Ultrasonographic and hemodynamic characteristics of patients with symptomatic carotid near-occlusion: results from a multicenter registry study.

PURPOSE: The ultrasonographic and hemodynamic features of patients with carotid near-occlusion (CNO) are still not well known. Our aim was to describe the ultrasonographic and hemodynamic characteristics of a cohort of patients with CNO. METHODS: A prospective, observational, nationwide, and multicenter study was conducted from January/2010 to May/2016. Patients with digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-confirmed CNO were included. We collected information on clinical and demographic characteristics, carotid and transcranial ultrasonography and DSA findings, presence of full-collapse, collateral circulation, and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five patients were analyzed. Ultrasonographic and DSA diagnosis of CNO were concordant in only 44%. This disagreement was related to the presence/absence of full-collapse: 45% of patients with CNO with full-collapse were classified as a complete carotid occlusion, and 40% with a CNO without full-collapse were interpreted as severe stenosis (p < 0.001). Mean velocities (mV) and pulsatility indexes (PIs) were significantly lower in the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery compared with the contralateral (43 cm/s vs 58 cm/s, p < 0.001; 0.80 vs 1.00, p < 0.001). Collateral circulation was identified in 92% of patients, with the anterior communicating artery (73%) being the most frequent. CVR was decreased or exhausted in 66% of cases and was more frequent in patients with a poor or absent collateral network compared with patients with ≥ 2 collateral arteries (82% vs 56%, p = 0.051). CONCLUSION: The accuracy of carotid ultrasonography in the diagnosis of CNO seems to be limited, with significant discrepancies with DSA. Decreased ipsilateral mV, PI, and CVR suggest a hemodynamic compromise in patients with CNO.

The risk of recurrent stroke at 24 months in patients with symptomatic carotid near-occlusion: results from CAOS, a multicentre registry study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The risk of recurrent stroke amongst patients with symptomatic carotid near-occlusion (SCNO) has not been clearly established, and its management remains controversial. The aim was to define the 24-month risk of recurrent stroke and to analyse the effect of the different treatment modalities (medical treatment and revascularization) in a population of patients with SCNO. METHODS: A multicentre, nationwide, prospective study from January 2010 to May 2016 was performed. Patients with angiography-confirmed SCNO were included. The primary end-point was ipsilateral ischaemic stroke including periprocedural events within 24 months following the presenting event. Revascularization results and periprocedural complications, ipsilateral transient ischaemic attack, disabling or fatal stroke, and mortality were also noted. RESULTS: The study population comprised 141 patients from 17 Spanish centres. Seventy patients (49.6%) were treated by revascularization (carotid stenting in 47, endarterectomy in 23). Complete revascularization was achieved in 58 patients (83%). Periprocedural stroke or death occurred in 5.7%. The 24-month cumulative incidence of the primary end-point was 11.1% (95% confidence interval 5.8-16.4; n = 15), 12% in the medical treatment group and 10.2% in the revascularization group, log-rank P = 0.817. The cumulative rates of ipsilateral ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack, disabling or fatal stroke, and mortality, were 17%, 4.5% and 7.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of ipsilateral ischaemic stroke in patients with SCNO seems to be lower than the known rate associated with severe carotid stenosis without near-occlusion. The potential benefit of revascularization in the prevention of stroke in patients with SCNO may be influenced by the effectiveness and safety of the procedure.

Endovascular treatment of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST): Is a complete recanalization required for a good clinical outcome?

The usual therapy in cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is based on anticoagulant treatment with adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin. When medical treatment fails, endovascular techniques, such as mechanical thrombectomy, are available. We report a case of a 21-year-old woman with a diagnosis of left CVST, treated by a neurointerventional approach with mechanical thrombectomy using the Penumbra(®) System. Despite the fact that only incomplete recanalization was achieved, a gradual resolution of the thrombus and a progressive clinical improvement occurred.

Endarterectomy, Stenting, or Medical Treatment for Symptomatic Carotid Near-Occlusion: Results from CAOS, a Multicenter Registry Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The treatment of symptomatic carotid near-occlusion is controversial. Our aim was to analyze the results of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stent placement in patients with symptomatic carotid near-occlusion and to identify factors related to technical failure, periprocedural complications, and restenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective nonrandomized study. Patients with angiography-confirmed carotid near-occlusion were included. We assessed the revascularization rate and periprocedural stroke or death. Twenty-four-month clinical and carotid imaging follow-up was performed, and rates of carotid restenosis or occlusion, ipsilateral stroke, and mortality were analyzed. Carotid artery stent placement, carotid endarterectomy, and medical treatment were compared. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one patients were included. Forty-four carotid artery stent placement and 23 carotid endarterectomy procedures were performed within 6 months after the event. Complete revascularization was achieved in 83.6%, 81.8% in the carotid artery stent placement group and 87% with carotid endarterectomy (P = .360). Periprocedural stroke or death occurred in 6% (carotid artery stent placement = 2.3%; carotid endarterectomy = 13%; P = .077) and was not related to revascularization failure. The carotid restenosis or occlusion rate was 8.3% (5% restenosis, 3.3% occlusion); with carotid artery stent placement it was 10.5%; and with carotid endarterectomy it was 4.5% (P = .419). The 24-month cumulative rate of ipsilateral stroke was 4.8% in the carotid artery stent placement group, 17.4% for carotid endarterectomy, and 13.1% for medical treatment (P = .223). Mortality was 12%, 4.5%, and 5.6%, respectively (P = .422). Revascularization failure and restenosis occurred more frequently in patients with full collapse compared with patients without full collapse (33.3% versus 5.6%, P = .009; 21.4% versus 2.9%, P = .032, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Carotid artery stent placement and carotid endarterectomy are associated with high rates of failure and periprocedural stroke. Carotid near-occlusion with full collapse appears to be associated with an increased risk of technical failure and restenosis. Carotid near-occlusion revascularization does not seem to reduce the risk of stroke at follow-up compared with medical treatment.

[Endovascular treatment of carotid disease. The state of the art, technical aspects and occupational training]. / Tratamiento endovascular de la enfermedad carotídea. Situación actual, aspectos técnicos y capacitación profesional.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to carry out a review of the state of the art in the endovascular treatment of carotid disease, taking into account the findings currently available, its indications, the technical aspects linked to the intervention as well as those related to the occupational training of the specialists involved in performing the technique. DEVELOPMENT: Surgical treatment of carotid artery disease can be of benefit to symptomatic patients with stenoses above 70% and to subgroups of patients with symptomatic stenoses between 50-69%. The benefit of carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients is the object of a great deal of controversy that is concerned with the reduction in risk that is obtained and also the large number of patients to be treated in order to prevent the occurrence of ischaemic events. The endovascular treatment of carotid disease comes to the fore, then, as an alternative to surgical treatment. At the present time, a number of randomised multicentre studies are being conducted that will allow the two techniques to be compared in homogeneous groups of patients. Preliminary data nevertheless seem to suggest that this technique offers a number of benefits, especially in groups of subjects with a high surgical risk, and thus they could allow the indications for revascularisation to be extended. We analyse the technical and medical aspects linked to this procedure, the findings from studies carried out to date, its indications and the occupational training of the specialists involved in performing the technique. CONCLUSIONS: The endovascular treatment of carotid disease constitutes an alternative to surgical treatment in specifically selected patients. The potential increase in its indications is conditioned by the results from the multicentre studies currently being carried out.

Revisión de 2 casos de pseudoaneurismas de carótida común, micótico y secundario a radioterapia, tratados con stent recubiertos / Review of two common carotid pseudoaneurysms, radiotherapy-induced and mycotic, treated with coated stents

No disponible

Tratamiento endovascular de la enfermedad carotídea. Situación actual, aspectos técnicos y capacitación profesional / Endovascular treatment of carotid disease. The state of the art, technical aspects and occupational training

Objetivos. Revisar la situación actual del tratamiento endovascular de la enfermedad carotídea con inclusión de los resultados disponibles, sus indicaciones, los aspectos técnicos vinculados con el procedimiento y aquellos relacionados con la capacitación profesional de los especialistas implicados en la realización de la técnica. Desarrollo. El beneficio del tratamiento quirúrgico de la enfermedad carotídea se establece para pacientes sintomáticos con estenosis superiores al 70% y para subgrupos de pacientes con estenosis sintomáticas del 50-69%. Existe una amplia controversia en lo relativo al beneficio de la endarterectomía carotídea en pacientes asintomáticos, en relación con la reducción de riesgo obtenida y con el elevado número de pacientes a tratar para prevenir eventos isquémicos. El tratamiento endovascular de la enfermedad carotídea surge como una alternativa al tratamiento quirúrgico. En el momento actual, se encuentran en curso varios estudios multicéntricos aleatorizados, que permitirán establecer una comparación entre ambas técnicas en grupos homogéneos de pacientes. Existen, sin embargo, datos preliminares que apuntan hacia el beneficio de esta técnica, especialmente en grupos de riesgo quirúrgico, que podrían permitir ampliar las indicaciones de revascularización. Analizamos los aspectos técnicos y médicos relacionados con el procedimiento, los resultados de los estudios efectuados, sus indicaciones y la capacitación profesional de los especialistas implicados en la realización de la técnica. Conclusiones. El tratamiento endovascular de la enfermedad carotídea constituye una alternativa al tratamiento quirúrgico en pacientes seleccionados. El incremento potencial de sus indicaciones se condiciona por los resultados de estudios multicéntricos actualmente en marcha

Aims. The aim of this study was to carry out a review of the state of the art in the endovascular treatment of carotid disease, taking into account the findings currently available, its indications, the technical aspects linked to the intervention as well as those related to the occupational training of the specialists involved in performing the technique. Development. Surgical treatment of carotid artery disease can be of benefit to symptomatic patients with stenoses above 70% and to subgroups of patients with symptomatic stenoses between 50-69%. The benefit of carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients is the object of a great deal of controversy that is concerned with the reduction in risk that is obtained and also the large number of patients to be treated in order to prevent the occurrence of ischaemic events. The endovascular treatment of carotid disease comes to the fore, then, as an alternative to surgical treatment. At the present time, a number of randomised multicentre studies are being conducted that will allow the two techniques to be compared in homogeneous groups of patients. Preliminary data nevertheless seem to suggest that this technique offers a number of benefits, especially in groups of subjects with a high surgical risk, and thus they could allow the indications for revascularisation to be extended. We analyse the technical and medical aspects linked to this procedure, the findings from studies carried out to date, its indications and the occupational training of the specialists involved in performing the technique. Conclusions. The endovascular treatment of carotid disease constitutes an alternative to surgical treatment in specifically selected patients. The potential increase in its indications is conditioned by the results from the multicentre studies currently being carried out