Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 35(5): 888-894, 2020 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30165691

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whether calcium oxalate (CaOx) deposition in kidney allografts following transplantation (Tx) adversely affects patient outcomes is uncertain, as are its associated risk factors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who had kidney allograft biopsies performed within 3 months of Tx at Brigham and Women's Hospital and examined the association of CaOx deposition with the composite outcome of death or graft failure within 5 years. RESULTS: Biopsies from 67 of 346 patients (19.4%) had CaOx deposition. In a multivariable logistic regression model, higher serum creatinine [odds ratio (OR) = 1.28 per mg/dL, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.43], longer time on dialysis (OR = 1.11 per additional year, 95% CI 1.01-1.23) and diabetes (OR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.09-4.66) were found to be independently associated with CaOx deposition. CaOx deposition was strongly associated with delayed graft function (DGF; OR = 11.31, 95% CI 5.97-21.40), and with increased hazard of the composite outcome after adjusting for black recipient race, donor type, time on dialysis before Tx, diabetes and borderline or acute rejection (hazard ratio 1.90, 95% CI 1.13-3.20). CONCLUSIONS: CaOx deposition is common in allografts with poor function and portends worse outcomes up to 5 years after Tx. The extent to which CaOx deposition may contribute to versus result from DGF, however, cannot be determined based on our retrospective and observational data. Future studies should examine whether reducing plasma and urine oxalate prevents CaOx deposition in the newly transplanted kidney and whether this has an effect on clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Oxalato de Calcio/metabolismo , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Supervivencia de Injerto , Enfermedades Renales/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Aloinjertos , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/metabolismo , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/metabolismo , Enfermedades Renales/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Am J Transplant ; 18(6): 1494-1501, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29316241

RESUMEN

Outcomes of patients receiving solid organ transplants in the United States are systematically aggregated into bi-annual Program-Specific Reports (PSRs) detailing risk-adjusted survival by transplant center. Recently, the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) issued 5-tier ratings evaluating centers based on risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival. Our primary aim was to examine the reliability of 5-tier ratings over time. Using 10 consecutive PSRs for adult kidney transplant centers from June 2012 to December 2016 (n = 208), we applied 5-tier ratings to center outcomes and evaluated ratings over time. From the baseline period (June 2012), 47% of centers had at least a 1-unit tier change within 6 months, 66% by 1 year, and 94% by 3 years. Similarly, 46% of centers had at least a 2-unit tier change by 3 years. In comparison, 15% of centers had a change in the traditional 3-tier rating at 3 years. The 5-tier ratings at 4 years had minimal association with baseline rating (Kappa 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.002 to 0.158). Centers had a median of 3 different 5-tier ratings over the period (q1 = 2, q3 = 4). Findings were consistent for center volume, transplant rate, and baseline 5-tier rating. Cumulatively, results suggest that 5-tier ratings are highly volatile, limiting their utility for informing potential stakeholders, particularly transplant candidates given expected waiting times between wait listing and transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Salud/normas , Trasplante de Órganos/normas , Adulto , Humanos , Estados Unidos
3.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 20(5): e12959, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29968947

RESUMEN

Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) are very effective therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection, and have revolutionized the treatment of hepatitis C in kidney allograft recipients. Although well tolerated in general, rare renal complications have been reported. We describe a case of recurrent membranous nephropathy and acute cellular rejection in a kidney allograft recipient after DAA (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir) therapy, whose allograft function had been stable for more than 30 years. The patient was presented with nephrotic range proteinuria with stable creatinine. The kidney allograft biopsy revealed recurrent membranous nephropathy with fine granular deposits of IgG1/IgG4 codominance and positive phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) staining. The patient was treated with pulse steroid and rituximab, leading to a decrease in proteinuria. As DAAs are more frequently used, physicians should be aware of immune-related renal complications.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/efectos adversos , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Aloinjertos/inmunología , Aloinjertos/patología , Antivirales/inmunología , Bencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Bencimidazoles/inmunología , Biopsia , Fluorenos/efectos adversos , Fluorenos/inmunología , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/patología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Riñón/inmunología , Riñón/patología , Masculino , Recurrencia , Sofosbuvir , Uridina Monofosfato/efectos adversos , Uridina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Uridina Monofosfato/inmunología
4.
BMC Nephrol ; 18(1): 83, 2017 03 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28253839

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In developing countries, renal specialists are scarce and physician-to-patient contact time is limited. While conventional hospital-based, physician-oriented approach has been the main focus of chronic kidney disease (CKD) care, a comprehensive multidisciplinary health care program (Integrated CKD Care) has been introduced as an alternate intervention to delay CKD progression in a community population. The main objective is to assess effectiveness of Integrated CKD Care in delaying CKD progression. METHODS: We carried out a community-based, cluster randomized controlled trial. Four hundred forty-two stage 3-4 CKD patients were enrolled. In addition to the standard treatments provided to both groups, the patients in the intervention group also received "Integrated CKD Care". This was delivered by a multidisciplinary team of hospital staff in conjunction with a community CKD care network (subdistrict healthcare officers and village health volunteers) to provide group counseling during each hospital visit and quarterly home visits to monitor compliance with the treatment. Duration of the study was 2 years. The primary outcome was difference of mean eGFR between the intervention and the control groups over the study period. RESULTS: The mean difference of eGFR over time in the intervention group was significantly lower than the control group by 2.74 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95%CI 0.60-4.50, p = 0.009). Seventy composite clinical endpoints were reported during the study period with significantly different incidences between the control and the intervention groups (119.1 versus 69.4 per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio (HR) 0.59, 95% CI 0.4-0.9, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Integrated CKD Care can delay CKD progression in resource-limited settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ( NCT01978951 ). Prospectively registered as of December 8, 2012.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/métodos , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Visita Domiciliaria , Cooperación del Paciente , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Anciano , Agentes Comunitarios de Salud , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrología , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/metabolismo , Población Rural , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tailandia
6.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 189(10): 1234-9, 2014 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24749479

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: The prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies in lung transplant candidates and their impact on waitlist and transplant outcomes is not known. OBJECTIVES: We examined the prevalence of pretransplant anti-HLA antibodies at varying thresholds and evaluated their impact on outcomes before and after lung transplantation. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study including all patients listed for lung transplantation between January 2008 and August 2012. Per protocol, transplant candidates were assessed by solid phase LABscreen mixed Class I and II and LABscreen Single Antigen assays. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 224 patients, 34% had anti-HLA antibodies at mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) greater than or equal to 3,000 (group III), and 24% had antibodies at MFI 1,000 to 3,000 (group II). Ninety percent of the patients with pretransplant anti-HLA antibodies had class I antibodies, whereas only seven patients developed class II alone. Patients in group III were less likely to receive transplants than patients without any anti-HLA antibodies (group I) (45.5 vs. 67.7%, P = 0.005). Wait time to transplant was longer in group III than group I, although this difference did not meet statistical significance, and waitlist mortality was similar. Among transplant recipients, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) was more frequent in group III than in group II (20% vs. 0%, P = 0.01) or group I (6.3%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of anti-HLA antibodies at the high MFI threshold (>3,000) was associated with lower transplant rate and higher rates of AMR. Screening for anti-HLA antibodies using the 3,000 MFI threshold may be important in managing transplant candidates and recipients.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Antígenos HLA/sangre , Factores Inmunológicos/sangre , Isoanticuerpos/sangre , Trasplante de Pulmón , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Prueba de Histocompatibilidad , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de Tejidos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Mod Pathol ; 27(6): 788-99, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24434898

