RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess oncological (biochemical and histological recurrence) and functional (urinary and potency) outcomes in patients with unilateral low-risk organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa) treated with focal cryoablation (FC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2009 to March 2012, patients with localized PCa who refused active surveillance were assigned to a FC protocol. This was a prospective, single-arm cohort study. Inclusion criteria were: unilateral disease, clinical stage T1c to T2a, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration <10 ng/mL, low volume index lesion and Gleason score ≤6 (3+3). Hemi-ablation was carried out using the Precise(TM) cryoablation system (Galil Medical, Inc., Arden Hills, MN, USA). Oncological (PSA values) and functional (International Prostate Symptom Score and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 score) outcomes were analysed at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. The primary endpoint for oncological efficacy, no cancer in ipsilateral side, was based on the 12-month mandatory biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 48 consecutive patients with a mean age of 67 years were included. The median (interquartile range) follow-up was 13.2 (7.4-26.5) months. Follow-up prostate biopsies were negative for the treated lobe in 86% of patients. The mean PSA concentration dropped significantly at 3 months (by 55%) but did not correlate well with positive biopsy results. Urinary symptoms were unchanged. A slight decrease in the IIEF-5 score was present at 3 months, but did not differ significantly from baseline at 6-month follow-up. There were 15% grade 1 and 4% grade 2 complications (Clavien classification). CONCLUSIONS: Focal cryoablation is a low-morbidity option in selected patients with low-risk PCa. We showed PSA concentration to be an unreliable marker for monitoring FC and recommend a protocol of mandatory biopsies for follow-up. A multicentre randomized controlled trial is necessary to confirm the low-morbidity and the biopsy-proven PCa cure rates.
Asunto(s)
Criocirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Criocirugía/efectos adversos , Criocirugía/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Erección Peniana , Estudios Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/fisiopatología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , MicciónRESUMEN
Androgen deprivation therapy is the standard of care for the initial treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. However, the majority of these patients live long enough to experience disease progression despite castration. This scenario is defined as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and has a poor outcome and limited options for treatment. First-line treatment after hormonal therapy failure include secondary hormonal manipulation and docetaxel. Advances in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying CRPC have translated into a recent increase in the number of effective systemic agents, and some of them have been already approved as first and second-line treatment. Despite these advances, the median survival in the first-line setting of metastatic CRPC is approximately 20 months and in the postdocetaxel setting is approximately 15 months. Promising and necessary new therapies in Phase III trials include hormonal agents, new cytotoxics agents, as well as other immunotherapeutics and antiprostate-specific membrane antigen therapies.