients in facilities with H-PACT available were more likely than those from facilities without H-PACT to report positive experiences with communication (RD=4.7) and self-management support (RD=4.6). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-centered medical homes designed to address the social determinants of health offer a better care experience for homeless patients, when compared with standard primary care approaches. The lessons learned from H-PACT can be applied throughout VHA and to other health care settings.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/organización & administración
6.
J Gen Intern Med ; 34(8): 1522-1529, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31144281

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment by high-opioid prescribing physicians in the emergency department (ED) is associated with higher rates of long-term opioid use among Medicare beneficiaries. However, it is unclear if this result is true in other high-risk populations such as Veterans. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of exposure to high-opioid prescribing physicians on long-term opioid use for opioid-naïve Veterans. DESIGN: Observational study using Veterans Health Administration (VA) encounter and prescription data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Veterans with an index ED visit at any VA facility in 2012 and without opioid prescriptions in the prior 6 months in the VA system ("opioid naïve"). MEASUREMENTS: We assigned patients to emergency physicians and categorized physicians into within-hospital quartiles based on their opioid prescribing rates. Our primary outcome was long-term opioid use, defined as 6 months of days supplied in the 12 months subsequent to the ED visit. We compared rates of long-term opioid use among patients treated by high versus low quartile prescribers, adjusting for patient demographic, clinical characteristics, and ED diagnoses. RESULTS: We identified 57,738 and 86,393 opioid-naïve Veterans managed by 362 and 440 low and high quartile prescribers, respectively. Patient characteristics were similar across groups. ED opioid prescribing rates varied more than threefold between the low and high quartile prescribers within hospitals (6.4% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.001). The frequency of long-term opioid use was higher among Veterans treated by high versus low quartile prescribers, though above the threshold for statistical significance (1.39% vs. 1.26%; adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.997-1.24, p = 0.056). In subgroup analyses, there were significant associations for patients with back pain (adjusted OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55, p = 0.04) and for those with a history of depression (adjusted OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.51, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: ED physician opioid prescribing varied by over 300% within facility, with a statistically non-significant increased rate of long-term use among opioid-naïve Veterans exposed to the highest intensity prescribers.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Dimensión del Dolor/clasificación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/clasificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Adulto Joven
7.
Ann Intern Med ; 169(9): 593-601, 2018 11 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30304353

RESUMEN

Background: Overlapping use of opioids and benzodiazepines is associated with increased risk for overdose. Veterans receiving medications concurrently from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Medicare may be at higher risk for such overlap. Objective: To assess the association between dual use of VA and Medicare drug benefits and receipt of overlapping opioid and benzodiazepine prescriptions. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: VA and Medicare. Participants: All veterans enrolled in VA and Medicare Part D who filled at least 2 opioid prescriptions in 2013 (n = 368 891). Measurements: Outcomes were the proportion of patients with a Pharmacy Quality Alliance (PQA) measure of opioid-benzodiazepine overlap (≥2 filled prescriptions for benzodiazepines with ≥30 days of overlap with opioids) and the proportion of patients with high-dose opioid-benzodiazepine overlap (≥30 days of overlap with a daily opioid dose >120 morphine milligram equivalents). Augmented inverse probability weighting regression was used to compare these measures by prescription drug source: VA only, Medicare only, or VA and Medicare (dual use). Results: Of 368 891 eligible veterans, 18.3% received prescriptions from the VA only, 30.3% from Medicare only, and 51.4% from both VA and Medicare. The proportion with PQA opioid-benzodiazepine overlap was larger for the dual-use group than the VA-only group (23.1% vs. 17.3%; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.27 [95% CI, 1.24 to 1.30]) and Medicare-only group (23.1% vs. 16.5%; aRR, 1.12 [CI, 1.10 to 1.14]). The proportion with high-dose overlap was also larger for the dual-use group than the VA-only group (4.7% vs. 2.3%; aRR, 2.23 [CI, 2.10 to 2.36]) and Medicare-only group (4.7% vs. 2.9%; aRR, 1.06 [CI, 1.02 to 1.11]). Limitation: Data are from 2013 and cannot capture medications purchased without insurance; unmeasured confounding may remain in this cross-sectional study. Conclusion: Among a national cohort of veterans dually enrolled in VA and Medicare, receiving prescriptions from both sources was associated with greater risk for receiving potentially unsafe overlapping prescriptions for opioids and benzodiazepines. Primary Funding Source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare Part D , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Sobredosis de Droga/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
8.
Med Care ; 56(7): 610-618, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29762272

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Homeless patients describe poor experiences with primary care. In 2012, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented homeless-tailored primary care teams (Homeless Patient Aligned Care Team, HPACTs) that could improve the primary care experience for homeless patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in primary care experiences between homeless and nonhomeless Veterans receiving care in VHA facilities that had HPACTs available (HPACT facilities) and in VHA facilities lacking HPACTs (non-HPACT facilities). RESEARCH DESIGN: We used multivariable multinomial regressions to estimate homeless versus nonhomeless patient differences in primary care experiences (categorized as negative/moderate/positive) reported on a national VHA survey. We compared the homeless versus nonhomeless risk differences (RDs) in reporting negative or positive experiences in 25 HPACT facilities versus 485 non-HPACT facilities. SUBJECTS: Survey respondents from non-HPACT facilities (homeless: n=10,148; nonhomeless: n=309,779) and HPACT facilities (homeless: n=2022; nonhomeless: n=20,941). MEASURES: Negative and positive experiences with access, communication, office staff, provider rating, comprehensiveness, coordination, shared decision-making, and self-management support. RESULTS: In non-HPACT facilities, homeless patients reported more negative and fewer positive experiences than nonhomeless patients. However, these patterns of homeless versus nonhomeless differences were reversed in HPACT facilities for the domains of communication (positive experience RDs in non-HPACT versus HPACT facilities=-2.0 and 2.0, respectively); comprehensiveness (negative RDs=2.1 and -2.3), shared decision-making (negative RDs=1.2 and -1.8), and self-management support (negative RDs=0.1 and -4.5; positive RDs=0.5 and 8.0). CONCLUSIONS: VHA facilities with HPACT programs appear to offer a better primary care experience for homeless versus nonhomeless Veterans, reversing the pattern of relatively poor primary care experiences often associated with homelessness.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Hospitales de Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Salud de los Veteranos
9.
J Gen Intern Med ; 33(8): 1366-1373, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29948804

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Managing depression in primary care settings has increased with the rise of integrated models of care, such as patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs). The relationship between patient experience in PCMH settings and receipt of depression treatment is unknown. OBJECTIVE: In a large sample of Veterans diagnosed with depression, we examined whether positive PCMH experiences predicted subsequent initiation or continuation of treatment for depression. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a lagged cross-sectional study of depression treatment among Veterans with depression diagnoses (n = 27,362) in the years before (Y1) and after (Y2) they completed the Veterans Health Administration's national 2013 PCMH Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients. MAIN MEASURES: We assessed patient experiences in four domains, each categorized as positive/moderate/negative. Depression treatment, determined from administrative records, was defined annually as 90 days of antidepressant medications or six psychotherapy visits. Multivariable logistic regressions measured associations between PCMH experiences and receipt of depression treatment in Y2, accounting for treatment in Y1. KEY RESULTS: Among those who did not receive depression treatment in Y1 (n = 4613), positive experiences in three domains (comprehensiveness, shared decision-making, self-management support) predicted greater initiation of treatment in Y2. Among those who received depression treatment in Y1 (n = 22,749), positive or moderate experiences in four domains (comprehensiveness, care coordination, medication decision-making, self-management support) predicted greater continuation of treatment in Y2. CONCLUSIONS: In a national PCMH setting, patient experiences with integrated care, including care coordination, comprehensiveness, involvement in shared decision-making, and self-management support predicted patients' subsequent initiation and continuation of depression treatment over time-a relationship that could affect physical and mental health outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Veteranos/psicología , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
10.
Am J Public Health ; 108(2): 248-255, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29267065

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence and consequences of receiving prescription opioids from both the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Medicare Part D. METHODS: Among US veterans enrolled in both VA and Part D filling 1 or more opioid prescriptions in 2012 (n = 539 473), we calculated 3 opioid safety measures using morphine milligram equivalents (MME): (1) proportion receiving greater than 100 MME for 1 or more days, (2) mean days receiving greater than 100 MME, and (3) proportion receiving greater than 120 MME for 90 consecutive days. We compared these measures by opioid source. RESULTS: Overall, 135 643 (25.1%) veterans received opioids from VA only, 332 630 (61.7%) from Part D only, and 71 200 (13.2%) from both. The dual-use group was more likely than the VA-only group to receive greater than 100 MME for 1 or more days (34.3% vs 10.9%; adjusted risk ratio [ARR] = 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.9, 3.1), have more days with greater than 100 MME (42.5 vs 16.9 days; adjusted difference = 16.4 days; 95% CI = 15.7, 17.2), and to receive greater than 120 MME for 90 consecutive days (7.8% vs 3.1%; ARR = 2.2; 95% CI = 2.1, 2.3). CONCLUSIONS: Among veterans dually enrolled in VA and Medicare Part D, dual use of opioids was associated with more than 2 to 3 times the risk of high-dose opioid exposure.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare Part D/estadística & datos numéricos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
BMC Infect Dis ; 17(1): 401, 2017 06 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28592230

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effectiveness of targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis in transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUSP). METHODS: A prospective, non-randomized cohort study was conducted. Rectal swab cultures plated on non-selective blood agar and on selective MacConkey agar supplemented with ciprofloxacin identified ciprofloxacin-susceptible and -resistant gram-negative bacteria (CS-GNB and CR-GNB). Patients with CS-GNB received ciprofloxacin while those with CR-GNB received directed prophylaxis. Infectious complications were defined clinically and microbiologically within 30 days after TRUSP. Data were derived at 7 and 30 days post procedure by questionnaires and electronic medical records. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in the infectious outcomes among the CS and CR groups. RESULTS: From November 1, 2012 to March 31, 2015, 510 men completed the study; 430 (84.3%) had CS-GNB and 80 (15.7%) had CR-GNB. 484 (94.9%) completed the study per protocol, while 26 (5.1%) had an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Of the 484, 475 (98.1%) had no infections, nine (1.9%) had infections, six of which (1.2%) were culture-proven (CP). The nine infections were as follows: five (1.0%) uncomplicated UTIs, one (0.2%) complicated UTI, and three (0.6%) urosepsis. One case of uncomplicated UTI and two cases of urosepsis were not CP, but were diagnosed clinically. ITT outcomes were similar. The infection rates were not statistically different between the CS-and CR-GNB patients (p-value = 0.314; 95% CI 0.8-3.3). The four patients with complicated UTIs or sepsis were hospitalized for a mean of 2.6 days and discharged without sequelae. Of the nine infections, three were antimicrobial prophylaxis failures (two ciprofloxacin and one amikacin); three were likely due to failure of the collection or processing of the rectal swab or increasing bacterial resistance between the time of swab collection and biopsy, and three developed clinical infections with no isolate recovered. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis follows the principles of antimicrobial stewardship and achieved a low rate of infectious complications with limited morbidity and no sequelae. This individualized method of prophylaxis may be widely applied. Further studies are needed to explore reasons for targeted prophylaxis failure and to determine comparative efficacy of non-ciprofloxacin-containing targeted prophylaxis regimens. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT01659866 . Registered 9 July 2012. First patient enrolled 1 November 2012.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Ciprofloxacina/farmacología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Sepsis/prevención & control , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Humanos , Illinois , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/microbiología , Medicina de Precisión , Estudios Prospectivos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Recto/microbiología , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sepsis/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología
12.
Endocr Pract ; 23(1): 46-55, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27682356

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to elucidate 30-day and long-term outcomes in patients experiencing postoperative hypoglycemia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent cardiac surgery between September 4, 2007, and April 30, 2011, at Northwestern Memorial Hospital who had intensive treatment of hyperglycemia postoperatively. Of 1,325 patients, 215 experienced a hypoglycemic episode (blood glucose <70 mg/dL) within the first 3 postoperative days. A total of 198 were propensity-score (PS) matched to 363 patients without hypoglycemia. The analysis consisted of a comparison of 30-day cardiac outcomes and long-term mortality between those who experienced a hypoglycemic event and those who did not. RESULTS: Between patients who experienced hypoglycemia compared to those that did not, there were no significant differences in mean glucose values while on insulin drips (119.8 ± 33.5 mg/dL vs. 120.9 ± 30.5 mg/dL; P = .69) or subcutaneous insulin (122.0 ± 38.0 mg/dL vs. 127.2 ± 35.5 mg/dL; P = .11) or postoperative surgical complication rates (30-day mortality: 3.5% vs. 1.7%; complications (any): 40% vs. 42%; 30-day re-admissions: 13% vs. 13%; all cardiac complications: 35% vs. 31%; and all infections: 8% vs. 5%). Over an average of 5.1 ± 2.2 years following index surgery, there was higher all-cause mortality among those PS-matched who had experienced hypoglycemia compared to those who had not (log-rank P = .031), primarily due to those (n = 32) experiencing more than one episode of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSION: Postoperative hypoglycemia did not negatively impact immediate surgical complication rates but was associated with a significant risk of increased postoperative morbidity and long-term all-cause mortality in patients experiencing multiple episodes of hypoglycemia. ABBREVIATIONS: BG = blood glucose BMI = body mass index CARD = Cardiovascular Research Database HR = hazard rate PS = propensity score.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Insulina/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/inducido químicamente , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Cardíaca , Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/epidemiología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Readmisión del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
13.
Subst Abus ; 38(1): 22-25, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27925868

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine is a key tool in the management of opioid use disorder, but there are growing concerns about abuse, diversion, and safety. These concerns are amplified for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), whose patients may receive care concurrently from multiple prescribers within and outside VA. To illustrate the extent of this challenge, we examined overlapping prescriptions for buprenorphine, opioids, and benzodiazepines among veterans dually enrolled in VA and Medicare Part D. METHODS: We constructed a cohort of all veterans dually enrolled in VA and Part D who filled an opioid prescription in 2012. We identified patients who received tablet or film buprenorphine products from either source. We calculated the proportion of buprenorphine recipients with any overlapping prescription (based on days supply) for a nonbuprenorphine opioid or benzodiazepine, focusing on veterans who received overlapping prescriptions from a different system than their buprenorphine prescription (Part D buprenorphine recipients receiving overlapping opioids or benzodiazepines from VA and vice versa). RESULTS: There were 1790 dually enrolled veterans with buprenorphine prescriptions, including 760 (43%) from VA and 1091 (61%) from Part D (61 veterans with buprenorphine from both systems were included in each group). Among VA buprenorphine recipients, 199 (26%) received an overlapping opioid prescription and 11 (1%) received an overlapping benzodiazepine prescription from Part D. Among Part D buprenorphine recipients, 208 (19%) received an overlapping opioid prescription and 178 (16%) received an overlapping benzodiazepine prescription from VA. Among VA and Part D buprenorphine recipients with cross-system opioid overlap, 25% (49/199) and 35% (72/208), respectively, had >90 days of overlap. CONCLUSIONS: Many buprenorphine recipients receive overlapping prescriptions for opioids and benzodiazepines from a different health care system than the one in which their buprenorphine was filled. These findings highlight a previously undocumented safety risk for veterans dually enrolled in VA and Medicare.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare Part D/estadística & datos numéricos , Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Adulto Joven
14.
J Gen Intern Med ; 31(12): 1435-1443, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27325318

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMH) may be effective in managing care for racial/ethnic minorities with mental health and/or substance use disorders (MHSUDs). How such patients experience care in PCMH settings is relatively unknown. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine racial/ethnic differences in experiences with primary care in PCMH settings among Veterans with MHSUDs. DESIGN: We used multinomial regression methods to estimate racial/ethnic differences in PCMH experiences reported on a 2013 national survey of Veterans Affairs patients. PARTICPANTS: Veterans with past-year MHSUD diagnoses (n = 65,930; 67 % White, 20 % Black, 11 % Hispanic, 1 % American Indian/Alaska Native[AI/AN], and 1 % Asian/Pacific Island[A/PI]). MAIN MEASURES: Positive and negative experiences from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) PCMH Survey. RESULTS: Veterans with MHSUDs reported the lowest frequency of positive experiences with access (22 %) and the highest frequency of negative experiences with self-management support (30 %) and comprehensiveness (16 %). Racial/ethnic differences (as compared to Whites) were observed in all seven healthcare domains (p values < 0.05). With access, Blacks and Hispanics reported more negative (Risk Differences [RDs] = 2 .0;3.6) and fewer positive (RDs = -2 .3;-2.3) experiences, while AI/ANs reported more negative experiences (RD = 5.7). In communication, Blacks reported fewer negative experiences (RD = -1.3); AI/ANs reported more negative (RD = 3.6) experiences; and AI/ANs and APIs reported fewer positive (RD = -6.5, -6.7) experiences. With office staff, Hispanics reported fewer positive experiences (RDs = -3.0); AI/ANs and A/PIs reported more negative experiences (RDs = 3.4; 3.7). For comprehensiveness, Blacks reported more positive experiences (RD = 3.6), and Hispanics reported more negative experiences (RD = 2.7). Both Blacks and Hispanics reported more positive (RDs = 2.3; 4.2) and fewer negative (RDs = -1.8; -1.9) provider ratings, and more positive experiences with decision making (RDs = 2.4; 3.0). Blacks reported more positive (RD = 3.9) and fewer negative (RD = -5.1) experiences with self-management support. CONCLUSIONS: In a national sample of Veterans with MHSUDs, potential deficiencies were observed in access, self-management support, and comprehensiveness. Racial/ethnic minorities reported worse experiences than Whites with access, comprehensiveness, communication, and office staff helpfulness/courtesy.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/etnología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/etnología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Veteranos/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Etnicidad/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Salud Mental/etnología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Grupos Raciales/etnología , Grupos Raciales/psicología , Distribución Aleatoria , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
15.
Nat Genet ; 39(5): 631-7, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17401366

RESUMEN

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent noncutaneous cancer in males in developed regions, with African American men having among the highest worldwide incidence and mortality rates. Here we report a second genetic variant in the 8q24 region that, in conjunction with another variant we recently discovered, accounts for about 11%-13% of prostate cancer cases in individuals of European descent and 31% of cases in African Americans. We made the current discovery through a genome-wide association scan of 1,453 affected Icelandic individuals and 3,064 controls using the Illumina HumanHap300 BeadChip followed by four replication studies. A key step in the discovery was the construction of a 14-SNP haplotype that efficiently tags a relatively uncommon (2%-4%) susceptibility variant in individuals of European descent that happens to be very common (approximately 42%) in African Americans. The newly identified variant shows a stronger association with affected individuals who have an earlier age at diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Cromosomas Humanos Par 8/genética , Ligamiento Genético , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad/genética , Variación Genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Negro o Afroamericano , Europa (Continente) , Genómica/métodos , Haplotipos/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Estados Unidos , Población Blanca
16.
J Sex Med ; 11(4): 1078-1085, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24628707

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: A penile prosthesis infection (PPI) is either treated with explantation of the prosthesis with a possible delayed reimplantation or a salvage procedure with an immediate reimplantation of the prosthesis. AIM: We used a large, all-payer national database to investigate the use of the salvage procedure in the setting of PPI. METHODS: The study used years 2000-2009 of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify PPIs treated with immediate salvage or explantation alone. Admissions were then stratified by various parameters to compare differences in the salvage rates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Salvage Rate of Penile Prosthesis infection. RESULTS: A total of 1,557 patients were treated with an explantation only (82.7%) or salvage (17.3%) for PPI, a proportion that remained stable over the study period. The patients treated with salvage were younger (60.4 vs. 65.1 years), more likely to be discharged home (87.3% vs. 61.9%), and were less likely to have a severe presentation (7.2% vs. 31.6%) than those who were explanted only (P < 0.001). These factors were confirmed on multivariate regression analysis. The regression also revealed that treatment at rural hospitals had lower odds of salvage than treatment at urban teaching hospitals. Race, comorbid diabetes, and insurance status did not independently affect the salvage rate. There was no significant difference in total hospital charges between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage rates have remained low over the past decade. Our study elucidated several factors decreasing the chances of salvage after PPI including age, severity of presentation, and hospital setting.


Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil/cirugía , Implantación de Pene/estadística & datos numéricos , Prótesis de Pene/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia Recuperativa/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
17.
World J Urol ; 32(1): 105-8, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23633127

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To elucidate disease associations and possible etiology of lichen sclerosus (LS), we identified comorbidities present in men with LS. LS is a chronic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology affecting genitals and urethra of men commonly resulting in strictures. METHODS: Men with LS of the urethra, penis, prepuce and scrotum were identified. A control population was generated from men seen in the Department of Urology matched by age and race in a 5:1 ratio. A case-control study was performed and comorbidities identified by ICD9, CPT codes and medication use via systematic electronic medical record review. Subgroup analysis of men with urethral strictures was performed based on their LS status. RESULTS: Men with LS had a significantly higher mean body mass index [31.0 (range 18.9-52.6)] compared to controls [28.1 (16.8-64.1), p = 0.001], significantly increased rate of coronary artery disease (CAD) (15.3 vs. 8.9%, p = 0.05) as well as a twofold higher rate of diabetes mellitus (15.5 vs. 8.3%, p = 0.02). Of men with LS and stricture disease, 11/19 (58%) were current or former smokers, compared to 28% of men with strictures without LS (p = 0.006). No association of LS with other morbidities like hyperlipidemia, hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease or dermatologic disorders was found. CONCLUSIONS: Men suffering from LS have an increased BMI and a higher prevalence of concomitant CAD, diabetes mellitus and tobacco use. Development and chronicity of LS may not be a purely dermatologic condition, but be associated or confounded by systemic or vascular compromise from disorders of CAD, DM and smoking.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Liquen Escleroso y Atrófico/epidemiología , Obesidad/epidemiología , Fumar/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Liquen Escleroso y Atrófico/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pene/patología , Prevalencia , Escroto/patología , Uretra/patología
18.
Drugs Aging ; 41(4): 367-377, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38575748

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Nursing home (NH) residents with limited life expectancy (LLE) who are intensely treated for hyperlipidemia, hypertension, or diabetes may benefit from deprescribing. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to describe NH clinician and family caregiver perspectives on key influences on deprescribing decisions for chronic disease medications in NH residents near the end of life. METHODS: We recruited family caregivers of veterans who recently died in a Veterans Affairs (VA) NH, known as community living centers (CLCs), and CLC healthcare clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, registered nurses). Respondents completed semi-structured interviews about their experiences with deprescribing statin, antihypertensive, and antidiabetic medications for residents near end of life. We conducted thematic analysis of interview transcripts to identify key themes regarding influences on deprescribing decisions. RESULTS: Thirteen family caregivers and 13 clinicians completed interviews. Key themes included (1) clinicians and caregivers both prefer to minimize drug burden; (2) clinical factors strongly influence deprescribing of chronic disease medications, with differences in how clinicians and caregivers weigh specific factors; (3) caregivers trust and rely on clinicians to make deprescribing decisions; (4) clinicians perceive caregiver involvement and buy-in as essential to deprescribing decisions, which requires time and effort to obtain; and (5) clinicians perceive conflicting care from other clinicians as a barrier to deprescribing. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest a need for efforts to encourage communication with and education for family caregivers of residents with LLE about deprescribing, and to foster better collaboration among clinicians in CLC and non-CLC settings.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Deprescripciones , Humanos , Anciano , Casas de Salud , Muerte , Enfermedad Crónica
19.
Clin Infect Dis ; 57(2): 254-62, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23575195

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We developed and assessed the impact of a patient registry and electronic admission notification system relating to regional antimicrobial resistance (AMR) on regional AMR infection rates over time. We conducted an observational cohort study of all patients identified as infected or colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and/or vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) on at least 1 occasion by any of 5 healthcare systems between 2003 and 2010. The 5 healthcare systems included 17 hospitals and associated clinics in the Indianapolis, Indiana, region. METHODS: We developed and standardized a registry of MRSA and VRE patients and created Web forms that infection preventionists (IPs) used to maintain the lists. We sent e-mail alerts to IPs whenever a patient previously infected or colonized with MRSA or VRE registered for admission to a study hospital from June 2007 through June 2010. RESULTS: Over a 3-year period, we delivered 12 748 e-mail alerts on 6270 unique patients to 24 IPs covering 17 hospitals. One in 5 (22%-23%) of all admission alerts was based on data from a healthcare system that was different from the admitting hospital; a few hospitals accounted for most of this crossover among facilities and systems. CONCLUSIONS: Regional patient registries identify an important patient cohort with relevant prior antibiotic-resistant infection data from different healthcare institutions. Regional registries can identify trends and interinstitutional movement not otherwise apparent from single institution data. Importantly, electronic alerts can notify of the need to isolate early and to institute other measures to prevent transmission.


Asunto(s)
Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Aplicaciones de la Informática Médica , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Notificación de Enfermedades , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Indiana/epidemiología , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Sistema de Registros , Adulto Joven
20.
J Urol ; 190(1): 212-7, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23321584

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We determined whether including a care coordination system to manage the referral process for hematuria would lead to improved quality of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inflection Navigator, a protocol based, electronic medical record enabled care coordination system, was developed to support primary care physicians evaluating newly discovered hematuria. We studied the system for patients referred for microscopic and gross hematuria from May 2009 to May 2010. We compared outcomes in these 106 patients and in 105 referred to our urology department for hematuria during the same period who did not use the system. RESULTS: Patients in the care coordination group completed the evaluation in a significantly shorter time with more than a 1-month difference in time between referral and the completion of the imaging and cystoscopy components of the assessment (mean 40.9 vs 74.1 days, p <0.05). This system potentially lowered health care costs by decreasing the mean ± SD number of urology visits needed to complete an evaluation from 2.1 ± 1.5 in the standard referral group to 1.6 ± 1.4 in the care coordination group (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A protocol based care coordination system for hematuria decreased the time needed to complete an evaluation and decreased the number of overall visits required to make a final diagnosis. Thus, the Inflection Navigator system is an example of an electronic medical record enabled process innovation that can improve the efficiency of care while potentially lowering health care costs.


Asunto(s)
Ahorro de Costo , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Hematuria/diagnóstico , Hematuria/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hematuria/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Innovación Organizacional , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Recurrencia , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Estados Unidos , Urología/organización & administración
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA