RESUMEN
We aimed to compare the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) versus the best available therapy (BAT) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with bloodstream infection caused by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP-BSI). A retrospective (2016-2021) observational cohort study was performed in 14 INCREMENT-SOT centers (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02852902; Impact of Specific Antimicrobials and MIC Values on the Outcome of Bloodstream Infections Due to ESBL- or Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in Solid Organ Transplantation: an Observational Multinational Study). Outcomes were 14-day and 30-day clinical success (complete resolution of attributable manifestations, adequate source control, and negative follow-up blood cultures) and 30-day all-cause mortality. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses adjusted for the propensity score to receive CAZ-AVI were constructed. Among 210 SOT recipients with CPKP-BSI, 149 received active primary therapy with CAZ-AVI (66/149) or BAT (83/149). Patients treated with CAZ-AVI had higher 14-day (80.7% vs 60.6%, P = .011) and 30-day (83.1% vs 60.6%, P = .004) clinical success and lower 30-day mortality (13.25% vs 27.3%, P = .053) than those receiving BAT. In the adjusted analysis, CAZ-AVI increased the probability of 14-day (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-6.84; P = .044) and 30-day clinical success (aOR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.17-8.40; P = .023). In contrast, CAZ-AVI therapy was not independently associated with 30-day mortality. In the CAZ-AVI group, combination therapy was not associated with better outcomes. In conclusion, CAZ-AVI may be considered a first-line treatment in SOT recipients with CPKP-BSI.
Asunto(s)
Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos , Infecciones por Klebsiella , Sepsis , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Estudios Retrospectivos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are not well represented in pivotal trials with ceftazidime/avibactam. The best strategy for the treatment of these infections is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective observational study of patients who received ≥48â h of ceftazidime/avibactam or best available therapy (BAT) for documented CPE infections. The primary outcome was 30â day crude mortality. Secondary outcomes were 21â day clinical response and microbiological response. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify factors predictive of 30â day crude mortality. A propensity score to receive treatment with ceftazidime/avibactam was used as a covariate in the analysis. RESULTS: The cohort included 339 patients with CPE infections. Ceftazidime/avibactam treatment was used in 189 (55.8%) patients and 150 (44.2%) received BAT at a median of 2â days after diagnosis of infection. In multivariate analysis, ceftazidime/avibactam treatment was associated with survival (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.80; P = 0.01), whereas INCREMENT-CPE scores of >7 points (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.18-1.5.58; P = 0.01) and SOFA score (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.34; P = 0.001) were associated with higher mortality. In patients with INCREMENT-CPE scores of >7 points, ceftazidime/avibactam treatment was associated with lower mortality compared with BAT (16/73, 21.9% versus 23/49, 46.9%; P = 0.004). Ceftazidime/avibactam was also an independent factor of 21â day clinical response (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.16-5.12; P = 0.02) and microbiological eradication (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.85; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime/avibactam is an effective alternative for the treatment of CPE infections, especially in patients with INCREMENT-CPE scores of >7 points. A randomized controlled trial should confirm these findings.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Ceftazidima , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , beta-LactamasasRESUMEN
Background: The management and indication of empiric treatment in Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp)-colonized patients should be improved. Methods: A prospective cohort of 94 patients colonized by KPC-Kp was followed for 90 days to validate (i) the Giannella risk score (GRS) to predict the development of any type of KPC-Kp infection and (ii) the INCREMENT-CPE score (ICS) to predict 30-day mortality in patients with infection. Both scores were combined to recommend appropriate empiric treatment. The predictive ability of the scores was measured by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Results: The GRS showed an AUROC curve for infection due to KPC-Kp of 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], .87-.98). The optimal cutoff point was fixed at <7 and ≥7 (92.9% sensitivity, 84.8% specificity); infection developed in 6.3% patients in the 0-6 GRS group and in 84.8% patient in the ≥7 GRS group. According to the ICS, the severity of the infection was also significantly higher in the ≥7 GRS group. The ICS showed an AUROC of 0.78 (95% CI, .65-.91) for 30-day all-cause mortality among patients with infection. A classification and regression tree analysis confirmed the GRS cutoff point at 7, and selected ≥12 points to predict a KPC-Kp infection with a high ICS. Conclusions: Our results validate the GRS and ICS for indicating empiric therapy in KPC-Kp-colonized patients.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Infecciones por Klebsiella/mortalidad , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzimología , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Portador Sano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Recto/microbiología , Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) present a major problem for therapeutic management. We report here our experience with 12 patients with a severe MDRPA infection (6 of which were pneumonia) who received salvage therapy with ceftolozane-tazobactam after inappropriate empirical treatment and/or suboptimal targeted treatment. Although 10 of the 12 patients (83.3%) experienced septic shock, only 3 patients (25%) died during the follow-up period. Microbiological cure in 7 patients (58.3%) was observed.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Ácido Penicilánico/análogos & derivados , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/patogenicidad , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Penicilánico/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Bacteriana/microbiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/mortalidad , Neumonía Bacteriana/patología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/mortalidad , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/patología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/crecimiento & desarrollo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Choque Séptico/microbiología , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Choque Séptico/patología , Análisis de Supervivencia , TazobactamRESUMEN
We retrospectively investigated the impact of high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC > 2 µg/ml) on the outcome of 53 patients with bacteremia caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Vancomycin MIC was determined by broth microdilution according to CLSI methods. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality from the date of the first positive blood culture. The mortality rate was 22.6% (12 of 53 patients). High vancomycin MIC (odds ratio (OR) = 9.3; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.31-63.20; p = 0.027), Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 3 (OR = 10.3; 95% CI = 1.3-102.04; p = 0.03), advanced age (OR = 35.8; 95% CI = 2.3-659.2; p = 0.01), and severe sepsis (OR = 8.5; 95% CI = 1.2-61.4; p = 0.03) were associated with mortality.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Pneumonia continues to be one of the most frequent infectious syndromes and a relevant cause of death and health resources utilization. The OPENIN ("Optimización de procesos clínicos para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de infecciones") Group is composed of Infectious Diseases specialists and Microbiologists and aims at generating recommendations that can contribute to improve the approach to processes with high impact on the health system. Such task relies on a critical review of the available scientific evidence. The first Group meeting (held in October 2023) aimed at answering the following questions: Can we optimize the syndromic and microbiological diagnosis of pneumonia? Is it feasible to safely shorten the length of antibiotic therapy? And, is there any role for the immunomodulatory strategies based on the adjuvant use of steroids, macrolides or immunoglobulins? The present review summarizes the literature reviewed for that meeting and offers a series of expert recommendations.
RESUMEN
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a significant challenge in solid organ transplantation (SOT). The last international consensus guidelines on the management of CMV in SOT were published in 2018, highlighting the need for revision to incorporate recent advances, notably in cell-mediated immunity monitoring, which could alter the current standard of care. A working group including members from the Group for the Study of Infection in Transplantation and the Immunocompromised Host (GESITRA-IC) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and the Spanish Society of Transplantation (SET), developed consensus-based recommendations for managing CMV infection in SOT recipients. Recommendations were classified based on evidence strength and quality using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The final recommendations were endorsed through a consensus meeting and approved by the expert panel.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: De-escalation from broad-spectrum to narrow-spectrum antibiotics is considered an important measure to reduce the selective pressure of antibiotics, but a scarcity of adequate evidence is a barrier to its implementation. We aimed to determine whether de-escalation from an antipseudomonal ß-lactam to a narrower-spectrum drug was non-inferior to continuing the antipseudomonal drug in patients with Enterobacterales bacteraemia. METHODS: An open-label, pragmatic, randomised trial was performed in 21 Spanish hospitals. Patients with bacteraemia caused by Enterobacterales susceptible to one of the de-escalation options and treated empirically with an antipseudomonal ß-lactam were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1; stratified by urinary source) to de-escalate to ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (urinary tract infections only), cefuroxime, cefotaxime or ceftriaxone, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin, or ertapenem in that order according to susceptibility (de-escalation group), or to continue with the empiric antipseudomonal ß-lactam (control group). Oral switching was allowed in both groups. The primary outcome was clinical cure 3-5 days after end of treatment in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, formed of patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Safety was assessed in all participants. Non-inferiority was declared when the lower bound of the 95% CI of the absolute difference in cure rate was above the -10% non-inferiority margin. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2015-004219-19) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02795949) and is complete. FINDINGS: 2030 patients were screened between Oct 5, 2016, and Jan 23, 2020, of whom 171 were randomly assigned to the de-escalation group and 173 to the control group. 164 (50%) patients in the de-escalation group and 167 (50%) in the control group were included in the mITT population. 148 (90%) patients in the de-escalation group and 148 (89%) in the control group had clinical cure (risk difference 1·6 percentage points, 95% CI -5·0 to 8·2). The number of adverse events reported was 219 in the de-escalation group and 175 in the control group, of these, 53 (24%) in the de-escalation group and 56 (32%) in the control group were considered severe. Seven (5%) of 164 patients in the de-escalation group and nine (6%) of 167 patients in the control group died during the 60-day follow-up. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: De-escalation from an antipseudomonal ß-lactam in Enterobacterales bacteraemia following a predefined rule was non-inferior to continuing the empiric antipseudomonal drug. These results support de-escalation in this setting. FUNDING: Plan Nacional de I+D+i 2013-2016 and Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases; Spanish Clinical Research and Clinical Trials Platform, co-financed by the EU; European Development Regional Fund "A way to achieve Europe", Operative Program Intelligence Growth 2014-2020.
Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , beta-Lactamas , Humanos , beta-Lactamas/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Ceftriaxona , Ertapenem , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Cytomegalovirus infection remains a serious threat to solid transplant recipients. Despite advances in this field, there are still difficulties in the diagnosis of the disease and there are questions about the best and most cost-effective strategy to prevent infection and its direct and indirect consequences in the short and long term. All these points are discussed and updated in this chapter.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/etiología , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/terapia , Humanos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To monitor quantitatively the extent of intestinal colonisation by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) in colonised patients who receive selective digestive decontamination (SDD) with oral gentamicin. METHODS: We developed a real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) method for determination of the relative load of blaKPC (RLKPC) within the gut microbiota. Clinical validation was performed using a culture method as the gold standard and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. Fifteen patients were observationally and prospectively followed for one year. Clinical, microbiological variables and rectal swab samples were collected at 0 (baseline), 14 and 30 days and monthly thereafter. RESULTS: Clinical validation performed on 111 rectal swab samples demonstrated that the PCR method detected 17% more positives than the culture method. ROC curve analysis documented excellent agreement between both methods (area under the curve, 0.96; 95% confidence interval 0.93-0.99). The RLKPC decreased in 6/15 (40%) and 7/12 (58.3%) patients on days 14 and 30, respectively. Persistent eradication was observed in 2/12 (16.7%), 3/9 (33.3%), 4/8 (50%) and 7/8 (87.5%) patients at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively, with a median time of 150 days (range 30-270) to persistent eradication. Gentamicin-resistant KPC-Kp isolates were identified in 4/15 (26.7%) patients. The rates of infections (57.1% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.119) and deaths (71.4% vs. 0%, P = 0.007) were higher among patients with high baseline RLKPC. CONCLUSION: Following SDD, a rapid reduction on intestinal load is observed when the colonising KPC-Kp isolate is susceptible to gentamicin; however, persistent eradication at the end of SDD is low. Intestinal carriage of KPC-Kp persists after three months in about one third of patients.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Klebsiella , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Descontaminación , Gentamicinas/farmacología , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , beta-Lactamasas/genéticaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales are frequent and associated with high rates of mortality. Intestinal carriers are at increased risk of infection by these microorganisms. Decolonisation strategies with antibiotics have not obtained conclusive results. Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) could be an effective and safe strategy to decolonise intestinal carriers of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) but this hypothesis needs evaluation in appropriate clinical trials. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The KAPEDIS trial is a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2, superiority clinical trial of FMT for eradication of intestinal colonisation by KPC-Kp. One hundred and twenty patients with rectal colonisation by KPC-Kp will be randomised 1:1 to receive encapsulated lyophilised FMT or placebo. The primary outcome is KPC-Kp eradication at 30 days. Secondary outcomes are: (1) frequency of adverse events; (2) changes in KPC-Kp relative load within the intestinal microbiota at 7, 30 and 90 days, estimated by real-time quantitative PCR analysis of rectal swab samples and (3) rates of persistent eradication, KPC-Kp infection and crude mortality at 90 days. Participants will be monitored for adverse effects throughout the intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from Reina Sofía University Hospital Institutional Review Board (approval reference number: 2019-003808-13). Trial results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04760665.
Asunto(s)
Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos , Infecciones por Klebsiella , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Klebsiella pneumoniae , beta-LactamasasRESUMEN
Colonization by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) is associated with the risk of developing KPC-Kp infection. The impact of the time elapsed since a patient becomes colonized on this risk is not well known. An observational, prospective, longitudinal cohort study of colonized patients undergoing active rectal culture screening to rule out KPC-Kp colonization (July 2012 to November 2017). Patients with a positive culture at inclusion (colonized at start of follow-up) and those with a negative culture at inclusion who became colonized within 90 days (colonized during follow-up) were included in the analysis. CART analysis was used to dichotomize variables according to their association with infection. Kaplan-Meier infection-free survival curves and the log-rank test were used for group comparisons. Logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with KPC-Kp infection. Among 1310 patients included, 166 were colonized at the end of follow-up. Forty-seven out of 118 patients colonized at start of follow-up developed infection (39.8%) versus 31 out of 48 patients colonized during follow-up (64.6%; P = 0.006). Variables associated with KPC-Kp infection in the logistic regression analysis were: colonization detection during follow-up (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.07 to 7.04; P = 0.03), Giannella risk score (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.73; P < 0.001), high-risk ward (OR, 4.77; 95% CI, 1.61 to 14.10; P = 0.005) and urological manipulation after admission (OR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.08 to 12.60; P = 0.04). In 25 out of 31 patients (80.6%) colonized during follow-up who developed KPC-Kp infection, infection appeared within 15 days after colonization. The risk of KPC-Kp infection was higher when colonization is recently acquired during hospitalization. In this prospective study, we concluded that the timing of colonization was a factor to assess when considering empirical treatment for suspected KPC-Kp infection and prophylaxis or infection control. IMPORTANCE In this study, it was confirmed that patients who became colonized during hospitalization had a higher risk of developing KPC-Kp infection than hospitalized patients who were already colonized at the start of follow-up. Besides, the risk of infection in the group of patients who became colonized during follow-up was greater in the first weeks immediately after colonization was confirmed. Our findings support the need for designing preventive strategies for patients at the highest risk of infection development, including those admitted in high-risk hospital wards and those undergoing urological procedures.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Klebsiella , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Infecciones por Klebsiella/prevención & control , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Prospectivos , beta-LactamasasRESUMEN
Increased relative bacterial load of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-KP) within the intestinal microbiota has been associated with KPC-KP bacteremia. Prospective observational study of KPC-KP adult carriers with a hospital admission at recruitment or within the three prior months (January 2018 to February 2019). A qPCR-based assay was developed to measure the relative load of KPC-KP in rectal swabs (RLKPC, proportion of blaKPC relative to 16S rRNA gene copy number). We generated Fine-Gray competing risk and Cox regression models for survival analysis of all-site KPC-KP infection and all-cause mortality, respectively, at 90 and 30 days. The median RLKPC at baseline among 80 KPC-KP adult carriers was 0.28% (range 0.001% to 2.70%). Giannella Risk Score (GRS) was independently associated with 90-day and 30-day all-site infection (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aHR] 1.23, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.32, P < 0.001). RLKPC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.07, P = 0.008) and age (aHR 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.10, P = 0.008) were independent predictors of 90-day all-cause mortality in a Cox model stratified by length of hospital stay (LOHS) ≥20 days. An adjusted Cox model for 30-day all-cause mortality, stratified by LOHS ≥14 days, included RLKPC (aHR 1.03, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.06, P = 0.027), age (aHR 1.10, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.18, P = 0.004), and severe KPC-KP infection (INCREMENT-CPE score >7, aHR 2.96, 95% CI = 0.97 to 9.07, P = 0.057). KPC-KP relative intestinal load was independently associated with all-cause mortality in our clinical setting, after adjusting for age and severe KPC-KP infection. Our study confirms the utility of GRS to predict infection risk in patients colonized by KPC-KP. IMPORTANCE The rapid dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales represents a global public health threat. Increased relative load of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-KP) within the intestinal microbiota has been associated with an increased risk of bloodstream infection by KPC-KP. We developed a qPCR assay for quantification of the relative KPC-KP intestinal load (RLKPC) in 80 colonized patients and examined its association with subsequent all-site KPC-KP infection and all-cause mortality within 90 days. Giannella Risk Score, which predicts infection risk in colonized patients, was independently associated with the development of all-site KPC-KP infection. RLKPC was not associated with all-site KPC-KP infection, possibly reflecting the large heterogeneity in patient clinical conditions and infection types. RLKPC was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality within 90 and 30 days in our clinical setting. We hypothesize that KPC-KP load may behave as a surrogate marker for the severity of the patient's clinical condition.
Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Infecciones por Klebsiella , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/microbiología , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genética , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , beta-Lactamasas/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the association of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) rectal colonisation with crude mortality and whether this association is independent of the risk of KPC-Kp infection. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of patients followed-up 90 days after a study of rectal colonisation. Cox regression was used to study the variables associated with crude mortality. Sensitivity analyses for 90-day crude mortality in different subcohorts were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1244 patients (1078 non-colonised and 166 colonised) were included. None of the non-colonised patients and 78 (47.0%) of the colonised patients developed KPC-Kp infection. The 90-day crude mortality was 18.0% (194/1078) in non-colonised patients and 41.6% (69/166) in colonised patients. Rectal colonisation was not associated with crude mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.54; P = 0.85] when the model was adjusted for severe KPC-Kp infection [INCREMENT-CPE score (ICS) > 7]. KPC-Kp infection with ICS > 7 was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.35-3.63; P = 0.002). In the sensitivity analyses, KPC-Kp colonisation was not associated with mortality in any of the analysed subcohorts, including patients who did not develop KPC-Kp infection (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.60-1.43; P = 0.74). CONCLUSION: KPC-Kp rectal colonisation was not associated with crude mortality. Mortality increased when colonised patients developed severe KPC-Kp infection (ICS > 7). Rectal colonisation was a necessary although insufficient condition to die from a KPC-Kp infection.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Klebsiella , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Proteínas Bacterianas , Humanos , Klebsiella , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , beta-LactamasasRESUMEN
Cytomegalovirus infection remains a major complication of solid organ transplantation. In 2005 the Spanish Transplantation Infection Study Group (GESITRA) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) developed consensus guidelines for the prevention and treatment of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Since then, numerous publications have clarified or questioned the aspects covered in the previous document. These aspects include the situations and populations who must receive prophylaxis and its duration, the selection of the best diagnosis and monitoring technique and the best therapeutic strategy. For these reasons, we have developed new consensus guidelines to include the latest recommendations on post-transplant CMV management based on new evidence available.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Citomegalovirus/efectos de los fármacos , Citomegalovirus/fisiología , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/etiología , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/transmisión , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Selección de Donante , Esquema de Medicación , Farmacorresistencia Viral , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Inmunidad Celular , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Factores de Riesgo , Subgrupos de Linfocitos T/inmunología , Donantes de Tejidos , Trasplante/efectos adversos , Viremia/diagnóstico , Activación Viral/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) are a critical public health threat, and carbapenem use contributes to their spread. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have proven successful in reducing antimicrobial use. However, evidence on the impact of carbapenem resistance remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of a multifaceted ASP on carbapenem use and incidence of CR-GNB in a high-endemic hospital. An interrupted time-series analysis was conducted one year before and two years after starting the ASP to assess carbapenem consumption, CR-GNB incidence, death rates of sentinel events, and other variables potentially related to CR-GNB incidence. An intense reduction in carbapenem consumption occurred after starting the intervention and was sustained two years later (relative effect -83.51%; 95% CI -87.23 to -79.79). The incidence density of CR-GNB decreased by -0.915 cases per 1000 occupied bed days (95% CI -1.743 to -0.087). This effect was especially marked in CR-Klebsiella pneumoniae and CR-Escherichia coli, reversing the pre-intervention upward trend and leading to a relative reduction of -91.15% (95% CI -105.53 to -76.76) and -89.93% (95% CI -107.03 to -72.83), respectively, two years after starting the program. Death rates did not change. This ASP contributed to decreasing CR-GNB incidence through a sustained reduction in antibiotic use without increasing mortality rates.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of severe hepatitis in HIV-infected patients receiving rifampicin plus pyrazinamide (RZ) for antituberculosis prophylaxis with that of patients receiving a conventional isoniazid-based regime for 6 to 12 months (6-12H). METHODS: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, in which RZ was compared with 6-12H, the standard regimen for latent tuberculosis infection in HIV-infected patients. A systematic search of studies published between 1986 and 2007 was carried out, and 5 randomized clinical trials conducted in Spain (2), the USA (1), Haiti (1), and Zambia (1) were identified. The absence or presence of severe hepatoxicity, which was defined as toxicity causing the death of the patient or requiring treatment withdrawal, was assessed as a binary response, and the outcome measure was the difference in the risk of hepatotoxicity between patients receiving RZ and those receiving 6-12H (controls). RESULTS: Among the 5 trials retrieved, 1 was excluded from the final analysis because of incomplete data on the development of hepatotoxicity. A final total of 2657 patients were included (1324 patients receiving RZ and 1333 receiving 6-12H). The development of severe hepatotoxicity was lower in the RZ group than in the 6-12H group (1.208% vs. 2.851%; P=0.0042, 95% CI: -0.028 to -0.005). The meta-analysis showed no statistical evidence of heterogeneity between the studies or publication bias. The difference in the risk of severe hepatotoxicity favored the RZ regimen in both the fixed effects model (-0.0119, 95% CI: -0.0206 to -0.0033) and random effects model (-0.0147, 95% CI: -0.0289 to -0.0006). CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis did not demonstrate an increased risk of severe hepatoxicity in HIV-infected patients receiving tuberculosis prophylaxis with the rifampicin/pyrazinamide combination compared to the conventional 6- or 12-month isoniazid-based regimen.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Antituberculosos/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/etiología , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Pirazinamida/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Tuberculosis/prevención & control , Fármacos Anti-VIH/efectos adversos , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Antituberculosos/administración & dosificación , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/epidemiología , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Isoniazida/administración & dosificación , Isoniazida/efectos adversos , Isoniazida/uso terapéutico , Pirazinamida/administración & dosificación , Pirazinamida/uso terapéutico , RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe the case of a patient with infection due to a KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) isolate developing ceftazidime-avibactam resistance with restored carbapenem susceptibility during ceftazidime-avibactam therapy. To review the clinical/microbiological cure and survival rates using carbapenems in other similar case reports and case series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A patient with an intra-abdominal infection due to K. pneumoniae producing the KPC-48 variant (L169P-A172T) (resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam and susceptible to carbapenems) who was treated with imipenem-cilastatin in combination with tigecycline and gentamicin. The literature was reviewed in order to summarise the in vivo (clinical/microbiological cure and survival rate) use of carbapenems in this emerging scenario. RESULTS: The patient was successfully treated with the indicated regimen. In other reported cases (mostly with pneumonia) all-cause mortality was 50% and clinical cure was 62.5%. Meropenem-vaborbactam has been successful used in an additional case. CONCLUSIONS: A carbapenem-based regimen of combination therapy seems to be an option for treating patients infected with K. pneumoniae resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam and susceptible to carbapenems, at least when the risk of mortality is low.
Asunto(s)
Ceftazidima , Neumonía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Azabiciclo , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infections caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) are not well represented in pivotal trials with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI). This study aimed to investigate its efficacy in a single-centre cohort of patients infected with KPC-Kp. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted of consecutive patients treated for > 72 hours with CAZ-AVI for KPC-Kp infections. Fourteen-day clinical response was considered when none of these criteria were present: i) the patient died before day 14, ii) treatment with CAZ-AVI at day 14 for persistence of symptoms or signs of infection, iii) recurrence. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify factors predictive of 14-day clinical failure. A propensity score to receive targeted initial treatment with CAZ-AVI was used as a covariate of the analysis. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were included. The median age was 70 years and the median Charlson index was 4. The most frequent sources of infection were intraabdominal (n = 18; 38.3%) followed by pneumonia (n = 14; 29.8%). Twenty-five patients (53.2%) had septic shock. CAZ-AVI was used as monotherapy in 34 (72.3%) of the cases. CAZ-AVI resistance was detected after CAZ-AVI therapy in six of 47 (12.7%) patients. Thirty-day crude mortality was 23.4% (n = 11). The 14-day clinical response rate was 59.6% (n = 28). Pneumonia (OR 7.57; 95% CI 1.45-39.43; P = 0.01), and INCREMENT-CPE score > 7 points (OR 6.73; 95% CI 1.39-34.94; P = 0.02) were associated with 14-day clinical failure. CONCLUSIONS: CAZ-AVI offers an advance for the treatment of KPC-Kp infections. In patients with pneumonia or an INCREMENT-CPE score > 7 points it may be reasonable to use CAZ-AVI in combination.
Asunto(s)
Compuestos de Azabiciclo/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Klebsiella/tratamiento farmacológico , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo , Anciano , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/efectos de los fármacos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , España , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: There is scarce information on the prognosis of urinary tract infections (UTI) caused by KPC carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp). OBJETIVE: To investigate the association between KPC-Kp aetiology and clinical failure and all cause mortality and to explore the impact of inappropriate empirical treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of hospitalized patients with UTI due to K. pneumoniae. We explored clinical failure at day 21 and 30-day all-cause mortality using different models of adjusted analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed 142 episodes of UTI; 46 episodes (32.4%) were due to KPC-Kp and 96 episodes (67.6%) were due to non-KPC-Kp strains (62 wild type and 34 EBSL producer). Clinical failure was more frequent in the KPC-Kp group (41.3% vs. 15.6%, pâ¯=â¯0.001). KPC-Kp aetiology and inappropriate empirical therapy were associated in the non-adjusted analysis with clinical failure. When analysed in separate adjusted models, both were found to be associated; inappropriate empirical treatment (OR 2.51; 95% CI, 1.03-6.12; pâ¯=â¯0.04) and KPC-Kp (OR 2.73; 95% CI, 1.03-7.22; pâ¯=â¯0.04) were associated with increased risk of failure. All-cause 30-day mortality was higher in patients with KPC-Kp UTI (39.1% vs. 15.6%, pâ¯=â¯0.002). Bacteraemia was more frequent in patients with KPC-Kp etiology (23.9% vs. 10.4%; pâ¯=â¯0.034). In both cases, the association was not confirmed in the adjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: KPC-Kp UTI is associated with higher clinical failure and may be due to an increase in inappropriate empirical treatment.