RESUMEN

This series of 113 sequential biopsies of full facial transplants provides findings of potential translational significance as well as biological insights that could prompt reexamination of conventional paradigms of effector pathways in skin allograft rejection. Serial biopsies before, during, and after rejection episodes were evaluated for clinicopathological assessment that in selected cases included specific biomarkers for donor-versus-recipient T cells. Histologic evidence of rejection included lymphocyte-associated injury to epidermal rete ridges, follicular infundibula, and dermal microvessels. Surprisingly, during active rejection, immune cells spatially associated with target cell injury consisted abundantly or predominantly of lymphocytes of donor origin with an immunophenotype typical of the resident memory T-cell subset. Current dogma assumes that skin allograft rejection is mediated by recipient T cells that attack epidermal targets, and the association of donor T cells with sites of target cell injury raises questions regarding the potential complexity of immune cell interactions in the rejection process. A more histopathologically refined and immune-based biomarker approach to assessment of rejection of facial transplants is now indicated.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante Facial/efectos adversos , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Reacción Injerto-Huésped/inmunología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Adulto , Aloinjertos , Biomarcadores/análisis , Técnica del Anticuerpo Fluorescente , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Donantes de Tejidos
8.
FASEB J ; 27(11): 4366-74, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23882124

RESUMEN

We investigated the novel role of HCA2 (GPR109A) and its ligand nicotinic acid in regulating macrophage function. Hca2 expression in the RAW264.7 murine macrophage cell line is strongly induced by LPS treatment and correlates with the expression of TNF-α. Treatment with 300 µM nicotinic acid (reported EC50 3 µM, peak plasma concentration 50-300 µM), significantly inhibited TNF-α, IL-6, IL-12p40, and IL-1ß production (P<0.05) in LPS (1 ng/ml)-stimulated wild-type murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) but failed to do so in Hca2(-/-) BMMs. Treatment with nicotinic acid reduced nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) activation levels by 43% (P<0.03) in wild-type BMMs 6 h after LPS stimulation but not in Hca2(-/-) BMMs. Nicotinic acid significantly inhibited wild-type BMM chemotaxis (P<0.001), but had no effect on the chemotaxis of Hca2(-/-) BMMs. A significant increase in low-density lipoprotein uptake by both wild-type (P<0.006) and Hca2(-/-) BMMs (P<0.03) in response to LPS was observed, which was significantly suppressed by nicotinic acid in wild-type BMMs (P<0.04) but not in Hca2(-/-) BMMs. Our results suggest that the nicotinic acid-HCA2 axis is a novel negative regulator of macrophage activation.


Asunto(s)
Activación de Macrófagos , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/metabolismo , Receptores Nicotínicos/metabolismo , Animales , Transporte Biológico Activo/efectos de los fármacos , Línea Celular Tumoral , Quimiotaxis/efectos de los fármacos , Interleucinas/genética , Interleucinas/metabolismo , Lipopolisacáridos/farmacología , Lipoproteínas LDL/metabolismo , Macrófagos/inmunología , Ratones , FN-kappa B/metabolismo , Niacina/farmacología , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/agonistas , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/genética , Receptores Nicotínicos/genética , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/farmacología
9.
Curr Opin Organ Transplant ; 19(6): 531-44, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25333831

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute rejection is the most common complication after vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA). This review provides a state-of-the-art analysis of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of acute rejection episodes and highlights recent findings with the potential to improve patient care and enhance understanding of the underlying biologic processes. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent reports suggest that maintenance immunosuppression dose reduction and steroid withdrawal are realistic goals in VCA, despite the known high immunogenicity of the skin component. It appears that utilization of sentinel flaps, in-depth histological analyses and application of novel biomarkers have facilitated early diagnosis and characterization of acute rejection episodes, leading to timely institution of appropriate therapy. The successful management of the first highly sensitized face transplant recipient suggests the possibility of carefully considering these high-risk VCA candidates for transplantation. SUMMARY: Acute rejection is higher in VCA than in any other organ in the field of transplantation, although most episodes are controlled by high-dose steroids and optimization of maintenance immunosuppression. Because of limitations in patient number and the duration of follow-up, the long-term safety and effectiveness of VCA remain unclear. Moreover, the tests currently used to diagnose acute rejection are of limited value. Better diagnostic tools and a better understanding of the immunologic events during acute rejection are therefore needed to improve diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of this life-changing restorative surgery.


Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Enfermedad Aguda , Animales , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Rechazo de Injerto/terapia , Humanos , Tolerancia Inmunológica , Piel/inmunología , Trasplante de Piel , Alotrasplante Compuesto Vascularizado
10.
J Clin Oncol ; 42(9): 1021-1030, 2024 Mar 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252908

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Cemiplimab is approved for treating locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Solid organ transplant recipients have been excluded from immunotherapy trials, given concern for allograft rejection despite their increased risk of skin cancers. Chronic immunosuppression is necessary to prevent organ rejection but may attenuate antitumor response with PD-1 inhibitors. METHODS: We report a phase I study of cemiplimab for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with advanced CSCC. After cross-taper to a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor and pulsed dose corticosteroids (prednisone 40 mg once daily, the day before and on days 1-3 of each cycle, followed by 20 mg once daily on days 4-6, then 10 mg once daily until the day before each subsequent cycle), patients received cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to 2 years and were assessed for response every 8 weeks. The primary end point was the rate of kidney rejection, with key secondary end points including rate and duration of response, and survival. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated. No kidney rejection or loss was observed. A response to cemiplimab was observed in five of 11 evaluable patients (46%; 90% CI, 22 to 73), including two with durable responses beyond a year. Median follow-up was 6.8 months (range, 0.7-29.8). Treatment-related grade 3 or greater adverse events occurred in five patients (42%), including diarrhea, infection, and metabolic disturbances. One patient died of angioedema and anaphylaxis attributed to mTOR inhibitor cross-taper. CONCLUSION: mTOR inhibitor and corticosteroids represent a favorable immunosuppressive regimen for KTRs with advanced CSCC receiving immunotherapy. This combination resulted in durable antitumor responses with no kidney rejection events (funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04339062]).


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Trasplante de Riñón , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Inhibidores mTOR , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico
11.
Transpl Int ; 23(6): 636-40, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20074083

RESUMEN

Antithymocyte globulin rabbit (r-ATG) has been used for the treatment and prevention of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients (RTR). Current manufacturer recommendations for r-ATG dictate the need for administration through a high-flow vein (central line). Previous studies have shown peripheral administration of r-ATG to be safe; however, these studies suggest the co-administration of heparin and hydrocortisone and did not compare the infusion-site reaction rates to a control group. A retrospective analysis was conducted of adult RTR receiving r-ATG or basiliximab between January 2004 and October 2006. Each agent was administered through a dedicated peripheral line. The primary endpoint was the incidence of infusion-site reactions. Other endpoints included the need to replace the intravenous catheter and the incidence of systemic thrombosis within 1 month of transplantation. During the study period, 152 peripheral infusions of r-ATG and 92 peripheral infusions of basiliximab were administered. No difference in infusion-site reactions was noted between the groups. There was also no difference either in the need for peripheral line replacement or the rates of systemic thrombosis. Peripheral administration of r-ATG is safe and can be infused without concomitant heparin and hydrocortisone. This method of r-ATG infusion was shown to be as safe as peripherally administered basiliximab.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Suero Antilinfocítico/administración & dosificación , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Infusiones Intravenosas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Animales , Basiliximab , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Conejos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Seguridad
12.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 14249, 2020 08 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32859934

RESUMEN

Solid organ transplantation is a lifesaving therapy for patients with end-organ disease. Current immunosuppression protocols are not designed to target antigen-specific alloimmunity and are uncapable of preventing chronic allograft injury. As myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are potent immunoregulatory cells, we tested whether donor-derived MDSCs can protect heart transplant allografts in an antigen-specific manner. C57BL/6 (H2Kb, I-Ab) recipients pre-treated with BALB/c MDSCs were transplanted with either donor-type (BALB/c, H2Kd, I-Ad) or third-party (C3H, H2Kk, I-Ak) cardiac grafts. Spleens and allografts from C57BL/6 recipients were harvested for immune phenotyping, transcriptomic profiling and functional assays. Single injection of donor-derived MDSCs significantly prolonged the fully MHC mismatched allogeneic cardiac graft survival in a donor-specific fashion. Transcriptomic analysis of allografts harvested from donor-derived MDSCs treated recipients showed down-regulated proinflammatory cytokines. Immune phenotyping showed that the donor MDSCs administration suppressed effector T cells in recipients. Interestingly, significant increase in recipient endogenous CD11b+Gr1+ MDSC population was observed in the group treated with donor-derived MDSCs compared to the control groups. Depletion of this endogenous MDSCs with anti-Gr1 antibody reversed donor MDSCs-mediated allograft protection. Furthermore, we observed that the allogeneic mixed lymphocytes reaction was suppressed in the presence of CD11b+Gr1+ MDSCs in a donor-specific manner. Donor-derived MDSCs prolong cardiac allograft survival in a donor-specific manner via induction of recipient's endogenous MDSCs.


Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Trasplante de Corazón/métodos , Células Supresoras de Origen Mieloide/inmunología , Aloinjertos/inmunología , Animales , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Trasplante de Corazón/mortalidad , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Tolerancia Inmunológica , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Células Mieloides/inmunología , Células Supresoras de Origen Mieloide/metabolismo , Células Supresoras de Origen Mieloide/fisiología , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Donantes de Tejidos , Trasplante Homólogo
13.
Transplant Direct ; 5(5): e446, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31165081

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many kidney transplant centers in the United States report both HLA class I and II antibodies detected by sensitive solid-phase assays (SPAs) to United Network for Organ Sharing as unacceptable antigens, significantly reducing the compatible donor organ pool and prolonging waiting time for highly sensitized patients. However, the clinical relevance of all detected donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) by SPA is not unequivocal, because fluorescence intensity does not always accurately reflect antibody pathogenicity. Our center does not exclude patients from transplantation based on DSA class II. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis in 179 deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients with solely DSA class II before transplant and patients without DSA and compared graft survival, rejection, and clinical outcomes. Patient survival was also compared with matched controls on the waiting list. RESULTS: Patients transplanted with DSA class II showed a clear survival benefit compared with matched patients who remained on dialysis or were waitlisted on dialysis/transplanted at 5 years (100%, 34%, and 73%, respectively). After a mean follow-up of 5.5 years, there was no significant difference in death-censored graft survival between transplanted patients without DSA and those with preformed DSA class II (adjusted HR 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-2.97), although the incidence of rejection was higher in recipients with DSA class II (adjusted HR 5.84; 95% confidence interval, 2.58-13.23; P < 0.001). Serum creatinine levels at 1, 3, and 5 years posttransplant did not differ between groups. No predictors of rejection were found, although patients who received basiliximab induction therapy had higher incidence of rejection (100%) compared with those who received antithymocyte globulin (52%). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that for highly sensitized patients, deceased-donor kidney transplantation with DSA class II yields a survival benefit over prolonged waiting time on dialysis. Instead of listing DSA class II as unacceptable antigens, an individual approach with further immunologic risk assessment is recommended.

16.
Front Immunol ; 7: 412, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27790214

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have demonstrated the role of CX3CR1 in regulating the migration of monocytes into peripheral tissue and their transformation into dendritic cell (DC). No data are yet available on the importance of chemokine pathways in regulating homeostasis of DC in heart transplants. Recently, we showed that recipients of heart allografts from CX3CR1-/- donors show longer survival. To assess the trafficking of dDC, we have developed and tested a novel in vivo imaging tool in CX3CR1GFP/+ DC (B6 background) heart graft into BALB/c recipient model. RESULTS: Majority of GFP+ cells were noted in the middle of cardiac myocyte. However few hours post transplant, they experienced morphological changes including stretching their extensions (3 and 24 h). However, images from 72 h at cardiac graft showed many of GFP+ cells moved to vessel areas. GFP+ cells were detected in near vessel wall. Only one GFP+ cell was observed in three lymph nodes (two mesenteric and one inguinal) (72 h). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that immediately post transplant dDC undergo morphological changes and traffic out of the organs via systemic circulation. While, we still noted presence of dDC in the transplanted organs, their trafficking to lymphoid tissue remains to be fully explored.

18.
Pharmacotherapy ; 24(10): 1323-30, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15628830

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of valganciclovir 450 mg/day for 6 months for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective analysis. SETTING: Urban, academic medical center. PATIENTS: Fifty-eight patients who received de novo renal transplants from August 1, 2001-November 21, 2002. INTERVENTION: Valganciclovir 450 mg/day was administered to all renal transplant recipients at risk for CMV disease. Therapy was begun postoperatively and was dose adjusted to renal function. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data collected from renal transplant recipients were demographics, immunosuppressive and antiviral drug therapy, and occurrence of CMV disease, acute rejection, allograft loss, and hematologic adverse events. Donor (D)/recipient (R) CMV serostatus was 37.9% D+/R+, 29.3% D-/R+, 17.3% D+/R-, and 15.5% D-/R-. Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) was administered to 62.1% of patients. Most of the transplant recipients received triple immunosuppression as maintenance therapy. Median follow-up was 20 months. The frequency of CMV disease was 1.7% within 6 months after transplantation and 5.2% at any point after transplantation. All patients who developed CMV disease were D+/R- and had received ATG. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia associated with valganciclovir were seen in 28% and 24% of patients, respectively. One patient developed acute cellular rejection. No graft losses or deaths occurred. Early discontinuation of valganciclovir occurred in 20% of patients secondary to severe, persistent leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and/or diarrhea. None of these patients developed CMV disease. CONCLUSION: A high rate of CMV disease was noted among the D+/R- population. Administration of ATG as an induction agent also increased the frequency of CMV disease. Despite the low dosage of valganciclovir, hematologic adverse events were common. However, valganciclovir, administered at 450 mg/day for 6 months, was effective and relatively safe for prophylaxis of CMV disease in renal transplant recipients.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/prevención & control , Ganciclovir/análogos & derivados , Ganciclovir/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Anciano , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Femenino , Ganciclovir/administración & dosificación , Ganciclovir/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Valganciclovir
19.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 43(3): 891-7, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21384099

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Age and body mass index (BMI) of kidney donors and recipients affect kidney allograft outcomes. Moreover, while deceased donor and recipient body size mismatch have been reported to influence allograft outcomes, how BMI mismatch in living kidney donor-recipient pairs affect graft survival is not well defined. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: We investigated trends in characteristics of 90,815 US. living kidney donors and their recipients between 1987 and 2008. RESULTS: Median ages of donors and their recipients have risen over time, and the proportion of living donors age ≥ 50 years increased from 11 to 25%. Median BMI of recipients increased from 22.6 to 26.6 kg/m(2); median BMI of kidney donors for the past 5 years has been 26.4 kg/m(2). Only 35% of living donor-recipient pairs were in the same BMI category (<25, 25-29.9, 30-34.9, or ≥ 35 kg/m(2)). BMI mismatch where the living donor was three categories heavier than the recipient was associated with a significant adjusted risk for death-censored allograft loss (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.05-5.08). CONCLUSIONS: Living kidney donors are donating at more advanced ages, and the majority are overweight or obese in recent years. In summary: (1) previous longitudinal studies of living kidney donor outcomes may not be generalizable to recent donors, and studies of contemporary living kidney donor cohorts may be informative, (2) the majority of living donor-recipient pairs have BMI mismatch, and (3) extreme BMI mismatch where the living donor is heavier may confer an independent risk for allograft loss.


Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Riñón/tendencias , Donadores Vivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Trasplante de Riñón/etnología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estados Unidos
20.
Transpl Int ; 20(12): 993-1015, 2007 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17617181

RESUMEN

This manuscript will review the risk factors, prevalence, clinical presentation, and management of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Primary literature was obtained via MEDLINE (1966-April 2007) and EMBASE. Abstracts were obtained from scientific meetings or pharmaceutical manufacturers and included in the analysis. All studies and abstracts evaluating IFIs and/or antifungal therapies, with a primary focus on solid organ transplantation, were considered for inclusion. English-language literature was selected for inclusion, but was limited to those consisting of human subjects. Infectious complications following SOT are common. IFIs are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in this patient population. Determining the best course of therapy is difficult due to the limited availability of data in SOT recipients. Well-designed clinical studies are infrequent and much of the available information is often based on case-reports or retrospective analyses. Transplant practitioners must remain aware of their therapeutic options and the advantages and disadvantages associated with the available treatment alternatives.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Micosis/prevención & control , Trasplante de Órganos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Humanos , Micosis/epidemiología , Micosis/microbiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/microbiología , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA