Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Surg Innov ; : 15533506241264371, 2024 Jun 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38907732

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adherence to preoperative weight loss recommendations may serve as a surrogate for the level of engagement in hiatal hernia (HH) patients. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between achieving preoperative weight loss goals and outcomes after HH repair. METHODS: A retrospective review of 235 patients undergoing laparoscopic HH repair at a single institution was performed. Patients were grouped based on the percentage of weight loss goal achieved. Low achievement was defined as the bottom quartile of goal achievement (≤75%); high achievement was defined as the top quartile (≥140%). Baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and patient reported outcomes (PROMs) were compared between groups. RESULTS: 131/235 (55.7%) achieved their weight loss goal. No differences in baseline characteristics or clinical outcomes were observed between the low and high achievement groups. While both groups experienced improvements in PROMs postoperatively, patients in the high achievement group demonstrated significantly lower symptom burden at one-month postoperatively. Further, high-achievement patients were more likely to experience complete resolution of common HH symptoms at one-month postoperatively, including no difficulty swallowing food, no breathing difficulties or choking episodes, no choking when eating food, no choking when drinking liquid, and no regurgitation of food or liquid. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing laparoscopic HH repair, patients achieving their preoperative weight loss goals experienced less overall symptom burden and lower prevalence of common symptoms one-month postoperatively than those with low levels of goal achievement. These results demonstrate that patients can take an active role in improving their own surgical outcomes and health status.

2.
Am Surg ; 87(7): 1155-1162, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33345564

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are an established complication following colorectal operations, with rates up to 30% reported in the literature. Obesity is a known risk factor for SSI; however, body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, waist-hip ratio, or abdominal circumference are imperfect measures. The purpose of our study was to determine whether abdominal wall thickness (AWT) is predictive of SSI. METHODS: We queried our American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) database for patients (age ≥18 years) undergoing a colectomy at the University of Kentucky (UK) from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2018. The exclusion criteria included patients with open abdomens or the lack of preoperative computed tomography (CT) within 3 months of their operation. AWT was measured at the level of the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) on abdominal CT. SSI was defined by superficial SSI, deep SSI, and wound dehiscence. RESULTS: Of 1261 patients enrolled, 52.2% were female, with an average age of 57.4 years. More patients had laparoscopic operations (51%), and the median length of stay was 7 days. Our study demonstrated an SSI rate of 9.4% and a 30-day readmission rate of 11%. The overall mean AWT was 2.6 cm (range .1-13.1), and patients with the highest AWT quintile were more likely to develop an SSI than the lowest quintile (12% vs. 5%). After controlling for risk factors and confounders, the odds of an SSI were 3.6 times higher for patients with the highest AWT than patients with the lowest AWT. CONCLUSIONS: Among colorectal surgery patients, AWT is an independent risk factor predictive for SSI.


Asunto(s)
Pared Abdominal/patología , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Pared Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades del Colon/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades del Colon/patología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Kentucky , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
3.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 75(2): 212-9, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23823612

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many resuscitation scenarios include the use of emergency intubation to support injured patients. New video-guided airway management technology is available, which may minimize the risk to patients from this procedure. METHODS: This was a controlled clinical trial conducted in the trauma receiving unit in a university-affiliated urban hospital in which 623 consecutive adult patients requiring emergency airway management were prospectively randomized to intubation with either the direct laryngoscope (DL) or the GlideScope video laryngoscope (GVL) device. RESULTS: The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. There was no significant difference in mortality between the GVL group (28 [9%] of 303) and the DL group (24 [8%] of 320) (p = 0.43) for all patients. Within a smaller cohort identified retrospectively, there was a higher mortality rate seen in the subgroup of patients with severe head injuries (head Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] score > 3) who were randomized to intubation with GVL (22 [30%] of 73) versus DL (16 [14%] of 112) (p = 0.047). Among all patients, median intubation duration in seconds was significantly higher for the GVL group (median, 56; interquartile range, 40-81) than for the DL group (median, 40; interquartile range, 24-68) (p < 0.001). Among those with severe head injuries, median intubation duration in seconds was also significantly higher for the GVL group (median, 74) than for the DL group (median, 65) (p < 0.003). Correspondingly, this group also experienced a greater incidence of low oxygen saturations of 80% or less (27 [50%] of 54 for the GVL group and 15 [24%] of 63 for the DL group; p = 0.004). There were no significant differences between the two groups in first-pass success (80% for GVL and 81% for DL, p = 0.46). CONCLUSION: Use of the GlideScope did not influence survival to hospital discharge among all patients and was associated with longer intubation times than direct laryngoscopy. Among the video laryngoscope cohort, a smaller subgroup of severe head injury trauma patients identified retrospectively seemed to be associated with a greater incidence of hypoxia of 80% or less and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Laringoscopía/métodos , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Intubación Intratraqueal/instrumentación , Laringoscopios , Laringoscopía/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA