Reducing cardiovascular disease risk in diabetes: a randomised controlled trial of a quality improvement initiative.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in Australian patients with diabetes; to compare the effectiveness of a quality improvement initiative for people with and without diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Subgroup analyses of patients with and without diabetes participating in a cluster randomised trial. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Indigenous people (≥ 35 years old) and non-Indigenous people (≥ 45 years old) who had attended one of 60 Australian primary health care services at least three times during the preceding 24 months and at least once during the past 6 months. INTERVENTION: Quality improvement initiative comprising point-of-care electronic decision support with audit and feedback tools. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adherence to CVD risk screening and prescribing guidelines. RESULTS: Baseline rates of guideline-recommended screening were higher for 8829 patients with diabetes than for 44 335 without diabetes (62.0% v 39.5%; P < 0.001). Baseline rates of guideline-recommended prescribing were greater for patients with diabetes than for other patients at high risk of CVD (55.5% v 39.6%; P < 0.001). The proportions of patients with diabetes not attaining recommended treatment targets for blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol or HbA1c levels who were not prescribed the corresponding therapy at baseline were 28%, 44% and 24% respectively. The intervention was associated with improved screening rates, but the effect was smaller for patients with diabetes than for those without diabetes (rate ratio [RR], 1.14 v 1.28; P = 0.01). It was associated with improved guideline-recommended prescribing only for undertreated individuals at high risk; the effect size was similar for those with and without diabetes (RR, 1.63 v 1.53; P = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to CVD risk management guidelines was better for people with diabetes, but there is room for improvement. The intervention was modestly effective in people with diabetes, but further strategies are needed to close evidence-practice gaps.Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number: ACTRN12611000478910.

Preconception care and contraceptive use among Australian women with diabetes mellitus

Background and objective: Effective contraception is important for pregnancy planning and reducing adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with diabetes mellitus (DM). The aim of this study was to explore preconception care practices and contraception use among women with DM. Methods: The study used a cross-sectional structured questionnaire to survey women with DM aged 16­49 years in Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District (NBMLHD), a Western Sydney tertiary referral centre. Results: A total of 107 of 215 (49.7%) women completed the questionnaire. While 80.4% were aware of DM-related pregnancy risks, preconception advice was reported by only 46.8% of the 47 previously or currently pregnant women. Most women had used condoms (87.2%) and/or the combined oral contraceptive pill (74.4%). Many did not know if intrauterine contraception (61.7%) or contraceptive implants (43.7%) were safe in DM. Discussion: Despite being aware of the risks of DM in pregnancy, less than half of the women had sought preconception care, and many had poor knowledge of the most reliable contraceptive methods.

A Leydig cell tumor of the ovary resulting in extreme hyperandrogenism, erythrocytosis, and recurrent pulmonary embolism.

CONTEXT: Secondary erythrocytosis due to androgens is most commonly seen in the context of T replacement therapy in men. Leydig cell ovarian tumors are a rare cause of virilization, erythrocytosis, and thromboembolism. PATIENT CASE: We describe the case of a 55-year-old postmenopausal woman who presented with a 3-year history of frontal balding and virilization and a 5-year history of obstructive sleep apnea. She had not experienced significant alteration in libido or mood. Menstruation had ceased at age 46. She had a history of recurrent pulmonary embolism and unexplained secondary erythrocytosis. Past hematological investigations had not revealed any evidence of malignancy or thrombophilia, and the JAK2 mutation was negative. The serum erythropoietin was mildly elevated at 20.3 mIU/mL (normal range, 3.6-16.6 mIU/mL). The serum T was initially reported (by immunoassays) as >1600 ng/dL (>55 nmol/L). Similarly, serum androstenedione (>1000 ng/dL; >35 nmol/L), estradiol (169 pg/mL; 621 pmol/L), and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (348 µg/dL; 9.4 µmol/L) were all elevated for a postmenopausal woman. Repeat analysis of the serum T by mass spectrometry showed an extremely elevated level of 4270 ng/dL (148 nmol/L). Computed tomography scan revealed a 5.0-cm right ovarian tumor. After surgical removal of an ovarian Leydig cell tumor, her virilization, erythrocytosis, and sleep apnea resolved. CONCLUSION: Hyperandrogenism in women should be considered as a rare but important cause of erythrocytosis, recurrent thromboembolism, and sleep apnea. The diagnosis of hyperandrogenism requires a careful history and physical examination because in postmenopausal women, menstrual disturbance does not occur and cosmetic measures may mask overt clinical features.